Advertisement

Anterior joint space narrowing in patients with temporomandibular disorder

  • Yeon-Hee LeeEmail author
  • Il Ki Hong
  • Jung-Sub An
Original Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this work is to investigate changes in the anterior joint space (AJS) and the relationship of such changes to clinical symptoms in chronic temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) patients, and to compare symptoms between chronic and acute TMD patients.

Methods

Data from 100 TMD patients diagnosed based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (55 women; mean age 34.34 ± 14.88 years) including 50 patients with acute TMD (aTMD) and 50 patients with chronic TMD (cTMD) were analyzed. The AJS was calculated based on cone-beam computed tomography images analyzed using AutoCAD software (Autodesk Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA). The presence of osteoarthritis (OA) in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) was evaluated using bone scintigraphy.

Results

Bilateral OA was significantly more frequent in patients with cTMD than in those with aTMD (50% vs. 30%; p < 0.05). Significant differences in the AJS of the TMJs were found between patients with cTMD and those with aTMD. AJS values of both right and left TMJs were significantly smaller in the patients with cTMD than in those with aTMD (4.18 ± 1.71 mm2 vs. 7.35 ± 1.71 mm2, and 6.20 ± 2.88 mm2 vs. 7.34 ± 2.47 mm2, respectively; p < 0.05). In patients with cTMD, narrowed AJS was correlated with increased dysfunction index (r = −0.373, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Over time, AJS of the TMJ can be narrowed in TMD patients, causing aggravation of TMJ dysfunction.

Keywords

Jaw Cone-beam computed tomography Mandibular condyle Arthralgia Osteoarthritis 

Einengung des Gelenkraumes bei Patienten mit Craniomandibulärer Dysfunktion

Zusammenfassung

Ziel

Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war es, Veränderungen des Gelenkraumes („anterior joint space“) die Wechselwirkungen dieser Veränderungen mit klinischen Symptomen bei Patienten mit chronischer mandibulärer Dysfunktion zu untersuchen und die Symptome zwischen chronischen und akuten CMD-Patienten zu vergleichen.

Methoden

Daten von insgesamt 100 CMD-Patienten (55 weibliche Probandinnen; Durchschnittsalter 34,3 ± 14,9 Jahren), darunter 50 Patienten mit akuten (aTMD) und 50 Patienten mit chronischen CMD-Beschwerden (cTMD) wurden unter DC/TMD Kriterien analysiert. AJS wurde anhand von DVT-Aufnahmen mit AutoCAD Software (Autodesk Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA) berechnet. Das Vorliegen von Osteoarthritis (OA) des Kiefergelenkes wurde knochenscintigraphisch untersucht.

Ergebnisse

Beidseitige Osteoarthritis trat bei Patienten mit cTMD häufiger als bei Patienten mit aTMD auf (50 % vs. 30 %; p < 0,05). Signifikante Unterschiede hinsichtlich des Gelenkraumes des Kiefergelenkes wurden bei Patienten mit cTMD und aTMD festgestellt. AJS Werte des rechten und linken Kiefergelenkes waren signifikant niedriger bei Patienten mit cTMD als bei Patienten mit aTMD (4,18 ± 1,71 mm2 vs. 7,35 ± 1,71 mm2, und 6,20 ± 2,88 mm2 vs. 7,34 ± 2,47 mm2; p < 0,05). Bei Patienten mit cTMD korrelierte der eingeengte AJS mit einem erhöhten Dysfunktionsindex (r = −0,373, p < 0,01).

Schlussfolgerungen

Bei CMD-Patienten kann eine Einengung des vorderen Gelenkraumes vorliegen, was zu einer Verschlechterung der craniomandibulären Dysfunktion führt.

Schlüsselwörter

Kiefergelenk Digitale Volumentomographie Kondylus Arthralgie Osteoarthritis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Conflict of interest

Y.-H. Lee, I.K. Hong and J.-S. An declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. In addition, the study design in the manuscript was approved by the appropriate ethics review boards of Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Herb K, Cho S, Stiles MA (2006) Temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction. Curr Pain Headache Rep 10(6):408–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sharma S, Gupta DS, Pal US, Jurel SK (2011) Etiological factors of temporomandibular joint disorders. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2(2):116–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang X, Jin X, Blizzard L et al (2017) Associations between knee effusion-synovitis and joint structural changes in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 44(11):1644–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lanyon P, O’Reilly S, Jones A, Doherty M (1998) Radiographic assessment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in the community: Definitions and normal joint space. Ann Rheum Dis 57(10):595–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Lane KA, Katz BP (2002) Knee pain reduces joint space width in conventional standing anteroposterior radiographs of osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum 46(5):1223–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katsavrias EG, Halazonetis DJ (2005) Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: A morphometric tomographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128(3):337–346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.05.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rodrigues AF, Fraga MR, Vitral RW (2009) Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in Class II Division 1 and Class III malocclusion patients: Condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136(2):199–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nitzan DW (2001) The process of lubrication impairment and its involvement in temporomandibular joint disc displacement: A theoretical concept. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59(1):36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zimmerman BK, Bonnevie ED, Park M et al (2015) Role of interstitial fluid pressurization in TMJ lubrication. J Dent Res 94(1):85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stegenga B (2001) Osteoarthritis of the temporomandibular joint organ and its relationship to disc displacement. J Orofac Pain 15(3):193–205Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsiklakis K, Syriopoulos K, Stamatakis HC (2004) Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33(3):196–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barghan S, Tetradis S, Mallya S (2012) Application of cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the temporomandibular joints. Aust Dent J 57(Suppl 1):109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ikeda K, Kawamura A (2009) Assessment of optimal condylar position with limited cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135(4):495–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muraki S, Akune T, En-Yo Y et al (2015) Joint space narrowing, body mass index, and knee pain: The ROAD study (OAC1839R1). Osteoarthr Cartil 23(6):874–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wen L, Shin MH, Kang JH et al (2017) Association between grip strength and hand and knee radiographic osteoarthritis in Korean adults: Data from the Dong-gu study. PLoS ONE 12(11):e185343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Muller L, Kellenberger CJ, Cannizzaro E et al (2009) Early diagnosis of temporomandibular joint involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A pilot study comparing clinical examination and ultrasound to magnetic resonance imaging. Rheumatology (Oxf) 48(6):680–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim JH, Kim YK, Kim SG, Yun PY, Kim JD, Min JH (2012) Effectiveness of bone scans in the diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41(3):224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dworkin SF, LeResche L (1992) Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 6(4):301–355Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E et al (2014) Diagnostic criteria for Temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: Recommendations of the international RDC/TMD consortium network* and Orofacial pain special interest Groupdagger. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 28(1):6–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Komiyama O, Obara R, Iida T et al (2014) Age-related associations between psychological characteristics and pain intensity among Japanese patients with temporomandibular disorder. J Oral Sci 56(3):221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gallagher C, Gallagher V, Whelton H, Cronin M (2004) The normal range of mouth opening in an Irish population. J Oral Rehabil 31(2):110–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Helkimo M (1974) Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. II. Index for anamnestic and clinical dysfunction and occlusal state. Swed Dent J 67(2):101–121Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stauss J, Hahn K, Mann M, De Palma D (2010) Guidelines for paediatric bone scanning with 99mTc-labelled radiopharmaceuticals and 18F-fluoride. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(8):1621–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chan WP, Huang G‑S, Hsu S‑M, Chang Y‑C, Ho W‑P (2008) Radiographic joint space narrowing in osteoarthritis of the knee: Relationship to meniscal tears and duration of pain. Skeletal Radiol 37(10):917–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ueki K, Moroi A, Tsutsui T et al (2018) Time-course change in temporomandibular joint space after advancement and setback mandibular osteotomy with Le Fort I osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 46(4):679–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pérez del Palomar A, Doblaré M (2007) Influence of unilateral disc displacement on the stress response of the temporomandibular joint discs during opening and mastication. J Anatom 211(4):453–463.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00796.x Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Diernberger S, Bernhardt O, Schwahn C, Kordass B (2008) Self-reported chewing side preference and its associations with occlusal, temporomandibular and prosthodontic factors: Results from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP-0). J Oral Rehabil 35(8):613–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Miyawaki S, Tanimoto Y, Kawakami T, Sugimura M, Takano-Yamamoto T (2001) Motion of the human mandibular condyle during mastication. J Dent Res 80(2):437–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hylander WL (1979) Experimental analysis of temporomandibular joint reaction force in macaques. Am J Phys Anthropol 51(3):433–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Motghare V, Kumar J, Kamate S et al (2015) Association between harmful oral habits and sign and symptoms of Temporomandibular joint disorders among adolescents. J Clin Diagn Res 9(8):ZC45–ZC48.  https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2015/12133.6338 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Emodi-Perlman A, Eli I, Friedman-Rubin P, Goldsmith C, Reiter S, Winocur E (2012) Bruxism, oral parafunctions, anamnestic and clinical findings of temporomandibular disorders in children. J Oral Rehabil 39(2):126–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lobbezoo F, van der Zaag J, van Selms MK, Hamburger HL, Naeije M (2008) Principles for the management of bruxism. J Oral Rehabil 35(7):509–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Egermark-Eriksson I, Carlsson GE, Ingervall B (1981) Prevalence of mandibular dysfunction and orofacial parafunction in 7‑, 11- and 15-year-old Swedish children. Eur J Orthod 3(3):163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lories RJ, Luyten FP (2011) The bone-cartilage unit in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 7(1):43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Saidi A, Naaman A, Zogheib C (2015) Accuracy of cone-beam computed Tomography and Periapical radiography in Endodontically treated teeth evaluation: A five-year retrospective study. J Int Oral Health 7(3):15–19Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kiuru MJ, Pihlajamaki HK, Hietanen HJ, Ahovuo JA (2002) MR imaging, bone scintigraphy, and radiography in bone stress injuries of the pelvis and the lower extremity. Acta radiol 43(2):207–212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/028418502127347790 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fushima K, Gallo LM, Krebs M, Palla S (2003) Analysis of the TMJ intraarticular space variation: A non-invasive insight during mastication. Med Eng Phys 25(3):181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lelis ER, Guimaraes Henriques JC, Tavares M, de Mendonca MR, Fernandes Neto AJ, Almeida Gde A (2015) Cone-beam tomography assessment of the condylar position in asymptomatic and symptomatic young individuals. J Prosthet Dent 114(3):420–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orofacial Pain and Oral MedicineKyung Hee University Dental HospitalSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of MedicineKyung Hee University HospitalSeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of OrthodonticsSeoul National University Dental HospitalSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations