A biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques in osteoporotic reverse oblique intertrochanteric femur fracture with fragmented lateral cortex
- 19 Downloads
The treatment of the reverse oblique osteoporotic femur fractures is still problematic and can be complicated especially that are accompanied by a fragmented lateral cortex.
The aim of this study was to compare three different internal fixation methods in the osteosynthesis of osteoporotic reverse oblique intertrochanteric femur fracture models with a fragmented lateral cortex.
Biomechanical experiment study.
A total of 24 osteoporotic femur models were obtained and divided into three groups [Group A: Proximal femoral nail (PFN), Group B: 95° angled blade plate (ABP), and Group C: proximal femoral anatomic locking plate (PFLP)] with each group which include eight bones. A standard fracture configuration was created as a reverse oblique intertrochanteric fracture and fixed with these implants. After fixation, all femur constructs were tested with an Instron 5800R tester (Instron, Canton, MA) in the biomechanics laboratory with axial loading and bending forces to assess axial and rotational stiffness and failure load. Displacement over 10 mm and angulation greater than 10° in the fracture line were considered as failure.
In all tests, ABP had statistically poorer results in comparison to the PFN and PFLP group. PFLP fixation had better biomechanical fixation results in comparison to the PFN group, although the results were not statistically significant.
Orthopaedic surgeons should keep in mind that lateral cortex comminution brings further instability to these reverse oblique intertrochanteric osteoporotic fractures and high rates of failure may be encountered due to this instability. PFLP fixation may be an alternative fixation method biomechanically for these instable fractures.
KeywordsFragmented lateral cortex Locking plate Osteoporotic saw bone 95° angled blade plate Proximal femoral nail
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 8.Yao C, Zhang CQ, Jin DX, Chen YF. Early results of reverse less invasive stabilization system plating in treating elderly intertrochanteric fractures: a prospective study compared to proximal femoral nail. Chin Med J (Engl). 2011;124:2150–7.Google Scholar
- 18.Collinge CA, Hymes R, Archdeacon M, Streubel P, Obremskey W, Weber T, Watson JT, Lowenberg D, Members of the Proximal Femur Working Group of the Southeast Trauma Consortium. Unstable proximal femur fractures treated with proximal femoral locking plates: a retrospective, multicenter study of 111 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(9):489–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Zderic I, Oh JK, Stoffel K, Sommer C, Helfen T, Camino G, Richards G, Nork SE, Gueorguiev B. Biomechanical analysis of the proximal femoral locking compression plate: do quality of reduction and screw orientation influence construct stability? J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(2):67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Ma JX, Wang J, Xu WG, Yu JT, Yang Y, Ma XL. Biomechanical outcome of proximal femoral nail antirotation is superior to proximal femoral locking compression plate for reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures: a biomechanical study of intertrochanteric fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(4):426–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar