Stellungnahme zum Kommentar von B. Strittmatter zu P.J. Gupta et al. Closed Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy Versus Anal Sphincterolysis for Chronic Anal Fissure. A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Originalarbeit in: coloproctology 2008;30:242–8 (Nr. 4) (DOI 10.1007/s00053-008-8023-8) Kommentar in: coloproctology 2008;30:249 (Nr. 4) (DOI 10.1007/s00053-008-8025-6)
Stellungnahme
First Online:
- 80 Downloads
Supplementary material
Literatur
- 1.Gupta PJ, Heda PS, Kalaskar S. Closed lateral internal sphincterotomy versus anal sphincterolysis for chronic anal fissure. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. coloproctology 2008;30:242–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Gupta PJ. Sphincterolysis: a novel approach towards chronic anal fissure. Eur Surg Res 2006;38:122–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Baraza W, Boereboom C, Shorthouse A, et al. The long-term efficacy of fissurectomy and botulinum toxin injection for chronic anal fissure in females. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:239–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Engel AF, Eijsbouts QA, Balk AG. Fissurectomy and isosorbide dinitrate for chronic fissure in ano not responding to conservative treatment. Br J Surg 2002;89:79–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Bhardwaj R, Parker MC. Modern perspectives in the treatment of chronic anal fissures. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007;89:472–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Scholz T, Hetzer FH, Dindo D, et al. Long-term follow-up after combined fissurectomy and Botox injection for chronic anal fissures. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22:1077–1081.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Urban & Vogel, Muenchen 2008