Return to work after early repair of acute traumatic rotator cuff tears

  • Knut E. Aagaard
  • Patrik Randeblad
  • Fikri M. Abu-ZidanEmail author
  • Karl Lunsjö
Original Article



Lost workdays following rotator cuff repair is not well-studied in the literature. We aimed to define the time away from work following early arthroscopic repair of acute traumatic rotator cuff tears and compare it with the recommendations of the American Medical Disability Advisor (MD Guidelines) and The Swedish Social Insurance Agency.


Thirty-two consecutive working patients with a median age of 58 (42–70) years suffering from acute traumatic rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic repair were prospectively studied. The studied variables were age, gender, alcohol use, smoking, number of injured tendons, dominant side involvement, work-related injury, employment status, preoperative work level, alterations of work tasks at return to work, and time away from work.


97% of the patients returned to full-duty work. The median time to return to full-duty work was 5.0 (1.1–10.5) months. Preoperative work level (p = 0.025) and dominant side (p = 0.02) significantly affected the time away from work on the univariate analysis, while GLM model showed a trend (p = 0.09) for shorter sick leave by dominant side involvement. The sick leave was longer in all three work level categories compared with the MD Guidelines and longer in the light and medium work categories compared with the recommendations by FK.


According to the present study, acute traumatic rotator cuff tears cause a considerable loss of work days. However, almost all patients are expected to return to work after a median time of 5 months following arthroscopic repair. Current guidelines and recommendations regarding sick leave following repair of rotator cuff tears might have to be reviewed.


Acute rotator cuff tear Shoulder trauma Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair Time away from work Sick leave Return to work Disability duration 



Acute shoulder assessment project


Canadian classification and dictionary of occupations




General linear model


Medical disability



The authors thank the ASAP collaborators PT Anna Lönnberg, PT Madelaine Andersson for their help in monitoring the study and Dr. Torsten Boegård for radiological advice.

Author contributions

KEA assisted in the design of the study, reviewed the literature, collected data, and wrote the manuscript. PR collected data and assisted in data analyses. FA contributed to the statistical analysis and critically revised the manuscript. KL initiated and designed the study and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the paper in its final version.


The study was supported by grants from the Stig and Ragna Gorthons Research Foundation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Knut E Aagaard, Patrik Randeblad, Fikri Abu-Zidan and Karl Lunsjö declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants

This study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Lund, registration number 2011/119.

Informed consent

All patients signed a consent form giving permission to use their anonymous data for research.


  1. 1.
    Bevan S, McGee R, Quadrello T. Fit for Work? Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Irish Labour Market. The Work Foundation, London. 2009. Accessed Dec 2015.
  2. 2.
    United States Bone and Joint Initiative: The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States (BMUS), 2nd edn. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2008. Accessed 20 Nov 2015.
  3. 3.
    Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(1):116–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mather RC III, Koenig L, Acevedo D, et al. The societal and economic value of rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg. 2013;95:1993–2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Socialdepartementet. Regeringen tar krafttag för ökad hälsa och minskad sjukfrånvaro 2015. Accessed 21 Feb 2016
  6. 6.
    Savoie FH 3rd, Field LD, Jenkins RN. Costs analysis of successful rotator cuff repair surgery: an outcome study. Comparison of gatekeeper system in surgical patients. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(6):672–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhatia S, Piasecki DP, Nho SJ, et al. Early return to work in workers’ compensation patients after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(8):1027–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nové-Josserand L, Liotard JP, Godeneche A, et al. Occupational outcome after surgery in patients with a rotator cuff tear due to a work-related injury or occupational disease. A series of 262 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97(4):361–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shields E, Thirukumaran C, Noyes K, Voloshin I. A review of a workers’ compensation database 2003 to 2013: patient factors influencing return to work and cumulative financial claims after rotator cuff repair in geriatric workers’ compensation cases. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2017;8:208–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Misamore GW, Ziegler DW, Rushton JL. Repair of the rotator cuff. A comparison of results in two populations of patients. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77(9):1335–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Collin P, Abdullah A, Kherad O, Gain S, Denard PJ, Ladermann A. Prospective evaluation of clinical and radiologic factors predicting return to activity within 6 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(3):439–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mall NA, Lee AS, Chahal J, et al. An evidenced-based examination of the epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(2):366–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Aagaard KE, Hänninen J, Abu-Zidan FM, Lunsjö K. Physical therapists as first-line diagnosticians for traumatic acute rotator cuff tears: a prospective study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018;44(5):735–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Canadian classification and dictionary of occupations 1971. Ottawa: Information Canada; 1974.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Munro BH. Selected nonparametric techniques. In: Munro BH, editor. Statistical methods for health care research. 4th edn. New York: Lippincott; 2001. pp. 97–121.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miller JHP. Statistical Analysis with the general linear model. Accessed 18 Sep 2014
  18. 18.
    Bassett RW, Cofield RH. Acute tears of the rotator cuff. The timing of surgical repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;(175):18–24.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bjornsson HC, Norlin R, Johansson K, Adolfsson LE. The influence of age, delay of repair, and tendon involvement in acute rotator cuff tears: structural and clinical outcomes after repair of 42 shoulders. Acta Orthop. 2011;82(2):187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hantes ME, Karidakis GK, Vlychou M, Varitimidis S, Dailiana Z, Malizos KN. A comparison of early versus delayed repair of traumatic rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(10):1766–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Davis AD, Kakar S, Moros C, Kaye EK, Schepsis AA, Voloshin I. Arthroscopic versus open acromioplasty: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(3):613–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Medical Disability Advisor: Reed Group Ltd. Accessed 24 Nov 2015.
  23. 23.
    Charousset C, Grimberg J, Duranthon LD, Bellaiche L, Petrover D, Kalra K. The time for functional recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: correlation with tendon healing controlled by computed tomography arthrography. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(1):25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O’Holleran JD, Kocher MS, Horan MP, Briggs KK, Hawkins RJ. Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after rotator cuff surgery. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87(1):121–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Romeo AA, Hang DW, Bach BR Jr, Scott S. Repair of full thickness rotator cuff tears. Gender, age, and other factors affecting outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;(367):243–255.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fermont AJM, Wolterbeek N, Wessel RN, Baeyens J-P, De Bie RA. Prognostic factors for successful recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic literature review. J Ortho Sports Phys. 2014;44(3):153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oh JH, Kim SH, Ji HM, Jo KH, Bin SW, Gong HS. Prognostic factors affecting anatomic outcome of rotator cuff repair and correlation with functional outcome. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:30–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Razmjou H, Davis AM, Jaglal SB, Holtby R, Richards RR. Disability and satisfaction after rotator cuff decompression or repair: a sex and gender analysis. BMC Musculoskel Dis. 2011;12:66–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Inderhaug E, Kollevold KH, Kalsvik M, Hegna J, Solheim E. Preoperative NSAIDs, non-acute onset and long-standing symptoms predict inferior outcome at long-term follow-up after rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(7):2067–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kolk A, Wolterbeek N, Auw Yang KG, Zijl JA, Wessel RN. Predictors of disease-specific quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Int Orthop. 2016;40(2):323–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cho CH, Ye HU, Jung JW, Lee YK. Gender affects early postoperative outcomes of rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015;7(2):234–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Choi S, Kim MK, Kim GM, Roh Y-H, Hwang IK, Kang H. Factors associated with clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a suture bridge technique in medium, large, and massive tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23:1675–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gulotta LV, Nho SJ, Dodson CC, Adler RS, Altchek DW, MacGillivray JD. Prospective evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs at 5 years: part II–prognostic factors for clinical and radiographic outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20:941–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Razmjou H, Lincoln S, Boljanovic D, Gallay S, Henry P, Richards RR, Holtby R. The effect of expedited rotator cuff surgery in injured workers: a case-control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26:1196–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Riktlinjer för sjukskrivning vid sjukdomar i rörelseorganen - ett kunskapsunderlag. Wallin & Dalholm 2009. Accessed 22 Sep 2015.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Knut E. Aagaard
    • 1
    • 2
  • Patrik Randeblad
    • 1
  • Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
    • 3
    Email author
  • Karl Lunsjö
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OrthopedicsHelsingborg HospitalRegion SkåneSweden
  2. 2.Orthopedics, Department of Clinical Sciences LundLund UniversityLundSweden
  3. 3.Trauma Group, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health SciencesUAE UniversityAl-AinUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations