Geriatric hip fracture management: keys to providing a successful program
- 711 Downloads
Hip fractures are a common event in older adults and are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and costs. This review examines the necessary elements required to implement a successful geriatric fracture program and identifies some of the barriers faced when implementing a successful program.
The Geriatric Fracture Center (GFC) is a treatment model that standardizes the approach to the geriatric fracture patient. It is based on five principles: surgical fracture management; early operative intervention; medical co-management with geriatricians; patient-centered, standard order sets to employ best practices; and early discharge planning with a focus on early functional rehabilitation. Implementing a geriatric fracture program begins with an assessment of the hospital’s data on hip fractures and standard care metrics such as length of stay, complications, time to surgery, readmission rates and costs. Business planning is essential along with the medical planning process.
To successfully develop and implement such a program, strong physician leadership is necessary to articulate both a short- and long-term plan for implementation. Good communication is essential—those organizing a geriatric fracture program must be able to implement standardized plans of care working with all members of the healthcare team and must also be able to foster relationships both within the hospital and with other institutions in the community. Finally, a program of continual quality improvement must be undertaken to ensure that performance outcomes are improving patient care.
KeywordsGeriatric Hip fracture Management Implementation
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Niladri Basu, M. Natour, Varatharaj Mounasamy and Stephen L. Kates declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Compliance with ethical guidelines
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
- 1.NHDS (2015) National Hospital Discharge Survey, National Center for Health Statistics, “Health Data, Interactive, Health care Use and Expenditures”, Centers for Disease Control. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db182.htm. Accessed 31 Jan 2016.
- 2.National Center for Injury Prevention and Control CfDCaPCfDCaP (2015) Injury Prevention & Control: Data & Statistics (WISQARS). http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/. Accessed 15 Oct 2015.
- 12.Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, McCann RM. Geriatric co-management of proximal femur fractures: total quality management and protocol-driven care result in better outcomes for a frail patient population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(7):1349–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01770.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Prestmo A, Hagen G, Sletvold O, Helbostad JL, Thingstad P, Taraldsen K, Lydersen S, Halsteinli V, Saltnes T, Lamb SE, Johnsen LG, Saltvedt I. Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9978):1623–33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62409-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Moja L, Piatti A, Pecoraro V, Ricci C, Virgili G, Salanti G, Germagnoli L, Liberati A, Banfi G. Timing matters in hip fracture surgery: patients operated within 48 h have better outcomes. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of over 190,000 patients. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046175.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar