Advertisement

coloproctology

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 30–33 | Cite as

Perianaler Morbus Crohn

Multidisziplinäre Behandlungsstrategien
  • A. J. KroesenEmail author
Leitthema
  • 19 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Der perianale M. Crohn ist schwer zu behandeln. Weder chirurgische noch konservative Therapievarianten erzielen Abheilungsraten von über 60 %. Dieser Beitrag bewertet die verschiedenen Ansätze anhand der vorhandenen Literatur und persönlicher Erfahrung. Einen besonderen Stellenwert hat die multidisziplinäre Herangehensweise mit einem patientenorientierten, maßgeschneiderten Vorgehen.

Schlüsselwörter

Anorektale Fistel Therapiekonzepte Algorithmus Tailored approach TNF-α-Antikörper 

Perianal Crohn’s disease

Multidisciplinary therapy

Abstract

The treatment of perianal Crohn’s disease remains very difficult. Neither surgical nor conservative treatment options can achieve healing rates over 60%. This article evaluates the different treatment options on the basis of the current literature and personal experience. Special emphasis is put on the multidisciplinary aspect with a patient-oriented and tailored approach.

Keywords

Anorectal fistula Treatment options Algorithm Tailored approach TNF-α antibodies 

Notes

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt

A.J. Kroesen gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine vom Autor durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Chen HJ, Sun GD, Zhu P et al (2017) Effective and long-term outcome following ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) for transsphincteric fistula. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:583–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Groof EJ, Sahami S, Lucas C et al (2016) Treatment of perianal fistula in Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing seton drainage and anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment. Colorectal Dis 18:667–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Furst A, Schmidbauer C, Swol-Ben J et al (2008) Gracilis transposition for repair of recurrent anovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas in Crohn’s disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:349–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nanaeva BA, Vardanyan AV, Khalif IL (2015) Efficiency of tacrolimus therapy for perianal Crohn’s disease. Ter Arkh 87:83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nasseri Y, Cassella L, Berns M et al (2016) The anal fistula plug in Crohn’s disease patients with fistula-in-ano: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 18:351–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Panes J, Garcia-Olmo D, Van Assche G et al (2018) Long-term efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy (Cx601) for complex perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol 154(5):1334–1342.e4Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Panes J, Garcia-Olmo D, Van Assche G et al (2016) Expanded allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (Cx601) for complex perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease: a phase 3 randomised, double-blind controlled trial. Lancet 388:1281–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panes J, Reinisch W, Rupniewska E et al (2018) Burden and outcomes for complex perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease: systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 24:4821–4834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pitel S, Lefevre JH, Parc Y et al (2011) Martius advancement flap for low rectovaginal fistula: short- and long-term results. Colorectal Dis 13:e112–e115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prosst RL, Joos AK (2016) Short-term outcomes of a novel endoscopic clipping device for closure of the internal opening in 100 anorectal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 20:753–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rojanasakul A, Pattanaarun J, Sahakitrungruang C et al (2007) Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano; the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. J Med Assoc Thai 90:581–586PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rozalen V, Pares D, Sanchez E et al (2017) Advancement flap technique for anal fistula in patients with Crohn’s disease: a systematic review of the literature. Cir Esp 95:558–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruffolo C, Scarpa M, Bassi N et al (2010) A systematic review on advancement flaps for rectovaginal fistula in Crohn’s disease: transrectal vs transvaginal approach. Colorectal Dis 12:1183–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schloericke E, Zimmermann M, Benecke C et al (2017) Surgical management of complicated rectovaginal fistulas and the role of omentoplasty. Tech Coloproctol 21:945–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seyfried S, Bussen D, Joos A et al (2018) Fistulectomy with primary sphincter reconstruction. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:911–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilhelm A, Fiebig A, Krawczak M (2017) Five years of experience with the FiLaC laser for fistula-in-ano management: long-term follow-up from a single institution. Tech Coloproctol 21:269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Williams JG, Rothenberger DA, Nemer FD et al (1991) Fistula-in-ano in Crohn’s disease. Results of aggressive surgical treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 34:378–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Allgemein- und ViszeralchirurgieKrankenhaus Porz am RheinKölnDeutschland

Personalised recommendations