Advertisement

Analysis of REBOA in systematic reviews: it is early to provide evidence-based, strong recommendations

  • R. Manzano Nunez
  • C. A. Ordoñez Delgado
Letter to the Editor

Keywords

REBOA Endovascular procedures Systematic review Bias 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Ramiro Manzano Nunez and Carlos A. Ordoñez Delgado comply with the ethical guidelines for authorship and publishing in the European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. This letter does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the authors. Finally, informed consent is not applicable to this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

Ramiro Manzano Nunez and Carlos A. Ordoñez Delgado certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. No funding was received for the writing of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Branco BC, DuBose JJ. Endovascular solutions for the management of penetrating trauma: an update on REBOA and axillo-subclavian injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2016:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0739-5.
  2. 2.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLOS Med. 2009;6:e1000100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. Br Med J 2015;349.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnard EBG, Morrison JJ, Madureira RM, Lendrum R, Fragoso-Iñiguez M, Edwards A, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA): a population based gap analysis of trauma patients in England and Wales. Emerg Med J. 2015;32:926–32. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morrison JJ, Galgon RE, Jansen JO, Fficm F, Cannon JW, Rasmussen TE, et al. A systematic review of the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the management of hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;80:324–34. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Belenkiy SM, Batchinsky AI, Rasmussen TE, Cancio LC. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for hemorrhage control: Past, present, and future. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015;79.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moore LJ, Brenner M, Kozar RA, Pasley J, Wade CE, Baraniuk MS, et al. Implementation of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta as an alternative to resuscitative thoracotomy for noncompressible truncal hemorrhage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;79:523–32. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinical Research CenterFundación Valle del LiliCaliColombia
  2. 2.Division of Acute Care SurgeryFundación Valle del LiliCaliColombia

Personalised recommendations