Diagnostic Efficacy of Conventional MRI Pulse Sequences in the Detection of Lesions Causing Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia in Multiple Sclerosis Patients
- 296 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of a range of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pulse sequences in the identification of internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO) caused by medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) lesions in multiple sclerosis patients using a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) methodology.
A total of 15 clinically confirmed INO and 15 control subjects underwent conventional MRI at 1.5 T consisting of T2-weighted, proton density (PD)-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences, following full institutional approval. A free-response, multiple-reader multiple-case design ROC study was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of each sequence. All imaging sequences were evaluated by 10 board-certified neuroradiologists. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were analysed statistically for all three pulse sequences using repeated-measures analyses of variance and post-test analysis using Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test of differences.
No significant AUC differences were found between the three sequences (p = 0.0697), with T2 recording the highest AUC (0.8346). Sensitivity differences between PD (0.7927) and FLAIR (0.6329) were significant (p < 0.05). Non-significant differences were also evident between T2 and FLAIR (p = 0.0511). The specificity analysis revealed an overall difference (p = 0.0005), with specific inter-sequence differences shown between T2 and PD (p < 0.05) and PD and FLAIR (p < 0.001) with the PD values being lower than those provided with the other two sequences.
T2-weighted axial imaging through the MLF region resulted in the greatest overall diagnostic efficacy when viewing a combination of mean AUC, sensitivity, and specificity, in terms of the identification of INO-causing lesions.
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imaging Sequences Internuclear ophthalmoplegia Medial longitudinal fasciculus Multiple sclerosis
We express our thanks and gratitude to the staff and examiners from the American Board of Radiology for their assistance and participation in this study. We would also like to thank Dr. Mark McEntee (University of Sydney) and Dr. Rachel Toomey (University College Dublin) for their help with data acquisition and data analysis.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest related to the present study.
- 1.Matthews B. Symptoms and signs of multiple sclerosis. In: Compston A, Ebers G, Lassmann H, McDonald I, Matthews B, Wekerle H, editors. McAlpine’s multiple sclerosis. 3rd ed. London: Churchill Liveingstone; 1998. pp. 157–62.Google Scholar
- 12.Savino PJ. Neuro-ophthalmology. In: Tasman W, Jaeger EA, editors. The Wills Eye Hospital atlas of clinical ophthalmology. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. pp. 310–1.Google Scholar
- 13.Lavin PJM, Donahue SP. Disorders of supranuclear control of ocular motility. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, editors. Ophthalmology. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004. p. 1310.Google Scholar
- 17.Flipse JP, Straathof CSM, Van der Steen J, Van Leeuwen AF, Van Doorn PA, Van der Meché, et al. Binocular saccadic eye movements in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 1997;148:53–65.Google Scholar
- 18.Frohman EM, Frohman TC, O’Suilleabhain P, Zhang H, Hawker K, Racke M, et al. Quantitative oculographic characterization of internuclear ophthalmoparesis in multiple sclerosis: the versional dysconjugacy index Z score. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:51–5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Alexander JA, Castillo M, Hoffman JC. Magnetic resonance findings in a patient with internuclear ophthalmoplegia. J Clin Neuroophthalmol. 1991;11:58–61.Google Scholar
- 26.The Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. Consortium of MS centres MRI protocol for the diagnosis and follow-up of MS. 2009 revised guidelines. 2009. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.mscare.org/resource/collection/9C5F19B9-3489-48B0-A54B-623A1ECEE07B/mriprotocol2009.pdf.
- 31.Wattjes MP, Lutterbey GG, Harzheim M, Gieseke J, Traber F, Klotz L, et al. Imaging of inflammatory lesions at 3.0 Tesla in patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis: a comparison of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery with T2 turbo spin-echo. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1494–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar