Advertisement

Der Chirurg

, Volume 87, Issue 3, pp 195–201 | Cite as

Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken?

Teil 1: Eingriffe an der Aorta
  • E. S. DebusEmail author
  • T. Kölbel
  • D. Manzoni
  • C.-A. Behrendt
  • F. Heidemann
  • R. T. Grundmann
Leitthema
  • 409 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Die endovaskuläre Gefäßchirurgie hat die konventionelle operative Gefäßchirurgie in weiten Bereichen verdrängt. Dies hat dazu geführt, dass beide Techniken vielerorts als miteinander konkurrierende Verfahren angesehen werden. Evidenzbasierte Daten aus randomisierten Studien, Metaanalysen und klinischen Registern belegen jedoch zunehmend deutlich, dass sich die beiden Technologien komplementär ergänzen. Dabei ist es von der jeweiligen Grunderkrankung und der Anatomie abhängig, welcher der beiden Vorgehensweisen der Vorzug zu geben ist – wobei auch die kombinierte Nutzung beider Verfahren (Hybridtechnik) sinnvoll sein kann. Die vorliegende Übersicht konzentriert sich auf die Versorgung der akuten komplizierten Aortendissektion Typ B, auf Aneurysmen der deszendierenden thorakalen Aorta, auf thorakoabdominelle Aortenaneurysmen sowie das asymptomatische und rupturierte Bauchaortenaneurysma.

Schlüsselwörter

Endovaskulär Offene Chirurgie Aortendissektion Thorakales Aortenaneurysma Abdominelles Aortenaneurysma 

Endovascular versus conventional vascular surgery – old-fashioned thinking?

Part 1: interventions on the aorta

Abstract

Endovascular therapy has widely replaced conventional open vascular surgical reconstruction. For this reason both techniques were widely considered to be competing approaches. Evidence-based data from randomized prospective trials, meta-analyses and clinical registries, however, demonstrated that both techniques should be used to complement each other. It became increasingly more evident that the use of either procedure depends on the underlying disease and the anatomical conditions, whereby a combination of both (hybrid approach) may be the preferred option in certain situations. This review focuses on the treatment of complicated acute type B aortic dissection, descending thoracic aortic aneurysms, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms as well as asymptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Keywords

Endovascular repair Open repair Aortic dissection Thoracic aortic aneurysm Abdominal aortic aneurysm 

Notes

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt

E.S. Debus, T. Kölbel, D. Manzoni, C.-A. Behrendt, F. Heidemann und R.T. Grundmann geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Debus ES, Grundmann RT (2015) Evidenzbasierte Gefäßchirurgie. Springer, Berlin. (Kapitel 2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moulakakis KG, Mylonas SN, Dalainas I et al (2014) Management of complicated and uncomplicated acute type B dissection. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 3:234–246PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramdass M (2015) TEVAR for symptomatic Stanford B dissection: a systematic review of 30-day mortality and morbidity. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 63:97–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mody PS, Wang Y, Geirsson A et al (2014) Trends in aortic dissection hospitalizations, interventions, and outcomes among medicare beneficiaries in the United States, 2000–2011. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 7:920–928CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sachs T, Pomposelli F, Hagberg R et al (2010) Open and endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. J Vasc Surg 52:860–866CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luebke T, Brunkwall J (2014) Cost-effectiveness of endovascular versus open repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg 59:1247–1255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hogendoorn W, Hunink MG, Schlösser FJ et al (2014) Endovascular vs. open repair of complicated acute type B aortic dissections. J Endovasc Ther 21:503–514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chou HP, Chang HT, Chen CK et al (2015) Outcome comparison between thoracic endovascular and open repair for type B aortic dissection: a population-based longitudinal study. J Chin Med Assoc 78:241–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thrumurthy SG, Karthikesalingam A, Patterson BO et al (2011) A systematic review of mid-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) of chronic type B aortic dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 42:632–647CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tian DH, De Silva RP, Wang T, Yan TD (2014) Open surgical repair for chronic type B aortic dissection: a systematic review. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 3:340–350PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fujikawa T, Yamamoto S, Sekine Y et al (2015) Operative results and clinical features of chronic Stanford type B aortic dissection: examination of 234 patients over 6 years. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.07.012
  12. 12.
    Debus ES, Grundmann RT (2015) Evidenzbasierte Gefäßchirurgie. Springer, Berlin. (Kapitel 3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheng D, Martin J, Shennib H et al (2010) Endovascular aortic repair versus open surgical repair for descending thoracic aortic disease a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:986–1001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jonker FH, Trimarchi S, Verhagen HJ et al (2010) Meta-analysis of open versus endovascular repair for ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 51:1026–1032CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iafrancesco M, Ranasinghe AM, Claridge MW et al (2014) Current results of endovascular repair of thoraco-abdominal aneurysms. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 46:981–984CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guillou M, Bianchini A, Sobocinski J et al (2012) Endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 56:65–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reilly LM, Rapp JH, Grenon SM et al (2012) Efficacy and durability of endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair using the caudally directed cuff technique. J Vasc Surg 56:53–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clough RE, Modarai B, Bell RE et al (2012) Total endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 43:262–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Verhoeven EL, Katsargyris A, Bekkema F et al (2015) Ten-year experience with endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: results from 166 consecutive patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 49:524–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Canaud L, Karthikesalingam A, Jackson D et al (2013) Clinical outcomes of single versus staged hybrid repair for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 58:1192–1200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosset E, Ben Ahmed S, Galvaing G, Association Universitaire de Recherche en Chirurgie et al (2014) Editor̕s choice – hybrid treatment of thoracic, thoracoabdominal, and abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 47:470–478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hughes GC, Andersen ND, Hanna JM, McCann RL (2012) Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm: hybrid repair outcomes. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1:311–319PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Coselli JS, Lemaire SA, Weldon SA (2012) Extent II repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm secondary to chronic dissection. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1:394–397PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bensley RP, Curran T, Hurks R et al (2013) Open repair of intact thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Vasc Surg 58:894–900CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lemaire SA, Price MD, Green SY et al (2012) Results of open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1:286–292PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG et al (2012) The UK EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) trials: randomised trials of EVAR versus standard therapy. Health Technol Assess 16(9):1–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    de Bruin JL, Baas AF, Buth J, DREAM Study Group et al (2010) Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 362: 1881–1889CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    de Bruin JL, Vervloet MG, Buimer MG, DREAM Study Group et al (2013) Renal function 5 years after open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair from a randomized trial. Br J Surg 100:1465–1470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nguyen BN, Neville RF, Rahbar R et al (2013) Comparison of outcomes for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and endovascular repair in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Ann Surg 258:394–399CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lovegrove RE, Javid M, Magee TR, Galland RB (2008) A meta-analysis of 21,178 patients undergoing open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 95:677–684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stather PW, Sidloff D, Dattani N et al (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 100:863–872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Paravastu SC, Jayarajasingam R, Cottam R et al (2014) Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD004178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schermerhorn ML, Buck DB, O̕’Malley AJ et al (2015) Long-term outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med 373:328–338CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Badger S, Bedenis R, Blair PH et al (2014) Endovascular treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD005261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Reimerink JJ, Hoornweg LL, Vahl AC, Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial Collaborators et al (2013) Endovascular repair versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 258:248–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    IMPROVE Trial Investigators, Powell JT, Sweeting MJ, Thompson MM et al (2014) Endovascular or open repair strategy for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 30 day outcomes from IMPROVE randomised trial. BMJ 348:f7661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gunnarsson K, Wanhainen A, Djavani Gidlund K et al (2015) Endovascular versus open repair as primary strategy for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a national population-based study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.07.001
  38. 38.
    Gupta PK, Ramanan B, Engelbert TL et al (2014) A comparison of open surgery versus endovascular repair of unstable ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 60:1439–1445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. S. Debus
    • 1
    Email author
  • T. Kölbel
    • 1
  • D. Manzoni
    • 1
  • C.-A. Behrendt
    • 1
  • F. Heidemann
    • 1
  • R. T. Grundmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Klinik und Poliklinik für GefäßmedizinUniversitäres Herzzentrum Hamburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgDeutschland
  2. 2.BurghausenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations