A seven-center examination of the relationship between monthly volume and mortality in trauma: a hypothesis-generating study

  • Stanislaw P. Stawicki
  • Keith Habeeb
  • Niels D. Martin
  • M. Shay O’Mara
  • James Cipolla
  • David C. Evans
  • Creagh Boulger
  • Babak Sarani
  • Charles H. Cook
  • Alok Gupta
  • William S. Hoff
  • Peter G. Thomas
  • Jeffrey M. Jordan
  • Weidun Alan Guo
  • Mark J. Seamon
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

The relationship between trauma volumes and patient outcomes continues to be controversial, with limited data available regarding the effect of month-to-month trauma volume variability on clinical results. This study examines the relationship between monthly trauma volume variations and patient mortality at seven Level I Trauma Centers located in the Eastern United States. We hypothesized that higher monthly trauma volumes may be associated with lower corresponding mortality.

Methods

Monthly patient volume data were collected from seven Level I Trauma Centers. Additional information retrieved included monthly mortality, demographics, mean monthly injury severity (ISS), and trauma mechanism (blunt versus penetrating). Mortality was utilized as the primary study outcome. Statistical corrections for mean age, gender distribution, ISS, and mechanism of injury were made using analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA). Center-specific, annually-adjusted median monthly volumes (CSAA-MMV) were calculated to standardize patient volume differences across participating institutions. Statistical significance was set at α < 0.05.

Results

A total of 604 months of trauma admissions, encompassing 122,197 patients, were analyzed. Controlling for patient age, gender, ISS, and mechanism of injury, aggregate data suggested that monthly trauma volumes < 100 were associated with significantly greater mortality (3.9%) than months with volumes > 400 (mortality 2.9%, p < 0.01). To account for differences in monthly volumes between centers, as well as for temporal bias associated with potential differences over the entire study duration period, data were normalized using CSAA-MMV as a standardized reference point. Monthly volumes ≤ 33% of the CSAA-MMV were associated with adjusted mortality of 5.0% whereas monthly volumes ≥ 134% CSAA-MMV were associated with adjusted mortality of 2.7% (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

This hypothesis-generating study suggests that greater monthly trauma volumes appear to be associated with lower mortality. In addition, our data also suggest that across all participating centers mortality may be a function of relative month-to-month volume variation. When normalized to institution-specific, annually-adjusted “median” monthly trauma contacts, we show that months with patient volumes ≤ 33% median may be associated with subtly but not negligibly (1.4–2.3%) higher mortality than months with patient volumes ≥ 134% median.

Keywords

Care optimization Mortality Multi-center study Population study Trauma networks Trauma outcomes Trauma volumes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the generous help from the following individuals (alphabetically by last name): Scott Eley (OSU), Peggy Rhoades (OSU), Noelle L. Saillant (BIDMC), Holly Weber (SLUHN), and Rebecca Wilde-Onia (SLUHN). Without their assistance this study would not be possible.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Drs. Stanislaw P. Stawicki, Keith Habeeb, Niels D. Martin, M. Shay O’Mara, James Cipolla, David C. Evans, Creagh Boulger, Babak Sarani, Charles H. Cook, Alok Gupta, William S. Hoff, Peter G. Thomas, Jeffrey M. Jordan, Weidun Alan Guo, and Mark J. Seamon declare no conflicts of interest related to this scholarly work.

Ethical standards

The conduct of this study was approved by Institutional Review Boards at each participating institution. Research procedures have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

References

  1. 1.
    Nathens AB, et al. Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes. JAMA. 2001;285(9):p. 1164–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Demetriades D, et al. The effect of trauma center designation and trauma volume on outcome in specific severe injuries. Ann Surg. 2005;242(4):512–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    London JA, Battistella FD. Is there a relationship between trauma center volume and mortality? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2003;54(1):16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glance LG, et al. The relation between trauma center outcome and volume in the National Trauma Databank. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2004;56(3):682–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    SMITH RF, et al. The impact of volume on outcome in seriously injured trauma patients: two years’ experience of the Chicago Trauma System. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1990;30(9):1066–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Di Bartolomeo S, et al. A population based study on the night-time effect in trauma care. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(10):808–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kiekkas P, et al. Association between nursing workload and mortality of intensive care unit patients. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2008;40(4):385–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zare MM, et al. Mortality after nonemergent major surgery performed on Friday versus Monday through Wednesday. Ann Surg. 2007;246(5):866–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Alencar C. Preventable trauma deaths. Rev Saúde Pública, 2012. 46(2):1–8.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Egol KA, et al. Mortality rates following trauma: the difference is night and day. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011;4(2):178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Califf RM, et al. One-year results from the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial. GUSTO-I Investig Circ. 1996;94(6):1233–8.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eppich WJ, et al. The role of high-fidelity simulation in training pediatric emergency medicine fellows in the United States and Canada. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29(1):1–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freeman KM, et al. A virtual reality patient simulation system for teaching emergency response skills to US Navy medical providers. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2001;16(01):3–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alexander AL, et al. From gaming to training: A review of studies on fidelity, immersion, presence, and buy-in and their effects on transfer in pc-based simulations and games. DARWARS Train Impact Group. 2005;5:1–14.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Emaus N, et al. Hip fractures in a city in Northern Norway over 15 years: time trends, seasonal variation and mortality. Osteoporosis Int. 2011;22(10):2603–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Crawford JR, Parker MJ. Seasonal variation of proximal femoral fractures in the United Kingdom. Injury. 2003;34(3):223–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robertson A, et al. Spinal injury patterns resulting from car and motorcycle accidents. Spine. 2002;27(24):2825–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brown B, Baass K. Seasonal variation in frequencies and rates of highway accidents as function of severity. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board. 1997;1581:p. 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klauber MR et al. The epidemiology of head injury a prospective study of an entire community—San Diego County, California, 1978. Am J Epidemiol. 1981;113(5):500–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith DL, Manning T, Petruzzello SJ. Effect of strenuous live-fire drills on cardiovascular and psychological responses of recruit firefighters. Ergonomics. 2001;44(3):244–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bolstad CA, Endsley MR, Cuevas HM. A theoretically based approach to cognitive readiness and situation awareness assessment, in teaching and measuring cognitive readiness. Berlin: Springer; 2014. pp. 161–77.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    von Lubitz D, et al. Medical readiness in the context of operations other than war: Development of first responder readiness using OODA-Loop thinking and advanced distributed interactive simulation technology. In Proceedings EMISPHERE 2004 symposium on European-Mediterranean Virtual Hospital, Istanbul (Turkey). 2004.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Farkašovská D, Ferenc J, Training program to increase. The resistance of members of fire and rescue services at the airport. Acta Avionica. 2013;15(27).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stawicki S, et al. Fundamentals of patient safety in medicine and surgery. New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer Health (India) Pvt Ltd.; 2014.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scherer LA, et al. Videotape review leads to rapid and sustained learning. Am J Surg. 2003;185(6):p. 516–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seymour NE, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236(4):458–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Difede J, et al. Virtual reality exposure therapy for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder following September 11, 2001. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68(11):1639.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reznek M, Harter P, Krummel T. Virtual reality and simulation: training the future emergency physician. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9(1):78–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanislaw P. Stawicki
    • 1
    • 9
  • Keith Habeeb
    • 1
  • Niels D. Martin
    • 2
  • M. Shay O’Mara
    • 3
  • James Cipolla
    • 1
  • David C. Evans
    • 4
  • Creagh Boulger
    • 5
  • Babak Sarani
    • 6
  • Charles H. Cook
    • 7
  • Alok Gupta
    • 7
  • William S. Hoff
    • 1
  • Peter G. Thomas
    • 1
  • Jeffrey M. Jordan
    • 8
  • Weidun Alan Guo
    • 8
  • Mark J. Seamon
    • 2
  1. 1.Level I Regional Trauma CenterSt. Luke’s University Health NetworkBethlehemUSA
  2. 2.Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Department of SurgeryPenn Presbyterian Medical CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Grant Level I TraumaOhioHealth Grant Medical CenterColumbusUSA
  4. 4.Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Burn, Department of SurgeryThe Ohio State University College of MedicineColumbusUSA
  5. 5.Department of Emergency MedicineThe Ohio State University College of MedicineColumbusUSA
  6. 6.Department of Surgery, Center for Trauma and Critical CareGeorge Washington School of Medicine and Health SciencesWashingtonUSA
  7. 7.Division of Acute Care Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  8. 8.Division of Trauma/Critical Care, Department of SurgeryThe State University of New YorkBuffaloUSA
  9. 9.Department of Research and InnovationSt. Luke’s University Health Network, EW2 Research AdministrationBethlehemUSA

Personalised recommendations