Reducible defence: chemical protection alters the dynamics of predator–prey interactions
- 290 Downloads
Morphological and chemical defences are widespread anti-predator mechanisms in most domains of life, and play an important role in understanding predator–prey interactions. Classical concepts of dynamical protection (‘inducible defence’) include the morphological changes in certain crustaceans or the production of chemicals in many plants. Permanently stored defensive secretions are, to our knowledge, ignored in food web ecology. We show that this kind of chemical defence is highly dynamic and may loose its effect over time (‘reducible defence’). Combining experimental and theoretical approaches, we show that chemical defence also changes the time budget of predators and decreases the strength of the functional response. However, this may be counteracted by increasing predator density—an effect we call ‘apparent facilitation’. The interplay of ‘reducible defence’ and ‘apparent facilitation’ may substantially contribute to stability in terrestrial ecosystems.
KeywordsOribatida Archegozetes Stenus Functional response Chemical defence Stability Apparent facilitation
We thank Lars Koerner for providing Stenus juno specimens, Ulrich Brose for discussion on the model and Nico Blüthgen and Andrew D. Barnes for discussion on the manuscript.
- Altwegg R, Eng M, Caspersen S, Anholt BR (2006) Functional response and prey defence level in an experimental predator–prey system. Evol Ecol Res 8:115–128Google Scholar
- Caro T (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Core Team R (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Eisner T, Eisner M, Siegler M (2005) Secret weapons—defenses of insects, spiders, scorpions, and other many-legged creatures. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Koen-Alonso M (2007) A process-oriented approach to the multispecies functional response. Energ Ecosyst Dyn Struct Ecol Syst, pp 1–36Google Scholar
- Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D; R Core Team (2014) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–117. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
- Soetaert K, Petzoldt T, Setzer R (2010) Solving differential equations in R: package deSolve. J Stat Softw 33:1–25Google Scholar
- Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) (1999) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Zar JH (2009) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar