Outcomes of omental patch repair in large or giant perforated peptic ulcer are comparable to gastrectomy
- 99 Downloads
Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) complicates 2 to 10% of patients with peptic ulcer disease and has mortality risk of up to 20%. Omental patch repair is the mainstay of surgical management and gastric resectional procedures are advocated for a large/giant ulcer or suspected malignancy. Emergency gastrectomy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of omental patch repair with gastrectomy in patients with large PPU (≥ 20 mm).
A retrospective review of all PPU patients who underwent surgery from January 2008 to December 2014 was done. Patients with PPU < 20 mm were excluded. Patient demographics and perioperative data were recorded. Length of hospital stay, post-operative complications, need for intensive care unit admission and all-cause mortality are reported.
110 patients with a median age of 69.1 (range 28–90) years had PPU ≥ 20 mm. 42 (38.2%) patients presented within 24 h from the onset of abdominal pain. The median American Society of Anaesthesiology score was 3 (range 1–4). 52 patients had omental patch repair and 58 patients had gastrectomy. The overall incidence of intra-abdominal collection, post-operative leakage, re-operation and all-cause mortality was 16.4%, 11.8%, 6.4% and 19.1%, respectively. No difference in post-operative outcomes between the two groups was detected: intra-abdominal collection (p = 0.793), post-operative leakage (p = 0.813), re-operation (p = 0.809) and all-cause mortality (p = 0.736).
Omental patch repair confers similar perioperative outcomes as compared to gastrectomy in patients with large PPU.
KeywordsPeptic ulcer perforation Large peptic ulcer Omental patch repair Gastrectomy
Chan Kai Siang performed the statistical analysis of the clinical data and wrote the manuscript. Wang Yi Liang, Chan Xue Wei and Shelat Vishal G. supervised the study and modified the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
- 13.World Health O. (1992). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: 10th revision (ICD-10) [cited 24 January 2019]. https://www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd
- 17.Shelat VG, Pandya GJ. Nutritional support in dysphagia. In: speyer R and Bogaardt H, editors. Seminars in dysphagia, IntechOpen. 2015. pp. 122–32. https://doi.org/10.5772/61243. https://www.intechopen.com/books/seminars-in-dysphagia/nutritional-support-in-dysphagia.
- 26.Kujath P, Schwandner O, Bruch H-P. Morbidity and mortality of perforated peptic gastroduodenal ulcer following emergency surgery. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2002;387(7–8):298–302.Google Scholar
- 31.Lee DJK, Ye M, Sun KH, Shelat VG, Koura A. Laparoscopic versus open omental patch repair for early presentation of perforated peptic ulcer: matched retrospective cohort study. Surg Res Pract. 2016;2016:7.Google Scholar