Direct Admission vs. Secondary Transfer to a Comprehensive Stroke Center for Thrombectomy
- 21 Downloads
Background and Purpose
This study aimed at comparing short-term clinical outcome after thrombectomy in patients directly admitted (DA) to a comprehensive stroke center with patients secondarily transferred (ST) from a primary stroke center.
In a prospective regional stroke registry, all stroke patients with a premorbid modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 0–2 who were admitted within 24 h after stroke onset and treated with thrombectomy between 2014 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with DA and ST were compared regarding the proportion of good outcome (discharge mRS 0–2), median discharge mRS, mRS shift (difference between premorbid mRS and mRS on discharge) and occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.
Out of 2797 patients, 1051 (37.6%) achieved good clinical outcome. In the DA group (n = 1657), proportion of good outcome was higher (DA 42.2% vs. ST 30.9%, P < 0.001) and median discharge mRS (DA 3 vs. ST 4, P < 0.001) and median mRS shift (DA 3 vs. ST 4, P < 0.001) were lower. The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar in both groups (DA 9.3% vs. ST 7.5%, P = 0.101). Multivariate analysis revealed that direct admission was an independent predictor of good clinical outcome (adjusted odds ratio, OR 1.32, confidence interval, CI 1.09–1.60, P = 0.004).
These results confirm prior studies stating that DA to a comprehensive stroke center leads to better outcome compared to ST in stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy.
KeywordsMothership Drip and Ship Triage Regional stroke care Interhospital transfer
Comprehensive stroke center
F. Seker, S. Bonekamp, M. Bendszus and M.A. Möhlenbruch conceived the study and initiated the study design. S. Hyrenbach and S. Rode contributed to acquisition of data. F. Seker, M. Bendszus and M.A. Möhlenbruch contributed to analysis and interpretation of data. All authors contributed to refinement of the study protocol and reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest
F. Seker, S. Bonekamp, S. Rode, S. Hyrenbach, M. Bendszus and M.A. Möhlenbruch declare that they have no competing interests.
- 6.Prothmann S, Schwaiger BJ, Gersing AS, Reith W, Niederstadt T, Felber A, et al. Acute recanalization of thrombo-embolic Ischemic stroke with pREset (ARTEsp): the impact of occlusion time on clinical outcome of directly admitted and transferred patients. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9:817–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Pfaff J, Pham M, Herweh C, Wolf M, Ringleb PA, Schönenberger S, et al. Clinical outcome after mechanical thrombectomy in non-elderly patients with acute Ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation: primary admission versus patients referred from remote hospitals. Clin Neuroradiol. 2017;27:185–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Froehler MT, Saver JL, Zaidat OO, Jahan R, Aziz-Sultan MA, Klucznik RP, et al. Interhospital transfer before thrombectomy is associated with delayed treatment and worse outcome in the STRATIS registry (systematic evaluation of patients treated with neurothrombectomy devices for acute ischemic stroke). Circulation. 2017;136:2311–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Weisenburger-Lile D, Blanc R, Kyheng M, Desilles JP, Labreuche J, Piotin M, et al. Direct admission versus secondary transfer for acute stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy: insights from the endovascular treatment in ischemic stroke registry. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;47:112–20. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499112 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Purrucker JC, Härtig F, Richter H, Engelbrecht A, Hartmann J, Auer J, et al. Design and validation of a clinical scale for prehospital stroke recognition, severity grading and prediction of large vessel occlusion: the shortened NIH Stroke Scale for emergency medical services. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e16893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar