Der Anaesthesist

, Volume 63, Issue 6, pp 470–476 | Cite as

Deutsches Reanimationsregister

Wissenschaft und Reanimationsforschung
  • J.-T. Gräsner
  • S. Seewald
  • A. Bohn
  • M. Fischer
  • M. Messelken
  • T. Jantzen
  • J. Wnent
Leitthema

Zusammenfassung

Das Deutsche Reanimationsregister verzeichnet seit seinem Start im Jahr 2007 ein stetiges Wachstum. Mit aktuell über 230 innerklinischen und präklinischen Teilnehmern sowie mehr als 45.000 erfassten Datensätzen ist es eine der größten Reanimationsdatenbanken in Deutschland. Fünf Jahre nach dem offiziellen Start erfolgten 2012 eine Revision und Anpassung des Datensatzes „Erstversorgung“ und die Etablierung des Datensatzes „Weiterversorgung Basis“. Zusatzmodule, wie z. B. Telefon-CPR, ergänzen die umfangreichen Erfassungs- und Auswertungsoptionen. Neben dem Qualitätsmanagement steht das Deutsche Reanimationsregister auch als Instrument der Versorgungsforschung zur Verfügung.

Schlüsselwörter

Außerklinischer Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand Innerklinische Notfallversorgung Notfallmedizin Qualitätsmanagement Versorgungsforschung 

German resuscitation registry

Science and resuscitation research

Abstract

Sudden death due to cardiac arrest represents one of the greatest challenges facing modern medicine, not only because of the massive number of cases involved but also because of its tremendous social and economic impact. For many years, the magic figure of 1 per 1000 inhabitants per year was generally accepted as an estimate of the annual incidence of sudden death in the industrialized world, with a survival rate of 6 %. This estimate was based on large numbers of published reports of local, regional, national and multinational experience in the management of cardiac arrest. Measuring the global incidence of cardiac arrest is challenging as many different definitions of patient populations are used. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) provide insights into the value of specific treatments or treatment strategies in a well-defined section of a population. Registries do not compete with clinical studies, but represent a useful supplement to them. Surveys and registries provide insights into the ways in which scientific findings and guidelines are being implemented in clinical practice. However, as with clinical studies, comprehensive preparations are needed in order to establish a registry. This is all the more decisive because not all of the questions that may arise are known at the time when the registry is established. The German resuscitation registry started in May 2007 and currently more than 230 paramedic services and hospitals take part. More than 45,000 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and in-hospital cardiac arrest are included. With this background the German resuscitation registry is one of the largest databases in emergency medicine in Germany. After 5 years of running the preclinical care dataset was revised in 2012. Data variables that reflect current or new treatment were added to the registry. The postresuscitation basic care and telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) datasets were developed in 2012 and 2013 as well. The German resuscitation registry is an instrument of quality management and a research network. The registry documents the course in patients who have undergone resuscitation at the time points of first aid, further management and long-term outcome and it can therefore provide a complete presentation of the procedures carried out and the quality of the outcomes. In addition, important scientific questions can be answered from the database. For example, a score for benchmarking the outcome quality after out-of-hospital resuscitation, known as the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest (RACA) score, has been developed. The registry is available for all emergency medical services (EMS) and hospitals in Germany and other German-speaking countries.

Keywords

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest In-hospital emergency care Emergency medical services Quality management Health services research 

Notes

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. Die Autoren sind Mitglieder des Organisationskomitees des Deutschen Reanimationsregisters. Die Finanzierung des Deutschen Reanimationsregisters erfolgt durch die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin e. V. (DGAI) und Teilnehmerbeiträge. T. Gräsner, S. Seewald, A. Bohn, M. Fischer, M. Messelken, T. Jantzen, J. Wnent geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Der Beitrag enthält keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Bahr J, Bossaert L, Handley A et al (2010) AED in Europe. Report on a survey. Resuscitation 81:168–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JG et al (2010) Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation 81:1479–1487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Böttiger BW, Schleppers A, Schüttler J et al. (2012) Deutsches Reanimationsregister – Vom regionalen Vergleich zum bundesweiten Qualitätsmanagement. Anaesth Intensivmed 52:703–706Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bohm K, Vaillancourt C, Charette ML et al (2011) In patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, does the provision of dispatch cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions as opposed to no instructions improve outcome: a systematic review of the literature. Resuscitation 82:1490–1495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buist M, Harrison J, Abaloz E et al (2007) Six year audit of cardiac arrests and medical emergency team calls in an Australian outer metropolitan teaching hospital. BMJ 335:1210–1212PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chamberlain D, Cummins RO (1992) Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the ‚Utstein style’. European Resuscitation Council, American Heart Association, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and Australian Resuscitation Council. Eur J Anaesthesiol 9:245–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cummins RO, Chamberlain D, Hazinski MF et al (1997) Recommended guidelines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research on in-hospital resuscitation: the in-hospital ‚Utstein style’. A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Australian Resuscitation Council, and the Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa. Resuscitation 34:151–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cummins RO, Chamberlain DA, Abramson NS et al (1991) Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the Utstein Style. Task Force of the American Heart Association, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the Australian Resuscitation Council. Ann Emerg Med 20:861–874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cummins RO, Chamberlain DA, Abramson NS et al (1991) Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the Utstein Style. A statement for health professionals from a task force of the American Heart Association, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the Australian Resuscitation Council. Circulation 84:960–975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gräsner JT, Dörges V (2006) Internationales webbasiertes Reanimationsregister. Notfall Rettungsmed 9:630–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gräsner JT, Fischer M, Altemeyer KH et al (2005) Nationales Reanimationsregister. Notfall Rettungsmed 8:112–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gräsner JT, Herlitz J, Koster RW et al (2011) Quality management in resuscitation – Towards a European cardiac arrest registry (EuReCa). Resuscitation 82:989–994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gräsner JT, Messelken M, Fischer M et al (2008) Das DGAI-Reanimationsregister: Die Datensätze „Weiterversorgung“ und „Langzeitverlauf“. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 43:706–709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gräsner JT, Meybohm P, Fischer M et al (2009) A national resuscitation registry of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Germany-a pilot study. Resuscitation 80:199–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gräsner JT, Meybohm P, Lefering R et al (2011) ROSC after cardiac arrest – the RACA score to predict outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Eur Heart J 32:1649–1656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gräsner JT, Seewald S, Wnent J et al (2011) Strukturierte Reanimationsdatenerfassung: Datensatz Erstversorgung und Weiterversorgung. Anaesth Intensivmed 52:S707–S715Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gräsner JT, Seewald S, Wnent J (2014) Das Deutsche Reanimationsregister. Anaesth Intensivmed (im Druck)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herlitz J, Bahr J, Fischer M et al (1999) Resuscitation in Europe: a tale of five European regions. Resuscitation 41:121–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hodgetts TJ, Kenward G, Vlackonikolis I et al (2002) Incidence, location and reasons for avoidable in-hospital cardiac arrest in a district general hospital. Resuscitation 54:115–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hunt EA, Mancini ME, Smyth M et al (2009) Using the American Heart Association’s National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for performance improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 35:13–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jacobs I, Nadkarni V (2013) Targeted temperature management following cardiac arrest – an update. http://www.ilcor.org/data/TTM-ILCOR-update-Dec-2013.pdf. Zugegriffen: 30. Apr. 2014Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jacobs I, Nadkarni V, Bahr J et al (2004) Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update and simplification of the Utstein templates for resuscitation registries. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the international liaison committee on resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa). Resuscitation 63:233–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kause J, Smith G, Prytherch D et al (2004) A comparison of antecedents to cardiac arrests, deaths and emergency intensive care admissions in Australia and New Zealand, and the United Kingdom – the ACADEMIA study. Resuscitation 62:275–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Langhelle A, Nolan J, Herlitz J et al (2005) Recommended guidelines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research on post-resuscitation care: the Utstein style. Resuscitation 66:271–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lerner EB, Rea TD, Bobrow BJ et al (2012) Emergency medical service dispatch cardiopulmonary resuscitation prearrival instructions to improve survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 125:648–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McNally B, Stokes A, Crouch A et al (2009) CARES: Cardiac Arrest Registry to enhance survival. Ann Emerg Med 54:674–683 e672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Messelken M, Schlechtriemen T, Arntz HR et al (2011) Der Minimale Notfalldatensatz MIND3. DIVI 3:130–135Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morley P (2008) Steady as a ROC: the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. Resuscitation 78:105–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nichol G, Thomas E, Callaway CW et al (2008) Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome. JAMA 300:1423–1431PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nielsen N, Wetterslev J, Cronberg T et al (2013) Targeted temperature management at 33°C versus 36°C after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 369: 2197–2206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Song KJ, Shin SD, Park CB et al (2014) Dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a metropolitan city: a before-after population-based study. Resuscitation 85: 34–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Willich SN, Lowel H, Lewis M et al (1994) Weekly variation of acute myocardial infarction. Increased Monday risk in the working population. Circulation 90:87–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zaritsky A, Nadkarni V, Hazinski MF et al (1995) Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of pediatric advanced life support: the Pediatric Utstein Style. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Heart Association, and the European Resuscitation Council. Resuscitation 30:95–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.-T. Gräsner
    • 1
  • S. Seewald
    • 1
  • A. Bohn
    • 2
  • M. Fischer
    • 3
  • M. Messelken
    • 4
  • T. Jantzen
    • 5
  • J. Wnent
    • 6
  1. 1.Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative IntensivmedizinUniversitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus KielKielDeutschland
  2. 2.FeuerwehrMünsterDeutschland
  3. 3.Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Operative Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und SchmerztherapieKlinik am EichertGöppingenDeutschland
  4. 4.-Bad BollDeutschland
  5. 5.Intensivverlegungsdienst Mecklenburg-VorpommernDRK ParchimParchimDeutschland
  6. 6.Klinik für Anästhesiologie und IntensivmedizinUniversitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus LübeckLübeckDeutschland

Personalised recommendations