Abdominal blast injuries: different patterns, severity, management, and prognosis according to the main mechanism of injury
- 354 Downloads
To review the frequency, different patterns, anatomic severity, management, and prognosis of abdominal injuries in survivors of explosions, according to the main mechanism of injury.
A MEDLINE search was conducted from January 1982 to August 2013, including the following MeSH terms: blast injuries, abdominal injuries. EMBASE was also searched, with the same entries. Abdominal blast injuries (ABIs) have been defined as injuries resulting not only from the effects of the overpressure on abdominal organs, but also from the multimechanistic effects and projectile fragments resulting from the blast. Special emphasis was placed on the detailed assessment of ABIs in patients admitted to GMUGH (Gregorio Marañón University General Hospital) after the Madrid 2004 terrorist bombings, and in patients admitted to HYMC (Hillel Yaffe Medical Centre) in Hadera (Israel) following several bombing episodes. The anatomic severity of injuries was assessed by the abdominal component of the AIS, and the overall anatomic severity of casualties was assessed by means of the NISS.
Abdominal injuries are not common in survivors of terrorist explosions, although they are a frequent finding in those immediately killed. Primary and tertiary blast injuries have predominated in survivors from explosions in enclosed spaces reported outside of Israel. In contrast, secondary blast injuries causing fragmentation wounds were predominant in suicide bombings in open and/or semi-confined spaces, mainly in Israel, and also in military conflicts. Multiple perforations of the ileum seem to be the most common primary blast injury to the bowel, but delayed bowel perforations are rare. Secondary blast injuries carry the highest anatomic severity and mortality rate. Most of the deaths assessed occurred early, with hemorrhagic shock from penetrating fragments as the main contributing factor. The negative laparotomy rate has been very variable, with higher rates reported, in general, from civilian hospitals attending a large number of casualties.
The pattern, severity, management, and prognosis of ABI vary considerably, in accordance with the main mechanism of injury.
KeywordsBlast injuries Abdominal injuries Fragment wounds Explosions
Conflict of interest
F. Turégano-Fuentes, D. Pérez-Diaz, M. Sanz-Sánchez, R. Alfici, and I. Ashkenazi declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Compliance with ethics guidelines
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
- 2.Centers for Disease Control. Explosions and blast injuries: a primer for clinicians. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control; 2007.Google Scholar
- 4.Holcomb JB, McMullin NR, Pearse L, et al. Causes of death in US. Special operations forces in the global war on terrorism: 2001–2004. Ann Surg. 2007;245:986–91.Google Scholar
- 5.Owens BD, Kragh JF, Wenke JC, Macaitis J, Wade CE, Holcomb J. Combat wounds in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. J Trauma. 2008;64:295–9.Google Scholar
- 22.Shenoy SG, Pai PR, Dalvie S, Bapat RD. Analytical data of March 1993 blast victims—the KEM Hospital experience. J Postgrad Med. 1993;39:10–3.Google Scholar
- 46.Nechaev EA, Gritsanov AI, Formin NF, Minnullin IP. Mine blast trauma: experience from the war in Afghanistan. Varnamo: Russian Ministry of Public Health and Medical Industry; 1995.Google Scholar
- 57.Cripps NPJ, Glover MA, Guy RJ. The pathophysiology of primary blast injury and its implications for treatment. Part II: the auditory structures and abdomen. J R Nav Med Serv. 1999;851:13–24.Google Scholar