European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 565–569 | Cite as

Geriatric hip fracture management: keys to providing a successful program

  • N. Basu
  • M. Natour
  • V. Mounasamy
  • S. L. KatesEmail author
Original Article



Hip fractures are a common event in older adults and are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and costs. This review examines the necessary elements required to implement a successful geriatric fracture program and identifies some of the barriers faced when implementing a successful program.


The Geriatric Fracture Center (GFC) is a treatment model that standardizes the approach to the geriatric fracture patient. It is based on five principles: surgical fracture management; early operative intervention; medical co-management with geriatricians; patient-centered, standard order sets to employ best practices; and early discharge planning with a focus on early functional rehabilitation. Implementing a geriatric fracture program begins with an assessment of the hospital’s data on hip fractures and standard care metrics such as length of stay, complications, time to surgery, readmission rates and costs. Business planning is essential along with the medical planning process.


To successfully develop and implement such a program, strong physician leadership is necessary to articulate both a short- and long-term plan for implementation. Good communication is essential—those organizing a geriatric fracture program must be able to implement standardized plans of care working with all members of the healthcare team and must also be able to foster relationships both within the hospital and with other institutions in the community. Finally, a program of continual quality improvement must be undertaken to ensure that performance outcomes are improving patient care.


Geriatric Hip fracture Management Implementation 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Niladri Basu, M. Natour, Varatharaj Mounasamy and Stephen L. Kates declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


  1. 1.
    NHDS (2015) National Hospital Discharge Survey, National Center for Health Statistics, “Health Data, Interactive, Health care Use and Expenditures”, Centers for Disease Control. Accessed 31 Jan 2016.
  2. 2.
    National Center for Injury Prevention and Control CfDCaPCfDCaP (2015) Injury Prevention & Control: Data & Statistics (WISQARS). Accessed 15 Oct 2015.
  3. 3.
    Brown CA, Starr AZ, Nunley JA. Analysis of past secular trends of hip fractures and predicted number in the future 2010–2050. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(2):117–22. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318219c61a.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mears S, Kates S, Ahmed O, Bass J, Tyler W, et al. A guide to improving the care of patients with fragility fractures, second edition. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2015;6(2):58–120.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievanen H, Heinonen A, Vuori I, Jarvinen M. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone. 1996;18(1 Suppl):57S–63S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Braithwaite RS, Col NF, Wong JB. Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(3):364–70 (pii: jgs51110).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cummings SR, Rubin SM, Black D. The future of hip fractures in the United States. Numbers, costs, and potential effects of postmenopausal estrogen. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;252:163–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shiga T, Wajima Z, Ohe Y. Is operative delay associated with increased mortality of hip fracture patients? Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55(3):146–54. doi: 10.1007/BF03016088.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giusti A, Barone A, Razzano M, Pizzonia M, Pioli G. Optimal setting and care organization in the management of older adults with hip fracture. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011;47(2):281–96 (pii: R33112529).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balasubramanian A, Tosi LL, Lane JM, Dirschl DR, Ho PR, O’Malley CD. Declining rates of osteoporosis management following fragility fractures in the U.S., 2000 through 2009. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2014;96(7):e52. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Bingham KW, Kates SL. Impact of a comanaged Geriatric Fracture Center on short-term hip fracture outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(18):1712–7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, McCann RM. Geriatric co-management of proximal femur fractures: total quality management and protocol-driven care result in better outcomes for a frail patient population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(7):1349–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01770.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kates SL, Mendelson DA, Friedman SM. Co-managed care for fragility hip fractures (Rochester model). Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(Suppl 4):S621–5. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1417-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prestmo A, Hagen G, Sletvold O, Helbostad JL, Thingstad P, Taraldsen K, Lydersen S, Halsteinli V, Saltnes T, Lamb SE, Johnsen LG, Saltvedt I. Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9978):1623–33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62409-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schnell S, Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Bingham KW, Kates SL. The 1-year mortality of patients treated in a hip fracture program for elders. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2010;1(1):6–14. doi: 10.1177/2151458510378105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kates SL, Mendelson DA, Friedman SM. The value of an organized fracture program for the elderly: early results. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(4):233–7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e5e901.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Della Rocca GJ, Moylan KC, Crist BD, Volgas DA, Stannard JP, Mehr DR. Comanagement of geriatric patients with hip fractures: a retrospective, controlled, cohort study. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2013;4(1):10–5. doi: 10.1177/2151458513495238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Collinge CA, McWilliam-Ross K, Beltran MJ, Weaver T. Measures of clinical outcome before, during, and after implementation of a comprehensive geriatric hip fracture program: is there a learning curve? J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27(12):672–6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318291f0e5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gu Q, Koenig L, Mather RC 3rd, Tongue J. Surgery for hip fracture yields societal benefits that exceed the direct medical costs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(11):3536–46. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3820-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moja L, Piatti A, Pecoraro V, Ricci C, Virgili G, Salanti G, Germagnoli L, Liberati A, Banfi G. Timing matters in hip fracture surgery: patients operated within 48 h have better outcomes. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of over 190,000 patients. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046175.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, Guyatt GH, Schemitsch E, Debeer J, Bhandari M. Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2010;182(15):1609–16. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.092220.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liem IS, Kammerlander C, Suhm N, Kates SL, Blauth M. Literature review of outcome parameters used in studies of geriatric fracture centers. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(2):181–7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-012-1594-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fisher AA, Davis MW, Rubenach SE, Sivakumaran S, Smith PN, Budge MM. Outcomes for older patients with hip fractures: the impact of orthopedic and geriatric medicine cocare. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(3):172–8. doi: 10.1097/ (discussion 179-180).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O’Malley NT, Blauth M, Suhm N, Kates SL. Hip fracture management, before and beyond surgery and medication: a synthesis of the evidence. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(11):1519–27. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1341-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alagiakrishnan K, Wiens CA. An approach to drug induced delirium in the elderly. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80(945):388–93. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2003.017236.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wilk A, Sajjan S, Modi A, Fan CP, Mavros P. Post-fracture pharmacotherapy for women with osteoporotic fracture: analysis of a managed care population in the USA. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(12):2777–86. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2827-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kates SL, Kates OS, Mendelson DA. Advances in the medical management of osteoporosis. Injury. 2007;38(Suppl 3):S17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.08.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bukata SV, Kates SL, O’Keefe RJ. Short-term and long-term orthopaedic issues in patients with fragility fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(8):2225–36. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1779-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kates SL. Lean business model and implementation of a geriatric fracture center. Clin Geriatr Med. 2014;30(2):191–205 (3/4/2014).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kates SL, O’Malley N, Friedman SM, Mendelson DA. Barriers to implementation of an organized geriatric fracture program. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012;3(1):8–16. doi: 10.1177/2151458512436423.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kates SL, Behrend C, Mendelson DA, Cram P, Friedman SM. Hospital readmission after hip fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(3):329–37. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2141-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Basu
    • 1
  • M. Natour
    • 1
  • V. Mounasamy
    • 1
  • S. L. Kates
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryVCU Medical CenterRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations