A standardised computed tomography measurement method for distal fibular rotation
- 16 Downloads
The aim of the study is to identify an ideal location to measure fibular rotation in the ankle joint using axial computed tomography (CT) scans. Another objective was to detect the average fibular rotation in the uninjured ankle joint in a large cohort.
Standardised axial CT with coronal/sagittal reconstructions was performed in healthy ankle joints. Three investigators performed the measurements. In the axial view, each investigator appointed the ideal location to measure the angle of fibular rotation with the use of reference lines either 4, 6, 8 or 10 mm distal from the talar joint line. Inter- and intraobserver reliability, as well as the intraclass correlation coefficient, were determined.
CT scans of one hundred individuals—78 males and 22 females—were analysed. The most common locations for measuring the fibular rotation were in 31% of cases 4 mm and in 51% of cases 6 mm distal the talar joint line. The external rotation of the fibula averaged 8.42° ± 4.86° (range 0°–26°). The intraclass coefficient correlations (ICC) for interrater and intrarater reliability were 0.75.
The results of the study demonstrate a reproducible location to measure the fibular rotation in the ankle joint. The most convenient location to measure fibular rotation with a high reliability was 6 mm distal to the talar joint line.
KeywordsFibular rotation Syndesmotic injury Syndesmosis Cone beam CT Fibular notch
The research group had grants/grants pending and technical support from Siemens (Erlangen, Germany). Siemens had no involvement in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
PG and JF are paid members of an advisory board for Siemens. SV, KS, BS, MS, NB and HK declare that they have no competing interests.
Approval from the local ethics committee was obtained for anonymous analysis of the data. Approval Number: 837.366.14 (9605).
Formal consent is not required for this type of study.
- 5.Pakarinen H, Flinkkila T, Ohtonen P, Hyvonen P, Lakovaara M, Leppilahti J, et al. Intraoperative assessment of the stability of the distal tibiofibular joint in supination-external rotation injuries of the ankle: sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of two clinical tests. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2011;93(22):2057–61. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Vetter SY, Euler F, von Recum J, Wendl K, Grutzner PA, Franke J. Impact of intraoperative cone beam computed tomography on reduction quality and implant position in treatment of tibial plafond fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(9):977–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100716650532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Barbosa PBF, Kojima K, Demmer P. Syndesmosis injury: Fibulo-tibial positioning screw. In: AO Foundation. 2006. https://www2.aofoundation.org/wps/portal/surgery?showPage=redfix&bone=Tibia&segment=Malleoli&basicTechnique=Syndesmosis%20injury%3A%20Fibulo-tibial%20positioning%20screw&backLink=both#stepUnit-6.