Advertisement

Endovascular Treatment Decision Making in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians

Insights from UNMASK EVT an International Multidisciplinary Study
  • Johanna Maria Ospel
  • Nima Kashani N
  • Bijoy Menon
  • Mohammed Almekhlafi
  • Alexis Wilson
  • Urs Fischer
  • Bruce Campbell
  • Shinichi Yoshimura
  • Francis Turjman
  • Mathew Cherian
  • Ji-Hoe Heo
  • Michael Hill
  • Gustavo Saposnik
  • Mayank GoyalEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Evidence for efficacy and safety in stroke patients ≥80 years is limited, since they were underrepresented in randomized thrombectomy trials. This study sought to explore how physicians approach endovascular therapy (EVT) decision making in octogenarians and nonagenarians under their current local resources under assumed ideal conditions, i.e. without external (monetary or infrastructural) limitations.

Methods

In an international multidisciplinary survey, 607 physicians involved in acute stroke care were randomly assigned 10 out of a pool of 22 case scenarios with different evidence levels for EVT, 4 of which involved octogenarians and 2 nonagenarians, and asked how they would treat the patient in the given scenario A) under their current local resources and B) under assumed ideal conditions, i.e. with no external restraints. Decision rates were calculated and clustered multivariable regression analysis performed to determine adjusted measures of effect size for patient age.

Results

In octogenarians, physicians decided in favor of EVT in 76.7% (all of which were level 2B evidence scenarios) under current local resources and in 80.2% under assumed ideal conditions. In nonagenarians, 74.0% decided in favor of EVT under current local resources (level 1A scenarios: 87.7%, level 2B scenarios: 60.3%) and 79.2% would offer EVT under assumed ideal conditions (level 1A scenarios: 91.3%, level 2B scenarios: 67.2%). Age was not a significant predictor for treatment decision under current local resources (adjusted odds ratio, OR: 0.99, confidence interval, CI: 0.96–1.02 per decile increase) and under assumed ideal conditions (adjusted OR: 1.00, CI 0.97–1.03 per decile increase).

Conclusion

The vast majority of physicians participating in this survey would offer EVT to acute ischemic stroke patients above 80 years.

Keywords

Acute ischemic stroke Elderly patients Mechanical thrombectomy Guidelines 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are most grateful to all participants of the survey.

Funding

The study was funded by Stryker through an unrestricted research grant to the University of Calgary. The company was not involved in the design, execution, analysis, and interpretation or reporting of the results.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Conflict of interest

J.M. Ospel is supported by the University of Basel Research Foundation, the Julia Bangerter Rhyner Foundation and the “Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft Basel” Foundation. U. Fischer is a consultant for Medtronic, Stryker and CSL Behring and Co-Principal Investigator of SWIFT-DIRECT, a randomized controlled endovascular stroke treatment trial (Medtronic). F. Turjman works as a consultant for Balt and Stryker. G. Saposnik is supported by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada Career Award. M. Goyal is a consultant for Medtronic, Stryker, Microvention, GE Healthcare, Mentice. N. Kashani N, B. Menon, M. Almekhlafi, A. Wilson, B. Campbell, S. Yoshimura, M. Cherian, J.-H. Heo and M. Hill declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

For this article no studies with human patients or animals were performed by any of the authors. All studies performed were in accordance with the ethical standards indicated in each case.

Supplementary material

62_2019_848_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Case-scenarios with corresponding evidence levels

References

  1. 1.
    Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387:1723–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, et al. 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute Ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49:e46–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meyer L, Alexandrou M, Leischner H, Flottmann F, Deb-Chatterji M, Abdullayev N, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy in nonagenarians with acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:1091–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sussman ES, Martin B, Mlynash M, Marks MP, Marcellus D, Albers G, et al. Thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke in nonagenarians compared with octogenarians. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Jul 26. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015147. [Epub ahead of print]CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alawieh A, Starke RM, Chatterjee AR, Turk A, De Leacy R, Rai AT, et al. Outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy in the elderly: a ‘real-world’ multicenter study. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:545–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohen JE, Gomori JM, Leker RR. Stent retriever-based thrombectomy in octogenarians. Interv Neurol. 2016;5:111–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharobeam A, Cordato DJ, Manning N, Cheung A, Wenderoth J, Cappelen-Smith C. Functional outcomes at 90 days in octogenarians undergoing thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2019;10:254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saposnik G, Black SE, Hakim A, Fang J, Tu JV, Kapral MK, et al. Age disparities in stroke quality of care and delivery of health services. Stroke. 2009;40:3328–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saposnik G, Cote R, Phillips S, Gubitz G, Bayer N, Minuk J, et al. Stroke outcome in those over 80: a multicenter cohort study across Canada. Stroke. 2008;39:2310–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Castonguay AC, Zaidat OO, Novakovic R, Nguyen TN, Taqi MA, Gupta R, et al. Influence of age on clinical and revascularization outcomes in the North American Solitaire Stent-Retriever Acute Stroke Registry. Stroke. 2014;45:3631–6.  CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chandra RV, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Oh DC, Chaudhry ZA, Mehta BP, Rost NS, et al. Elderly patients are at higher risk for poor outcomes after intra-arterial therapy. Stroke. 2012;43:2356–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharma JC, Fletcher S, Vassallo M. Strokes in the elderly—higher acute and 3‑month mortality—an explanation. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999;9:2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lui SK, Nguyen MH. Elderly stroke rehabilitation: overcoming the complications and its associated challenges. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2018;2018:9853837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saposnik G, Menon BK, Kashani N, Wilson AT, Yoshimura S, Campbell BCV, et al. Factors associated with the decision-making on endovascular thrombectomy for the management of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2019;50:2441–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ospel JM, Kashani N, Goyal M, Menon BK, Campbell BCV, Fischer U, et al. Time of day and endovascular treatment decision in acute stroke with relative endovascular treatment indication: insights from UNMASK EVT international survey. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014976. (Epub ahead of print)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ospel JM, Kashani N, Wilson AT, Fischer U, Campbell BCV, Sylaja PN, et al. Endovascular treatment decision in acute stroke: does physician gender matter? Insights from UNMASK EVT, an international, multidisciplinary survey. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015003. (Epub ahead of print)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turc G, Bhogal P, Fischer U, Khatri P, Lobotesis K, Mazighi M, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO)—European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014569. [Epub ahead of print]CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie. Akuttherapie des ischämischen Schlaganfalls – Ergänzung 2015. 2015. https://www.dgn.org/leitlinien/3198-030-140-rekanalisierende-therapie-ergaenzung-akuttherapie-schlaganfall. Accessed 15 Oct 2019.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Societe francaise de neuroradiologie. Charte de la Thrombectomie. 2019. https://www.sfnr.net/neuroradiologie-quotidien/thrombectomie/charte-thrombectomie. Accessed 15 Oct 2019.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    National Health Service. Clinical Commissioning Policy: mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke (all ages). 2019. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Mechanical-thrombectomy-for-acute-ischaemic-stroke-ERRATA-29-05-19.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2019.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    El Nawar R, Lapergue B, Piotin M, Gory B, Blanc R, Consoli A, et al. Higher annual operator volume is associated with better reperfusion rates in stroke patients treated by mechanical thrombectomy: the ETIS registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:385–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saber H, Navi BB, Grotta JC, Kamel H, Bambhroliya A, Vahidy FS, et al. Real-world treatment trends in endovascular stroke therapy. Stroke. 2019;50:683–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fischer U, Mono ML, Schroth G, Jung S, Mordasini P, El-Koussy M, et al. Endovascular therapy in 201 patients with acute symptomatic occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Eur J Neurol. 2013;20:1017–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johanna Maria Ospel
    • 1
    • 3
  • Nima Kashani N
    • 2
  • Bijoy Menon
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mohammed Almekhlafi
    • 2
    • 3
  • Alexis Wilson
    • 3
  • Urs Fischer
    • 4
  • Bruce Campbell
    • 5
  • Shinichi Yoshimura
    • 6
  • Francis Turjman
    • 7
  • Mathew Cherian
    • 8
  • Ji-Hoe Heo
    • 9
  • Michael Hill
    • 2
    • 3
  • Gustavo Saposnik
    • 10
  • Mayank Goyal
    • 2
    • 3
    • 11
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, University Hospital BaselUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  3. 3.Department of Clinical NeurosciencesUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  4. 4.University Hospital Bern, InselspitalUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  5. 5.Department of Medicine and Neurology, Royal Melbourne HospitalUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  6. 6.Department of NeurosurgeryHyogo College of Medicine 1-1 MukogawaNishinomiyaJapan
  7. 7.Department of Interventional Neuroradiology at Lyon University HospitalUniversity of LyonLyonFrance
  8. 8.Department of RadiologyKovai Medical Center and HospitalCoimbatoreIndia
  9. 9.Department of NeurologyYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulKorea (Republic of)
  10. 10.Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael’s HospitalUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  11. 11.Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical CentreUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations