Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic performance of thromboelastometry in trauma-induced coagulopathy: a comparison between two level I trauma centres using two different devices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The implementation of a ROTEM®-based algorithm requires reliable thresholds to mirror a prothrombin time (PT) ratio > 1.2 and/or a fibrinogen concentration < 1.5 g l−1. Our goal was to compare the diagnostic performances of two devices (ROTEM® Sigma and Delta, IL Werfen, Munich, Germany) in two level-I trauma centres for the diagnostic of post-traumatic coagulopathy.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of two registries across two periods of time: from September 2014 to December 2015 in Lyon-Sud university trauma centre and from April 2016 to January 2018 in the Grenoble Alps Trauma Centre. Accuracies of EXTEM and FIBTEM assays to detect patients with coagulation disorders were tested for each device using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.

Results

Within the study period, 74 trauma patients in the Grenoble cohort and 75 trauma patients in the Lyon cohort had concomitant ROTEM® and standard coagulation testing on admission. No statistically significant difference was found between the two ROC curves for FIBTEM amplitude at 5 min (A5), FIBTEM maximum clot firmness, EXTEM clotting time (CT) and EXTEM A5 for ROTEM® Sigma and Delta to diagnose post-traumatic coagulation disorders. The best threshold for FIBTEM A5 to predict low fibrinogen concentration was 7 mm for each device. EXTEM CT thresholds to diagnose PT ratio > 1.2 were 78 s and 74 s for ROTEM® Sigma and Delta, respectively.

Conclusions

These results suggest that ROTEM®-based algorithms may be transposed from one trauma centre to another independently of the setting and the ROTEM® device in use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frith D, Goslings JC, Gaarder C, Maegele M, Cohen MJ, Allard S, et al. Definition and drivers of acute traumatic coagulopathy: clinical and experimental investigations. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:1919–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan S, Davenport R, Raza I, Glasgow S, De’Ath HD, Johansson PI, et al. Damage control resuscitation using blood component therapy in standard doses has a limited effect on coagulopathy during trauma hemorrhage. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:239–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. MacLeod JB, Lynn M, McKenney MG, Cohn SM, Murtha M. Early coagulopathy predicts mortality in trauma. J Trauma. 2003;55:39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maegele M, Lefering R, Yucel N, Tjardes T, Rixen D, Paffrath T, et al. Early coagulopathy in multiple injury: an analysis from the German Trauma Registry on 8724 patients. Injury. 2007;38:298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hess JR, Brohi K, Dutton RP, Hauser CJ, Holcomb JB, Kluger Y, et al. The coagulopathy of trauma: a review of mechanisms. J Trauma. 2008;65:748–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maegele M, Schochl H, Cohen MJ. An update on the coagulopathy of trauma. Shock. 2014;41(Suppl 1):21–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dzik WH. Predicting hemorrhage using preoperative coagulation screening assays. Curr Hematol Rep. 2004;3:324–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Davenport R, Manson J, De’Ath H, Platton S, Coates A, Allard S, et al. Functional definition and characterization of acute traumatic coagulopathy. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:2652–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Luddington RJ. Thrombelastography/thromboelastometry. Clin Lab Haematol. 2005;27:81–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brenni M, Worn M, Bruesch M, Spahn DR, Ganter MT. Successful rotational thromboelastometry-guided treatment of traumatic haemorrhage, hyperfibrinolysis and coagulopathy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:111–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Doran CM, Woolley T, Midwinter MJ. Feasibility of using rotational thromboelastometry to assess coagulation status of combat casualties in a deployed setting. J Trauma. 2010;69(Suppl 1):S40–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schochl H, Cotton B, Inaba K, Nienaber U, Fischer H, Voelckel W, et al. FIBTEM provides early prediction of massive transfusion in trauma. Crit Care. 2011;15:R265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schochl H, Nienaber U, Hofer G, Voelckel W, Jambor C, Scharbert G, et al. Goal-directed coagulation management of major trauma patients using thromboelastometry (ROTEM)-guided administration of fibrinogen concentrate and prothrombin complex concentrate. Crit Care. 2010;14:R55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schochl H, Nienaber U, Maegele M, Hochleitner G, Primavesi F, Steitz B, et al. Transfusion in trauma: thromboelastometry-guided coagulation factor concentrate-based therapy versus standard fresh frozen plasma-based therapy. Crit Care. 2011;15:R83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Veigas PV, Callum J, Rizoli S, Nascimento B, da Luz LT. A systematic review on the rotational thrombelastometry (ROTEM(R)) values for the diagnosis of coagulopathy, prediction and guidance of blood transfusion and prediction of mortality in trauma patients. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24:114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rossaint R, Bouillon B, Cerny V, Coats TJ, Duranteau J, Fernandez-Mondejar E, et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition. Crit Care. 2016;20:100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Inaba K, Rizoli S, Veigas PV, Callum J, Davenport R, Hess J, et al. 2014 Consensus conference on viscoelastic test-based transfusion guidelines for early trauma resuscitation: report of the panel. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78:1220–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brohi K, Cohen MJ, Davenport RA. Acute coagulopathy of trauma: mechanism, identification and effect. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13:680–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yuan S, Ferrell C, Chandler WL. Comparing the prothrombin time INR versus the APTT to evaluate the coagulopathy of acute trauma. Thromb Res. 2007;120:29–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rugeri L, Levrat A, David JS, Delecroix E, Floccard B, Gros A, et al. Diagnosis of early coagulation abnormalities in trauma patients by rotation thrombelastography. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5:289–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gonzalez E, Moore EE, Moore HB, Chapman MP, Chin TL, Ghasabyan A, et al. Goal-directed hemostatic resuscitation of trauma-induced coagulopathy: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial comparing a viscoelastic assay to conventional coagulation assays. Ann Surg. 2016;263:1051–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Levy JH, Welsby I, Goodnough LT. Fibrinogen as a therapeutic target for bleeding: a review of critical levels and replacement therapy. Transfusion. 2014;54:1389–405 (quiz 8).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bouzat P, Ageron FX, Charbit J, Bobbia X, Deras P, Nugues JBD, et al. Modelling the association between fibrinogen concentration on admission and mortality in patients with massive transfusion after severe trauma: an analysis of a large regional database. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26:55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Erdoes G, Gerster G, Colucci G, Kaiser H, Alberio L, Eberle B. Prediction of post-weaning fibrinogen status during cardiopulmonary bypass: an observational study in 110 patients. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0126692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Herbstreit F, Winter EM, Peters J, Hartmann M. Monitoring of haemostasis in liver transplantation: comparison of laboratory based and point of care tests. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:44–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mace H, Lightfoot N, McCluskey S, Selby R, Roy D, Timoumi T, et al. Validity of thromboelastometry for rapid assessment of fibrinogen levels in heparinized samples during cardiac surgery: a retrospective, single-center, observational study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:90–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ogawa S, Szlam F, Bolliger D, Nishimura T, Chen EP, Tanaka KA. The impact of hematocrit on fibrin clot formation assessed by rotational thromboelastometry. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:16–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Song JG, Jeong SM, Jun IG, Lee HM, Hwang GS. Five-minute parameter of thromboelastometry is sufficient to detect thrombocytopenia and hypofibrinogenaemia in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:290–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rourke C, Curry N, Khan S, Taylor R, Raza I, Davenport R, et al. Fibrinogen levels during trauma hemorrhage, response to replacement therapy, and association with patient outcomes. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10:1342–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Innerhofer P, Fries D, Mittermayr M, Innerhofer N, von Langen D, Hell T, et al. Reversal of trauma-induced coagulopathy using first-line coagulation factor concentrates or fresh frozen plasma (RETIC): a single-centre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e258–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hagemo JS, Christiaans SC, Stanworth SJ, Brohi K, Johansson PI, Goslings JC, et al. Detection of acute traumatic coagulopathy and massive transfusion requirements by means of rotational thromboelastometry: an international prospective validation study. Crit Care. 2015;19:97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PB, RG, JN, AL, JG and JSD conceived the study and designed the trial. PB, RG, JN, AL, JG and JSD supervised data collection. PB, JSD and BB managed the data. BB provided statistical advice on study design and analyzed the data. PB, BB, MM and JSD drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. PB takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Bouzat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

PB received grants from LFB Biomedicaments. JSD received honoraria, congress travel support and fees for serving speaker from LFB Biomedicaments. Marc Maegele has received honoraria, congress travel support and fees for serving speaker and advisory boards from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Biotest, CSL Behring, TEM International, IL Werfen and LFB Biomedicaments

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Regional Institutional Ethics Committee (Comité d’Ethique des Centres d’Investigation Clinique de l’inter-région Rhône-Alpes-Auvergne, IRB number 5891) approved the implementation of the TRENAU registry (File number: 2013-07, approved on March 27, 2013) and, given its observational nature, waived the requirements for written informed consent from each patient. The RESUVAL registry, which is supervised by the regional network RESUVAL, was approved by the national data protection commission (Commission Nationale Informatique et Liberté, N°2009-674).

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bouzat, P., Guerin, R., Boussat, B. et al. Diagnostic performance of thromboelastometry in trauma-induced coagulopathy: a comparison between two level I trauma centres using two different devices. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 47, 343–351 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01165-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01165-7

Keywords

Navigation