Systematic Evaluation of Low-dose MDCT for Planning Purposes of Lumbosacral Periradicular Infiltrations
- 16 Downloads
To evaluate image quality and confidence for planning of periradicular infiltrations using virtually lowered tube currents and in-house developed iterative reconstruction (IR) for multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).
A total of 20 patients (mean age 54.9 ± 13.1 years) underwent MDCT for planning purposes of periradicular infiltrations at the lumbosacral spine (120 kVp and 100 mAs). Planning scans were simulated as if they were performed at 50% (D50), 10% (D10), 5% (D5), and 1% (D1) of the tube current of original scanning. Image reconstruction was achieved with two levels of IR (A: similar in appearance to clinical reconstructions, B: 10 times stronger noise reduction). Qualitative image evaluation was performed by two readers (R1 and R2) considering overall image quality and artifacts, image contrast, determination of nerve root, and confidence for intervention planning (scoring: 1 high, 2 medium, and 3 low confidence).
Level A of IR was favorable regarding overall image quality, artifacts, image contrast, and nerve root depiction according to both readers, with preserved good to excellent scores down to D10 scans. The confidence for intervention planning was not significantly different (p > 0.05) between scans with tube currents virtually lowered down to 10% as compared to the original scans when using level A of IR (R1: 1.2 ± 0.4, R2: 1.1 ± 0.3). Inter-reader agreement for planning confidence was good to excellent (range of weighted Cohen’s kappa: 0.62–1.00).
The use of MDCT for planning purposes of lumbosacral periradicular infiltrations may be possible with tube currents lowered down to 10% of standard dose (equal to 10 mAs) without limitations in planning confidence.
KeywordsImage processing Interventional radiology Multidetector computed tomography Radiation dosage Spine
As low as reasonably achievable
Volumetric CT dose index
Field of view
Multidetector computed tomography
Picture archiving and communication system
We acknowledge support through the University of Pennsylvania Research Foundation (URF) and Philips Healthcare.
Compliance with ethical guidelines
Conflict of interest
N. Sollmann, K. Mei, S. Schön, I. Riederer, F.K. Kopp, M.T. Löffler, M. Probst, E.J. Rummeny, C. Zimmer, J.S. Kirschke, P.B. Noël and T. Baum declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the methods used or results presented in this study.
All investigations described in this manuscript were carried out with the approval of the responsible ethics committee and in accordance with national law and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (in its current revised form). Informed consent was obtained from the patient in this case if identifiable from images or other information within the manuscript. Ethics Committee Registration Number: 62/18 S
- 7.Deml MC, Buhr M, Wimmer MD, Pflugmacher R, Riedel R, Rommelspacher Y, Kabir K. CT-guided infiltration saves surgical intervention and fastens return to work compared to anatomical landmark-guided infiltration in patients with lumbosciatica. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25(Suppl 1):S177–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Mei K, Kopp FK, Bippus R, Köhler T, Schwaiger BJ, Gersing AS, Fehringer A, Sauter A, Münzel D, Pfeiffer F, Rummeny EJ, Kirschke JS, Noël PB, Baum T. Is multidetector CT-based bone mineral density and quantitative bone microstructure assessment at the spine still feasible using ultra-low tube current and sparse sampling? Eur Radiol. 2017;27:5261–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.Sollmann N, Mei K, Hedderich DM, Maegerlein C, Kopp FK, Löffler MT, Zimmer C, Rummeny EJ, Kirschke JS, Baum T, Noël PB. Multi-detector CT imaging: impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:3606–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Sollmann N, Mei K, Schwaiger BJ, Gersing AS, Kopp FK, Bippus R, Maegerlein C, Zimmer C, Rummeny EJ, Kirschke JS, Noël PB, Baum T. Effects of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on MDCT-based femoral BMD measurements. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29:2685–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 30.Fessler JA. Statistical image reconstruction methods for transmission tomography. In: Fitzpatrick JM, Sonka M, editors. Medical image processing and analysis. Handbook of medical imaging, Vol. 2. SPIE Publications; 2000. pp. 1–70.Google Scholar
- 33.Mookiah MRK, Subburaj K, Mei K, Kopp FK, Kaesmacher J, Jungmann PM, Foehr P, Noel PB, Kirschke JS, Baum T. Multidetector computed tomography imaging: effect of sparse sampling and iterative reconstruction on trabecular bone microstructure. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018;42:441–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar