Prehospital triage, discrepancy in priority-setting between emergency medical dispatch centre and ambulance crews

  • A. Khorram-Manesh
  • K. Lennquist Montán
  • A. Hedelin
  • M. Kihlgren
  • P. Örtenwall
Original Article



The timely provision of emergency medical services might be influenced by discrepancies in triage-setting between emergency medical dispatch centre and ambulance crews (ACR) on the scene resulting in overloaded emergency departments (ED) and ambulance activities. The aim of this study was to identify such discrepancies by reviewing ambulance transports within a metropolitan city in the western region of Sweden.


All data regarding ambulance transports in Gothenburg, Sweden, during a 6-month period were obtained and analyzed by reviewing the available registry.


There was a discrepancy between emergency medical dispatch centre and ACR in priority setting, which may result in a number of unnecessary transports to the hospital with consequent overloading of ED and a negative impact on ambulance availability.


Appropriate ambulance use is one important part of emergency preparedness. Overuse results in decreased emergency medical services (EMS) availability and ED-overcrowding. Several factors, such as an imprecise triage system and increased public demands, may influence such overutilization. Improving the triage system and comprehensive public education on appropriate use of ambulances are two important steps toward a better use of national EMS resources.


Ambulances Emergency Medical Services Triage 


Conflict of interest statement



  1. 1.
    Khorram-Manesh A, Hedelin A, Örtenwall P. Hospital-related incidents; causes and its impact on disaster preparedness and prehospital organizations. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009;17:26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cherry RA, Trainer M. The current crisis in emergency care and the impact on disaster preparedness. BMC Emerg Med. 2008;8:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marinovich A, Afilao J, Afilalo M, Colacone A, Unger B, Giguére C, Léger R, Xue X, Boivin JF, McNamara E. Impact of ambulance transportation on resource use in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:312–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brokaw J, Olson L, Fullerton L, et al. Repeated ambulance use by patients with acute alcohol intoxication, seizure disorder, and respiratory illness. Am J Emerg Med. 1998;16:141–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Camasso-Richardson K, Wilde JA, Petrack EM. Medically unnecessary pediatric ambulance transport: a medical taxi service? Acad Emerg Med. 1997;4:1137–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Billittier AJ, Moscati R, Janicke D, et al. A multisite survey of factors contributing to medically unnecessary ambulance transport. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3:1046–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strange GR, Chen EH, Sanders AB. Use of emergency departments by elderly patients: projections from a multicenter data base. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:819–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ruger JP, Richter CJ, Lewis LM. Clinical and economic factors associated with ambulance use to the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:879–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richards JR, Ferrall SJ. Inappropriate use of emergency medical services transport: comparison of provider and patient perspectives. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6:14–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hjälte L, Suserud BO, Herlitz J, Karlberg I. Initial emergency medical dispatching and prehospital needs assessment: a prospective study of the Swedish ambulance service. Eur J Emerg Med. 2007;14:134–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hjälte L, Suserud BO, Herlitz J, Karlberg I. Why are people without medical needs transported by ambulance? A study of indications for prehospital care. Eur J Emerg Med. 2007;14:151–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Cooke MW, Morrell R, Wilson S, Bridge P, Edwards S, Allan TF, Holder RL. Does criteria based dispatch of 999 calls adequately detects the critically ill and injured? Prehosp Immed Care. 1999;3:191–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hinchey P, Myers B, Zalkin J, Lewis R, Garner D. Low acuity EMS dispatch criteria can reliably identify patients without high-acuity illness or injury. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007;11:42–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Widgren B, Jourak M. Medical emergancy triage and treatment system (METTS): a new protocol in primary triage and secondary priority decision in emergency medicine. J Emerg Med. 2008 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clawson J, Olola CHO, Heward A, Scott G, Patterson B. Accuracy of emergency medical dispatchers’ subjective ability to identify when higher dispatch levels re warranted over a medical priority dispatch system automated protocol’s recommended coding based on paramedic outcome data. Emerg Med J. 2007;24:560–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O′cathain A, Webber E, Nicholl J, Munro J, Knowles E. NHS direct: consistency of triage outcomes. Emerg Med J. 2003;20:289–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients. Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2009; 58: RR-1. (
  19. 19.
    Squires JP, Mason S. Developing alternative ambulance response schemes: analysis of attitudes, barriers, and change. Emerg Med J. 2004;21:724–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gray JT, Wardrope J. Introduction of non-transport guidelines into an ambulance service: a retrospective review. Emerg Med J. 2007;24:727–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Snooks HA, Dale J, Hartley-Sharpe C, Halter M. On-scene alternatives for emergency ambulance crews attending patients who do not need to travel to the accident and emergency department: a review of the literature. Emerg Med J. 2004;21:212–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kawakami C, Ohshige K, Kubota K, Tochikubo O. Influence of socioeconomic factors on medically unnecessary ambulance calls. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yarris LM, Moreno R, Schmidt TA, Adams AL, Brooks HS. Reasons why patients choose an ambulance and willingness to consider alternatives. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:401–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ohshige K. Reduction in ambulance transports during a public awareness campaign for appropriate ambulance use. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:289–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramanujam P, Guluma KZ, Castillo EM, Chacon M, Jensen MB, Patel E, Linnick W, Dunford JV. Accuracy of stroke recognition by emergency medical dispatchers and paramedics—San Diego experience. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008;12:307–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kindberg K, Nielsen SL, Møller AM. Physician-based prehospital units in Denmark. Ugeskr Laeger. 2009;171:2553–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ringburg AN, Frissen IN, Spanjersberg WR, Jel G, Frankema SP, Schipper IB. Physician-staffed HEMS dispatch in the Netherlands: adequate deployment or minimal utilization? Air Med J. 2005;24:248–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Urban & Vogel 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Khorram-Manesh
    • 1
  • K. Lennquist Montán
    • 1
  • A. Hedelin
    • 1
  • M. Kihlgren
    • 1
  • P. Örtenwall
    • 1
  1. 1.Prehospital and Disaster Medicine CentreGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations