Herz Kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 30–38 | Cite as

Das akute Koronarsyndrom ohne ST-Hebung

Article

Zusammenfassung

Die koronare Herzerkrankung ist die führende Todesursache in westliche Industrienationen. Akute Koronarsyndrome sind dabei häufig lebensbedrohliche Manifestationen, die der umsichtigen Diagnostik und Therapie bedürfen. Dabei sollte während der Diagnosestellung das individuelle Risiko der Patienten wiederholt evaluiert werden, da die bestmögliche Behandlung in erster Linie durch das ermittelte Risiko des Patienten bestimmt wird. Grundsätzlich beruht die Behandlung von Patienten mit akutem Koronarsyndrom auf fünf Säulen: antiischämische Behandlung, Antikoagulation, antithrombozytäre Therapie, Revaskularisierung und Langzeitbetreuung der Patienten.

Wertvolle Hilfestellung bei Diagnostik und Therapie geben aktuelle Leitlinien der kardiologischen Fachgesellschaften. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird der klinische Diagnostik- und Behandlungspfad anhand der Leitlinien der European Society of Cardiology erläutert.

Schlüsselwörter:

Akutes Koronarsyndrom NSTEMI Plättcheninhibition Koronarintervention 

Acute Coronary Syndromes without ST Segment Elevation

Abstract

Coronary artery disease accounts for most deaths in Western communities. Especially acute coronary syndromes – with or without ST segment elevation in the ECG – are potentially life-threatening events. The tremendous number of more than 400,000 acute coronary syndromes per year in Germany demonstrates the necessity of guidelines for diagnosis and treatment approaches.

During the diagnostic process the patients’ individual risk is repeatedly assessed. The ultimate treatment regimen is based on this risk stratification and includes five major therapeutic tools: anti-ischemic agents, anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs, coronary revascularization, and long-term patient management.

Several anticoagulants, which act at different levels of the coagulation cascade, have been investigated in the NSTE-ACS (non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome). Most anticoagulants have been shown to be capable of reducing the risk of death and myocardial infarction, however, at the cost of bleeding complications.

Antiplatelet agents are necessary for both, the acute event and the subsequent maintenance therapy. The recommended treatment regimen includes aspirin in combination with a thienopyridine. During the acute phase of the acute coronary syndrome, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been shown to reduce cardiovascular events.

Revascularization for NSTE-ACS is performed to relieve angina and ongoing myocardial ischemia, and to prevent the progression to myocardial infarction or death. The indications for myocardial revascularization and the preferred approach (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting) depend on the extent and severity of the lesions as identified by coronary angiography, the patient’s condition and comorbidity.

The long-term management after an acute coronary syndrome implies lifestyle measures and drug treatment in order to control risk factors impacting on the patients’ outcome.

Key Words:

Acute coronary syndrome NSTEMI Platelet inhibition Coronary intervention 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997;349:1498–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hasdai D, Behar S, Wallentin L,. A prospective survey of the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Europe and the Mediterranean basin; the Euro Heart Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes (Euro Heart Survey ACS). Eur Heart J 2002;23:1190–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wenaweser P, Windecker S. Acute coronary syndromes: management and secondary prevention. Herz 2008;33:25–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D,. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1598–660.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Savonitto S, Ardissino D, Granger CB,. Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 1999;281:707–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Terkelsen CJ, Lassen JF, Norgaard BL,. Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: observations from an unselected cohort. Eur Heart J 2005;26:18–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mizuno K, Satomura K, Miyamoto A,. Angioscopic evaluation of coronary-artery thrombi in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 1992;326:287–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Canto JG, Fincher C, Kiefe CI,. Atypical presentations among Medicare beneficiaries with unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:248–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brieger D, Eagle KA, Goodman SG,. Acute coronary syndromes without chest pain, an underdiagnosed and undertreated high-risk group: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Chest 2004;126:461–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van de Werf F, Ardissino D, Betriu A,. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2003;24:28–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rouan GW, Lee TH, Cook EF,. Clinical characteristics and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in patients with initially normal or nonspecific electrocardiograms (a report from the Multicenter Chest Pain Study). Am J Cardiol 1989; 64:1087–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Myocardial infarction redefined — a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Eur Heart J 2000;21:1502–13.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hamm CW, Ravkilde J, Gerhardt W, et al. The prognostic value of serum troponin T in unstable angina. N Engl J Med 1992;327:146–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Al Suwaidi J, Reddan DN, Williams K, et al. Prognostic implications of abnormalities in renal function in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2002;106:974–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eikelboom JW, Anand SS, Malmberg K, et al. Unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin in acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2000;355:1936–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Petersen JL, Mahaffey KW, Hasselblad V, et al. Efficacy and bleeding complications among patients randomized to enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for antithrombin therapy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic overview. JAMA 2004;292:89–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, et al. Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1464–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Antiplatelet Trialists’ Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 2002;324:71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001;345: 494–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fox KA, Mehta SR, Peters R, et al. Benefits and risks of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients undergoing surgical revascularization for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischemic Events (CURE) trial. Circulation 2004;110:1202–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boersma E, Harrington RA, Moliterno DJ, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of all major randomised clinical trials. Lancet 2002;359:189–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kong DF, Hasselblad V, Harrington RA, et al. Meta-analysis of survival with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists for percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92:651–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Frantz E. [Management of the acute coronary syndrome under German diagnosis related groups in 2005/2006.] Herz 2005;30:710–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Scholz KH, Knobelsdorff G von, Ahlersmann D, et al. [Optimizing systems of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction. STEMI networks, telemetry ECG, and standardized quality improvement with systematic data feedback.] Herz 2008;33:102–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mehta SR, Cannon CP, Fox KA, et al. Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA 2005;293:2908–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fox KA, Anderson FAJr, Dabbous OH, et al. Intervention in acute coronary syndromes: do patients undergo intervention on the basis of their risk characteristics? The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Heart 2007; 93:177–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, Pogatsa-Murray G, et al. Evaluation of prolonged antithrombotic pretreatment (“cooling-off” strategy) before intervention in patients with unstable coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003;290:1593–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ryden L, Standl E, Bartnik M, et al. Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases: executive summary. The Task Force on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Eur Heart J 2007;28:88–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Roffi M, Chew DP, Mukherjee D, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce mortality in diabetic patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2001;104:2767–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Collet JP, Montalescot G, Agnelli G, et al. Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in patients with renal dysfunction: benefit of low-molecular-weight heparin alone or with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors on outcomes. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2285–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Januzzi JL, Cannon CP, DiBattiste PM, et al. Effects of renal insufficiency on early invasive management in patients with acute coronary syndromes (the TACTICS-TIMI 18 trial). Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1246–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sabatine MS, Morrow DA, Giugliano RP, et al. Association of hemoglobin levels with clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2005;111:2042–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Urban & Vogel, Muenchen 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helge Möllmann
    • 2
  • Holger Nef
  • Christian W. Hamm
    • 1
  1. 1.Kerckhoff-KlinikBad NauheimGermany
  2. 2.Kerckhoff-KlinikBad NauheimGermany

Personalised recommendations