Advertisement

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie

, Volume 194, Issue 10, pp 904–910 | Cite as

Complementary medicine in radiation oncology

German health care professionals’ current qualifications and therapeutic methods
  • Kerstin A. KesselEmail author
  • Evelyn Klein
  • Carolin C. Hack
  • Stephanie E. Combs
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Recently, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has moved more into the focus, and cancer societies such as the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, DKG) have established working groups to develop a guideline for CAM. The present work aims to evaluate the acceptance of CAM in the whole radiation oncology community.

Methods

We conducted an online survey on CAM and sent the modified questionnaire that was successfully distributed to all members of the Research Group on Gynecological Oncology (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynakologische Onkologie, AGO) of the DKG in 2014 to the members of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, DEGRO). The survey consisted of 17 questions regarding personal information and current CAM guidelines within the workplace/clinic.

Results

A total of 143 members participated. Of these, 12% had some CAM qualification. For hematological cancer in 35% and in up to 76% for breast cancer, CAM treatment is offered in German radiation oncology facilities, mainly due to fatigue symptoms. CAM is part of routine treatment in 32.2%, 22.0% are planning to incorporate it. Most physicians advise patients to partake in sports activities and recommend dietary supplements and nutritional counseling. The cost of CAM treatment is fully covered in 9.8% of all participating facilities.

Conclusion

Today, CAM is integrated into cancer care; however, skepticism regarding its effect still exists. Evidence-based results must be generated to convince physicians of the effectiveness of CAM methods. CAM qualifications must be included in physicians’ training to improve their understanding and counseling regarding CAM options in cancer care.

Keywords

Quality of life Neoplasms Integrative medicine Fatigue Surveys and questionnaires 

Komplementärmedizin in der Radioonkologie

Aktuelle Qualifikationen und Therapiemethoden deutscher medizinischer Fachkräfte

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die Komplementär- und Alternativmedizin (CAM) rückt als begleitende Krebstherapie immer stärker in den Fokus und Gesellschaften wie die Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (DKG) gründeten Arbeitsgruppen, um eine Leitlinie zu CAM zu entwickeln. Die vorliegende Arbeit zielt darauf ab, die Akzeptanz von CAM im gesamten Bereich der Radioonkologie zu bewerten.

Methoden

Wir führten eine Online-Befragung zum Thema CAM durch und schickten den im Jahr 2014 erfolgreich verteilten Fragebogen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) an die Mitglieder der Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie (DEGRO). Die Umfrage umfasste 17 Fragen zu persönlichen Informationen und aktuellen Richtlinien in der Klinik und Praxis bezüglich CAM.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt nahmen 143 Mitglieder teil. Von allen hatten 12 % eine CAM-Zusatzqualifikation. In deutschen onkologischen Strahlenkliniken wird eine CAM-Behandlung in 35% bei hämatologischen Krebserkrankungen und in bis zu 76 % bei Mammakarzinomen – hauptsächlich aufgrund einer Fatigue-Symptomatik – angeboten. In 32,2 % ist CAM Teil der Routinebehandlung; 22,0 % planen CAM zu integrieren. Die meisten Ärzte raten den Patienten selbst zu Sport, Nahrungsergänzungsmitteln und Ernährungsberatung. Die CAM-Behandlung ist in 9,8 % aller teilnehmenden Einrichtungen kostendeckend.

Schlussfolgerung

CAM ist bereits in die Krebsbehandlung integriert; dennoch gibt es Skeptiker bezüglich ihrer Wirkung. Evidenzbasierte Ergebnisse müssen generiert werden, um Onkologen von CAM-Methoden zu überzeugen. CAM-Zusatzqualifikation müssen bereits in der Ausbildung der Ärzte gefördert werden, um ihr Verständnis und ihre Beratung bezüglich CAM-Optionen in der Krebsbehandlung zu verbessern.

Schlüsselwörter

Lebensqualität Neoplasien Integrative Medizin Fatigue Umfragen und Fragebögen 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank all DEGRO members who participated in this survey.

Conflict of interest

K.A. Kessel, E. Klein, C.C. Hack, and S.E. Combs declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

66_2018_1345_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (545 kb)
Questioniare (German)

References

  1. 1.
    PDQ Integrative, Alternative, and Complementary Therapies Editorial Board (2002) Topics in integrative, alternative, and complementary therapies (PDQ®): health professional version. National Cancer Institute (US), Bethesda (MD)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aguilar BA (2017) The efficacy of art therapy in pediatric oncology patients: an integrative literature review. J Pediatr Nurs 36:173–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2017.06.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stub T, Quandt SA, Arcury TA et al (2018) Attitudes and knowledge about direct and indirect risks among conventional and complementary health care providers in cancer care. Bmc Complement Altern Med 18:44.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-018-2106-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sertel S, Herrmann S, Greten HJ et al (2009) Additional use of acupuncture to NSAID effectively reduces post-tonsillectomy pain. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:919–925.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0851-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fuller JT, Hartland MC, Maloney LT, Davison K (2018) Therapeutic effects of aerobic and resistance exercises for cancer survivors: a systematic review of meta-analyses of clinical trials. Br J Sports Med.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098285 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agarwal RP, Maroko-Afek A (2018) Yoga into cancer care: a review of the evidence-based research. Int J Yoga 11:3–29.  https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoy.IJOY_42_17 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kessel KA, Fischer H, Oechnser M et al (2017) High-precision radiotherapy for meningiomas: long-term results and patient-reported outcome (PRO). Strahlenther Onkol 29:197.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1156-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klein E, Beckmann MW, Bader W et al (2017) Gynecologic oncologists’ attitudes and practices relating to integrative medicine: results of a nationwide AGO survey. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296:295–301.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4420-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kessel KA, Lettner S, Kessel C et al (2016) Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) as part of the oncological treatment: survey about patients’ attitude towards CAM in a university-based oncology center in Germany. PLoS ONE 11:e165801.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165801 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lettner S, Kessel KA, Combs SE (2017) Complementary and alternative medicine in radiation oncology: survey of patients’ attitudes. Strahlenther Onkol 16:655.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1101-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Akpunar D, Bebis H, Yavan T (2015) Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in patients with gynecologic cancer: a systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 16:7847–7852.  https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.17.7847 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Joos S, Musselmann B, Miksch A et al (2008) The role of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in Germany—a focus group study of GPs. Bmc Health Serv Res 8:127.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-127 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patel SJ, Kemper KJ, Kitzmiller JP (2017) Physician perspectives on education, training, and implementation of complementary and alternative medicine. Adv Med Educ Pract 8:499–503.  https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S138572 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Endres HG, Zenz M, Schaub C et al (2004) German Acupuncture Trials (gerac) address problems of methodology associated with acupuncture studies. Schmerz 19:201–213.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-004-0345-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Enblom A, Johnsson A, Hammar M et al (2012) Acupuncture compared with placebo acupuncture in radiotherapy-induced nausea—a randomized controlled study. Ann Oncol 23:1353–1361.  https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr402 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simcock R, Fallowfield L, Monson K et al (2013) ARIX: A randomised trial of acupuncture v oral care sessions in patients with chronic xerostomia following treatment of head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol 24:776–783.  https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds515 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Montazeri A, Sajadian A, Ebrahimi M, Akbari ME (2004) Depression and the use of complementary medicine among breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 13:339–342.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0709-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mannel M, Kuhn U, Schmidt U et al (2010) St. John’s wort extract LI160 for the treatment of depression with atypical features—a double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial. J Psychiatr Res 44:760–767.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.01.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pan Y, Yang K, Wang Y et al (2017) Could yoga practice improve treatment-related side effects and quality of life for women with breast cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asia-Pacific. J Clin Oncol 13:e79–e95.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.12329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Asadpour R, Kessel KA, Bruckner T et al (2017) Randomized study exploring the combination of radiotherapy with two types of acupuncture treatment (ROSETTA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 18:398.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2139-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jansen E (2017) The role of complementary and alternative medicine in the Healthcare system: a German paradox. Complement Med Res 24:290–294.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000475549 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huebner J, Muenstedt K, Muecke R et al (2013) Counseling cancer patients on complementary and alternative medicine. Background, theory, and implementation of nationwide counseling facilities. Strahlenther Onkol 189:613–617.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-013-0392-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerstin A. Kessel
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Evelyn Klein
    • 3
  • Carolin C. Hack
    • 4
  • Stephanie E. Combs
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der IsarTechnical University of Munich (TUM)MunichGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Innovative Radiotherapy(iRT)Helmholtz Zentrum MünchenNeuherbergGermany
  3. 3.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsTechnical University of Munich (TUM)MunichGermany
  4. 4.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsErlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen/European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN)ErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations