Download PDF

European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 70, Issue 1–3, pp 113–118 | Cite as

Effect of industrial wood particle size on mechanical properties of wood-polyvinyl chloride composites

  • Marek Kociszewski
  • Cezary Gozdecki
  • Arnold Wilczyński
  • Stanisław Zajchowski
  • Jacek Mirowski
Open Access
Originals Originalarbeiten
First Online:
Received:

Abstract

Wood-polyvinyl chloride (PVC) composites were prepared using industrial wood particles used for manufacturing three-layer particleboards. The effect of particle size (0.25–0.5, 0.5–1, 1–2, and 2–4 mm) on the mechanical properties of the composites was investigated. The effect of cross-section size (4×10, 6×15 and 8×20 mm2) of composite pieces made by an injection moulding method was also studied. Both the particle size and specimen cross-section area significantly influenced these properties. The tensile and flexural properties as well as the impact strength in general increased with increasing particle size, and decreased with increasing cross-section size.

Keywords

Flexural Strength Impact Strength HDPE Wood Flour Flexural Modulus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Einfluss von industrieüblichen Holzspanabmessungen auf die mechanischen Eigenschaften von Holz-PVC-Verbundwerkstoffen

Zusammenfassung

Holz-PVC-Verbundwerkstoffe wurden unter Verwendung industrieüblicher Holzspäne, wie sie zur Herstellung von dreischichtigen Spanplatten eingesetzt werden, hergestellt. Der Einfluss der Spangröße (0,25–0,5, 0,5–1, 1–2 und 2–4 mm) auf die mechanischen Eigenschaften der Verbundwerkstoffe sowie der Einfluss der Querschnittsgröße (4×10, 6×15 and 8×20 mm2) der mittels Spritzgusstechnik hergestellten Verbundwerkstoffe wurde untersucht. Sowohl die Spangröße als auch die Querschnittsabmessungen der Prüfkörper hatten einen Einfluss auf diese Eigenschaften. Die Zug- und Biegeeigenschaften sowie die Schlagbiegefestigkeit nahmen generell mit zunehmender Spangröße zu und mit zunehmender Querschnittsgröße ab.

1 Introduction

Mechanical properties of wood plastic composites (WPCs) generally depend on the properties of their components and the ratio of these components. One of the factors affecting properties of a wood component is wood particle size. The effect of this factor on WPC mechanical properties was mainly evaluated for typical WPCs containing small wood particles (wood flour) or short wood fibres. WPCs with polypropylene (PP) (Zaini et al. 1996; Lee et al. 2001; Stark and Rowlands 2003; Khalil et al. 2006; Salemane and Luyt 2006; Kumari et al. 2007; Cheng et al. 2009; Pan et al. 2009) and high density polyethylene (HDPE) (Cui et al. 2008; Migneault et al. 2008, 2009; Bouafif et al. 2009) as the matrix were primarily studied. Results of some studies have shown that the effect of wood particle size on WPC mechanical properties was considerable, whereas others revealed that this effect was slight. For most tested WPCs an increase in wood particle size resulted in an increase in WPC mechanical properties, but in some cases there was a reverse tendency. The divergence of the results of these studies is difficult to interpret. It is due to many factors, mainly such as thermoplastic type, wood content, wood particle geometry, coupling agent type and content, and processing method. It can be concluded that the effect of wood particle size on WPC mechanical properties is not sufficiently clear.

Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is increasingly being used as a matrix of WPC, in particular by manufacturers of windows and deck profiles. This composite has well enough mechanical properties and high moisture, fungi and UV radiation resistance. Furthermore, it is relatively inexpensive and allows for multiple processing. Recycled PVC waste from pipes, windows and sidings can be successfully used to produce wood-PVC composites. Mechanical properties of WPCs with PVC as the matrix have seldom been studied (Bledzki et al. 1998; Takatani et al. 2000; Xu et al. 2008) compared to WPCs with PP and HDPE. The effect of wood or natural fibre content was mainly considered. Only Takatani et al. (2000) evaluated the effect of wood particle size for WPCs with softwood flour and steam exploded beech flour using two sizes of wood particle: 0.125 and 0.841 mm. They found that the smaller particles gave better WPC flexural strength when softwood flour was the wooden component, and worse when a mix of softwood and steam-exploded beech flour was such a component.

Large-sized wood particles are seldom used as filler in WPCs, especially for the fabrication of WPCs by injection moulding. However, industrial wood particles with long length and a high length-to-thickness ratio were found to be useful for producing wood-PP (Bledzki and Faruk 2003; Gozdecki et al. 2006; Wilczyński et al. 2008) and wood-HDPE (Chen et al. 2006) composites. Using these particles improves the WPC mechanical properties, compared with typical WPC with wood flour.

The continual increase in the use of WPCs results in the need to create WPCs with particular properties. Such can be WPCs with large-sized wood particles. In this study, industrial wood particles used for manufacturing the face and core layers of particleboards were employed to make wood-PVC composites by an injection moulding method. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of particle size on the mechanical properties of these composites. The use of large-sized particles makes the WPCs more heterogeneous, therefore it was decided to consider also the size of cross-section of injection moulded pieces.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

The PVC used in this study was POLANVIL S-58 obtained from Anwil S.A. (Poland). Its bulk density was 0.595 g/cm3.

Industrial softwood particles used for manufacturing three-layer particleboards, fine particles for face layers and coarse particles for the core layer, were employed as raw wood material. They were supplied by Kronospan Szczecinek (Poland). Their fraction analysis is shown in Table 1. The particles were screened by an analytical sieve shaker using sieves of 5, 10, 18, 35 and 60 mesh to obtain four particle sizes: (1) very small, S1, 0.25–0.5 mm; (2) small, S2, 0.5–1 mm; (3) large L1, 1–2 mm; and (4) very large L2, 2–4 mm. The screened particles are shown in Fig. 1. Dimensions were measured for 200 randomly selected particles of each size, and length-to-thickness and width-to-thickness ratios were calculated to obtain particle geometric characteristics. Particle bulk density was also determined. Mean values of these parameters are listed in Table 2.
Open image in new window
Fig. 1

Screened wood particles of S1, S2, L1 and L2 sizes

Abb. 1

Gesiebte Holzspäne der Größe S1, S2, L1 und L2

Table 1

Fraction analysis (%) per weight of industrial wood particles

Tab. 1

Siebanalyse in Masseprozent industrieüblicher Holzspäne

Fine particle

Coarse particle

Screen hole size range (mm)

Content (%)

Screen hole size range (mm)

Content (%)

<0.212

11.5

<0.5

1.9

0.212–03

9.2

0.5–1.0

8.5

0.3–0.4

15.5

1.0–1.4

11.3

0.4–0.6

20.9

1.4–2.0

28.9

0.6–1.0

39.5

2.0–4.0

42.9

1.0–1.25

3.2

4.0–6.3

5.8

>1.25

0.2

>6.3

0.7

Table 2

Length, length/thickness and width/thickness ratios, and bulk density of wood particles

Tab. 2

Länge, Verhältnis von Länge zu Dicke und von Breite zu Dicke sowie Schüttdichte der Holzspäne

 

Length (mm)

Length/thickness

Width/thickness

Bulk density (g/cm3)

S1

1.9 (0.8)

14.9 (3.2)

2.4 (0.7)

0.201

S2

3.9 (1.4)

16.3 (4.1)

2.5 (0.9)

0.192

L1

12.2 (6.0)

20.2 (6.1)

2.6 (1.2)

0.162

L2

20.2 (6.9)

21.4 (6.3)

2.8 (1.1)

0.150

Standard deviations in parentheses

2.2 Sample preparation

All the particles were dried at 80°C in an air-circulation oven for 24 hours before mixing in order to achieve a moisture content of less than 3%. Next the particles were mixed with PVC at 40% by weight. Test specimens were made by injection moulding using a screw injection moulding machine. The temperature profile was 140, 175 and 180°C. The injection pressure time, hold pressure time and cooling time were 3, 6 and 40 s, respectively. To minimize mechanical degradation of particles during moulding, the diameter of the injection die was enlarged to 4.5 mm, and the diameter of the sprue bush to 8 mm. The cross section of the runner and the gate was 10×10 mm2 and 6×6 mm2, respectively.

For determining the effect of cross-section size of injection moulded pieces, three cross-section areas were assumed: (1) 4×10 mm2; (2) 6×15 mm2; and (3) 8×20 mm2. Specimens with these three cross-section sizes were made. Dimensions of those of 4×10 mm2 cross-section were according to EN ISO 527, and dimensions of those of 6×15 mm2 and 8×20 mm2 cross-sections were adequately larger. After processing the specimens were stored in controlled conditions (50% relative humidity and 20°C) for two weeks prior to testing.

2.3 Methods of testing

The mechanical properties of the obtained WPCs were evaluated according to standard procedures. Tensile and flexural properties were determined according to EN ISO 527 and EN ISO 178, respectively, using an Instron 3367 machine. Cross-head speed was 2 mm per min. Unnotched Charpy impact strength tests were conducted according to EN ISO 179 with PSd 50/15 impact test device. Ten replicates were run for each test. All tests were performed at room temperature (20°C) and at constant relative humidity (50%).

3 Results and discussion

3.1 ANOVA analysis

Mean values of the tensile modulus and strength, flexural modulus and strength, and impact strength of tested WPCs are given in Figs. 2–6. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine the significance of the effects of particle size and cross-section size on the WPC mechanical properties (Table 3). Results of this analysis show that all mechanical properties vary significantly with particle size and specimen cross-section size. The interaction between these two variables is significant only for the flexural strength.
Open image in new window
Fig. 2

Effect of specimen cross-section size on tensile modulus of WPC with different sizes of wood particles (standard deviations in parentheses)

Abb. 2

Einfluss der Querschnittsgröße der Prüfkörper und der Holzspangröße auf den Zugelastizitätsmodul von WPCs (Standardabweichung in Klammern)

Table 3

Two-way ANOVA test on the effects of particle size and cross-section size on WPC mechanical properties (p-values)

Tab. 3

Zwei-Faktoren-ANOVA zur Bestimmung der Einflüsse von Spangröße und Querschnittsgröße auf die mechanischen Eigenschaften von WPCs (p-Werte)

Variable

Tensile modulus

Tensile strength

Flexural modulus

Flexural strength

Impact strength

Wood particle size

<0.0001*

<0.0001*

<0.0001*

<0.0001*

0.0002*

Cross-section size

<0.0001*

<0.0001*

0.0147*

<0.0001*

<0.0001*

Wood particle size × cross-section size

0.9883ns

0.6005ns

0.3388ns

0.0388*

0.9120ns

*Denotes significance at 0.01

nsNon significant at 0.05

3.2 Effect of particle size

Specimens of different cross-section size and the same wood particle size were included in one group. The mean values of mechanical properties for these groups are presented in Table 4. Tukey’s test was applied to evaluate the statistical significance between mean values of mechanical properties of WPCs with different particle sizes. Values with the same letter for given property are not significantly different at the 5% significance level.
Table 4

Effect of wood particle size on WPC mechanical properties

Tab. 4

Einfluss der Größe der Holzspäne auf die mechanischen Eigenschaften von WPCs

Wood particle size

Tensile modulus (MPa)

Tensile strength (MPa)

Flexural modulus (MPa)

Flexural strength (MPa)

Impact strength (kJ/m2)

S1

5290a

35.2a

4930a

58.5a

10.6a

S2

5470ab

37.0a

5110ab

63.3a

11.7b

L1

6210c

42.2b

5720c

74.4b

12.1b

L2

5850bc

38.3a

5480bc

69.3b

12.3b

Mean values with the same letter for given property are not significantly different at the 5% significance level

The WPC tensile and flexural properties increase gradually with increasing particle size from S1 to L1 and decrease with increasing particle size to L2 (Table 4, Figs. 2, 3, 4, and 5). Values of these properties for the WPC with L2 particles are greater than those for the WPC with S2 particles. The tensile modulus and strength of WPCs with larger (L1 and L2) particles are on average 12% and 11% greater, respectively, than those of WPCs with smaller (S1 and S2) particles. The relative difference between the tensile properties of WPCs with larger and smaller particles does not depend on specimen cross-section size.
Open image in new window
Fig. 3

Effect of specimen cross-section size on tensile strength of WPC with different sizes of wood particles (standard deviations in parentheses)

Abb. 3

Einfluss der Querschnittsgröße der Prüfkörper und der Holzspangröße auf die Zugfestigkeit von WPCs (Standardabweichung in Klammern)

Open image in new window
Fig. 4

Effect of specimen cross-section size on flexural modulus of WPC with different sizes of wood particles (standard deviations in parentheses)

Abb. 4

Einfluss der Querschnittsgröße der Prüfkörper und der Holzspangröße auf den Biegeelastizitätsmodul von WPCs (Standardabweichung in Klammern)

Open image in new window
Fig. 5

Effect of specimen cross-section size on flexural strength of WPC with different sizes of wood particles (standard deviations in parentheses)

Abb. 5

Einfluss der Querschnittsgröße der Prüfkörper und der Holzspangröße auf die Biegefestigkeit von WPCs (Standardabweichung in Klammern)

The flexural modulus and strength of WPCs with larger particles are on average greater by 11% and 18%, respectively, than those of WPCs with smaller particles. For the flexural modulus the relative difference between values of WPC with larger and smaller particles was greatest when this modulus was determined using specimens of 4×10 mm2 cross-section. For flexural strength this difference was almost the same as when it was derived from testing the specimens of different cross-section size.

Regarding the impact strength, the composite made of the smallest particles showed the lowest value (Fig. 6). The other three groups had a higher score, and showed no significant difference (Table 4). The impact strength of WPCs with larger particles is on average 9% greater than that of WPCs with smaller particles. The relative difference between the impact strength of WPCs with larger and smaller particles is greatest in determining this strength using specimens of 8×20 mm2 cross-section.
Open image in new window
Fig. 6

Effect of specimen cross-section size on impact strength of WPC with different sizes of wood particles (standard deviations in parentheses)

Abb. 6

Einfluss der Querschnittsgröße der Prüfkörper und der Holzspangröße auf die Schlagfestigkeit von WPCs (Standardabweichung in Klammern)

The increase in the mechanical properties of tested WPCs with increasing wood particle size is a result of particle geometry. According to the mechanics of fibre-reinforced composite materials, one important factor affecting their mechanical properties is fibre aspect ratio defined as fibre length-to-thickness ratio. Fibres with a higher aspect ratio enhance stress transfer from the polymer matrix to the fibres and finally improve the composite mechanical properties. Values of this ratio for wood particles used in the study were 20.2 and 21.4 for L1 and L2 particles, respectively, and 14.9 and 16.3 for S1 and S2 particles, respectively (Table 2). Improving the WPC mechanical properties by particles with a higher aspect ratio was also observed for wood-PP (Zaini et al. 1996; Stark and Rowlands 2003) and wood-HDPE (Migneault et al. 2008, 2009) composites.

The tensile and flexural properties of tested WPCs with L2 particles are smaller than those of WPCs with L1 particles. The relative decreases are on average 7% and 5% for the tensile and flexural properties, respectively. These increases are probably due to the fact that too-large particles were breaking during the processing.

3.3 Effect of cross-section size

The effect of specimen cross-section size on WPC mechanical properties is presented in Figs. 2–6. In general, the properties derived from specimens with greater cross-section have lower values. Tensile, flexural and impact properties decrease gradually when cross-section size increases from 4×10 to 8×20 mm2. Only for the WPC with S1 particles is the flexural modulus derived from the specimens of 6×15 mm2 cross-section slightly greater than that determined using the specimens of 4×10 mm2 cross-section.

WPC tensile modulus and strength derived from the specimens of 8×20 mm2 cross-section are on average 11% and 17% smaller than those derived from the specimens of 4×10 mm2 cross-section. The decrease in the tensile modulus is almost the same for WPCs with different wood particle size. The decrease in the tensile strength is greatest for the WPC with L1 particles.

WPC flexural modulus and strength derived from the specimens of 8×20 mm2 cross-section are on average 6% and 16% smaller than those derived from the specimens of 4×10 mm2 cross-section. The decrease in the flexural modulus is greater for WPCs with larger wood particles. The decrease in the flexural strength for WPCs with S2 and L1 particles is greater than that for WPCs with S1 and L2 particles.

The increase in specimen cross-section size results in a considerable decrease in WPC impact strength. This strength derived from the specimens of 8×20 mm2 cross-section is on average 22% smaller than that derived from the specimens of 4×10 mm2 cross-section. The decrease in this strength does not depend on wood particle size.

Standard deviations in the study results are affected by specimen cross-section size. In general they are lower for the results derived from testing specimens with larger cross-section. The decrease in standard deviations with increasing cross-section size is greater for WPCs with larger particle size. Standard deviations are also affected by wood particle size. They are generally higher when the particles are larger. Their increase with increasing particle size is highest for the results derived from specimens with the smallest cross-section. Summing up, the larger the cross-section size and the smaller the particle size, the lower the standard deviation. So, it is preferable to use specimens with a cross-section larger than a standard cross-section of 4×10 mm2 to determine the mechanical properties of WPCs with larger particles.

4 Conclusions

Industrial wood particles used for manufacturing three-layer particleboards can be a good raw material to make composites with PVC by an injection moulding method. These WPCs have good mechanical properties, which depend on particle size and the cross-section area of injection moulded pieces. The large-sized particles, used for manufacturing a core particleboard layer, provide better WPC properties than the small-sized particles used for manufacturing face particleboard layers. This is a result of the greater aspect ratio of larger wood particles. The mechanical properties derived from testing specimens with a larger cross-section area are in general lower, but show a lower standard deviation.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grant N508 011 32/0844 from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education. The authors would like to thank Kronospan Szczecinek Sp. z o.o. for providing wood material for this study.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Bledzki AK, Gassan J, Theis S (1998) Wood-filled thermoplastic composites. Mech Compos Mater 34:563–568 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bledzki AK, Faruk O (2003) Wood fibre reinforced polypropylene composites: effect of fibre geometry and coupling agent on physico-mechanical properties. Appl Compos Mater 10:365–379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouafif H, Koubaa A, Perre P, Cloutier A (2009) Effects of fiber characteristics on the physical and mechanical properties of wood plastic composites. Compos Part A 40:975–1981 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen HC, Chen TY, Hsu CH (2006) Effects of wood particle size and mixing ratios of HDPE on the properties of the composites. Holz Roh- Werkst 64:172–177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng Q, Wang S, Rials TG, Kit KM, Hansen M (2009) Fabrication optimization of polypropylene composites reinforced with steam-exploded wood flour by wet process. Eur J Wood Prod 67:449–455 Google Scholar
  6. Cui Y, Lee S, Noruziaan B, Cheung M, Tao J (2008) Fabrication and interfacial modification of wood/recycled plastic composite materials. Compos Part A 39:655–661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gozdecki C, Kociszewski M, Zajchowski S (2006) Use of particles from the particleboard manufacturing for the polypropylene filling. Ann Wars Univ Life Sci SGGW For Wood Technol 58:326–329 Google Scholar
  8. Khalil HPSA, Shahnaz SBS, Ratnam MM, Ahmad F, Fuaad NAN (2006) Recycle polypropylene (RPP) wood saw dust (WSD) composites—Part 1: The effect of different filler size and filler loading on mechanical and water absorption properties. J Reinf Plast Compos 25:1291–1303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kumari R, Ito H, Takatani M, Uchiyama M, Okamoto T (2007) Fundamental studies on wood/cellulose-plastic composites: effects of composition and cellulose dimension on the properties of cellulose/PP composite. J Wood Sci 53:470–480 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee BJ, McDonald AG, James B (2001) Influence of fiber length on the mechanical properties of wood-fiber/polypropylene prepreg sheets. Mater Res Innov 4:97–103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Migneault S, Koubaa A, Erchiqui F, Chaala A, Englund K, Krause C, Wolcott M (2008) Effect of fiber length on processing and properties of extruded wood-fiber/HDPE composites. J Appl Polym Sci 110:1085–1092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Migneault S, Koubaa A, Erchiqui F, Chaala A, Englund K, Wolcott M (2009) Effects of processing method and fiber size on the structure and properties of wood-plastic composites. Compos Part A 40:80–85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pan MZ, Zhou DG, Bousmina M, Zhang SY (2009) Effects of wheat straw fiber content and characteristics, and coupling agent concentration on the mechanical properties of wheat straw fiber-polypropylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 113:1000–1007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Salemane MG, Luyt AS (2006) Thermal and mechanical properties of polypropylene-wood powder composites. J Appl Polym Sci 100:4173–4180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stark NM, Rowlands RE (2003) Effects of wood fiber characteristics on mechanical properties of wood/polypropylene composites. Wood Fiber Sci 35(2):167–174 Google Scholar
  16. Takatani M, Ito H, Ohsugi S, Kitayama T, Saegusa M, Kawai S, Okamoto T (2000) Effect of lignocellulosic materials on the properties of thermoplastic polymer/wood composites. Holzforschung 54:197–200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilczyński A, Kociszewski M, Gozdecki C, Zajchowski S (2008) The effect of wood particle size on the properties of PP/wood composite made by injection molding method. In: The 7th Global WPC and Natural Fibre Composites Congress and Exhibition, Kassel, June 18–19, 2008, pp 6/1–16/5 Google Scholar
  18. Xu Y, Wu Q, Lei Y, Yao F, Zhang Q (2008) Natural fiber reinforced poly(vinyl chloride) composites: Effect of fiber type and impact modifier. J Polym Env 16:250–257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zaini MJ, Fuad MYA, Ismail Z, Mansor MS, Mustafah J (1996) The effect of filler content and size on the mechanical properties of polypropylene/oil palm wood flour composites. Polym Int 49:51–55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marek Kociszewski
    • 1
  • Cezary Gozdecki
    • 1
  • Arnold Wilczyński
    • 1
  • Stanisław Zajchowski
    • 2
  • Jacek Mirowski
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of TechnologyKazimierz Wielki UniversityBydgoszczPoland
  2. 2.Faculty of Chemical Technology and EngineeringUniversity of Technology and Life Sciences in BydgoszczBydgoszczPoland

Personalised recommendations