Advertisement

Logistical factors associated with adverse outcomes following emergency surgery in an acute care surgical unit

  • Daniel NelEmail author
  • Christo Kloppers
  • Shreya Rayamajhi
  • Juan H. Klopper
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The Acute Care Surgical Unit at Groote Schuur Hospital was established in 2010 and is the first of its kind in Africa. The aim of this study was to describe the outcomes of emergency surgical cases, as well as determine the logistical factors associated with adverse outcomes following surgery within the unit.

Methods

This study was a retrospective audit which reviewed the folders of adult patients who underwent an emergency surgical procedure from July 2016 to July 2017. The primary outcome was a major adverse event (AE) which was defined by a Clavien–Dindo score of 3–5. A number of logistical factors related to patient admission and operation were evaluated for association with outcomes.

Results

A total of 271 patients were included with a mean age of 47 years, with 48% females and 52% males. A major AE was recorded for 13% of patients. The following factors were found to be predictive of a major AE: referral from outside the hospital, urgent booking colour code, reoperation, and consultant most senior surgeon present during procedure. Patient admission/surgery performed outside of normal working hours, being booked for surgery on admission, as well as delay to surgery beyond colour code were not associated with a major AE.

Conclusion

Apart from the traditional clinical parameters, factors related to perioperative logistics may contribute to the risk of a major AE after emergency surgery and should be considered for inclusion in more comprehensive predictive models for adverse outcomes within an acute care surgery unit.

Keywords

Emergency surgery Acute care surgery Complications Mortality Prognostication 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr Richard Spence for his advice on the manuscript preparation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Daniel Nel, Christo Kloppers, Shreya Rayamajhi, and Juan Klopper declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Stitzenberg KB, Sheldon GF. Progressive specialization within general surgery: adding to the complexity of workforce planning. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;6:925–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cubas RF, Gómez NR, Rodriguez S, Wanis M, Sivanandam A, Garberoglio CA. Outcomes in the management of appendicitis and cholecystitis in the setting of a new acute care surgery service model: impact on timing and cost. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;5:715–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoyt DB, Kim HD, Barrios C. Acute care surgery: a new training and practice model in the United States. World J Surg. 2008;8:1630–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lau B, DiFronzo LA. An acute care surgery model improves timeliness of care and reduces hospital stay for patients with acute cholecystitis. Am Surg. 2011;10:1318–21.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schaetzel S, Dirks R, Davis J. Comparison of outcomes of patients with acute appendicitis between an acute care surgery model and traditional call coverage model in the same community. Am J Surg. 2016;6:1083–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gandy RC, Truskett PG, Wong SW, Smith S, Bennett MH, Parasyn AD. Outcomes of appendicectomy in an acute care surgery model. Med J Aust. 2010;5:281–4.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fu CY, Huang HC, Chen RJ, Tsuo HC, Tung HJ. Implementation of the acute care surgery model provides benefits in the surgical treatment of the acute appendicitis. Am J Surg. 2014;5:794–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Von Conrady D, Hamza S, Weber D, Kalani K, Epari K, Wallace M, Fletcher D. The acute surgical unit: improving emergency care. ANZ J Surg. 2010;12:933–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nagaraja V, Eslick GD, Cox MR. The acute surgical unit model verses the traditional “on call” model: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2014;6:1381–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Page DE, Dooreemeah D, Thiruchelvam D. Acute surgical unit: the Australasian experience. ANZ J Surg. 2014;1–2:25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koea JB, Srinivasa S, Hundal H. Provision of acute general surgery: a systematic review of models of care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;1:219–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sudarshan M, Feldman LS, Louis ES, Al-Habboubi M, Hassan MM, Fata P, Deckelbaum DL, Razek TS, Khwaja KA. Predictors of mortality and morbidity for acute care surgery patients. J Surg Res. 2015;2:868–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mentula PJ, Leppäniemi AK. Applicability of the Clavien–Dindo classification to emergency surgical procedures: a retrospective cohort study on 444 consecutive patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2014;1:31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elshove-Bolk J, Ellensen VS, Baatrup G. Logistics and outcome in urgent and emergency colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:e255-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khan S, Zafar H, Zafar SN, Haroon N. Inter-facility transfer of surgical emergencies in a developing country: effects on management and surgical outcomes. World J Surg. 2014;2:281–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Klopper JH, Rayamajhi S, Venter JJ, De Villiers DJ, Almgla N, Kloppers JC. Provision of acute and elective general surgical care at a tertiary facility in the era of subspecialisation. S Afr Med J. 2017;11:948–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;2:187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spence RT, Hampton M, Pluke K, Kahn M, Chinyepi N, Elmusbahi M, van Wyngaard T, Panieri E. Factors associated with adverse events after emergency laparotomy in Cape Town, South Africa: identifying opportunities for quality improvement. J Surg Res. 2016;2:363–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aloia TA, Cooper A, Shi W, Vauthey JN, Lee JE. Reoperative surgery: a critical risk factor for complications inadequately captured by operative reporting and coding of lysis of adhesions. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;1:143–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shakerian R, Thomson BN, Gorelik A, Hayes IP, Skandarajah AR. Outcomes in emergency general surgery following the introduction of a consultant-led unit. Br J Surg. 2015;13:1726–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Casadei R, Ricci C, Pezzilli R, Calculli L, D’Ambra M, Taffurelli G, Minni F. Assessment of complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification after distal pancreatectomy. J Pancreas. 2011;2:126–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of General SurgeryGroote Schuur HospitalCape TownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Head of Acute Care Surgery Unit, Division of General SurgeryGroote Schuur HospitalCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations