Advertisement

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 645–650 | Cite as

Anterior fixation of unstable pelvic ring fractures using the modified Stoppa approach: mid-term results are independent on patients’ age

  • J. D. BastianEmail author
  • A. Ansorge
  • S. Tomagra
  • K. A. Siebenrock
  • L. M. Benneker
  • L. Büchler
  • M. J. B. Keel
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Open surgical management of unstable pelvic ring injuries has been discussed controversially compared to percutaneous techniques in terms of surgical site morbidity especially in older patients. Thus, we assessed the impact of age on the outcome following fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries through the modified Stoppa approach.

Methods

Out of a consecutive series of 92 patients eligible for the study, 63 patients (mean age 50 years, range 19–78) were evaluated [accuracy of reduction, complications, failures, Majeed-Score, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI), Mainz Pain Staging System (MPSS)] at a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (range 1.0–7.9). Logistic multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the outcome in relation to increasing patient age and/or Injury Severity Score (ISS).

Results

Out of 63 patients, in 36 an “anatomic” reduction was achieved. Ten postoperative complications occurred in eight patients. In five patients, failure of fixation was noted at the anterior and/or posterior pelvic ring. In 49 patients, an “excellent” or “good” Majeed-Score was obtained; the mean ODI was 14 % (range 0–76 %); 50 patients reported either no or only minor chronic pelvic pain (MPSS). Only an increasing ISS conferred an increased likelihood of the occurrence of a non-anatomical reduction, a “poor” or “fair” Majeed-Score, or an ODI >20 %.

Conclusions

Increasing age did not impact the analysed parameters. Open reduction and internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring through a modified Stoppa approach in unstable pelvic ring injuries did not result in an unfavourable outcome with increasing age of patients.

Keywords

Pelvic ring injury Modified Stoppa approach Outcome Osteosynthesis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Paul Rodham, Newcastle, UK for linguistic help in the preparation of this manuscript. We thank Dr. Daniel Dietrich, Institute of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Bern, Switzerland for performing the statistical analysis and his assistance in interpretation of the results.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Johannes Dominik Bastian, Alexandre Ansorge, Salvatore Tomagra, Klaus Arno Siebenrock, Lorin Michael Benneker, Lorenz Büchler, Marius Johann Baptist Keel declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and was performed in compliance with ethical requirements.

References

  1. 1.
    Rommens PM. Is there a role for percutaneous pelvic and acetabular reconstruction? Injury. 2007;38(4):463–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E. Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964;46:1615–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matta JM. Indications for anterior fixation of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:88–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tile M. Pelvic ring fractures: should they be fixed? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70(1):1–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cole JD, Bolhofner BR. Acetabular fracture fixation via a modified Stoppa limited intrapelvic approach. Description of operative technique and preliminary treatment results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;305:112–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stoppa R, Petit J, Abourachid H, Henry X, Duclaye C, Monchaux G, et al. Original procedure of groin hernia repair: interposition without fixation of Dacron tulle prosthesis by subperitoneal median approach. Chirurgie. 1973;99(2):119–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hirvensalo E, Lindahl J, Kiljunen V. Modified and new approaches for pelvic and acetabular surgery. Injury. 2007;38(4):431–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ponsen KJ, Joosse P, Schigt A, Goslings JC, Luitse JS. Internal fracture fixation using the Stoppa approach in pelvic ring and acetabular fractures: technical aspects and operative results. J Trauma. 2006;61(3):662–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Culemann U, Marintschev I, Gras F, Pohlemann T. Infra-acetabular corridor–technical tip for an additional screw placement to increase the fixation strength of acetabular fractures. J Trauma. 2011;70(1):244–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14(3):187–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sink EL, Leunig M, Zaltz I, Gilbert JC, Clohisy J. Reliability of a complication classification system for orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(8):2220–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rommens PM, Hessmann MH. Staged reconstruction of pelvic ring disruption: differences in morbidity, mortality, radiologic results, and functional outcomes between B1, B2/B3, and C-type lesions. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16(2):92–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Majeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71(2):304–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25(24):3115–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gerbershagen HJ, Dagtekin O, Isenberg J, Martens N, Ozgur E, Krep H, et al. Chronic pain and disability after pelvic and acetabular fractures–assessment with the Mainz Pain Staging System. J Trauma. 2010;69(1):128–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Culemann U, Scola A, Tosounidis G, Pohlemann T, Gebhard F. Concept for treatment of pelvic ring injuries in elderly patients. A challenge. Unfallchirurg. 2010;113(4):258–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meyhoff CS, Thomsen CH, Rasmussen LS, Nielsen PR. High incidence of chronic pain following surgery for pelvic fracture. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(2):167–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Jarvinen M. Epidemiology of osteoporotic pelvic fractures in elderly people in Finland: sharp increase in 1970-1997 and alarming projections for the new millennium. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(5):443–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cole PA, Gauger EM, Anavian J, Ly TV, Morgan RA, Heddings AA. Anterior pelvic external fixator versus subcutaneous internal fixator in the treatment of anterior ring pelvic fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(5):269–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E, Bostman O, Santavirta S. Failure of reduction with an external fixator in the management of injuries of the pelvic ring. Long-term evaluation of 110 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(6):955–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rommens PM, Wagner D, Hofmann A. Osteoporotic fractures of the pelvic ring. Z Orthop Unfall. 2012;150(3):e107–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gardner MJ, Mehta S, Mirza A, Ricci WM. Anterior pelvic reduction and fixation using a subcutaneous internal fixator. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(5):314–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hiesterman TG, Hill BW, Cole PA. Surgical technique: a percutaneous method of subcutaneous fixation for the anterior pelvic ring: the pelvic bridge. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(8):2116–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vaidya R, Kubiak EN, Bergin PF, Dombroski DG, Critchlow RJ, Sethi A, et al. Complications of anterior subcutaneous internal fixation for unstable pelvis fractures: a multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(8):2124–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vaidya R, Colen R, Vigdorchik J, Tonnos F, Sethi A. Treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries with an internal anterior fixator and posterior fixation: initial clinical series. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT, Grujic L. The retrograde medullary superior pubic ramus screw for the treatment of anterior pelvic ring disruptions: a new technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9(1):35–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kuttner M, Klaiber A, Lorenz T, Fuchtmeier B, Neugebauer R. The pelvic subcutaneous cross-over internal fixator. Unfallchirurg. 2009;112(7):661–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury. 2013;44(12):1733–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. D. Bastian
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Ansorge
    • 1
  • S. Tomagra
    • 1
  • K. A. Siebenrock
    • 1
  • L. M. Benneker
    • 1
  • L. Büchler
    • 1
  • M. J. B. Keel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, InselspitalUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations