Advertisement

The additional value of gravity stress radiographs in predicting deep deltoid ligament integrity in supination external rotation ankle fractures

  • Claar van Leeuwen
  • Timo Haak
  • Marnix Kop
  • Nikki Weil
  • Frank Zijta
  • Jochem Hoogendoorn
Original Article
  • 92 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

Goal of this study was to investigate whether a gravity stress radiograph is beneficial in determining instability in Supination-External rotation (SER)-type ankle fractures without a medial fracture.

Methods

39 Patients with a SER-type ankle fracture without a medial or posterior fracture and medial clear space (MCS) < 6 mm at regular mortise view were included. A gravity stress radiograph and Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI)-scan were made. The MCS measurements of the regular and gravity stress radiographs were compared with the MRI findings (set as reference standard) to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values as indication for a complete deltoid ligament rupture.

Results

Mean MCS at regular mortise views was 3.11 (range 1.73–5.93) mm, compared to 4.54 (range 2.33–10.40) mm at gravity stress radiographs. With MCS ≥ 4 mm as threshold for predicting a complete rupture at regular ankle mortise views the sensitivity was 66.7, specificity 91.7, PPV 40.0 and NPV 97.0. Gravity stress radiographs with MCS ≥ 6 mm as threshold led to a sensitivity of 100, specificity 91.7, PPV 50.0 and NPV 100.

Conclusion

Gravity stress radiographs have more discriminative ability for diagnosing SER-type fractures with or without a complete deltoid ligament tear than regular ankle mortise views.

Keywords

Lateral malleolus fractures Joint instability Diagnostic imaging Overtreatment Predictive value 

Abbreviations

SER

Supination-external rotation

MCS

Medial clear space

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

PPV

Positive predictive value

NPV

Negative predictive value

DDL

Deep deltoid ligament

SCS

Superior clear space

VAS

Visual Analogue Scale

AITFL

Anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament

PITFL

Posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

C.A.T. van Leeuwen, T. Haak, M.P.M Kop, N.L. Weil, F.M. Zijta and J.M Hoogendoorn declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Court-Brown CM. Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Close B. Some applications of the functional anatomy of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1956;38:761–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Michelson JD. Fractures about the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(1):142–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vander Griend R, Michelson JD, Bone LB. Fractures of the ankle and the distal part of the tibia. Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:311–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donken CC, Verhofstad MH, Edwards MJ, van Laarhoven CJ. Twenty-one year follow-up of supination-external rotation type II–IV (OTA type B) ankle fractures: a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;(8):108–14.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rasmussen O. Stability of the ankle joint. Analysis of the function and traumatology of the ankle ligaments. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1985;211:1–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Egol KA, Amirtharajah M, Teiwani NC, Capla EL, Koval KJ. Ankle stress test for predicting the need for surgical fixation of isolated fibular fractues. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(11):2393–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Warner S, Garner M, Fabrikant P. The diagnostic accuracy of mortise radiographs and MRI in predicting deltoid ligament ruptures in supination external rotation ankle fractures. Paper #89: OTA. Foot and Ankle; 2015.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheung Y, Perrich KD, Gui J, Koval KJ, Goodwin DW. MRI of isolated distal fibular fractures with widened medial clear space on stressed radiographs; which ligaments are interrupted? AJR AM J Roentgenol. 2009;192(1):W7–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Briggs SM, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. The ability of the Lauge–Hansen classification to predict ligament injury and mechanism in ankle fractures: an MRI study. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(4):267–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Michelson JD, Varner KE, Checcone M. Diagnosing deltoid injury in ankle fractures: the gravity stress view. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;387):178–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schock HJ, Pinzur M, Manion L, Stover M. The use of gravity or manual-stress radiographs in the assessment of supination-external rotation fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint SUrg Br. 2007;89(8):1055–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gill JB, Risko T, Raducan V, Grimes JS, Schutt RC Jr. Comparison of manual and gravity stress radiographs for the evaluation of supination-external rotation fibular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:994–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chhabra A, Subhawong TK, Carrino JA. MR imaging of deltoid ligament pathologic findings and associatied impingement syndromes. Radiographics. 2010;30(3):751–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McConnell T, Creevy W, Tornetta P. Stress examination of supination external rotation-type fibular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(10):217–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lauge Hansen N. Fractures of the ankle III. Genetic roentgenologic diagnosis of fractures of the ankle. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1954;71(3):456–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bauer M, Jonsson K, Nilsson B. Thirty-year follow-up of ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;56(2):103–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kristensen KD, Hansen T. Closed treatment of ankle fractures. Stage II supination-eversion fractures followed for 20 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;56(2):107–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zeegers AV, Van Raay JJ, van der Werken C. Ankle fractures treated with a stabilizing shoe. Acta Orthop Scand. 1989;60(5):597–0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ryd L, Bengtsson S. Isolated fracture of the lateral malleolus requires no treatment. 49 prospective cases of supination-eversion type II ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;63(4):443–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dietrich A, Lill H, Engel T, Schonfelder M, Josten C. Conservative functional treatment of ankle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122(3):165–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    DeAngelis NA, Eskander MS, French BG. Does medial tenderness predict deep deltoid ligament incompetence in supination-external rotation type ankle fractures? J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(4):244–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stufkens SA, van den Bekerom MP, Knupp M, Hintermann B, van Dijk CN. The diagnosis and treatment of deltoid ligament lesions in supination-external rotation ankle fractures: a review. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2012;7(2):73–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schuberth JM, Collman DR, Rush SM, Ford LA. Deltoid ligament integrity in lateral malleolar fractures: a comparative analysis of arthroscopic and radiographic assessments. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43(1):20–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murphy JM, Kadakia AR, Schilling PL, Irwin TA. Relationship among radiographic ankle medial clear space, sex, and height. Orthopedics. 2014;37(5):449–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Muhle C, Frank LR, Rand T, Yeh L, Wong EC, Skaf A, et al. Collateral ligaments of the ankle; high-resolution MR imaging with a local gradient coil and anatomic correlation in cadavers. RadioGraphics. 1999;19(3):673–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Henari S, Banks LN, Radovanovic I, Queally J, Morris S. Ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool in assessing deltoid ligament injury in supination external rotation fractures of the ankle. Orthopedics 5. 2011;34(10):639–43.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chen PY, Wang TG, Wang CL. Ultrasonographic examination of the deltoid ligament in bimalleolar equivalent fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(9):883–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schottel PC, Fabricant PD, Berkes MB, Garner MR, Little MT, Hentel KD, et al. Manual stress ankle radiography has poor ability to predict deep deltoid ligament integrity in a supination external rotation fracture cohort. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54:531–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Koval KJ, Egol KA, Cheung Y, Goodwin DW, Spratt KF. Does a positive ankle stress test indicate the need for operative treatment after lateral malleolus fracture? A preliminary report. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(7):449–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kragh JF, Ward JA. Radiographic indicators of ankle instability: changes with plantarflexion. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(1):23–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weber M, Burmeister H, Flueckiger G, Krause FG. The use of weightbearing radiographs to assess the stability of supination-external rotation fractures of the ankle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:693–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hoshino CM, Nomoto EK, Norheim EP, Harris TG. Correlation of weightbearing radiographs and stability of stress positive ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(2):92–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hastie GR, Akhtar S, Butt U, Baumann A, Barrie JL. Weightbearing radiographs facilitate functional treatment of ankle fractures of uncertain stability. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(6):1042–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Holmes JR, Acker WB 2nd, Murphy JM, McKinney A, Kadakia AR, Irwin TA. A novel algorithm for isolated weber B Ankle fractures: a retrospective review of 51 nonsurgicallytreated patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24(9):645–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stewart C, Saleem O, Mukherjee DP, Suk M, Marymont J, Anission L. Axial load weightbearing radiography in determining lateral malleolus fracture stability: a cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(7):548–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988;18:1007–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gouguolias N, Sakellariou A. When a simple fracture of the lateral malleolus is not so simple? Bone Joint J. 2017;9-B:851–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mengiardi B, Pfirmann CW, Vienne P, Hodler J, Zanetti M. Medial collateral ligament complex of the ankle: MR appearance in asymptomatic subjects. Radiology. 2007;242(3):817–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nortunen S, Lepojarvi S, Savola O, Niinimaki J, Ohtonen P, Flinkkila T, et al. Stability assessment of the ankle mortise in supination-external rotation-type ankle fractures: lack of additional value of MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(22):1855–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Trauma SurgeryHaaglanden Medisch CentrumThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyHaaglanden Medisch CentrumThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations