Advertisement

Der Chirurg

, Volume 78, Issue 5, pp 420–427 | Cite as

Endoluminaler Ultraschall des Gastrointestinaltraktes

  • M. Moehler
  • P.R. Galle
  • R. Kiesslich
Leitthema

Zusammenfassung

Neue endoluminale, bildgebende Techniken nehmen einen zunehmenden klinischen Stellenwert in der Diagnostik und Therapie verschiedenster gastrointestinaler Erkrankungen ein. Die klassische Endosonographie (EUS) erweitert ihre klinischen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten durch den Einsatz von Kontrastmitteln oder der Elastographie. Diese Übersichtsarbeit zeigt aktuelle Standards auf, diskutiert ausgewählte endoluminal geführte Therapieoptionen und stellt neue Techniken der Bildgebung vor.

Schlüsselwörter

Endosonographie Gastrointestinaltrakt Malignome Frühkarzinome 

Endosonography of the gastrointestinal tract

Abstract

The clinical value of endosonography (EUS) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is currently increasing and supported by new imaging techniques. Conventional EUS combined with contrast application or elastography might further refine the diagnostic yield for GI cancers. The present review discusses current standards of EUS and endosonographically guided therapy and discusses newly available imaging modalities.

Keywords

Cancer Early cancer Endosonography Gastrointestinal tract 

Notes

Interessenkonflikt

Keine Angaben

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Agarwal B, Swisher S et al. (2004) Endoscopic ultrasound after preoperative chemoradiation can help identify patients who benefit maximally after surgical esophageal resection. Am J Gastroenterol 99: 1258–1266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arcidiacono PG, Rossi M (2004) Celiac plexus neurolysis.“ Jop 5: 315–321Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arguedas MR, Dupont AW et al. (2001) Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model. Am J Gastroenterol 96: 2892–2899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker D, Strobel D et al. (2001) Echo-enhanced color- and power-Doppler EUS for the discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 53: 784–789CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhandari S, Shim CS et al. (2004) Usefulness of three-dimensional, multidetector row CT (virtual gastroscopy and multiplanar reconstruction) in the evaluation of gastric cancer: a comparison with conventional endoscopy, EUS, and histopathology.“ Gastrointest Endosc 59: 619–626Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brugge WR (2004) Evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions with EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 59: 698–707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burmester E, Niehaus J et al. (2003) EUS-cholangio-drainage of the bile duct: report of 4 cases.“ Gastrointest Endosc 57: 246–251Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buscarini E, Tansini P et al. (2003) EUS for suspected choledocholithiasis: do benefits outweigh costs? A prospective, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 57: 510–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buttar NS, Wang KK et al. (2001) Combined endoscopic mucosal resection and photodynamic therapy for esophageal neoplasia within Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 54: 682–688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Canto MI (2001) Methylene blue chromoendoscopy for Barrett’s esophagus: coming soon to your GI unit? Gastrointest Endosc 54: 403–409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dietrich CF, Ignee A et al. (2005) Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound with low mechanical index: a n ew technique. Z Gastroenterol 43: 1219–1223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dittler HJ, Siewert JR (1993) Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in esophageal carcinoma. Endoscopy 25: 156–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dittler HJ, Siewert JR (1993) Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in gastric carcinoma. Endoscopy 25: 162–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ell C, May A et al. (2007) Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett’s cancer). Gastrointest Endosc 65: 3–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Engstrom CF, Wiechel KL (1990) Endoluminal ultrasound of the bile ducts. Surg Endosc 4: 187–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fritscher-Ravens A, Brand L et al. (2002) Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for focal pancreatic lesions in patients with normal parenchyma and chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 97: 2768–2775CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Giovannini M, Bernardini D et al. (1999) Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): results and prognostic factors in 21 patients. Endoscopy 31: 698–701CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giovannini M, Bories E et al. (2006) Three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound using a new freehand software program: results in 35 patients with rectal cancer. Endoscopy 38: 339–343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giovannini M, Bories E et al. (2004) Circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection in Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or mucosal cancer. Preliminary results in 21 patients. Endoscopy 36: 782–787CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giovannini M, Pesenti C et al. (2001) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts or pancreatic abscesses using a therapeutic echo endoscope. Endoscopy 33: 473–477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Habermann CR, Weiss F et al. (2004) Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology 230: 465–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harewood GC, Wright CA et al. (2003) Impact on patient outcomes of experience in the performance of endoscopic pancreatic fluid collection drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 58: 230–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hocke M, Schulze E et al. (2006) Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 12: 246–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim JC, Kim HC et al. (2006) Efficacy of 3-dimensional endorectal ultrasonography compared with conventional ultrasonography and computed tomography in preoperative rectal cancer staging. Am J Surg 192: 89–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kruger M, Schneider AS et al. (2006) Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts or abscesses after an EUS-guided 1-step procedure for initial access. Gastrointest Endosc 63: 409–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kunisaki C, Shimada H et al. (2001) Appropriate lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer based on lymph node metastases. Surgery 129: 153–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lerut T, Flamen P (2002) Role of FDG-PET scan in staging of cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Minerva Chir 57: 837–845PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lippert H (1998) Significance and value for the surgeon--the role of surgical examination. Endosonography within the scope of colon and rectal surgery. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 115: 271–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Makuuchi H (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection for mucosal cancer in the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 11: 445–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    May A, Gunter E et al. (2004) Accuracy of staging in early oesophageal cancer using high resolution endoscopy and high resolution endosonography: a comparative, prospective, and blinded trial. Gut 53: 634–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Meyenberger C, Huch Boni RA et al. (1995) Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Endoscopy 27: 469–479PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mortensen MB, Fristrup C et al. (2005) Prospective evaluation of patient tolerability, satisfaction with patient information, and complications in endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 37: 146–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mortensen MB, Pless T et al. (2001) Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies. A prospective study. Endoscopy 33: 478–483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Napoleon B, Dumortier J et al. (2003) Do normal findings at biliary endoscopic ultrasonography obviate the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspicion of common bile duct stone? A prospective follow-up study of 238 patients. Endoscopy 35: 411–415CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pech O, May A et al. (2006) The impact of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography on the TNM staging of early cancer in Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 101: 2223–2229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reeves AL (2000) Endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastroenterol Nurs 23: 215–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Romagnuolo J, Currie G (2005) Noninvasive vs. selective invasive biliary imaging for acute biliary pancreatitis: an economic evaluation by using decision tree analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 61: 86–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rosch T (1995) Endosonographic staging of gastric cancer: a review of literature results. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 5: 549–557PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Scotiniotis IA, Kochman ML et al. (2001) Accuracy of EUS in the evaluation of Barrett’s esophagus and high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 54: 689–696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smith JW, Brennan MF et al. (1993) Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound can predict the risk of recurrence after operation for gastric carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 11: 2380–2385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Taylor B (2003) Carcinoma of the head of the pancreas versus chronic pancreatitis: diagnostic dilemma with significant consequences. World J Surg 27: 1249–1257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema MJ et al. (2003) Impact of lymph node staging on therapy of esophageal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 125: 1626–1635CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wiersema MJ, Wiersema LM (1996) Endosonography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis. Gastrointest Endosc 44: 656–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wolfsen HC, Hemminger LL et al. (2004) Photodynamic therapy and endoscopic mucosal resection for Barrett’s dysplasia and early esophageal adenocarcinoma. South Med J 97: 827–830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Midwinter MJ et al. (1999) Correlation between spiral computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasonography and findings at operation in pancreatic and ampullary tumours. Br J Surg 86(2): 189–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gress F et al. (1999) A prospective randomized comparison of endoscopic ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided celiac plexus block for managing chronic pancreatitis pain. Am J Gastroenterol 94(4): 900–905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lisborg PH et al. (1997) Long-term survival analysis of gastric cancer limited to the subserosa. Z Gastroenterol 35(9): 663–668PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rosch T et al. (1991) Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic tumor diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc 37(3): 347–352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Erickson RA, Sayage-Rabie L, Beissner RS (2000) Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc 51(2): 184–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ono H et al. (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 48(2): 225–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gotoda T et al. (2000) Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer 3(4): 219–225PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.I. Medizinische Klinik und PoliklinikJohannes-Gutenberg-Universität MainzMainzDeutschland

Personalised recommendations