Advertisement

A single antegrade intramedullary k-wire for fifth metacarpal neck fractures

  • Chahine Assi
  • Jad Mansour
  • Camille Samaha
  • Sleiman Ajjoub
  • Kaissar YammineEmail author
Original Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

Antegrade intramedullary nailing (AIMN) using 2k-wires seems to be superior to other modalities in treating displaced fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck (FFMN). Few reports demonstrated similar results retrospective with a single k-wire. The aim of the study is to describe our single k-wire technique and evaluate the related results.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of a continuous series of patients treated with a single intramedullary k-wire for FFMN. It includes 30 patients who met the criteria for surgery: a dorsal angulation of more than 30°, malrotation, or both. The mean clinical follow-up period was 7 ± 14.9 months.

Results

The mean pre-operative angle was 50° ± 11.35° and the mean immediate post-operative angle was 4.86° ± 2.8°. The mean immediate correction was 47° ± 9.3°. The mean correction at last follow-up was 45.14° ± 8.55°. Healing was obtained in all patients and bone union was achieved at a mean of 5.6 ± 1.2 weeks. The mean operative time was 8.5 min. The mean C-arm usage (number of clicks) was 7.2 times. The mean exposure radiation time was calculated at 3.6 s. The mean radiation dose was 0.08 mGy/mm2. The mean satisfaction score was 1.26 ± 0.45. Quick-DASH and EQ-5D scores yielded excellent values.

Conclusions

With potential benefits like lesser surgical time, radiation and cost, the use of a single AIMN could be safer, quicker and cheaper while reproducing similar clinical, functional and radiological outcomes to those reported with the use of 2k-wires.

Keywords

Fifth metacarpal neck fracture Single antegrade elastic nailing Surgery 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All named authors (Chahine Assi, Jad Mansour, Camille Samaha, Sleiman Ajjoub, Kaissar Yammine) hereby declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Hove LM. Fractures of the hand. Distribution and relative incidence. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1993;27:317–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ozturk I, Erturer E, Sahin F, Seckin F, Toker S, Uzun M, Sahin S. Effects of fusion angle on functional results following non-operative treatment for fracture of the neck of the fifth metacarpal. Injury. 2008;39:1464–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gudmundsen TE, Borgen L. Fractures of the fifth metacarpal. Acta Radiol. 2009;50:296–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amadio PC, Beckenbaugh RD, Bishop AT. Fractures of the hand and wrist. In: Jupiter JB, editor. Flynn’s hand surgery. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1991.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harris AR, Beckenbaugh RD, Nettrour JF, Rizzo M. Metacarpal neck fractures: results of treatment with traction reduction and cast immobilization. Hand. 2009;4:161–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Birndorf MS, Daley R, Greenwald DP. Metacarpal fracture angulation decreases flexor mechanical efficiency in human hands. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:1079–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meunier MJ, Hentzen E, Ryan M, Shin AY, Lieber RL. Predicted effects of metacarpal shortening on interosseous muscle function. J Hand Surg. 2004;29-A:689–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kollitz KM, Hammert WC, Vedder NB. Metacarpal fractures: treatment and complications. Hand. 2014;9:16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Theeuwen GA, Lemmens JA, van Niekerk JL. Conservative treatment of boxer’s fracture: a retrospective analysis. Injury. 1991;22:394–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim JK, Kim DJ. Antegrade intramedullary pinning versus retrograde intramedullary pinning for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1747–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ford DJ, Ali MS, Steel WM. Fractures of the 5fth metacarpal neck: is reduction or immobilisation necessary? J Hand Surg [Br]. 1989;14:165–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corkum JP, Davison PG, Lalonde DH. Systematic review of the best evidence in intramedullary fixation for metacarpal fractures. Hand (NY). 2013;8:253–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wong TC, Ip FK, Yeung SH. Comparison between percutaneous transverse fixation and intramedullary K-wires in treating closed fractures of the metacarpal neck of the little finger. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2006;31:61–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Winter M, Balaguer T, Bessière C, Carles M, Lebreton E. Surgical treatment of the boxer’s fracture: transverse pinning versus intramedullary pinning. J Hand Surg [Eur]. 2007;32:709–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Facca S, Ramdhian R, Pelissier A, Diaconu M, Liverneaux P. Fifth metacarpal neck fracture fixation: locking plate versus K-wire? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96:506–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Strub B, Schindele S, Sonderegger J, Sproedt J, von Campe A, Gruenert JG. Intramedullary splinting or conservative treatment for displaced fractures of the little finger metacarpal neck? A prospective study. J Hand Surg [Eur]. 2010;35:725–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fujitani R, Omokawa S, Shigematsu K, Tanaka Y. Comparison of the intramedullary nail and low-profile plate for unstable metacarpal neck fractures. J Orthop Sci. 2012;17:450–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sletten IN, Hellund JC, Olsen B, Clementsen S, Kvernmo HD, Nordsletten L. Conservative treatment has comparable outcome with bouquet pinning of little finger metacarpal neck fractures: a multicentre randomized controlled study of 85 patients. J Hand Surg [Eur]. 2015;40:76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang X, Huang X, Shao X. Reduction of fifth metacarpal neck fractures with a Kirschner wire. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2015;40:1225–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sandzen SC Jr. Complications of the skeletal system of the hand. In: Sandzen SC Jr, editor. Current management of complications in orthopaedics: the hand and wrist. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1985.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Margic K. External fixation of closed metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of digits. A prospective study of one hundred consecutive patients. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2006;31:30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Manueddu CA, Della Santa D. Fasciculated intramedullary pinning of metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1996;21:230–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yammine K, Harvey A. Antegrade intramedullary nailing for fifth metacarpal neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24:273–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mohammed R, Farook MZ, Newman K. Percutaneous elastic intramedullary nailing of metacarpal fractures: surgical technique and clinical results study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011;19:37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lieber J, Härter B, Schmid E, Kirschner HJ, Schmittenbecher PP. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) of pediatric metacarpal fractures: experiences with 66 cases. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012;22:305–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boussakri H, Elidrissi M, Azarkane M, Bensaad S, Bachiri M, Shimi M, Elibrahimi A, Elmrini A. Fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal bone, treated by percutaneous intramedullary nailing: surgical technique, radiological and clinical results study (28 cases). Pan Afr Med J. 2014;18:187.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shen K, Xu Y, Cao D, Wang Z, Cai H. Outcome of antegrade intramedullary fixation for juvenile fifth metacarpal neck fracture with titanium elastic nail. Exp Ther Med. 2017;13:2997–3002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    She Y, Xu Y. Treatment of fifth metacarpal neck fractures with antegrade single elastic intramedullary nailing. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18:238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Amsallem L, Pierrart J, Bihel T, Sekri J, Lafosse T, Masmejean E, Delgrande D. Simplified internal fixation of fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104:257–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jahss SA. Fractures of the metacarpals: a new method of reduction and immobilization. J Bone Jt Surg. 1938;20:178–86.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Foucher G, Chemorin C, Sibilly A. Nouveau procédé d’ostéosynthèse original dans les fractures du tiers distal du cinquième métacarpien. Nouv Presse Méd. 1976;5:1139–40.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schädel-Höpfner M, Wild M, Windolf J, Linhart W. Antegrade intramedullary splinting or percutaneous retrograde crossed pinning for displaced neck fractures of the fifth metacarpal? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:435–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pogliacomi F, Mijno E, Pedrazzini A, Tocco S, Tonani M, Ceccarelli F, Vaienti E. Fifth metacarpal neck fractures: fixation with antegrade locked flexible intramedullary nailing. Acta Biomed. 2017;88:57–64.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Root CG, London DA, Schroeder NS, Calfee RP. Anatomical relationships and branching patterns of the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2013;38:1131–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kadlub N, Danino A, Trost O, Robe N, Malka G. Boxer’s fracture: Cost evaluation orthopaedic or surgical treatment. Chir Main. 2006;25:152–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bade H, Schubert M, Koebke J. Functional morphology of the deep transverse metacarpal ligament. Ann Anat. 1994;176:443–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee KS, Baek JR, Kim SB. The neglected rupture of deep transverse metacarpal ligament. Hand Surg. 2003;8:277–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Khan A, Giddins G. The outcome of conservative treatment of spiral metacarpal fractures and the role of the deep transverse metacarpal ligaments in stabilizing these injuries. J Hand Surg [Eur]. 2015;40:59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryLebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Lebanese American University School of MedicineBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations