Advertisement

Clinical Neuroradiology

, Volume 25, Supplement 2, pp 317–324 | Cite as

The Past, Present and Future of Endovascular Aneurysm Treatment

  • H. Henkes
  • W. Weber
Review Article

Abstract

The technology available for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms is rapidly evolving. Both current and future devices are described. This includes, among others, UNO for parent vessel occlusion, the Medina device for saccular filling, the Comaneci device for remodeling, pCONus for assisted coil occlusion, and WEB and pCANvas for intrasaccular flow disruption. Perspectives of further development such as surface coating for increased radioopacity and decreased thrombogenicity are explained.

Keywords

Aneurysm Endovascular Coil Stent Flow diversion 

References

  1. 1.
    Fox JL, Luessenhop AJ. Hydrocephalus secondary to hemorrhage from a basilar artery aneurysm. With a note on embolization technique. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1967;17:228–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Debrun G, Fox A, Drake C, Peerless S, Girvin J, Ferguson G. Giant unclippable aneurysms: treatment with detachable balloons. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1981;2:167–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Higashida RT, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, Barnwell SL, Hieshima GB. Intracranial aneurysms: interventional neurovascular treatment with detachable balloons—results in 215 cases. Radiology. 1991;178:663–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guglielmi G, Viñuela F, Sepetka I, Macellari V. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1: Electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:1–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Henkes H, Brew S, Felber S, Miloslavski E, Mogilevski G, Tavrovski I, Kühne D. In vitro and in vivo studies of the extent of electrothrombotic deposition of blood elements on the surface of electrolytically detachable coils. Interv Neuroradiol. 2004;10:189–201.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moret J, Cognard C, Weill A, Castaings L, Rey A. [Reconstruction technic in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. Long-term angiographic and clinical results. Apropos of 56 cases]. J Neuroradiol. 1997;24:30–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Higashida RT, Smith W, Gress D, Urwin R, Dowd CF, Balousek PA, Halbach VV. Intravascular stent and endovascular coil placement for a ruptured fusiform aneurysm of the basilar artery. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:944–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henkes H, Bose A, Felber S, Miloslavski E, Berg-Dammer E, Kühne D. Endovascular coil occlusion of intracranial aneurysms assisted by a novel self-expandable nitinol microstent (Neuroform). Interv Neuroradiol. 2002;30(8):107–19.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weber W, Bendszus M, Kis B, Boulanger T, Solymosi L, Kühne D. A new self-expanding nitinol stent (Enterprise) for the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: initial clinical and angiographic results in 31 aneurysms. Neuroradiology. 2007;49:555–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henkes H, Flesser A, Brew S, Miloslavski E, Doerfler A, Felber S, Monstadt H, Kuehne D. A novel microcatheter-delivered, highly-flexible and fully-retrievable stent, specifically designed for intracranial use. Technical note. Interv Neuroradiol. 2003;9:391–3.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roth C, Struffert T, Grunwald IQ, Romeike BF, Krick C, Papanagiotou P, Krampe P, Reith W. Long-term results with Matrix coils vs. GDC: an angiographic and histopathological comparison. Neuroradiology. 2008;50:693–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weber W, Siekmann R, Kis B, Kuehne D. Treatment and follow-up of 22 unruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms of the internal carotid artery with Onyx HD 500. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1909–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Millenium Research Group. European markets for transcatheter embolization and occlusion devices 2014. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, December 2013 and Millenium Research Group. US markets for transcatheter embolization and occlusion devices 2014. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, December 2013.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Molyneux AJ, Birks J, Clarke A, Sneade M, Kerr RS. The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet. 2015;385(9969):691–7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Turk AS, Maia O, Ferreira CC, Freitas D, Mocco J, Hanel R. Periprocedural safety of aneurysm embolization with the Medina Coil System: the early human experience. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Jan 27. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gupta R, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R, Eckhouse R. Comaneci neck bridging device for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Jan 12. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fargen KM, Mocco J, Neal D, Dewan MC, Reavey-Cantwell J, Woo HH, Fiorella DJ, Mokin M, Siddiqui AH, Turk AS, Turner RD, Chaudry I, Kalani MY, Albuquerque F, Hoh BL. A multicenter study of stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms with a Y configuration. Neurosurgery. 2013;73:466–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Piotin M, Blanc R, Berge J, Turjman F. O-030 Preliminary French registry clinical experience with the barrel bifurcation vascular reconstruction device. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6(Suppl 1):A15–6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aguilar-Pérez M, Kurre W, Fischer S, Bäzner H, Henkes H. Coil occlusion of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms assisted by a novel intra- to extra aneurysmatic neck-bridging device (pCONus): initial experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:965–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spiotta AM, Chaudry MI, Turk AS, Turner RD. Initial experience with the PulseRider for the treatment of bifurcation aneurysms: report of first three cases in the USA. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Jan 5. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Papagiannaki C, Spelle L, Januel AC, Benaissa A, Gauvrit JY, Costalat V, Desal H, Turjman F, Velasco S, Barreau X, Courtheoux P, Cognard C, Herbreteau D, Moret J, Pierot L. WEB intrasaccular flow disruptor-prospective, multicenter experience in 83 patients with 85 aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:2106–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cognard C, Januel AC. Remnants and recurrences after the use of the WEB intrasaccular device in large-neck bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2015;76:522–30.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lubicz B, Collignon L, Raphaeli G, Pruvo JP, Bruneau M, De Witte O, Leclerc X. Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke. 2010;41(10):2247–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, Moran CJ, Woo HH, Lopes DK, Berez AL, Cher DJ, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Albuquerque FC, Fiorella DJ, Berentei Z, Marosfoi M, Cekirge SH, Nelson PK. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology. 2013;267(3):858–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wakhloo AK, Lylyk P, de Vries J, Taschner C, Lundquist J, Biondi A, Hartmann M, Szikora I, Pierot L, Sakai N, Imamura H, Sourour N, Rennie I, Skalej M, Beuing O, Bonafé A, Mery F, Turjman F, Brouwer P, Boccardi E, Valvassori L, Derakhshani S, Litzenberg MW, Gounis MJ, Surpass Study Group. Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:98–107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fischer S, Aguilar-Pérez M, Henkes E, Kurre W, Ganslandt O, Bäzner H, Henkes H. Initial experience with p64, a novel mechanically detachable flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial saccular sidewall aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 in press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Möhlenbruch MA, Herweh C, Jestaedt L, Stampfl S, Schönenberger S, Ringleb PA, Bendszus M, Pham M. The FRED flow-diverter stent for intracranial aneurysms: clinical study to assess safety and efficacy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Feb 26. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    McVeigh PZ, Sacho R, Weersink RA, Pereira VM, Kucharczyk W, Seibel EJ, Wilson BC, Krings T. High-resolution angioscopic imaging during endovascular neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2014;75:171–80.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fischer S, Perez MA, Kurre W, Albes G, Bäzner H, Henkes H. Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of intra- and extracranial fusiform and dissecting aneurysms: initial experience and long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2014;75:364–74; discussion 374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cohen JE, Gomori JM, Moscovici S, Bala M, Itshayek E. The use of flow diverter stents in the management of traumatic vertebral artery dissections. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20:731–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Peach T, Cornhill JF, Nguyen A, Riina H, Ventikos Y. The ‘Sphere’: a dedicated bifurcation aneurysm flow-diverter device. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2014;5(4):334–347.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Marotta TR, Gunnarsson T, Penn I, Ricci DR, McDougall I, Marko A, Bourne G, da Costa L. A novel endovascular clip system for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: technology, concept, and initial experimental results. J Neurosurg. 2008;108:1230–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Klinik für Neuroradiologie, NeurozentrumKlinikum StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und NuklearmedizinUniversitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations