Advertisement

Ultrasound diagnosis of supracondylar fractures in children

  • K. Eckert
  • N. Janssen
  • O. Ackermann
  • B. Schweiger
  • E. Radeloff
  • P. Liedgens
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of our study was to evaluate the safety and accuracy of ultrasound (US) compared to standard radiographs in diagnosing supracondylar fractures (SCFs) of the humerus in children.

Patients and methods

A total of 106 children (aged between 1 and 13 years) with clinically suspected SCF of the humerus were primarily examined by US followed by standard two-plane radiographs of the elbow. US was conducted with a linear scanner viewing the distal humerus from seven standardized sectional planes. US fracture diagnosis was established either by a cortical bulging or cortical gap, or by a positive dorsal fat pad (dFP) sign. X-ray diagnosis was stated by an independent pediatric radiologist and, afterwards, compared to our US findings. Sonographic and radiographic findings were collected in a contingency table. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) for US fracture diagnosis were calculated according to the radiographs. In addition, by identifying significant angulation and/or disrupture, SCFs were classified as non-operative/stable and operative/instable SCFs according to the AO Pediatric Fracture Classification System.

Results

By US, a SCF could be excluded in 43 patients and in 63 patients, a fracture was diagnosed. In contrast, by radiographs, an SCF could be excluded in 46 patients and in 60 patients, a fracture was diagnosed. For US fracture diagnosis in comparison to radiographs, we calculated a sensitivity of 100 %, a specificity of 93.5 %, an NPV of 100 %, and a PPV of 95.2 %. Thirty-nine SCFs were sonographically classified as stable grades 1/2 SCFs and confirmed in 37 patients by X-rays. All four operative/instable SCFs were correctly identified by US.

Conclusion

By identifying a positive dFP sign and/or cortical lesions of the distal humerus, SCFs can be detected very sensitively by US. Even the estimation of fracture displacement seems to be possible. We suggest US as an applicable alternative method in the primary evaluation of suspected SCF in children, guiding further diagnostics, where appropriate. After minor injuries, if clinical assessment for an elbow fracture is low and US examination is negative for fracture, additional radiographs are dispensable. Thereby, the amount of X-ray burden during childhood can be reduced, without loss of diagnostic safety.

Keywords

Ultrasound Supracondylar fracture Humerus Elbow Children 

Notes

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Minkowitz B, Busch MT. Supracondylar humerus fractures. Current trends and controversies. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;25(4):581–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hell A, Weinberg A-M, Kraus R, Haxhija E. Kapitel 14 Ellbogen. In: Weinberg A-M, Tscherne H, Henkel R, editors. Unfallchirurgie im Kindesalter. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. p. 253–95.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bache E. Elbow injuries. In: Baert AL, Johnson KJ, Bache E, editors. Imaging in pediatric skeletal trauma: techniques and applications. 1st ed. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer; 2008. p. 257–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alzen G, Duque-Reina D, Urhahn R, et al. Radiographic examination of injuries in children. Clinical and legal considerations about indications. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1992;117:363–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alzen G, Benz-Bohm G. Radiation protection in pediatric radiology. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108(24):407–14.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(24):13761–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brix G, Nekolla E, Griebel J. Radiation exposure of patients from diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures. Facts, assessment and trends. Radiologe. 2005;45:340–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fletcher EW, Baum JD, Draper G. The risk of diagnostic radiation of the newborn. Br J Radiol. 1986;59(698):165–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Linet MS, Kim K, Rajaraman P. Children’s exposure to diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk: epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations. Pediatr Radiol. 2009;39(Suppl 1):S4–26.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rathfelder FJ, Paar O. Ultrasound as an alternative diagnostic measure for fractures during the growth phase. Unfallchirurg. 1995;98:645–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moritz JD, Berthold LD, Soenksen SF, et al. Ultrasound in diagnosis of fractures in children: unnecessary harassment or useful addition to X-ray? Ultraschall Med. 2008;29(3):267–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moritz JD, Hoffmann B, Meuser SH, et al. Is ultrasound equal to X-ray in pediatric fracture diagnosis? Rofo. 2010;182:706–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hübner U, Schlicht W, Outzen S, et al. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(8):1170–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ackermann O, Liedgens P, Eckert K, et al. Sonographische Diagnostik von metaphysären Wulstbrüchen. Unfallchirurg. 2009;112:706–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ackermann O, Sesia S, Berberich T, et al. Sonographische Diagnostik der subcapitalen Humerusfraktur im Wachstumsalter. Unfallchirurg. 2010;113:839–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chaar-Alvarez FM, Warkentine F, Cross K, et al. Bedside ultrasound diagnosis of nonangulated distal forearm fractures in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27:1027–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eckert K, Ackermann O, Schweiger B, et al. Ultrasound as a viable alternative to standard X-rays for the diagnosis of distal forearm fractures in children. Z Orthop Unfall. 2012;150(4):409–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eckert K, Ackermann O, Schweiger B, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of metaphyseal forearm fractures in children: a safe and applicable alternative to standard X-rays. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012;28(9):851–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pountos I, Clegg J, Siddiqui A. Diagnosis and treatment of greenstick and torus fractures of the distal radius in children: a prospective randomised single blind study. J Child Orthop. 2010;4:321–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Williamson D, Watura R, Cobby M. Ultrasound imaging of forearm fractures in children: a viable alternative? J Accid Emerg Med. 2000;17:22–4.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ackermann O, Sesia S, Berberich T, et al. Evaluation of proximal humerus fractures in children with ultrasonography a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011;37:322.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chien M, Bulloch B, Garcia-Filion P, et al. Bedside ultrasound in the diagnosis of pediatric clavicle fractures. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27:1038–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barr LL, Babcock DS. Sonography of the normal elbow. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157(4):793–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Finlay K, Ferri M, Friedman L. Ultrasound of the elbow. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33:63–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grechenig W, Clement H, Schatz B, et al. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of fractures—an experimental study. Biomed Technik. 1997;42:138–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grechenig W, Mayr J, Fellinger M, et al. Sonographic anatomy and pathologic findings of the elbow joint in children and adults. Radiologe. 1998;38:378–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grechenig W, Clement HG, Schatz B, et al. Sonographic examination of trauma to the elbow and hand. Orthopäde. 2002;31:271–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Konermann W, Gruber G. Standard ultrasound sections of the upper extremity—shoulder and elbow joint. Ultraschall Med. 1998;19:130–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Konermann W, Gruber G. Allgemeiner Teil. In: Konermann W, Gruber G, editors. Ultraschalldiagnostik der Stütz- und Bewegungsorgane. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2000. p. 1–38.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Markowitz RI, Davidson RS, Harty MP, et al. Sonography of the elbow in infants and children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159:829–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Zamorani MP, et al. Ultrasound of the elbow. Eur J Ultrasound. 2001;14:21–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Giovagnorio F, et al. Ultrasound of the elbow. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30:605–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tran N, Chow K. Ultrasonography of the elbow. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2007;11:105–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Davidson RS, Markowitz RI, Dormans J, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the elbow in infants and young children after suspected trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(12):1804–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pistor G, Graffstädt H. Sonographic diagnosis of supracondylar fractures of the humerus—retrospective and prospective studies in children. Ultraschall Med. 2003;24:331–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vocke-Hell AK, Schmid A. Sonographic differentiation of stable and unstable lateral condyle fractures of the humerus in children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2001;10(2):138–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang JD, Chen H. Ultrasonography for non-displaced and mini-displaced humeral lateral condyle fractures in children. Chin J Traumatol. 2008;11(5):297–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ziv N, Litwin A, Katz K, et al. Definitive diagnosis of fracture-separation of the distal humeral epiphysis in neonates by ultrasonography. Pediatr Radiol. 1996;26(7):493–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zuazo I, Bonnefoy O, Tauzin C, et al. Acute elbow trauma in children: role of ultrasonography. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38:982–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Slongo T, Audigé L, Schlickewei W, et al. Development and validation of the AO pediatric comprehensive classification of long bone fractures by the Pediatric Expert Group of the AO foundation in collaboration with AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation and the International Association for Pediatric Traumatology. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(1):43–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lutz N, Audigé L, Schmittenbecher P, et al. Diagnostic algorithm for a validated displacement grading of pediatric supracondylar fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(2):117–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rabiner JE, Khine H, Avner JR, et al. Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosis of elbow fractures in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(1):9–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Eckert
    • 1
  • N. Janssen
    • 1
  • O. Ackermann
    • 2
  • B. Schweiger
    • 3
  • E. Radeloff
    • 1
  • P. Liedgens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric SurgeryElisabeth Hospital EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma SurgeryKlinikum DuisburgDuisburgGermany
  3. 3.Department of Radiology and NeuroradiologyUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations