Advertisement

Trauma care in German-speaking countries: have changes in the curricula led to changes in practice after 10 years?

  • Sarah Kuhn-Régnier
  • Michael Stickel
  • Björn-Christian Link
  • Henning Fischer
  • Reto Babst
  • Frank J. P. BeeresEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Traditionally, in the German-speaking countries, trauma patients are treated by general surgeons specialized in trauma surgery known as the Unfallchirurg. Over the last decade, a trend towards a lower influence of surgeons and a higher influence of subspecialties in the emergency department has been noted. With additional transformations in the health care system towards highly specialized medicine and the arising of new (sub-) specialties, diversification in the management of the trauma patient appears to occur. The new curricula for surgical disciplines providing trauma care will widen this issue even further, moreover, triggered by the Anglo-American medical model. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the current situation in German-speaking countries concerning the management of trauma patients. The interfaces between emergency physicians, orthopaedic and general surgeons have been investigated concerning the management of the trauma patients. Additionally, different future scenarios have been evaluated.

Methods

An online questionnaire was submitted to members of the German Society of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery [Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DGOU)], including both general and orthopaedic surgeons, emergency physicians and also some members from Austria, the Netherlands and Switzerland. Questions dealt with demographic data, the current situation in the clinic of the responders in terms of management of mono- and polytrauma patients as well as fracture care. In addition, various future scenarios were evaluated.

Results

293 members of the DGOU answered the questionnaire. The majority of the responders (45%) were orthopaedic surgeons and 34% were general trauma surgeons. Sixty-two per cent of hospitals run their emergency departments with emergency physicians. Treatment of both mono- and polytrauma patients in the emergency department is equally distributed between general and orthopaedic surgeons. Fracture care, however, is predominantly (65%) being performed by general trauma surgeons in both mono- and polytrauma patients. The majority of the respondents (80%) do not want to change the current situation and predict that in the future fracture care will still be performed by general surgeons’ specialized in trauma surgery. Approximately two-thirds of the responders do not believe that emergency physicians will play a bigger role in the management of trauma patients in the future.

Conclusion

Despite the growing importance of emergency physicians, separated in the emergency room between surgical and internal medicine fields, in the acute care of surgical patients in the emergency departments, their role in the management of the polytraumatized patients remains limited. More than 13 years after the new curricula for orthopaedic and general surgery have been implemented in Germany, fracture care is still predominantly provided by general surgeons specialized in trauma surgery. In conclusion, it seems that the general surgeon specialized in trauma surgery still plays and wants to play the key role in the management of the polytrauma patient and fracture care in German-speaking countries.

Keywords

Polytrauma Fracture care General surgery Emergency physician 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Sarah K. Kuhn-Régnier, Michael Stickel, Björn-Christian Link, Henning Fischer, Reto Babst and Frank J. P. Beeres declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Soreide K. Trauma and the acute care surgery model—should it embrace or replace general surgery? Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med S. 2009;17:4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mittelmeier T, et al. Der Weg zum Unfallchirurgen—Teil II. Unfallchirurg. 2010;113:598–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ekkernkamp A, Probst J. Von der Unfallheilkunde zur Unfallchirurgie. Z ärztl Fortbild Qual Gesundh Wes S. 2004;98:31–6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Masmejean EH, Faye A, Alnot JY, Mignon AF. Trauma care systems in France. Injury. 2003;34(9):669–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Probst J, Siebert H, Zwipp H. 60 Jahre Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie nach Wiederbegründung - Meilensteine auf dem Weg von der Unfallheilkunde zur Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. Herausgeber: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie. Auflage im Oktober 2010Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bundesärztekammer, Deutschland. Weiterbildungsordnung 2013 in der Fassung vom 23.10.2015. 2015.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for de-scribing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma S. 1974;14(3):187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Österreichische Ärztekammer. Facharzt Weiterbildungsordnung Orthopädie und Traumatologie. 2015.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ford K, Menchine M, Burner E, Arora S, Inaba K, Demetriades D, Yersin B. Leadership and teamwork in trauma and resuscitation. West J Emerg Med S. 2016;17(5):549–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    http://www.eusem.org. Zitat vom: 13.11.2016.
  12. 12.
    http://www.knmg.nl. Accessed 16 Nov 2016
  13. 13.
    Korkeaoja J. Council Direktive 2006/100/EC. European Society for Emergency Medecine. Council Directive 2006/100/EC. 20.12.2006. Official Journal of the European Union.Union. 2006.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgen. Pressemeldung vom 01.08.2013. 2013.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beerheide R. Ambulante Notfallversorgung: Kassen fordern mehr Kooperation. Dtsch Arztebl S. 2016;113(37):A-1572/B-1328/C-1304.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rucholtz S, Lefering R, Debus F, Mand C, Kuhne C, Siebert H. TraumaregisterTraumNet-work DGU® und TraumaRegister DGU®. Chirurg S. 2015;84:730–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leppäniemi A. Trauma systems in Europe. Curr Opin Crit Care S. 2005;11(6):576–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lansink KW, Leenen LP. Do designated trauma systems improve outcome? Curr Opin Crit Care S. 2007;13(6):686–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie. Jahresbericht TraumaRegister. 2013. http://www.traumaregister-dgu.de. Zitat vom: 13.11.2016.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Kuhn-Régnier
    • 1
  • Michael Stickel
    • 2
  • Björn-Christian Link
    • 1
  • Henning Fischer
    • 2
  • Reto Babst
    • 1
  • Frank J. P. Beeres
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Klinik für Orthopädie und UnfallchirurgieLuzerner KantonsspitalLucerneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Interdisziplinäres NotfallzentrumLuzerner KantonsspitalLucerneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations