European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 70, Issue 1–3, pp 215–224 | Cite as

Effects of fire retardants on physical, mechanical, and fire properties of flat-pressed WPCs

  • Nadir Ayrilmis
  • Jan T. Benthien
  • Heiko Thoemen
  • Robert H. White
Originals Originalarbeiten

Abstract

Physical, mechanical, and fire properties of the flat-pressed wood plastic composites (WPCs) incorporated with various fire retardants (10% by weight) at different levels of wood flour (WF) content, 40, 50, or 60 wt%, were investigated. The WPC panels were made from dry-blended WF, polypropylene (PP), and fire retardant (FR) powders with maleic anhydride-grafted PP (2 wt%) formulations using a conventional flat-pressing process under laboratory conditions. Incorporation of the fire retardants into the WPC panels significantly decreased the internal bond strength compared to the WPC panels without FR at all levels of the WF content. The modulus of rupture of the WPC panels containing FRs decreased with the increase in the WF content from 40 to 60 wt%. The modulus of elasticity increased with the increase in the WF content from 40 to 50 wt% and then decreased as the WF content reached 60 wt%. The WPC panels incorporated with zinc borate gave an overall best performance in both physical and mechanical properties followed by the panels treated with decabromodiphenyl oxide, magnesium hydroxide, and ammonium polyphosphate. Higher levels of the WF content resulted in significantly improved fire resistance of the WPC panels with and without FR as measured in the cone calorimeter. Of the four fire retardants tested, ammonium polyphosphate showed the most improvement over untreated ones.

Keywords

Heat Release Rate Wood Flour Fire Retardant Thickness Swell Magnesium Hydroxide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Einfluss von Brandschutzmitteln auf die physikalischen, mechanischen und Brandeigenschaften flachgepresster Holz-Kunststoff-Verbundplatten (WPC)

Zusammenfassung

Die physikalischen, mechanischen und Brandeigenschaften flachgepresster Holz-Kunststoff-Verbundplatten (WPC) wurden mit verschiedenen Brandschutzmitteln (10% Masseanteil) mit unterschiedlichen Holzmehlanteilen (WF: 40, 50 und 60% Masseanteil) untersucht. Die WPC-Platten wurden trocken gemischt aus Holzmehl, Polypropylen (PP) und Brandschutzmitteln (FR) mit Maleinsäureanhydrid gepfropftem PP (2% Masseanteil) mit einer herkömmlichen Formulierung im Flachpressverfahren unter Laborbedingungen hergestellt. Die Zugabe von Brandschutzmittel in die WPC-Platten verringerte deren Querzugfestigkeit unabhängig vom Holzmehlanteil deutlich.

Die Biegefestigkeit der WPC-Platten mit FR nahm mit zunehmendem Holzmehlanteil von 40 bis 60% Masseanteil ab. Der Elastizitätsmodul nahm mit der Erhöhung des Holzmehlanteils von 40 bis 50% Masseanteil zu und nahm bei einem Holzmehlanteil von 60% wieder ab. Die mit Zinkborat hergestellten WPC-Platten wiesen im Allgemeinen die besten physikalischen und mechanischen Eigenschaften auf, gefolgt von den Platten, in die Decabromdiphenyloxid, Magnesiumhydroxid und Ammoniumpolyphosphat eingebracht wurde.

Gemessen im Kegelkalorimeter führten höhere Holzmehlanteile zu einem deutlich verbesserten Verhalten im Brandfall gegenüber den WPC-Platten mit oder ohne FR. Von den vier geprüften Brandschutzmitteln ergab Ammoniumpolyphosphat die beste Verbesserung gegenüber den unbehandelten Proben.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out while N. Ayrilmis was visiting Professor at the Department of Wood Science, Hamburg University. It was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (Tubitak), The Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (Germany) through the Agency for Renewable Resources (FNR), and United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison WI. Their support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. ASTM E 1354-08a (2008) Standard test method for heat and visible smoke release rates for materials and products using an oxygen consumption calorimeter. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA Google Scholar
  2. Ayrilmis N (2006) Effects of various fire-retardants on fire and technological properties of some wood based panel products. PhD thesis, Institute of Natural Sciences, Istanbul Univ, Istanbul, 259 pp (in Turkish with English abstract) Google Scholar
  3. Ayrilmis N, Candan Z, White RH (2007) Physical mechanical, and fire properties of oriented strandboard with FR treated veneers. Holz Roh- Werkst 65:449–458 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benthien J, Thoemen H, Weißmann V (2009) Flat-pressed WPC: effects of raw materials and process parameters on the physical and mechanical board properties. Third German WPC-Congress, 2–3 December 2009, Maritim Hotel, Köln, p 19 Google Scholar
  5. Chiu SH, Wang WK (1998) The dynamic flammability and toxicity of magnesium hydroxide filled intumescent fire retardant polypropylene. J Appl Polym Sci 67:989–995 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. EN 310 (1993) Wood-based panels. Determination of bending strength and modulus of elasticity. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium Google Scholar
  7. EN 312 (2003) Particleboards—specifications Google Scholar
  8. EN 317 (1993) Determination of swelling in thickness after immersion in water Google Scholar
  9. EN 319 (1993) Determination of tensile strength perpendicular to the plane of the board Google Scholar
  10. EN 323 (1993) Determination of density Google Scholar
  11. EN 622-5 (2006) Fibreboards: specifications. Requirements for dry process boards (MDF) Google Scholar
  12. Horn WE (2000) Inorganic hydroxides and hydroxycarbonates. In: Grand AF, Wilkie CA (eds) Fire retardancy of polymeric materials. Dekker, New York, 823 pp Google Scholar
  13. Klyosov AA (2007) Wood plastic composites. Wiley, New Jersey, 698 pp CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li B, He J (2004) Investigation of mechanical property, flame retardancy and thermal degradation of LLDPE-wood-fibre composites. Polym Degrad Stab 83:241–246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. NAS (2002) National academy of sciences. Toxicological risks of selected flame-retardant chemicals. National Academies Press, Washington Google Scholar
  16. Qing-Wen W, Bo S, Zhi-Jun Z, Yong-Ming S (2005) Effects of APP on the fire-retardant and mechanical properties of wood-flour/HDPE Composite. IUFRO D5 Conference 2007, Taipei Google Scholar
  17. Sain M, Park SH, Suhara F, Law S (2004) Flame retardant and mechanical properties of natural fibre-PP composites containing magnesium hydroxide. Polym Degrad Stab 83:363–367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stark NM, Mueller SA, White RH, Osswald TA (2010) Evaluation of various fire retardants for use in wood flour polyethylene composites. Polym Degrad Stab 95:1903–1910 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang Q, Li J, Winandy JE (2004) Chemical mechanism of fire retardance of boric acid on wood. Wood Sci Technol 38:375–389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Weil ED (2000) Synergists, adjuvants, and antagonists in flame-retardant systems. In: Grand AF, Wilkie CA (eds) Fire retardancy of polymeric materials. Dekker, New York, 823 p Google Scholar
  21. Wu K, Wang Z, Liang H (2008) Microencapsulation of ammonium polyphosphate: preparation, characterization, and its flame retardance in polypropylene. Polym Compos 29:854–860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadir Ayrilmis
    • 1
  • Jan T. Benthien
    • 2
  • Heiko Thoemen
    • 3
  • Robert H. White
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Wood Mechanics and Technology, Forestry FacultyIstanbul UniversityBahcekoyTurkey
  2. 2.Mechanical Wood Technology, Department of Wood ScienceHamburg UniversityHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Department of Architecture, Wood and Civil EngineeringBern University of Applied ScienceBiel 6Switzerland
  4. 4.United States Department of Agriculture, Forest ServiceForest Products LaboratoryMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations