Development of the Utrecht Score for clavicle fractures: a short and complete clavicle score with patient-reported and objective measures
- 35 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to develop a clavicle-specific questionnaire with patient-reported and objective measures.
The present study used data of DASH and Constant scores from a previously performed randomized-controlled trial comparing plate and intramedullary pin fixation of clavicle fractures. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify the most relevant items and the underlying structure of the questionnaires. To optimize the applicability to patients with a clavicle fracture, the selected items were reformulated. If relevant themes were underexposed, an additional question was added.
Based on the scree plot of eigenvalues and the parallel analysis, a seven-factor model with good factorability was constructed. Using exploratory factor analysis, 13 patient-reported and 2 objective measurements were identified. The internal consistency of the selected questions was excellent. An additional question was added to cover complaints relating to direct pressure on the clavicle and implants.
The Utrecht Score for clavicle fractures is a compact yet complete tool that was developed to assess functional outcome specifically in patients with a clavicle fracture, consisting of patient-reported and objective measures. After external validation, the USC can be used for research purposes or clinical follow-up during rehabilitation in patients with a clavicle fracture.
KeywordsClavicle Questionnaire Patient-reported Functional outcome
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
M. Hulsmans, S. Ferree, R Houwert, M Dijkgraaf, E.J. Verleisdonk, and M. van Heijl declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 3.Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;160-4.Google Scholar
- 4.Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, Diguiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(3):MR000008. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.
- 6.Gerber C. Integrated scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. In: Masten FA, Hawkins RJ, editors. The Shoulder: A Balance of Mobility and Stability. Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1993.Google Scholar
- 7.van der Meijden OA, Houwert RM, Hulsmans M, Wijdicks FJ, Dijkgraaf MG, Meylaerts SA, et al. Operative treatment of dislocated midshaft clavicular fractures: plate or intramedullary nail fixation? A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015;97(8):613–9. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00449.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. Seventh ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2010.Google Scholar
- 10.Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Principal components and factor analysis. In: Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, editors. Using multivariate statistics. 7th edn. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc; 2013. pp. 612–5.Google Scholar
- 11.Henson RK, Roberts JK. Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educ Psychol Measur 2006;66(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485.
- 23.MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, Bellamy N, Roth JH. Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(2):330–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar