Advertisement

Internal fixation or primary arthrodesis for Lisfranc complex joint injuries? A meta-analysis of comparative studies

  • Kaissar YammineEmail author
  • Karl Boulos
  • Chahine Assi
Original Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Though uncommon, Lisfranc complex joint injuries constitute a therapeutic challenge. Two surgical methods are commonly used to treat such injuries: open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and primary arthrodesis (PA). The aim of this meta-analysis is to look for significant differences in the outcomes between these two techniques.

Methods

A comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar was planned. Only studies with comparative design using ORIF/PA techniques were included. One randomized trial, one quasi-randomized trial and four of retrospective comparative studies met the inclusion criteria. Proportion meta-analysis was used to look for weighted frequencies of outcomes. Risk difference rate meta-analysis was conducted to look for significant differences between proportion rates.

Results

The pooled sample included 269 patients [269 surgical procedures: 176 (65.4%) ORIF vs. 93 (34.6%) PA] with a mean follow-up period of 31.85 ± 16.14 months. Besides a similar radiological healing failure rate, meta-analytical results yielded better outcomes in favour of PA: lesser implant removal rate (P < 0.0001), better rate of return to full activities (P = 0.01) and satisfaction rate (P = 0.052). A double rate of revision for non-healing following ORIF was found but did not reach significance (P = 0.1).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis demonstrated that even with a similar union rate, PA could be a better option in treating Lisfranc complex joint injuries when compared to ORIF. There is a need for larger controlled sampled studies to research on this type of injuries.

Keywords

Lisfranc injury Primary arthrodesis Open reduction and internal fixation 

Notes

Funding

There is no funding source.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Myerson MS, Fisher RT, Burgess AR, Kenzora JE. Fracture dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints: end results correlated with pathology and treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 1986;6:225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sands AK, Grose A. Lisfranc injuries. Injury. 2004;35:71–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cochran G, Renninger C, Tompane T, Bellamy J, Kuhn K. Primary arthrodesis versus open reduction and internal fixation for low-energy Lisfranc injuries in a young athletic population. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38:957–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Qiao YS, Li J, Shen H, Bao HY, Jiang M, et al. Comparison of arthrodesis and non-fusion to treat Lisfranc injuries. Orthop Surg. 2017;9:62–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeOrio M, Erickson M, Usuelli FG, Easley M. Lisfranc injuries in sport. Foot Ankle Clin. 2009;14:169–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Teng AL, Pinzur MS, Lomasney L, Mahoney L, Havey R. Functional outcome following anatomic restoration of tarsalmetatarsal fracture dislocation. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:922–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sheibani-Rad S, Coetzee JC, Giveans MR, DiGiovanni C. Arthrodesis versus ORIF for Lisfranc fractures. Orthopedics. 2012;35(6):e868–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith N, Stone C, Furey A. Does open reduction and internal fixation versus primary arthrodesis improve patient outcomes for Lisfranc trauma? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:1445–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hawkinson M, Tennent D, Belisle J, Osborn P, et al. Outcomes of Lisfranc injuries in an active duty military population. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38:1115–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mulier T, Reynders P, Dereymaeker G, Broos P. Severe Lisfranc injuries: primary arthrodesis or ORIF? Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:902–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ly TV, Coetzee JC. Treatment of primarily ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: primary arthrodesis compared with open reduction and internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:514–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henning JA, Jones CB, Sietsema DL, Bohay DR, Anderson JG. Open reduction and internal fixation versus primary arthrodesis for Lisfranc injuries: a prospective randomized study. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:913–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuo RS, Tejwani NC, Digiovanni CW, Benirschke SK, Hansen ST Jr, et al. Outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc joint injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1609–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adib F, Medadi F, Guidi E, Harandi AA, Reddy C. Osteoarthritis following open reduction and internal fixation of the Lisfranc injury. Paper presented at: 12th EFORT congress; June 1–4, 2011. http://www.ors.org/Transactions/57/1381.pdf. Accessed May 26, 2018.
  15. 15.
    Buzzard BM, Briggs PJ. Surgical management of acute tarsometatarsal fracture dislocation in the adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;353:125–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sangeorzan BJ, Veith RG, Hansen ST Jr. Salvage of Lisfranc’s tarsometatarsal joint by arthrodesis. Foot Ankle. 1990;10:193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rammelt S, Schneiders W, Schikore H, Holch M, Heineck J, Zwipp H. Primary open reduction and fixation compared with delayed corrective arthrodesis in the treatment of tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) fracture dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Desmond EA, Chou LB. Current concepts review: Lisfranc injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:653–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Panagakos P, Patel K, Gonzalez CN. Lisfranc arthrodesis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2012;29:51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Lebanese American University School of MedicineLebanese American UniversityBeirutLebanon
  2. 2.The Foot ClinicLebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk HospitalBeirutLebanon
  3. 3.Center for Evidence-Based Anatomy, Sport and Orthopedics ResearchBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations