Advertisement

Clinical Neuroradiology

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 327–333 | Cite as

Origin and Course of the Extracranial Vertebral Artery: CTA Findings and Embryologic Considerations

  • D. MeilaEmail author
  • M. Tysiac
  • M. Petersen
  • O. Theisen
  • A. Wetter
  • A. Mangold
  • M. Schlunz-Hendann
  • K. Papke
  • F. Brassel
  • A. Berenstein
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to show the different origins and courses of the extracranial VA on CTA with special emphasis on embryological considerations. The duplicated VA is an anomaly that has been assumed to predispose for dissection and to be associated with aneurysms. We report its frequency and clinical significance.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed CTA of 539 patients by using a contrast-enhanced CTA protocol of the VA on CT.

Results

Ninety-four-point-two percent of left VA originated from left subclavian artery and entered the transverse foramen at C6 in nearly all cases. Six-point-three-percent of left VA (m  = 4 %, f  = 10 %) originated from the aortic arch and entered the transverse foramen either at C4, C5 or C7 but never at C6. One case of an aberrant retroesophageal right VA originated from the aortic arch distal to the left subclavian artery and entered at C7 (0.19 %). All other right VA originated from the right subclavian artery (99.8 %) and entered between C4 and C6. We diagnosed four cases of duplicated VA (0.74 %) with a female predominance (1.9 %) without any signs of dissection on CTA. Two cases with VA duplication had intracranial arterial aneurysms.

Conclusions

The VA is a longitudinal anastomosis of segmental metameric arteries. The level of entrance into the transverse foramen indicates which metameric artery or arteries persist. Duplication corresponds to persistence of two segmental arteries and is a rare phenomenon. VA duplication might be associated with vascular lesions.

Keywords

Anatomy CTA Embryology Vertebral artery 

Notes

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Goddard AJ, Annesley-Williams D, Guthrie JA, Weston M. Duplication of the vertebral artery: report of two cases and review of the literature. Neuroradiology. 2001;43:477–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Takasato Y, Hayashi H, Kobayashi T, Hashimoto Y. Duplicated origin of right vertebral artery with rudimentary and accessory left vertebral arteries. Neuroradiology. 1992;34(4):287–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ionete C, Omojola MF. MR angiographic demonstration of bilateral duplication of the extracranial vertebral artery: unusual course and review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1304–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lasjaunias P, Berenstein A, Ter Brugge KG. Surgical neuroangiography: clinical vascular anatomy and variations. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Melki E, Nasser G, Vandedries C, Adams D, Ducreux D, Denier C. Congenital vertebral duplication: a predisposing risk factor for dissection. J Neurol Sci. 2012;314(1–2):161–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dare AO, Chaloupka JC, Putman CM, et al. Vertebrobasilar dissection in a duplicated cervical vertebral artery: a possible pathoetiologic association? A case report. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;31(1):103–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Padget DH. The development of cranial arteries in the human embryo. Contrib Embryol. 1948;32:207–61.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meila D, Papke K, Schlunz-Hendann M, Mangold A, Jacobs C, Brassel F. Bilateral persistent trigeminal arteries, one of them ending in the posterior inferior cerebellar artery: case report and review of the literature. Clin Neuroradiol. 2011;21(2):95–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nogueira TE, Chambers AA, Brueggemeyer MT, Miller TJ. Dual origin of the vertebral artery mimicking dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18:382–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Provenzale JM, Sarikaya B, Hacein-Bey L, Wintermark M. Causes of misinterpretation of cross-sectional imaging studies for dissection of the craniocervical arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:45–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kendi ATK, Brace JR. Vertebral artery duplication and aneurysms: 64-slice multidetector CT findings. Br J Radiol. 2009;82:e216-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Agnoli AL. Vascular anomalies and subarachnoid hemorrhage associated with persistent embryonic vessels. Acta Neurochir. 1982;60:183–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cloft HJ, Razack N, Kallmes D. Prevalence of cerebral aneurysms in patients with persistent primitive trigeminal artery. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:865–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Songsaeng D, Geibprasert S, Willinsky R, Tymianski M, TerBrugge KG, Krings T. Impact of anatomical variations of the circle of Willis on the incidence of aneurysms and their recurrence rate following endovascular treatment. Clin Radiol. 2010;65(11):895–901.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bayrak AH, Senturk S, Akay HO, Ozmen CA, Bukte Y, Nazaroglu H. The frequency of intracranial arterial fenestrations: a study with 64-detector CT-angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2011;77(3):392–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bharatha A, Aviv RI, White J, Fox AJ, Symons SP. Intracranial arterial fenestrations: frequency on CT angiography and association with other vascular lesions. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008;30(5):397–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Meila
    • 1
    • 6
    Email author
  • M. Tysiac
    • 2
  • M. Petersen
    • 1
  • O. Theisen
    • 1
  • A. Wetter
    • 3
  • A. Mangold
    • 1
  • M. Schlunz-Hendann
    • 1
  • K. Papke
    • 4
  • F. Brassel
    • 1
  • A. Berenstein
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Radiology and NeuroradiologyKlinikum Duisburg—Sana KlinikenDuisburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of AnaesthesiologyKlinikum Duisburg—Sana KlinikenDuisburgGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and NeuroradiologyUniversity EssenEssenGermany
  4. 4.Department of RadiologySt. Bonifatius-Hospital LingenLingenGermany
  5. 5.Center for Endovascular Surgery, Hyman Newman Institute for Neurology and NeurosurgeryRoosevelt HospitalNew YorkUSA
  6. 6.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional NeuroradiologyHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations