Danger signals in trauma

Open Access
Review Article
  • 201 Downloads

Abstract

This review summarizes a short list of currently discussed trauma-induced danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMP). Due to the bivalent character and often pleiotropic effects of a DAMP, it is difficult to describe its “friend or foe” role in post-traumatic inflammation and regeneration, both systemically as well locally in tissues. DAMP can be used as biomarkers to indicate or monitor disease or injury severity, but also may serve as clinically applicable parameters for better indication and timing of surgery. Due to the inflammatory processes at the local tissue level or the systemic level, the precise role of DAMP is not always clear to define. While in vitro and experimental studies allow for the detection of these biomarkers at the different levels of an organism—cellular, tissue, circulation—this is not always easily transferable to the human setting. Increased knowledge exploring the dual role of DAMP after trauma, and concentrating on their nuclear functions, transcriptional targets, release mechanisms, cellular sources, multiple functions, their interactions and potential therapeutic targeting is warranted.

Keywords

DAMP Trauma Injury Biomarker Inflammation 

Abbreviations

AM

Alveolar macrophage

APC

Activated protein C

ARDS

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

ATP

Adenosine triphosphate

AP-1

Activator protein-1

BAL

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

CARD

Caspase activation and recruitment domain

CARS

Compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome

CD

Cluster of differentiation

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CLP

Cecal ligation and puncture

CLR

C-type lectin receptor

CNS

Central nervous system

CSF

Cerebrospinal fluid

CXCL

Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand

CypA

Cyclophilin A

DAMP

Damage-associated molecular pattern

DC

Dendritic cells

DNA

Deoxyribonucleic acid

EGF

Epidermal growth factor

GMP–AMP

Guanosine monophosphate–adenosine monophosphate

HIF

Hypoxia-induced factor

HMGB

High-mobility group box

HSP

Heat-shock protein

ICAM

Intercellular adhesion molecule

IL

Interleukin

ILC

Innate lymphoid cell

IL-1R

Interleukin-1 receptor

LAM

Liporabinomannan

LPS

Lipopolysaccharide

LRR

Leucin-rich repeats

LTA

Lipoteichoic acid

MAPK

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

MBL

Mannose-binding lectin

MCP

Monocyte chemotactic protein

MDC

Macrophage-derived chemokine

MIF

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor

Mincle

Macrophage-inducible C-type lectin

MIP

Macrophage-inflammatory protein

MMP

Matrix metalloproteinase

MODS

Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

MPO

Myeloperoxidase

mtDNA

Mitochondrial DNA

MyD88

Myeloid differentiation primary response 88

NF-HEV

Nuclear factor from high endothelial venules

NF-κB

Nuclear factor ‘kappa-light-chain-enhancer’ of activated B cells

NLR

NOD-like receptor

NLRP

Pyrin domaine-containing nucleotide oligomerization receptor (NLR)

NOD

Nucleotide oligomerization domain

PAMP

Pathogen-associated molecular pattern

PKR

Protein kinase R

PRR

Pattern recognition receptor

RAGE

Receptor for advanced glycation end products of proteins

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

RNA

Ribonucleic acid

SAP130

Spliceosome-associated protein 130

SCI

Spinal cord injury

sFasL

Soluble Fas ligand

SIRS

Systematic inflammatory response syndrome

STAT-3

Signal transducers and activators of transcription 3

TBI

Traumatic brain injury

Th

T-helper cell

TLR

Toll-like receptor

TNF

Tumor necrosis factor

VCAM

Vascular cell adhesion molecule

VWF

Von Willebrand factor

WT

Wild type

Introduction

Traumatic injury, a major contributor to worldwide mortality, is one of the world’s most relevant but neglected health concerns [1, 2]. Next to the severe injury itself, which often results in immediate or early death at the scene or within only of a few hours, in the later post-injury phase, a large number of trauma patients die due to inflammation-related post-injury complications, which affect the immune system homeostasis, ending up in e.g., sepsis, septic shock, or multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. For several decades, research on post-traumatic complications has assumed a biphasic post-traumatic inflammation model. This model describes an initial proinflammatory systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), which was assumed to be mainly driven by the innate immune system, and a “counterbalancing” compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS) [3, 5]. However, the theory of a simultaneous SIRS–CARS paradigm has been widened for further ongoing injury-caused inflammatory processes, as, for example, the organism’s effort to strike the delicate balance between a sufficient defense against putative pathogens entering through eventual wounds on the one hand, and reducing collateral damage by immune cells on the other hand [7, 8, 9]. Furthermore, next to alterations of the innate immune system, the post-traumatic immunosuppression has been closely linked to modulations of the adaptive immune system, e.g., a shift from a T-helper cell type (Th)1- to a Th2-mediated immune response [8, 9, 10, 11]. Additionally, notably in the last two decades the biological host response to trauma, which initially has been characterized by massive cytokine release as well as the activation and recruitment of effector cells including antigen presenting cells, has further employed a large number of both microbial and host alarmins [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. Taken together, on a biochemical level, the post-traumatic immune response is not only activated by foreign non-self material, but includes endogenous factors as well, so-called danger-associated molecular pattern (DAMP), which are released from necrotic or physiologically “stressed” cells, and thus can initiate as well as recruit effector cells of the immune system [18, 19, 20]. A large number of those endogenous nuclear or cytosolic triggers have been described to initiate and perpetuate the systemic post-traumatic and/or noninfectious inflammatory response; however, the knowledge on their precise role still remains unknown [21, 22, 23]. In contrast, so-called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) are compromised of the infectious and pathogen-induced highly conserved structures, such as CpG motifs [24, 25]. The major DAMP, which are involved in endogenous signals originating from stressed, injured, or necrotic cells in the setting of trauma will be examined in this review.

Recognition, signaling and cellular response

The immune system, which has evolved over millions of years, can not only discriminate between self and non-self, but between safe and dangerous as well, as presented by Polly Matzinger in the “Danger Model”, expanding the work of Janeway and others [18, 19, 24, 26, 27]. Thus, this complex response to stress employs numerous equivalent or comparable components of PAMP or DAMP, which can be found in most vertebrates, invertebrates and even plants [24, 27].

As very potent triggers of inflammation, PAMP and/or DAMP are sensitized and recognized via pattern recognition receptors (PRR) [28, 29]. Several classes of PRR have been identified so far, including the most prominent group of toll-like receptors (TLR), nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLR), members of the C-type lectin receptors (CLR) like mannose binding lectine (MBL) or receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) among others [28, 30, 31, 32].

In mammalian thirteen and in human ten different TLR types have been identified so far [33, 34, 35]. Apart from their similar structures, they are either localized on the cell membrane (TLR1, 2, 4, 5 and 6), or on intracellular compartments, i.e., endosome membrane (TLR3, 7, 8 and 9) [28, 31]. Membrane-bound TLR recognize microbial components and environmental danger signals, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Gram-negative, lipoteichoic acid (LTA) or peptidoglycan of Gram-positive bacteria, or even liporabinomannan (LAM) of mycoplasma and, e.g., endogenous high-mobility group box (HMGB) proteins or HEME, which are released from distressed cells, respectively [28, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40]. Intracellular TLR recognize predominantly nucleic acids derived from bacteria and viruses, such as single or double-stranded RNA from viruses, unmethylated CpG motifs, or purine analogues as well as other components of cellular stress [28].

Upon their activation, PRR transduce signals intracellularly, e.g., via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways to nuclei, where diverse transcription factors, among others the nuclear factor ‘kappa-light-chain-enhancer’ of activated B cells (NF-κB) become activated, subsequently inducing a cellular response [41, 42]. Here, one prominent example constitutes the MyD88 pathway [43]. TLR3 is the only TLR not using the MyD88-dependent pathway for signal transduction [44]. The cellular response upon, e.g., NF-κB activation includes the expression of, e.g., cytokines or adhesion molecules to accelerate inflammation and diapedesis of the immune effector cells [42]. In a feedback loop, those inflammatory mediators themselves can induce, e.g., DAMP to potentiate inflammation [45].

NLR are sensitizing signals of cellular stress, such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-induced activation of P2X7 channels and the efflux of potassium ions, host cell-free nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), reactive oxygen species (ROS) as well as bacterial peptidoglycans, crystalline material, peptide aggregates, bacterial toxins and many others [46, 47, 48]. They are part of the multiprotein complexes, which mediate the cleavage of biologically inactive precursors of, e.g., IL-1β or IL-18 into their respective bioactive forms by the activated caspases 1 or 5, and which furthermore induce a specific form of cell death called pyroptosis [47, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53]. Most described inflammasomes contain a NLR sensor molecule, such as NOD-, leucin-rich repeats (LRR)-, and pyrin domain-containing (NLRP), e.g., 1 or NLRP3 [47, 52, 54, 55]. However, the direct link for the NLR-mediated inflammasome activation via binding of either PAMP or DAMP is still under discussion [48, 53]. It is strongly discussed that the secretion of inflammasome-activated cytokines must be “prepared” by a priming stimulus, which is usually supposed to be mediated by a TLR, which in turn activates the NF-κB pathway, and the transcription of IL-precursors as well as inflammasome components [56, 57]. In parallel, inflammasome induction by a DAMP as, e.g., potassium influx or binding of ATP to P2X7 is assumed to set off the NLR [53, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61]. Furthermore, an activation via ROS has been discussed. The dsRNA-dependent protein kinase R (PKR) has been identified as a further player of the inflammasome pathway [61, 62, 63]. Additionally, NLR with a N-terminal caspase activation and recruitment domain (CARD), which can bind RIP2, a protein kinase that can activate NF-κB and MAPK pathways inducing a response, are involved in signaling [41].

Apart from the cleavage, and subsequent activation of certain cytokines, the inflammasome complex is capable of inducing cell lysis. In addition to necrosis and apoptosis, in 2001, the new concept of pyroptosis has been introduced [64]. Pyroptosis is characterized by a well-orchestrated lysis of the cell, which is initiated by the inflammasome activation and consecutive formation of caspase-1-dependent pores of 1–2 nm width [64]. In consequence, cells are prone to swelling and lysis, but also to the release of intracellular molecules, which act as DAMP, e.g., HMGB1 or ATP. Thus, pyroptosis represents an important mode of cell death in DAMP-mediated enhancing and spreading of the immune response, which not only mainly affects the cells of the myeloid lineage but also occurs in epithelial, endothelial cells and neurons.

C-type lectin receptors (CLR) bind mainly to PAMP, such as bacterial, fungal and viral carbohydrates in a calcium-dependent manner [65]. There are two groups of transmembrane CLR, like dectin-1 or dectin-2 subgroups, and a group of soluble CLR including MBL, which comprise this large family of receptors that are expressed on most cell types including macrophages and dendritic cells (DC) [65, 66]. The signaling pathways can either directly activate NF-κB, or affect signaling by TLR, triggering cellular phagocytosis, DC maturation, chemotaxis, respiratory burst, and cytokine production [66]. In 2008, Yamasaki et al. found that macrophage-inducible C-type lectin (Mincle) senses nonhomeostatic cell death, and induces thereby the production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines to potentiate the neutrophilic infiltration of damaged tissue [67]. Hereby, a CLR activation due to a DAMP was introduced for the first time. The authors found that Mincle-expressing cells, mainly macrophages, were activated in the presence of necrotic dead of cells due to a component of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein, spliceosome-associated protein 130 (SAP130) [67]. Recently, the endogenous Mincle ligand SAP130 was confirmed as a danger signal, which can be released by damaged cells, thereby activating inflammatory responses including inflammasome activation [68].

The cell surface receptor for advanced glycation end products of proteins (RAGE), first described in 1992, belongs to the immunoglobulin superfamily. RAGE is a multiligand receptor that binds structurally diverse array of molecules, including DAMP-like HMGB1, but also S100 family members and amyloid-β proteins [69, 70, 71]. RAGE is mainly expressed in the lung, which is intriguing its contribution to the response to environmental challenge/stress [72]. Its activation plays a role in various diseases, including sepsis and cardiovascular disease among others [73, 74, 75]. In general, RAGE is predominantly involved in the recognition of endogenous molecules released in the context of infection, chronic inflammation or physiological stress [32]. It shares numerous TLR ligands and, therefore, RAGE–ligand interactions induce numerous cellular signaling pathways, which among others lead to the activation of different transcription factors such as NF-κB, activator protein (AP)-1, or signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT-)3 [32, 76, 77, 78]. The end products include proinflammatory mediators, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α, generation of nitric oxide, several adhesion molecules and RAGE itself [77, 79, 80, 81, 82], which is in consequence upregulated at sites of ligand interaction, thereby causing a continuous inflammatory response [77].

Danger signals in trauma

High-mobility group box protein

HMGB1 is one of best studied DAMP. HMGB1 is a chromatin peptide that acts as a DNA chaperon, but it is involved in binding of proteins and in DNA transcription, replication, and repair as well [83, 84]. Almost all cells constitutively express HMGB1. In physiologic conditions, HMGB1 is located in the nucleus, but it is either passively released after necrotic cell death, or actively secreted by living cells under stress in response to angiogenic and inflammatory signals [85, 86, 87]. The mechanisms of HMGB1 secretion are elusive, but it has been shown that the processing via inflammasome is involved [62]. HMGB1 can signal via RAGE, TLR2 and TLR4 as well, thereby inducing an activation of NF-κB.

Plasma levels of HMGB1 were increased within 30 min after severe trauma in humans [88]. Furthermore, HMGB1 levels correlated with the injury severity, tissue hypoperfusion, early posttraumatic coagulopathy, hyperfibrinolysis, and with complement activation as well as with the systemic inflammatory response [88]. Early increase of systemic HMGB1 after trauma indicated patients who developed organ injury, such as acute lung injury or acute renal failure in the later post-traumatic course [88]. Not only that HMGB1 was indicating organ complications, increased levels of HMGB1 were found in non-survivors from trauma as compared to survivors [88]. Levy et al. have demonstrated in their in vivo experiments that TLR4 wild-type (WT) mice had lower systemic interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 levels after treatment with neutralizing antibodies to HMGB1 and bilateral femur fracture compared with mice treated with nonimmune control antibody [89]. Anti-HMGB1 antibody treatment decreased serum alanine aminotransferase levels, and hepatic as well as gut mucosal NF-κB DNA binding [89]. Additionally, transient elevations in systemic HMGB1 levels were observed within 1 h post-trauma [89]. The authors have demonstrated that HMGB1, more precisely the TLR4-HMGB1 pathway, constitutes an early mediator of systemic inflammation and end-organ injury after peripheral tissue injury after trauma. Recently, it has been demonstrated in vivo that HMGB1 levels significantly increased in muscle 12 h after crush injury [90]. Furthermore, anti-HMGB1 antibody reduced the cellular apoptosis in the renal cortex, which has been associated with enhanced muscle HMGB1 levels, thus indicating a positive feedback cycle [90]. In a systematic review on the role of HMGB1 danger signaling in traumatic brain injury (TBI), HMGB1 was found to be released from damaged neurons, and furthermore elevated in patient’s serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [91]. Above that, the elaborated studies have shown that HMGB1 may serve as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in patients with TBI [91]. Next to the setting of trauma, it has been demonstrated before that HMGB1 plays an important role in the initiation and propagation of inflammation and organ injury under conditions of sterile inflammation which involve ischemic processes [92, 93, 94]. In patients without preexistent lung injury, mechanical ventilation was associated with increased HMGB1 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) [95]. Furthermore, HMGB1 levels during ventilator-associated pneumonia were increased compared to healthy volunteers, but they were not different as compared to mechanical ventilation alone [95]. Intratracheally or intranasally administered HMGB1 caused acute lung injury in mice, which has been reflected by enhanced acute inflammatory injury to the lungs, neutrophil accumulation, development of lung edema, and increased pulmonary production of IL-1β, TNFα, and macrophage-inflammatory protein (MIP)-2 [96, 97]. In summary, extracellular HMGB1 coordinates numerous cellular functions, including migration, chemotaxis, activation, maturation and proliferation but also the redox status of its target cells [98, 99, 100, 101]. However, the binding of HMGB1 to its receptors can be potentiated by binding to a whole variety of other factors, including PAMP and cytokines [101]. Table 1 provides a brief summary of only few DAMP including HMGB1 with chosen references.

Table 1

Brief summary of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMP) with selected references

DAMP

Experimental data

Clinical data

HMGB1

62

86, 88, 91, 95

IL-1α

108, 109, 110, 112, 113, 114, 115, 119, 120, 121

105, 116, 117, 118

IL-1β

120

104, 116, 117, 118

IL-33

124, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 139, 142, 143, 144

125, 136, 137, 138, 140, 141

S100B

151, 152, 153, 154, 161

150, 155, 156, 160, 162, 163, 164, 166, 168, 169

Histones

176, 178, 180, 181, 182, 183

184

HSP

188, 189, 190, 197, 198, 199

194, 195, 196, 200, 201, 202, 203, 205

HSP27

 

200, 201

HSP60

 

194, 201, 202

HSP70

188, 189, 198, 199

195, 201, 203

HSP72

190

205

mtDNA

 

210

ATP

214, 215

 

ATP adenosine triphosphate, HMGB1 high-mobility group box, HSP heat-shock protein, IL interleukin, mtDNA mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid

Interleukin-1

Cytokines are small messenger molecules, which are also produced, activated and released upon trauma [102]. Members of the IL-1 family IL-1α and IL-1β were the first cytokines to be discovered in 1974 by Charles A. Dinarello [103]. Even though IL-1α and IL-1β are encoded by different genes, they can be bound by the same IL-1 receptor (IL-1R) [103]. Nonetheless, IL-1α has a higher affinity for IL1-R1, and IL-1β for the soluble IL-1R2 [58]. Interleukin-1 can initiate many important immunological responses such as fever, prostaglandin synthesis, mobilization of neutrophils into tissues, activation of B- and T-cell lymphocytes, fibroblast proliferation as well as the production of antibodies, collagen and cytokines [58, 104]. In contrast to IL-1β, IL-1α is constitutively expressed mainly in resting nonhematopoietic cells, which line the gastrointestinal tract, liver, kidney and skin, but it can also be expressed in most cells and, furthermore, can be biologically active in its full-length form without its previous processing through inflammasomes, as it is mandatory for IL-1β activity [104, 105, 106]. Members of the IL-1 family also induce similar signaling cascades in their target cells via MAPK or NF-κB pathways [107]. IL-1α constitutes a dual function protein, on the one hand with being a proinflammatory activator of transcription as chromatin-associated protein, and cytokine on the other hand [108, 109, 110]. The latter is exerting its function as membrane-bound form or after being released from apoptotic or necrotic cells, thereby alerting the immune system to tissue damage [111]. The release of IL-1α into the extracellular space in stimulated cells occurs after processing of the membrane-bound IL-1α by the membrane-bound protease calpain, which is a calcium-dependent cysteine protease [112, 113, 114, 115].

There are only few studies on IL-1α in terms of trauma. Notably clinical studies with trauma patients are sparse, because most studies focussed on the role of the more prominent IL-1β. Jackman et al. tracked the plasma levels of 41 immunomodulatory proteins in 56 trauma patients beginning after trauma with a 1-year follow-up [116]. Thirty-one proteins had significant changes over time [116]. The authors have observed a mixed early response with elevated levels of IL-6, IL-10, IL-1Ra, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), myeloperoxidase (MPO), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), MMP-9, and sFasL, but also simultaneously decreased levels of fractalkine, epidermal growth factor (EGF), IL-7, IL-9, IL-17, tumor necrosis factor-beta (TNFβ), MIP-1α, and macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC) and notably IL-1α [116]. In vivo data from inflammation analyses in lung tissue following blunt chest trauma by DNA microarrays have confirmed the activation of a highly complex transcriptional program in response to trauma [117]. However, regarding IL-1α, the authors represent elevated expression levels, which are concomitant with increased levels of other inflammatory and coagulatory proteins, including TNFα receptor, IL-1β, C3, NF-κB and plasminogen activator [117]. Interestingly, increased levels of IL-1 have been described to be involved in the pathogenesis of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and subsequent idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, sarcoidosis, as well as in certain inflammatory diseases [115, 118]. In vitro, alveolar macrophages (AM) from patients with ARDS released significantly more total IL-1 and IL-1β than controls [118]. Similar results were observed after stimulation of these cells with LPS, which indicate that AM from patients with ARDS are capable of releasing significantly more IL-1, which on the other hand may be related to the progression of acute lung injury [118]. Due to its expression pattern, IL-1α seems to play an important role in inflammation caused by necrosis or tissue damage after ischemia or hypoxia due to poor oxygen supply [115]. Under hypoxic conditions in epithelial cells, IL-1α transcription was upregulated in a process which was mediated and promoted by hypoxia-induced factor (HIF) factors [119]. During brain ischemia in a mouse model, activated platelets of the brain vasculature expressed and released IL-1α but not IL-1β, and thereby stimulated endothelial cells to secrete the chemokine CXCL1 and express cell adhesion proteins VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, thus enabling the transendothelial migration of neutrophils [120]. The authors have suggested that the activation of brain endothelium via IL-1α deriving from platelets may hide the critical step for the entry of white blood cells, which are major contributors to inflammation-mediated brain injury [120]. Similar findings regarding the role of IL-1α were reported in terms of necrotic myocytes in ischemic heart following myocardial infarction [121]. Here, IL-1α-stimulated proinflammatory cytokine expression in necrotic myocytes has been reported (IL-1β, TNFα, and IL-6) [121]. In summary, little is known about the role of IL-1α in the regulation of the post-injury inflammatory response. However, in certain settings, IL-1α constitutes the initiator of proinflammatory mechanisms that often drives chronic inflammatory diseases as well as cancer [115]. Uncovering the specific role of IL-1α in trauma and trauma-related pathologies may be promising with regard to therapies due to the availability of clinically used drugs such as anakinra, which may allow specific targeting of IL-1α in pathological conditions. Figure 1 presents some selected trauma-induced DAMP with their tissue origin.

Fig. 1

Brief concept of selected danger-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) and pattern recognition receptor (PRR) localization and their release/activation upon trauma. Trauma with tissue injury leads correspondingly to tissue- or cell-specific death, and subsequent DAMP release. CLR C-type lectin receptors, CNS central nervous system, CypA cyclophilin A, HMGB1 high-mobility group box, HSP heat-shock protein, IL interleukin, Mincle macrophage-inducible C-type lectin, P2X7 P2X purinoceptor 7, RAGE receptor for advanced glycation end products, SAP130 spliceosome-associated protein 130, ST2 orphan receptor ST2

Interleukin-33

Interleukin-33 as the youngest member of the IL-1 family is mainly expressed in the cells lining the surfaces, which are in contact with the environment including stromal cells, such as endothelial cells, fibroblasts and epithelial cells [115, 122]. It was first described as nuclear factor from high endothelial venules (NF-HEV) [123]. As a dual-function protein, IL-33 is similar to IL-1α, and can be released upon the loss of cell integrity [124, 125]. IL-33 binds to the orphan receptor ST2 of the TLR/IL1R superfamily of receptors (also known as IL-1RL1), thereby initiating the potential signaling pathway via canonical NF-κB and MyD88 [126, 127]. Also comparable to IL-1α, IL-33 neither requires processing to maintain its activity [128]. Yet, IL-33 can be cleaved to a mature and more proinflammatory form [129]. Murine IL-33 has been cleaved by neutrophil cathepsin G and elastase, and both full-length as well as cleaved endogenous IL-33 proteins could be detected in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in an in vivo model of acute lung injury [129]. Thus, the relevance of IL-33 processing in a pathological environment is still not clear, but it is evident that an inflammatory microenvironment can exacerbate disease-associated functions of IL-33 via generating more active mature form [129]. Interestingly, unlike HMGB1 and IL-1α, nuclear IL-33 represses gene expression, and nuclear localization of IL-33 alters the subcellular localization of IL-33, thereby regulating the extracellular functions of IL-33 and affecting immune homeostasis [130, 131]. Furthermore, comparable to other alarmins and some members of the IL-1 family, post-translational modification of IL-33 via its oxidation (cysteine oxidation changes) can regulate its activity, and thereby restrict its inflammatory function to the local environment [115, 132]. Next to its influence on neutrophilic infiltration into tissues, biological functions of IL-33 include the modulation of the type 2 immune response, mainly Th2 cells, mast cells, eosinophils, basophils and group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC-2) [128, 133, 134].

With regard to trauma, there are only sparse studies, which allow to draw conclusion on the relevance of IL-33 in the regulation of the post-injury inflammatory response. Depending on the context of certain infections, IL-33 was either protective or even deleterious because it can either play a beneficial role in the resolution of inflammatory processes, or it can contribute to aggravating inflammation, respectively [115, 125, 135]. Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory condition due to bacterial infection with limited therapeutic but also diagnostic options, which frequently occurs after trauma, and hides a high risk for mortality [4, 136, 137, 138]. Interleukin-33 reduces mortality in septic mice after cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) due to increased neutrophil influx into the peritoneal cavity and enhanced bacterial clearance as compared with untreated mice [139]. Interestingly, IL-33 reduced systemic but not local proinflammatory responses by reducing the concentration of blood and lung cytokines, and thereby limiting the systemic inflammation induced by sepsis [139]. It has been shown that IL-33 prevented the downregulation of CXCR2, which is crucial for the recruitment of neutrophils from the circulation to the site of infection, thereby inhibiting their chemotaxis [139]. In summary, the authors suggested a beneficial and therapeutic potential of IL-33 in sepsis [139]. On the other hand, in certain terms of chronic inflammation, IL-33 was deleterious during the development of, e.g., asthma, or in the context of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and arthritic joint inflammation [140, 141, 142]. Thus, we can only hypothesize about the role of IL-33 in trauma. Gadani et al. have shown that IL-33 was highly expressed in white matter in the CNS, where it colocalized with oligodendrocyte markers as well as with astrocyte markers in gray matter [143]. The authors have demonstrated that IL-33 was released immediately after CNS injury from damaged oligodendrocytes, acting on local astrocytes and microglia to induce chemokines critical for monocyte recruitment [143]. Furthermore, mice lacking IL-33 had impaired recovery after CNS injury, which is associated with reduced myeloid cell infiltrates and decreased induction of M2 genes at the injury site [143]. Other in vivo experiments have shown that after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) administration of recombinant IL-33 turned beneficial [144]. The secondary damage was strongly alleviated by IL-33 by significantly decreasing tissue loss, demyelination and astrogliosis in the contused mouse spinal cord, finally resulting in dramatically improved functional recovery [144]. Similar to the above-discussed systemic and local differences in its mode of action, the authors found that IL-33 exerted effects on both, central and peripheral post-traumatic mechanisms. In spinal cord, IL-33 reduced the expression of proinflammatory TNFα, promoted the activation of anti-inflammatory arginase-1-positive M2 microglia/macrophages, and showed a tendency towards reduced T-cell infiltration [144]. In periphery, IL-33 resulted in a shift towards Th2 type cytokine profile, reduced cytotoxic TNFα-expressing CD4 cells, and increased the expression of FoxP3 T-regulatory cell marker in the spleen [144]. Taken together, these findings indicate at IL-33 to drive chemokines that recruit monocytes and polarize macrophages toward an M2 phenotype, thereby potentially protecting neurons from further damage and promoting recovery after CNS injury [145].

S100

The family of calcium-binding homodimeric S100 proteins, or calgranulins, consists of 25 members with a large variety of intracellular and/or extracellular functions [115]. First members were isolated from bovine brains more than 50 years ago [146]. They are mainly expressed in cells of myeloid origin, predominantly in neutrophils and induced in several cell types which mediate inflammatory responses and recruit inflammatory cells to sites of tissue damage [147]. These small molecules are localized intracellularly in the cytoplasm, and here they interact with various effector molecules to regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, energy metabolism, scavenging of ROS and nitric oxide, Ca2+ homeostasis, inflammation, apoptosis, transcriptional regulation as well as DNA repair and others [115, 148]. Certain members of the S100, such as S100A8, S100A9, and S100A12 family have been found extracellularly at high concentrations in inflamed tissue, where they exert their proinflammatory effects via binding to RAGE, TLR4 or upon interaction with other receptors [147, 149]. Importantly, not only proinflammatory functions have been described for S100 proteins, as in case of S100A8 and S100A9, some anti-inflammatory properties have been reported as well [150, 151]. The signaling pathways include the activation of kinases such as p38 MAPK, ERK1/2 and again transcription factors like NF-κB [32, 152, 153]. S100 proteins are released either passively or actively upon cell activation into the extracellular space, and act as alarmins via their interaction with different receptors to orchestrate innate and adaptive immune responses [115, 154]. Levels of S100 proteins, which have been detected in serum, urine, sputum, CSF and feces are associated with disease progression, and even more, they can be applied as biomarkers for certain pathologies, including cancer, atherosclerosis and stroke [155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160]. Several studies have reported an increase in S100A8/A9 levels in sepsis [161, 162, 163].

In the setting of trauma, S100 proteins are either released passively following cell death and tissue damage or actively to act as DAMP. Several studies have demonstrated that the level of S100B increases in CSF and plasma after injury, and even more that the increasing levels of S100B were negatively correlated to outcome from human TBI [164, 165, 166]. Nonetheless, it has been demonstrated that S100B can counteract and reduce some negative cellular consequences of injury as well [154, 165, 167]. More recent studies imply the negative role of S100B in TBI, and represent that S100B in CSF, as an astrocytic protein specific to the central nervous system is a useful marker in outcome prediction after TBI, with increased levels indicating mortality [168, 169]. Currently, S100B protein can be considered as a marker for blood–brain barrier damage, which plays an important role in the development and recovery of normal CNS after injury [170]. In terms of other S100 proteins and nervous injury, following peripheral nerve injury, an immediate acute immune response occured distally and proximally to the lesion site, and was associated with the rapid transcriptional activation of the S100a8 and S100a9 genes resulting in S100A8/A9 hetero- and homodimers [171]. These stimulated the release of chemokines and cytokines by activated Schwann cells on the other hand, and induced thereby the initial chemotactic gradient, which is responsible for the transmigration of hematogenous immune cells toward the trauma site into the injured nerve [171].

Though large number of studies deals with neurological trauma, there is some evidence that S100B is also elevated in patients with major extracranial trauma [172, 173, 174]. Anderson et al. [173] reported that S100B concentrations on admission correlate positively with greater injury severity and decreased survival in major trauma patients, independently of the presence of a head injury [174]. However, it cannot be ruled out that increased S100B after soft tissue trauma might be due to peripheral nerve injury. This study has been so far confirmed by only one further study. Here, the authors reported that circulating levels of S100B in severely injured trauma patients were increased compared to healthy volunteers [172]. Additionally, a comparison with mildly injured trauma patients has shown that S100B concentrations were associated with injury severity [172]. S100B levels correlated with systemic levels of sE-selectin, and Von Willebrand factor (vWF), which are indicating endothelial cell injury [172, 175]. Additional mechanistical analyses represented that transfection of human endothelial cells with pcDNA3.1-S100B resulted in increased apoptosis and enhanced levels of proinflammatory IL-6 and IL-8 [172]. This study has shown that S100B levels not only indicate trauma severity but also correlate with endothelial damage indicating important pathomechanical influence of S100B in the recovery from trauma as well.

Histones

Histones are nucleoproteins that enable DNA compaction into nucleosomes. As they localize in the nucleus, their release depends on cellular necrosis and nuclear destruction. Their extracellular activity has a long history, while more than 50 years ago the first observations uncovered the antibacterial activity of these molecules [176]. It has been demonstrated that an arginine-rich fraction of calf thymus histones can kill microorganisms from diverse bacteria species including Escherichia, Salmonella and Micrococcus [176, 177]. More recently, extracellular histones, as major nuclear proteins, have been recognized as DAMP, which are involved in the pathogenesis of several diseases [178, 179]. Since the findings of Xu et al. that have demonstrated that extracellular histones released in response to inflammatory challenge contribute to endothelial dysfunction, organ failure and death during sepsis, the mechanisms of histone-mediated injury in certain organs have been extensively studied [180]. Furthermore, pharmacological targeting by antibodies to histones or by activated protein C (APC) reduced the mortality of mice in LPS, TNF or CLP models of sepsis [180]. Pathomechanically, histone administration resulted in neutrophil margination, vacuolated endothelium, intra-alveolar hemorrhage and macro and microvascular thrombosis in vivo [180].

Thus, the authors proposed extracellular histones as potential molecular targets for therapeutics for sepsis and other inflammatory diseases. Recent findings have shown that histones mainly bind and activate TLR, e.g., TLR2, TLR4 or TLR9 on various cells, similar to other DAMP, subsequently triggering inflammatory response [178, 181, 182]. Therefore, the role of circulating histones for multiple organ failure, which frequently occurs in traumatized patients, has been elaborated. C57BL/6 mice were subjected to various doses of histones and chronological evaluation of the morphological and functional changes in various organs including lungs, liver, and kidneys were performed [183]. Histone administration led to death after a dose-dependent aggravation of multiple organ injury [183]. Pulmonary and hepatic damage were evident already within 15 min, while renal injuries occurred later phase [183]. The causative effects for organ injuries were histone-driven endothelial damage, as well as the release of another DAMP, the HMGB1 [183]. The authors concluded that extracellular histones induce multiple organ injury in two progressive stages, on the one hand via direct injury to endothelial cells, and the subsequent release of other DAMP on the other hand [183]. Finally, they proposed that a therapeutic blockade of histone and HMGB1 may present a new strategy for treating histone-induced multiple organ injury.

In trauma patients it has been shown that serum histone levels were significantly increased after severe non-thoracic blunt trauma [184]. Furthermore, enhanced histone levels positively correlated with severe complications such as the incidence of acute lung injury, and dismal prognosis, as well as with markers of endothelial damage and coagulation activation [184]. Complementary in vitro studies have shown that histones directly damaged endothelial cells, stimulated cytokine release (e.g., TNFα, IL-6, and IL-10), and induced neutrophil extracellular trap formation as well as myeloperoxidase release [184]. In vivo data confirmed the significant increase of both, cytokines and markers for endothelial damage and coagulation activation immediately after trauma or histone infusion [184]. Pathological examinations showed that lungs were the predominantly affected organ with edema, hemorrhage, microvascular thrombosis and neutrophil congestion [184]. An anti-histone antibody reduced these changes and protected mice from histone-induced lethality [184]. In summary, these findings suggest that histone release plays an important pathological role in trauma-associated injuries [184].

Heat-shock proteins

Heat-shock proteins (HSP) constitute a group of proteins that primarily act as molecular chaperones in the cytosol. They were discovered because of their specific elevated expression during the heat-shock response, which stands for their essential role in protecting cells from stress, and preparing them to survive under environmental challenges [185]. However, HSP are induced by a variety of cellular stress factors, including hypo- and hyperthermia, UV radiation, pathogens, and other forms of stress [148, 185, 186]. Its family members are named according to their molecular mass [187]. It has been under discussion, if HSP in general constitute DAMP, or if HSP70 is rather an exception. This is not as easy to evaluate as it appears, because very often contamination with molecules such as LPS or DNA can generate false-positive responses. After release, HSP70 can stimulate monocytes/macrophages, microglia and dendritic cells via the TLR2 and 4 and CD14 pathways, subsequently leading to the activation of intracellular signaling pathways [187]. Next to TLR, HSP70 binds to CD36, CD40, CD91, siglec-5 and siglec-14, lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor 1, and scavenger receptor class A to induce pro- or anti-inflammatory responses on a range of cells, mainly those of the innate immune system with exception of T lymphocytes [188, 189, 190]. In studies of cerebral ischemia, neurodegenerative diseases, and epilepsy, it has been shown that HSP70 reduces protein aggregates, intracellular inclusions, and apoptosis leading to neurological improvement [187, 191, 192, 193]. Regarding infectious septic complications, expression levels of HSP27, HSP60, HSP70 and HSP90 were increased in patients [194, 195, 196]. With this regard, in vivo studies have demonstrated conflictive results. Significant improvement in mortality, lung function (attenuated capillary leak), and local and systemic inflammation (prevention of the increase of MCP-1 and TNFα) in a mouse model of severe sepsis-induced ALI after therapeutical HSP90 inhibition were observed [197]. On the other hand, in CLP-induced sepsis model in HSP70.1/3 knockout mice NF-κB binding/activation, TNFα and IL-6 in lung tissue as well as mortality were increased after sepsis [198]. These data reveal that HSP70 alone confers protection from ARDS via acting at least partly through the NF-κB pathway, and thereby reducing the proinflammatory cytokine response [198]. Similar findings were reported by others; however, in their study the authors found that HSP70 may play a protective role in an age-dependent response to sepsis by preventing excessive gut apoptosis and both pulmonary and systemic inflammation [199].

Severe trauma causes enhanced expression of HSP in polymorphonuclear leukocytes during the acute post-injury phase [200]. In comparison with healthy volunteers increased expressions of HSP27, HSP70, and HSP90 in polymorphonuclear leukocytes from trauma patients were found, indicating that this enhanced expression of HSP may regulate PMNL functions [200]. Similar findings were reported for burn trauma patients, where increased expressions of HSP27, HSP60, and HSP70 in polymorphonuclear leukocytes were significantly higher than those in polymorphonuclear leukocytes from healthy volunteers [201]. Concomitant with these changes was an increase in oxidative activity in polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and markedly inhibited cell apoptosis after thermal injury [201]. Serum levels of HSP60 detected within 30 min after trauma correlated with the development of ALI after trauma [202]. In vitro, HSP60 caused the release of NO by macrophages [202]. The authors suggest that the extracellular release of the immature HSP60 may be associated with traumatic cell necrosis, and could be involved in the release of NO by immune-competent cells, subsequently inducing an activation of the local inflammatory response [202]. Increased levels of systemic HSP70 at 1–6 h after injury were found in trauma patients, and the magnitude of the increase was related to injury severity and prediction of secondary infection [203]. If HSP70 levels decreased in the period from 60 to 90 h after trauma the patient had a better outcome as compared to those patients without decreased HSP70 levels [203]. An increase in HSP70 levels between the 24–48-h period and the 60–90-h period suggested infection [203]. As suggested by others, these data support the hypothesis that HSP70 is produced as a danger signal to stimulate the immune systems of trauma patients [204]. In severely traumatized patients, systemic HSP72 levels were markedly elevated immediately after admission to the emergency department compared to healthy volunteers [205]. Moreover, elevated initial HSP72 were associated with improved survival in severely traumatized patients, although there was no difference in the overall injury severity between patients with high and low HSP72 levels [205]. Levels of HSP72 were neither related to the incidence or severity of the post-injury inflammatory response nor to organ dysfunction [205].

Nucleic acids

Next to the DNA, and based on the endosymbiotic theory suggesting that mitochondria originate from bacteria, the cells contain mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) as well. Nucleic acids are present in all cells, and naturally they are released into the circulation after cell necrosis and nuclear destruction, but their active release has been reported also [148, 206, 207]. This so-called extracellular DNA can be built up by either DNA or different species of RNA, and based on its origin, whether it is host or pathogen derived, is accounts for a DAMP or a PAMP, respectively [206]. Nucleic acids are recognized either by membrane-bound PRR including TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, TLR9 and RAGE, or by soluble, mainly cytosolic receptors retinoic acid-inducible gene I, melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5, and cyclic GMP–AMP [206, 208, 209].

Release of cell-free DNA plays an important role in trauma [207, 210]. The group around Zhang et al. has shown that traumatic injury causes a release of mitochondrial DAMP into the circulation, which have functionally important immune consequences [207]. These mitochondrial DAMP include formyl peptides and mtDNA as well that can activate human polymorphonuclear neutrophils via TLR [207]. The link between mitochondrial DAMP and the cellular response upon trauma is reviewed by Thurairajah et al. of this series.

Adenosine triphosphate

Adenosine 5′ triphosphate (ATP) as another DAMP originating from mitochondria can be released extracellularly following tissue damage, and contribute to the induction of inflammation by activation and recruitment of various inflammatory cells including macrophages, neutrophils and dendritic cells [22, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215]. ATP signaling is transduced via purinergic receptors, e.g., by the activation of P2X7 channels and the efflux of potassium ions, with subsequent aggregation and activation of the inflammasome complex [212, 213]. Thus, proteolytical activation of pro-caspase-1 to active caspase-1 results in the processing and activation of IL-1β or IL-18 cytokine precursors as described above, thereby initiating the proinflammatory response.

Other damp

Several other potential DAMP, which may play an important role in the initiation and regulation of the immune response, as well as in regeneration after trauma, have not been addressed in this article. For example, upon destruction of the red cells in the blood vessels, a significant quantity of hemoglobin and other contents of these cells are released into the circulation [216]. In case that this cell-free hemoglobin is not neutralized to its inert, non-toxic form by its scavenger proteins, significant damage in the vascular, perivascular and endothelial spaces occurs [216, 217].

Extracellular cyclophilin A (CypA) is a DAMP that has been associated with rheumatoid arthritis, liver injury and severe sepsis [218, 219, 220]. Cyclophilin A can act as a chemotactic agent for inflammatory cells via CD147 receptor, and directly stimulating the release of a number of inflammatory mediators. Using an in vitro shock tube model of blast TBI with SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells, a potential neuroprotective mechanism involving released CypA has been suggested [221]. Accumulation of CypA in the culture medium after repeated blast exposures supported the hypothesis that extracellular CypA mediated neuroprotection [221]. These findings were confirmed by post-exposure treatment of the cells with purified recombinant CypA that resulted in a significant protection against blast-induced neuronal injury [221].

Uric acid is released from injured cells as well [222]. Uric acid is soluble inside the cells, but it precipitates to monosodium urate microcrystals in its extracellular form, exerting inflammatory properties, as evident by its accumulation in tissues and gout [21, 223]. Uric acid crystals engage the caspase-1-activating NALP3 inflammasome, resulting in the production of active IL-1β and IL-18 [224]. Macrophages from mice deficient in various components of the inflammasome complex are defective in crystal-induced IL-1β processing [224]. Furthermore, an impaired neutrophil influx is found in an in vivo model of crystal-induced peritonitis in inflammasome-deficient mice or mice deficient in the IL-1β receptor (IL-1R) [224]. Elevated levels of serum uric acid correlate with early acute kidney injury after severe burns [225]. The authors propose uric acid-related aberrant inflammation to be one of the pathogenic factors [225].

Conclusions

This review summarizes only a short list of currently discussed DAMP that play a role in the inflammatory or regenerative response upon trauma. The list is certainly both incomplete and provides only a limited overview to the concept of trauma-induced DAMP. Due to the bivalent character and often pleotropic effects of a DAMP, it is difficult to describe its “friend or foe” role in the post-traumatic inflammation and regeneration. It is indisputable that DAMP are obligatory for the immune response upon traumatic insult, both systemically as well locally in tissues. On the one hand, they can not only be used as biomarkers to indicate or monitor disease or injury severity, but also may be clinically applicable for better indication and timing of surgery. On the other hand, they constitute either negative or positive contributing factors for the disease development. However, due to the inflammatory processes at the local tissue level or the systemic level, their precise roles are not always clear to define. While in vitro and experimental studies allow for the detection of these biomarkers at the different levels of an organism—cellular, tissue, circulation—this is not always easily transferable to the human setting. Increased knowledge exploring this dual role of DAMP after trauma, and concentrating on their nuclear functions, transcriptional targets, release mechanisms, cellular sources, multiple functions, their interactions and potential therapeutic targeting is warranted. Adjacent to in vivo studies and, furthermore, based on sometimes contradictory findings, which originate from differences between the immune system of animals and human, as discussed in this article as well, clinical research is necessary.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Andrea Janicova for the creation of the figure. No funding was obtained for this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Borna Relja, Katharina Mörs and Ingo Marzi declare no conflicts of interest.

Human and animal rights

This study does not include any human participants and/or animals.

Informed consent

No informed consent is necessary.

References

  1. 1.
    Peden M, Hyder A. Road traffic injuries are a global public health problem. BMJ. 2002;324(7346):1153.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    The global burden of disease. 2013. https://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/en/.
  3. 3.
    Wutzler S, et al. Pathophysiology of multiple trauma: intensive care medicine and timing of treatment. Chirurg. 2013;84(9):753–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wafaisade A, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of sepsis after multiple trauma: an analysis of 29,829 patients from the Trauma Registry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(4):621–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Osuka AO, Ueyama H, Shimazu M, Lederer T. JA., Immune response to traumatic injury: harmony and discordance of immune system homeostasis. Acute Medicine Surgery. 2014;1(2):6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rose S, Marzi I. Mediators in polytrauma: pathophysiological significance and clinical relevance. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998;383(3–4):199–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adib-Conquy M, Cavaillon JM. Compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome. Thromb Haemost. 2009;101(1):36–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhan C, et al. Role of cellular events in the pathophysiology of sepsis. Inflamm Res. 2016;65(11):853–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reikeras O. Immune depression in musculoskeletal trauma. Inflamm Res. 2010;59(6):409–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xiao W, et al. A genomic storm in critically injured humans. J Exp Med. 2011;208(13):2581–90.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Islam MN, Bradley BA, Ceredig R. Sterile post-traumatic immunosuppression. Clin Transl Immunol. 2016;5(4):e77.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raymond SL, et al., Microbial recognition and danger signals in sepsis and trauma. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.01.013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsukamoto T, Chanthaphavong RS, Pape HC. Current theories on the pathophysiology of multiple organ failure after trauma. Injury. 2010;41(1):21–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horst K, et al. Impact of haemorrhagic shock intensity on the dynamic of alarmins release in porcine poly-trauma animal model. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42(1):67–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Qiao Z, et al., Using IL-6 concentrations in the first 24 h following trauma to predict immunological complications and mortality in trauma patients: a meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-017-0880-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ahmed Ali M, et al., Interleukin-17 as a predictor of sepsis in polytrauma patients: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-017-0841-3.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huber-Lang M, Lambris JD, Ward PA. Innate immune responses to trauma. Nat Immunol. 2018;19(4):327–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Janeway CA Jr, Medzhitov R. Innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:197–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matzinger P. The danger model: a renewed sense of self. Science. 2002;296(5566):301–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lotze MT, et al. The grateful dead: damage-associated molecular pattern molecules and reduction/oxidation regulate immunity. Immunol Rev. 2007;220:60–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bianchi ME. DAMPs, PAMPs and alarmins: all we need to know about danger. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;81(1):1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Manson J, Thiemermann C, Brohi K. Trauma alarmins as activators of damage-induced inflammation. Br J Surg. 2012;99(Suppl 1):12–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zedler S, Faist E. The impact of endogenous triggers on trauma-associated inflammation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006;12(6):595–601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Janeway CA. Approaching the asymptote? Evolution and revolution in immunology. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1989;54(Pt 1):1–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Häcker G, Redecke V, Häcker H. Activation of the immune system by bacterial CpG-DNA. Immunology. 2002;105(3):245–51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Matzinger P. Tolerance, danger, and the extended family. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;12(1):991–1045.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Medzhitov R, Preston-Hurlburt P, Janeway CA. A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature. 1997;388(6640):394–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell. 2010;140(6):805–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bryant CE, et al. Advances in Toll-like receptor biology: modes of activation by diverse stimuli. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;50(5):359–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Creagh EM, L.A.J., O’Neill. TLRs, NLRs and RLRs: a trinity of pathogen sensors that co-operate in innate immunity. Trends Immunol. 2006;27(8):352–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gay NJ, et al. A leucine-rich repeat peptide derived from the Drosophila Toll receptor forms extended filaments with a beta-sheet structure. FEBS Lett. 1991;291(1):87–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ibrahim ZA, et al. RAGE and TLRs: relatives, friends or neighbours? Mol Immunol. 2013;56(4):739–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Delgado MA, et al. Toll-like receptors control autophagy. EMBO J. 2008;27(7):1110–21.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Akira S, Takeda K, Kaisho T. Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity. Nat Immunol. 2001;2(8):675–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Takeda K, Akira S. Toll-like receptors. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2015;109:1–10.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wegiel B, Hauser CJ, Otterbein LE. Heme as a danger molecule in pathogen recognition. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;89:651–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schwandner R, et al. Peptidoglycan- and lipoteichoic acid-induced cell activation is mediated by toll-like receptor 2. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(25):17406–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Poltorak A, et al. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 gene. Science. 1998;282(5396):2085–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kawai T, Akira S. Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity. Immunity. 2011;34(5):637–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yu M, et al. HMGB1 signals through toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 and TLR2. Shock. 2006;26(2):174–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Franchi L, et al. Function of Nod-like receptors in microbial recognition and host defense. Immunol Rev. 2009;227(1):106–28.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lawrence T. The nuclear factor NF-kappaB pathway in inflammation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009;1(6):a001651.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yamamoto M, et al., Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Science (New York). 2003;301(5633):640–3.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kawai T, Akira S. TLR signaling. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13(5):816–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tang D, et al. Hydrogen peroxide stimulates macrophages and monocytes to actively release HMGB1. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;81(3):741–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bauernfeind F, et al. Inflammasomes: current understanding and open questions. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68(5):765–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Martinon F, Burns K, Tschopp J. The inflammasome: a molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-beta. Mol Cell. 2002;10(2):417–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Muruve DA, et al. The inflammasome recognizes cytosolic microbial and host DNA and triggers an innate immune response. Nature. 2008;452(7183):103–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Agostini L, et al. NALP3 forms an IL-1beta-processing inflammasome with increased activity in Muckle-Wells autoinflammatory disorder. Immunity. 2004;20(3):319–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Arend WP, Palmer G, Gabay C. IL-1, IL-18, and IL-33 families of cytokines. Immunol Rev. 2008;223:20–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cerretti DP, et al. Molecular cloning of the interleukin-1 beta converting enzyme. Science. 1992;256(5053):97–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Latz E, Xiao TS, Stutz A. Activation and regulation of the inflammasomes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(6):397–411.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Martinon F, Mayor A, Tschopp J. The inflammasomes: guardians of the body. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:229–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Proell M, et al. The CARD plays a critical role in ASC foci formation and inflammasome signalling. Biochem J. 2013;449(3):613–21.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Relja B, et al. Nlrp1 inflammasome is downregulated in trauma patients. J Mol Med (Berl). 2015;93(12):1391–400.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Dinarello CA. Immunological and inflammatory functions of the interleukin-1 family. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27(1):519–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    van de Veerdonk FL, et al. Inflammasome activation and IL-1beta and IL-18 processing during infection. Trends Immunol. 2011;32(3):110–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Dinarello CA. Interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory diseases. Blood. 2011;117(14):3720–32.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rathinam VA, Fitzgerald KA. Inflammasome complexes: emerging mechanisms and effector functions. Cell. 2016;165(4):792–800.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Schroder K, Tschopp J. The inflammasomes. Cell. 2010;140(6):821–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Vladimer GI, et al. Inflammasomes and host defenses against bacterial infections. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2013;16(1):23–31.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lu B, et al. Novel role of PKR in inflammasome activation and HMGB1 release. Nature. 2012;488(7413):670–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Yang J, Liu Z, Xiao TS. Post-translational regulation of inflammasomes. Cell Mol Immunol. 2017;14(1):65–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Vande Walle L, Lamkanfi M. Pyroptosis. Curr Biol. 2016;26(13):R568-72.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hoving JC, Wilson GJ, Brown GD. Signalling C-type lectin receptors, microbial recognition and immunity. Cell Microbiol. 2014;16(2):185–94.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Dambuza IM, Brown GD. C-type lectins in immunity: recent developments. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;32:21–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Yamasaki S, et al. Mincle is an ITAM-coupled activating receptor that senses damaged cells. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(10) :1179–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zhou H, et al. IRAKM-Mincle axis links cell death to inflammation: pathophysiological implications for chronic alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology. 2016;64(6) :1978–93.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hori O, et al. The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a cellular binding site for amphoterin. Mediation of neurite outgrowth and co-expression of rage and amphoterin in the developing nervous system. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(43) :25752–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hofmann MA, et al. RAGE mediates a novel proinflammatory axis: a central cell surface receptor for S100/calgranulin polypeptides. Cell. 1999;97(7):889–901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Du Yan S, et al. Amyloid-beta peptide-receptor for advanced glycation endproduct interaction elicits neuronal expression of macrophage-colony stimulating factor: a proinflammatory pathway in Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(10):5296–301.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Demling N, et al. Promotion of cell adherence and spreading: a novel function of RAGE, the highly selective differentiation marker of human alveolar epithelial type I cells. Cell Tissue Res. 2006;323(3):475–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Yan SF, Ramasamy R, Schmidt AM. The receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) and cardiovascular disease. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2009;11:e9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Chen X, et al. RAGE: a potential target for Abeta-mediated cellular perturbation in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Mol Med. 2007;7(8):735–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Sims GP, et al. HMGB1 and RAGE in inflammation and cancer. Annu Rev Immunol. 2010;28:367–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Sorci G, et al. RAGE in tissue homeostasis, repair and regeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833(1):101–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Kierdorf K, Fritz G. RAGE regulation and signaling in inflammation and beyond. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;94(1):55–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ott C, et al. Role of advanced glycation end products in cellular signaling. Redox Biol. 2014;2:411–29.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Schmidt AM, et al. The multiligand receptor RAGE as a progression factor amplifying immune and inflammatory responses. J Clin Invest. 2001;108(7):949–55.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Bierhaus A, et al. Understanding RAGE, the receptor for advanced glycation end products. J Mol Med (Berl). 2005;83(11):876–86.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Wu X, et al. The activation of HMGB1 as a progression factor on inflammation response in normal human bronchial epithelial cells through RAGE/JNK/NF-kappaB pathway. Mol Cell Biochem. 2013;380(1–2):249–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Chen L, et al. Overexpression of RAGE contributes to cigarette smoke-induced nitric oxide generation in COPD. Lung. 2014;192(2):267–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Bianchi ME, Agresti A. HMG proteins: dynamic players in gene regulation and differentiation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005;15(5):496–506.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Pandolfi F, et al. Key role of DAMP in inflammation, cancer, and tissue repair. Clin Ther. 2016;38(5):1017–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Venereau E, Ceriotti C, Bianchi ME. DAMPs from Cell Death to New Life. Front Immunol. 2015;6:422.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Bellussi LM, et al. Are HMGB1 protein expression and secretion markers of upper airways inflammatory diseases? J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2013;27(3):791–804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Scaffidi P, Misteli T, Bianchi ME. Release of chromatin protein HMGB1 by necrotic cells triggers inflammation. Nature. 2002;418(6894):191–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Cohen MJ, et al. Early release of high mobility group box nuclear protein 1 after severe trauma in humans: role of injury severity and tissue hypoperfusion. Crit Care. 2009;13(6):R174.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Levy RM, et al. Systemic inflammation and remote organ injury following trauma require HMGB1. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007;293(4):R1538-44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Zhang BF, et al. Anti-high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) antibody attenuates kidney damage following experimental crush injury and the possible role of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha and c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12(1):110.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Parker TM, et al. The danger zone: systematic review of the role of HMGB1 danger signalling in traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2017;31(1):2–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Kim JY, et al. HMGB1 contributes to the development of acute lung injury after hemorrhage. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2005;288(5):L958–65.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Ogawa EN, et al. Contribution of high-mobility group box-1 to the development of ventilator-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(4):400–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Tsung A, et al. The nuclear factor HMGB1 mediates hepatic injury after murine liver ischemia-reperfusion. J Exp Med. 2005;201(7):1135–43.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    van Zoelen MA, et al. Pulmonary levels of high-mobility group box 1 during mechanical ventilation and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Shock. 2008;29(4):441–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Ueno H, et al. Contributions of high mobility group box protein in experimental and clinical acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170(12):1310–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Abraham E, et al. HMG-1 as a mediator of acute lung inflammation. J Immunol. 2000;165(6):2950–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Arshad MI, Piquet-Pellorce C, Samson M. IL-33 and HMGB1 alarmins: sensors of cellular death and their involvement in liver pathology. Liver Int. 2012;32(8):1200–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Yang H, Tracey KJ. Targeting HMGB1 in inflammation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1799(1–2):149–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Tang D, et al. High-mobility group box 1, oxidative stress, and disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14(7):1315–35.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Keyel PA. How is inflammation initiated? Individual influences of IL-1, IL-18 and HMGB1. Cytokine. 2014;69(1):136–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    van Griensven M. Cytokines as biomarkers in polytraumatized patients. Unfallchirurg. 2014;117(8):699–702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Dinarello CA, Goldin NP, Wolff SM. Demonstration and characterization of two distinct human leukocytic pyrogens. J Exp Med. 1974;139(6):1369–81.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Dinarello CA. A clinical perspective of IL-1beta as the gatekeeper of inflammation. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41(5):1203–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Aden N, et al. Epithelial cells promote fibroblast activation via IL-1alpha in systemic sclerosis. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(9):2191–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Rosenwasser LJ, Dinarello CA, Rosenthal AS. Adherent cell function in murine T-lymphocyte antigen recognition. IV. Enhancement of murine T-cell antigen recognition by human leukocytic pyrogen. J Exp Med. 1979;150(3):709–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Lefrancais E, Cayrol C. Mechanisms of IL-33 processing and secretion: differences and similarities between IL-1 family members. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2012;23(4):120–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Maier JA, Statuto M, Ragnotti G. Endogenous interleukin 1 alpha must be transported to the nucleus to exert its activity in human endothelial cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14(3):1845–51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Werman A, et al. The precursor form of IL-1alpha is an intracrine proinflammatory activator of transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(8):2434–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Sakurai T, et al. Hepatocyte necrosis induced by oxidative stress and IL-1 alpha release mediate carcinogen-induced compensatory proliferation and liver tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 2008;14(2):156–65.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Carta S, Lavieri R, Rubartelli A. Different members of the IL-1 family come out in different ways: DAMPs vs. Cytokines? Front Immunol. 2013;4:123.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Kobayashi Y, et al. Identification of calcium-activated neutral protease as a processing enzyme of human interleukin 1 alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87(14):5548–52.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Kavita U, Mizel SB. Differential sensitivity of interleukin-1 alpha and -beta precursor proteins to cleavage by calpain, a calcium-dependent protease. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(46):27758–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Carruth LM, Demczuk S, Mizel SB. Involvement of a calpain-like protease in the processing of the murine interleukin 1 alpha precursor. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(19):12162–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Bertheloot D, Latz E. HMGB1, IL-1alpha, IL-33 and S100 proteins: dual-function alarmins. Cell Mol Immunol. 2017;14(1):43–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Jackman RP, et al. Distinct roles of trauma and transfusion in induction of immune modulation after injury. Transfusion. 2012;52(12):2533–50.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Ehrnthaller C, et al. The molecular fingerprint of lung inflammation after blunt chest trauma. Eur J Med Res. 2015;20:70.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Jacobs RF, et al. Elevated interleukin-1 release by human alveolar macrophages during the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;140(6):1686–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Rider P, et al. The transcription of the alarmin cytokine interleukin-1 alpha is controlled by hypoxia inducible factors 1 and 2 alpha in hypoxic cells. Front Immunol. 2012;3:290.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Thornton P, et al. Platelet interleukin-1alpha drives cerebrovascular inflammation. Blood. 2010;115(17):3632–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Turner NA, et al. Interleukin-1alpha stimulates proinflammatory cytokine expression in human cardiac myofibroblasts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;297(3):H1117-27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Pichery M, et al. Endogenous IL-33 is highly expressed in mouse epithelial barrier tissues, lymphoid organs, brain, embryos, and inflamed tissues: in situ analysis using a novel Il-33-LacZ gene trap reporter strain. J Immunol. 2012;188(7):3488–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Baekkevold ES, et al. Molecular characterization of NF-HEV, a nuclear factor preferentially expressed in human high endothelial venules. Am J Pathol. 2003;163(1):69–79.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Carriere V, et al. IL-33, the IL-1-like cytokine ligand for ST2 receptor, is a chromatin-associated nuclear factor in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(1):282–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Hirsiger S, et al., Danger signals activating the immune response after trauma. Mediat Inflamm. 2012;2012:315941.Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Schmitz J, et al. IL-33, an interleukin-1-like cytokine that signals via the IL-1 receptor-related protein ST2 and induces T helper type 2-associated cytokines. Immunity. 2005;23(5):479–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Palmer G, et al. The IL-1 receptor accessory protein (AcP) is required for IL-33 signaling and soluble AcP enhances the ability of soluble ST2 to inhibit IL-33. Cytokine. 2008;42(3):358–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Molofsky AB, Savage AK, Locksley RM. Interleukin-33 in tissue homeostasis, injury, and inflammation. Immunity. 2015;42(6):1005–19.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Lefrancais E, et al. IL-33 is processed into mature bioactive forms by neutrophil elastase and cathepsin G. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(5):1673–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Roussel L, et al. Molecular mimicry between IL-33 and KSHV for attachment to chromatin through the H2A-H2B acidic pocket. EMBO Rep. 2008;9(10):1006–12.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Bessa J, et al. Altered subcellular localization of IL-33 leads to non-resolving lethal inflammation. J Autoimmun. 2014;55:33–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Cohen ES, et al. Oxidation of the alarmin IL-33 regulates ST2-dependent inflammation. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8327.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Cayrol C, Girard J-P. IL-33: an alarmin cytokine with crucial roles in innate immunity, inflammation and allergy. Curr Opin Immunol. 2014;31:31–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Ali S, et al. IL-1 receptor accessory protein is essential for IL-33-induced activation of T lymphocytes and mast cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(47):18660–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Humphreys NE, et al. IL-33, a potent inducer of adaptive immunity to intestinal nematodes. J Immunol. 2008;180(4):2443–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Park JH, et al. Risk factors for sepsis in Korean trauma patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42(4):453–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Tranca S, et al. sTREM-1, sIL-2Ralpha, and IL-6, but not sCD163, might predict sepsis in polytrauma patients: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017;43(3):363–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Lalwani S, et al. Sepsis in fatal pelvic trauma patients: report from a level-1 Indian Trauma Centre. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42(1):43–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Alves-Filho JC, et al. Interleukin-33 attenuates sepsis by enhancing neutrophil influx to the site of infection. Nat Med. 2010;16(6):708–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Kurowska-Stolarska M, et al. IL-33 amplifies the polarization of alternatively activated macrophages that contribute to airway inflammation. J Immunol. 2009;183(10):6469–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Sethi S, Murphy TF. Infection in the pathogenesis and course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(22):2355–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Palmer G, et al. Inhibition of interleukin-33 signaling attenuates the severity of experimental arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(3):738–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Gadani SP, et al. The glia-derived alarmin IL-33 orchestrates the immune response and promotes recovery following CNS injury. Neuron. 2015;85(4):703–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Pomeshchik Y, et al. Interleukin-33 treatment reduces secondary injury and improves functional recovery after contusion spinal cord injury. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;44:68–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Foster SL, Talbot S, Woolf CJ. CNS injury: IL-33 sounds the alarm. Immunity. 2015;42(3):403–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Moore BW. A soluble protein characteristic of the nervous system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1965;19(6):739–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Foell D, et al. S100 proteins expressed in phagocytes: a novel group of damage-associated molecular pattern molecules. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;81(1):28–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Timmermans K, et al. Danger in the intensive care unit: Damps in critically Ill patients. Shock. 2016;45(2):108–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Pruenster M, et al. S100A8/A9: from basic science to clinical application. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;167:120–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Fontaine M, et al. Innate danger signals in acute injury: from bench to bedside. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2016;35(4):283–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    De Lorenzo BH, et al. Macrophage suppression following phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils is mediated by the S100A9 calcium-binding protein. Immunobiology. 2010;215(5):341–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Ghavami S, et al. S100A8/A9 at low concentration promotes tumor cell growth via RAGE ligation and MAP kinase-dependent pathway. J Leukoc Biol. 2008;83(6):1484–92.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Loeser RF, et al. Articular chondrocytes express the receptor for advanced glycation end products: potential role in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(8):2376–85.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Ellis EF, et al. S100B protein is released from rat neonatal neurons, astrocytes, and microglia by in vitro trauma and anti-S100 increases trauma-induced delayed neuronal injury and negates the protective effect of exogenous S100B on neurons. J Neurochem. 2007;101(6):1463–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Foell D, et al. Expression of S100A12 (EN-RAGE) in cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2003;58(7):613–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Oesterle A, Bowman MA. S100A12 and the S100/calgranulins: emerging biomarkers for atherosclerosis and possibly therapeutic targets. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(12):2496–507.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Dassan P, Keir G, Brown MM. Criteria for a clinically informative serum biomarker in acute ischaemic stroke: a review of S100B. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(3):295–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Gogas H, et al. Biomarkers in melanoma. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(Suppl 6):vi8–13.Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Gazzolo D, Michetti F. Perinatal S100B protein assessment in human unconventional biological fluids: a minireview and new perspectives. Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol, 2010;2010: 703563.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Mocellin S, Zavagno G, Nitti D. The prognostic value of serum S100B in patients with cutaneous melanoma: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2008;123(10):2370–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Payen D, et al. Gene profiling in human blood leucocytes during recovery from septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(8):1371–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Zhang LN, et al. Diagnostic and predictive levels of calcium-binding protein A8 and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 in sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a prospective observational study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016;129(14):1674–81.Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    Uhel F, et al. Early expansion of circulating granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells predicts development of nosocomial infections in patients with sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(3):315–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Azmitia EC. Cajal’s hypotheses on neurobiones and neurotropic factor match properties of microtubules and S-100 beta. Prog Brain Res. 2002;136:87–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Van Eldik LJ, Wainwright MS. The Janus face of glial-derived S100B: beneficial and detrimental functions in the brain. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2003;21(3–4):97–108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Thelin EP, et al. Assessing bicycle-related trauma using the biomarker S100B reveals a correlation with total injury severity. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42(5):617–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Adami C, et al. S100B expression in and effects on microglia. Glia. 2001;33(2):131–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Goyal A, et al. S100b as a prognostic biomarker in outcome prediction for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30(11):946–57.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Kellermann I, et al. Early CSF and serum S100B concentrations for outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;145:79–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Rezaei O, et al. S100 B: a new concept in neurocritical care. Iran J Neurol. 2017;16(2):83–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Chernov AV, et al. The calcium-binding proteins S100A8 and S100A9 initiate the early inflammatory program in injured peripheral nerves. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(18):11771–84.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Dang X, et al. S100B ranks as a new marker of multiple traumas in patients and may accelerate its development by regulating endothelial cell dysfunction. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7(7):3818–26.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Anderson RE, et al. High serum S100B levels for trauma patients without head injuries. Neurosurgery. 2001;48(6):1255–8; Discussion 1258–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Pfortmueller CA, et al. S-100 B concentrations are a predictor of decreased survival in patients with major trauma, independently of head injury. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0152822.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Greven J, et al., Update on the role of endothelial cells in trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-017-0812-8 Google Scholar
  176. 176.
    Hirsch JG. Bactericidal action of histone. J Exp Med. 1958;108(6):925–44.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Pisetsky DS. Immune activation by histones: plusses and minuses in inflammation. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43(12):3163–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    Huang H, et al. Endogenous histones function as alarmins in sterile inflammatory liver injury through Toll-like receptor 9 in mice. Hepatology. 2011;54(3):999–1008.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    Tang D, et al. PAMPs and DAMPs: signal 0s that spur autophagy and immunity. Immunol Rev. 2012;249(1):158–75.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  180. 180.
    Xu J, et al. Extracellular histones are major mediators of death in sepsis. Nat Med. 2009;15(11):1318–21.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Allam R, et al. Histones from dying renal cells aggravate kidney injury via TLR2 and TLR4. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(8):1375–88.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Semeraro F, et al. Extracellular histones promote thrombin generation through platelet-dependent mechanisms: involvement of platelet TLR2 and TLR4. Blood. 2011;118(7):1952–61.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Kawai C, et al. Circulating extracellular histones are clinically relevant mediators of multiple organ injury. Am J Pathol. 2016;186(4):829–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    Abrams ST, et al. Circulating histones are mediators of trauma-associated lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(2):160–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Ritossa F. Discovery of the heat shock response. Cell Stress Chaperones. 1996;1(2):97–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Schopf FH, Biebl MM, Buchner J. The HSP90 chaperone machinery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(6):345–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    Kim JY, Yenari MA. The immune modulating properties of the heat shock proteins after brain injury. Anat Cell Biol. 2013;46(1):1–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    Arnold-Schild D, et al. Cutting edge: receptor-mediated endocytosis of heat shock proteins by professional antigen-presenting cells. J Immunol. 1999;162(7):3757–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    Fong JJ, et al. Immunomodulatory activity of extracellular HSP70 mediated via paired receptors Siglec-5 and Siglec-14. EMBO J. 2015;34(22):2775–88.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Tang D, et al. The anti-inflammatory effects of heat shock protein 72 involve inhibition of high-mobility-group box 1 release and proinflammatory function in macrophages. J Immunol. 2007;179(2):1236–44.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  191. 191.
    Turturici G, Sconzo G, Geraci F. HSP70 and its molecular role in nervous system diseases. Biochem Res Int. 2011;2011:618127.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    Giffard RG, Yenari MA. Many mechanisms for HSP70 protection from cerebral ischemia. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2004;16(1):53–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. 193.
    Adachi H, et al. Heat shock proteins in neurodegenerative diseases: pathogenic roles and therapeutic implications. Int J Hyperth. 2009;25(8):647–54.Google Scholar
  194. 194.
    Wheeler DS, et al. Extracellular heat shock protein 60 (HSP60) levels in children with septic shock. Inflamm Res. 2007;56(5):216–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  195. 195.
    Wheeler DS, et al. Extracellular HSP70 levels in children with septic shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6(3):308–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    Hashiguchi N, et al. Enhanced expression of heat shock proteins in activated polymorphonuclear leukocytes in patients with sepsis. J Trauma. 2001;51(6):1104–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    Chatterjee A, et al. Heat shock protein 90 inhibitors prolong survival, attenuate inflammation, and reduce lung injury in murine sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176(7):667–75.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  198. 198.
    Singleton KD, Wischmeyer PE. Effects of HSP70.1/3 gene knockout on acute respiratory distress syndrome and the inflammatory response following sepsis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2006;290(5):L956-61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    McConnell KW, et al. The role of heat shock protein 70 in mediating age-dependent mortality in sepsis. J Immunol. 2011;186(6):3718–25.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    Hashiguchi N, et al. Enhanced expression of heat shock proteins in leukocytes from trauma patients. J Trauma. 2001;50(1):102–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    Ogura H, et al. Long-term enhanced expression of heat shock proteins and decelerated apoptosis in polymorphonuclear leukocytes from major burn patients. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002;23(2):103–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  202. 202.
    Pespeni M, et al. Serum levels of HSP60 correlate with the development of acute lung injury after trauma. J Surg Res. 2005;126(1):41–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  203. 203.
    Ren B, et al. Serum levels of HSP70 and other DAMP proteins can aid in patient diagnosis after traumatic injury. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2016;21(4):677–86.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  204. 204.
    Hietbrink F, et al. Trauma: the role of the innate immune system. World J Emerg Surg. 2006;1:15.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  205. 205.
    Pittet JF, et al. Serum levels of HSP72 measured early after trauma correlate with survival. J Trauma. 2002;52(4):611–7; Discussion 617.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  206. 206.
    Preissner KT, Herwald H. Extracellular nucleic acids in immunity and cardiovascular responses: between alert and disease. Thromb Haemost. 2017;117(7):1272–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  207. 207.
    Zhang Q, Raoof M, Chen Y, Sumi Y, Sursal T, Junger W, Brohi K, Itagaki K, Hauser CJ. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;464(7285):104–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  208. 208.
    Roers A, Hiller B, Hornung V. Recognition of endogenous nucleic acids by the innate immune system. Immunity. 2016;44(4):739–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  209. 209.
    West AP, Shadel GS. Mitochondrial DNA in innate immune responses and inflammatory pathology. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(6):363–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  210. 210.
    Ahmed AI, Soliman RA, Samir S. Cell free DNA and procalcitonin as early markers of complications in ICU patients with multiple trauma and major surgery. Clin Lab. 2016;62(12):2395–404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  211. 211.
    Willart MA, Lambrecht BN. The danger within: endogenous danger signals, atopy and asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009;39(1):12–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  212. 212.
    Novak I. ATP as a signaling molecule: the exocrine focus. News Physiol Sci. 2003;18:12–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  213. 213.
    Martinon F. Detection of immune danger signals by NALP3. J Leukoc Biol. 2008;83(3):507–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  214. 214.
    Elliott MR, et al. Nucleotides released by apoptotic cells act as a find-me signal to promote phagocytic clearance. Nature. 2009;461(7261):282–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  215. 215.
    Chen Y, et al. ATP release guides neutrophil chemotaxis via P2Y2 and A3 receptors. Science. 2006;314(5806):1792–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  216. 216.
    Mendonca R, Silveira AA, Conran N. Red cell DAMPs and inflammation. Inflamm Res. 2016;65(9):665–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  217. 217.
    Schaer DJ, et al. Haptoglobin, hemopexin, and related defense pathways-basic science, clinical perspectives, and drug development. Front Physiol. 2014;5:415.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  218. 218.
    Billich A, et al. Presence of cyclophilin A in synovial fluids of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Exp Med. 1997;185(5):975–80.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  219. 219.
    Dear JW, et al. Cyclophilin A is a damage-associated molecular pattern molecule that mediates acetaminophen-induced liver injury. J Immunol. 2011;187(6):3347–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  220. 220.
    Tegeder I, et al. Elevated serum cyclophilin levels in patients with severe sepsis. J Clin Immunol. 1997;17(5):380–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  221. 221.
    Arun P, et al., Extracellular cyclophilin A protects against blast-induced neuronal injury. Neurosci Res. 2013;76(1–2):98–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  222. 222.
    Shi Y, Evans JE, Rock KL. Molecular identification of a danger signal that alerts the immune system to dying cells. Nature. 2003;425(6957):516–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  223. 223.
    Ragab G, Elshahaly M, Bardin T. Gout: an old disease in new perspective—a review. J Adv Res. 2017;8(5):495–511.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  224. 224.
    Martinon F, et al. Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2006;440(7081):237–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  225. 225.
    Liang J, et al. Elevated serum uric acid after injury correlates with the early acute kidney in severe burns. Burns. 2015;41(8):1724–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital FrankfurtGoethe UniversityFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations