Chemoecology

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 201–202 | Cite as

Chemical aposematism

Commentary

Abstract

Discussions of aposematism traditionally have focused on the visual displays of prey that denote unpalatability or toxicity to predators. However, the construct of aposematism accommodates a spectrum of unprofitable traits signaled through various sensory modalities, including contact and distance chemoreception. Aposematism, involving learned aversions by signal receivers or selection for their unlearned avoidances, arises in predator–prey or other interspecific interactions where a mutually beneficial avoidance of signal emitters by signal receivers exists. Aposematism evolves by selection against signal receivers, e.g., predators, imposed by signal emitters, e.g., unprofitable prey, and vice versa, where both nondiscriminating signal receivers and unrecognized signal emitters are imperiled. Chemical aposematism entails concurrent reciprocal selection where signal emitters select for chemosensory avoidance responses in signal receivers, and where signal receivers select for the emission of identifiable (distinctive) chemicals in signal emitters.

Keywords

Aposematism Chemical defense 

References

  1. Andersson M (2007) The effects of non-host volatiles on habitat location by phytophagous insects. Introductory Paper at the Faculty of Landscape Planning, Horticulture and Agricultural Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, pp 1–38Google Scholar
  2. Darwin C (1874) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eisner T, Grant RP (1980) Toxicity, odor aversion, and “olfactory aposematism”. Science 213:476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lindström L, Alatalo RV, Mappes J (1999) Reactions of hand-reared and wild-caught predators towards warningly colored, gregarious, and conspicuous prey. Behav Ecol 10:317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Poulton EB (1890) The colours of animals: their meaning and use, especially considered in the case of insects. D Appleton and Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Sherratt TN, Beatty CD (2003) The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense. Am Nat 162:377–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Wallace AR (1867) Proc Entomol Soc Lond. March 4th, Ixxx-IxxxiGoogle Scholar
  8. Weldon PJ (2010) Nuisance arthropods, nonhost odors, and vertebrate chemical aposematism. Naturwissenschaften 97:443–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Smithsonian Conservation Biology InstituteNational Zoological ParkFront RoyalUSA

Personalised recommendations