Team-based learning for teaching musculoskeletal ultrasound skills: a prospective randomised trial
The aim of this prospective randomised trial was to assess the impact of the team-based learning approach on basic musculoskeletal ultrasound skills in comparison to both peer-assisted and conventional teaching and to examine the influence of gender and learning style on learning outcomes.
In this prospective randomised trial, we randomly assigned 88 students to 3 groups: team-based learning (n = 19), peer-assisted learning (n = 36) and conventional teaching (n = 33). Pre-existing knowledge was assessed using a multiple-choice (MC) exam. Student performance after completing the course was measured using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and a second MC exam. Students were asked to complete Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory and to evaluate the course.
There was a significant gain in theoretical knowledge for all students (p < 0.001). The team-based learning groups’ performance proved to be significantly superior on the OSCE (p = 0.001). As gender had no significant effect on practical or theoretical performance, learning style was linked to differences in the practical outcome. An evaluation showed overall satisfaction with the course and with the respective teaching methods.
Team-based learning proved to be superior to peer-assisted and conventional teaching of musculoskeletal ultrasound skills.
KeywordsTeam-based learning Peer teaching Medical education Ultrasound MSUS Objective structured clinical examination
The authors thank all the students who participated—without their enthusiasm and willingness, this study would not have been possible. The manuscript was proofread by Scribendi Inc., 405 Riverview Drive, Suite 304, Chatham ON, Canada.
GGD, CC and MK had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors meet all three of the requirements for authorship. BCL, FJPB, LH, SN, CDW, CN, DE, CB and KH were highly involved in the planning and execution of this study. CC organized the project to complete his medical thesis. Furthermore, GGD, CC, BCL, FJPB, LH, CDW, CN, DE, CB and SN were highly involved in the acquisition of data and in the process of data interpretation. KH, CDW, CN and CB made a significant contribution to the analysis and interpretation of the data. Furthermore, they took part in the manuscript review process and revised it critically. In this way, they provided important intellectual content in line with the study’s execution. MK acted as the initiator of the study and was highly involved in the advancement of the conception.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Institutional Review Board approval was granted before initiation of this study, and strict confidentiality guidelines were followed (Local Ethics Committee Reference Number EK 178/09).
Consent to participate
Participants provided informed written consent for the use of their results in this study and for publication at the time of enrolment.
Consent for publication
Written consent for publication was provided at the time of enrolment by the participants.
- 4.Ozgonul L, Alimoglu MK. Comparison of lecture and team-based learning in medical ethics education. Nurs Ethics 2017:969733017731916.Google Scholar
- 20.Sarabi-Asiabar A, Jafari M, Sadeghifar J, Tofighi S, Zaboli R, Peyman H, Salimi M, Shams L. The relationship between learning style preferences and gender, educational major and status in first year medical students: a survey study from iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17(1):e18250.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Kolb A, Kolb D. The kolb learning style inventory—version 3.1 2005 technical specifi cations; 2005.Google Scholar
- 26.Smith MK, David A. Kolb on experiential learning. the encyclopedia of informal education [https://infed.org/mobi/david-a-kolb-on-experiential-learning/ retrieved: May 1st 2019]
- 29.Celebi N, Zwirner K, Lischner U, Bauder M, Ditthard K, Schurger S, Riessen R, Engel C, Balletshofer B, Weyrich P. Student tutors are able to teach basic sonographic anatomy effectively - a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33(2):141–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 43.Osseini SM, Amery H, Emadzadeh A, Babazadeh S. Dental students' educational achievement in relation to their learning styles: a cross-sectional study in Iran. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;7(5):152–8.Google Scholar