Chemoecology

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 59–70 | Cite as

Physiological benefits of feeding in the spring by Lymantria dispar caterpillars on red oak and sugar maple leaves: nutrition versus oxidative stress

  • Raymond V. Barbehenn
  • Julie Niewiadomski
  • Cristina Pecci
  • Juha-Pekka Salminen
Research Paper

Abstract

The rapid growth of insects that feed on tree leaves in the spring is believed to be due to high nutritional quality. This study tested the hypothesis that both high nutritional quality and low levels of oxidative stress (i.e., toxicological effects) benefit caterpillars that feed in the spring. Fourth-instar larvae of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) were used to bioassay the leaves of two contrasting host plants in the spring and summer: red oak (Quercus rubra), a high-quality host, and sugar maple (Acer saccharum), a low-quality host. On spring foliage, the combined effects of rapid consumption rate, efficient nutrient assimilation, and high nutritional quality allowed larvae to grow rapidly and attain larger body mass. Ellagitannins, a major source of oxidative stress in the midgut, were at higher concentrations in the spring than in the summer in maple leaves, but were at negligible levels throughout the growing season in oak. Thus, the impact of phenolic defenses (measured as semiquinone free radicals and oxidized glutathione in the midgut) was not decreased in spring-feeding larvae. Instead, oxidative stress in larvae on maple remained at elevated levels in the spring and summer. By contrast, larvae that fed on oak had consistently low levels of oxidative stress. We conclude that oak and maple were better host plants in the spring because of their higher nutritional quality, and not because of a lower effectiveness of their chemical defenses. This work emphasizes the need to measure not only foliar nutritional and phenolic chemistry but also specific physiological responses in the herbivore, such as oxidative stress. These physiological mechanisms add to our understanding of why spring-feeding life-history strategies have evolved in some insect herbivores.

Keywords

Herbivore Nutrition Leaf quality Tannins Protein Seasonal change 

References

  1. Ahmad S (1992) Biochemical defence of pro-oxidant plant allelochemicals by herbivorous insects. Biochem Syst Ecol 20:269–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appel HM (1993) Phenolics in ecological interactions: the importance of oxidation. J Chem Ecol 19:1521–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayres MP, MacLean SF (1987) Development of birch leaves and the growth energetics of Epirrita autumnata (Geometridae). Ecology 68:558–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbehenn RV (1992) Digestion of uncrushed leaf tissues by leaf-snipping larval Lepidoptera. Oecologia 89:229–235Google Scholar
  6. Barbehenn RV, Walker AC, Uddin F (2003) Antioxidants in the midgut fluids of a tannin-tolerant and a tannin-sensitive caterpillar: effects of seasonal changes in tree leaves. J Chem Ecol 29:1099–1116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barbehenn RV, Cheek S, Gasperut A, Lister E, Maben R (2005) Phenolic compounds in red oak and sugar maple leaves have prooxidant activities in the midguts of Malacosoma disstria and Orgyia leucostigma caterpillars. J Chem Ecol 31:969–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbehenn RV, Jones CP, Karonen M, Salminen J-P (2006a) Tannin composition affects the oxidative activities of tree leaves. J Chem Ecol 32:2235–2251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barbehenn RV, Jones CP, Hagerman AE, Karonen M, Salminen J-P (2006b) Ellagitannins have greater oxidative activities than gallotannins and condensed tannins at high pH: potential impact on caterpillars. J Chem Ecol 32:2253–2267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barbehenn RV, Maben RE, Knoester JJ (2008a) Linking phenolic oxidation in the midgut lumen with oxidative stress in the midgut tissues of a tree-feeding caterpillar Malacosoma disstria (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Environ Entomol 37:1113–1118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barbehenn RV, Weir Q, Salminen J-P (2008b) Oxidation of ingested phenolics in the tree-feeding caterpillar Orgyia leucostigma depends on foliar chemical composition. J Chem Ecol 34:748–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barbehenn RV, Jaros A, Lee G, Mozola C, Weir Q, Salminen J-P (2009a) Tree resistance to Lymantria dispar caterpillars: importance and limitations of foliar tannin composition. Oecologia 159:777–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barbehenn RV, Jaros A, Lee G, Mozola C, Weir Q, Salminen J-P (2009b) Hydrolyzable tannins as “quantitative defenses”: limited impact against Lymantria dispar caterpillars on hybrid poplar. J Insect Physiol 55:297–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernays EA (1978) Tannins: an alternative viewpoint. Entomol Exp Appl 24:244–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Choong MR (1996) What makes a leaf tough and how this affects the pattern of Castanopsis fissa leaf consumption by caterpillars. Funct Ecol 10:668–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen SA, Michaud DP (1983) Synthesis of a fluorescent derivatizing reagent, 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hyroxysuccinimidyl carbamate, and its application for the analysis of hydrolysate amino acids via high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Biochem 211:279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coley PD (1982) Rates of herbivory on different tropical trees. In: Leigh EG Jr, Rand AS, Winslow DM (eds) The ecology of a tropical forest. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, D.C., pp 123–132Google Scholar
  18. Coley PD, Bateman ML, Kursar TA (2006) The effects of plant quality on caterpillar growth and defense against natural enemies. Oikos 115:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Costantini D, Rowe M, Butler MW, McGraw KJ (2010) From molecules to living systems: historical and contemporary issues in oxidative stress and antioxidant ecology. Funct Ecol 24:950–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duffey SS, Stout MJ (1996) Antinutritive and toxic components of plant defense against insects. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 32:3–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edwards PJ, Wratten SD (1983) Wound induced defences in plants and their consequences for patterns of insect grazing. Oecologia 59:88–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feeny PP (1970) Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51:565–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Futuyma DJ, Gould F (1979) Associations of plants and insects in a deciduous forest. Ecol Monogr 49:33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griffith OW (1999) Biologic and pharmacologic regulation of mammalian glutathione synthesis. Free Rad Biol Med 27:922–935PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC (1999) Free radicals in biology and medicine. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Haukioja E, Ossipov V, Lempa K (2002) Interactive effects of leaf maturation and phenolics on consumption and growth of a geometrid moth. Entomol Exp Appl 104:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hough JA, Pimentel D (1978) Influence of host foliage on development, survival and fecundity of the gypsy moth. Environ Entomol 7:97–102Google Scholar
  28. Jones DP (2002) Redox potential of GSH/GSSG couple: assay and biological significance. Meth Enzymol 348:93–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karowe DN (1989) Differential effect of tannic acid on two tree-feeding Lepidoptera: implications for theories of plant-herbivore chemistry. Oecologia 80:507–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krishnan N, Sehnal F (2006) Compartmentalization of oxidative stress and antioxidant defense in the larval gut of Spodoptera littoralis. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 63:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liebhold AM, Gottschalk KW, Muzika R-M, Montgomery ME, Young R, O’Day K, Kelley B (1995) Suitability of North American tree species to the gypsy moth: a summary of field and laboratory tests. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experimental Station, Gen Tech Rept NE-211Google Scholar
  32. Martin MM, Van’t Hof HM (1988) The cause of reduced growth of Manduca sexta larvae on a low-water diet: increased metabolic processing costs or nutrient limitation? J. Insect Physiol 34:515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin JS, Martin MM, Bernays EA (1987) Failure of tannic acid to inhibit digestion or reduce digestibility of plant protein in gut fluids of insect herbivores: implications for theories of plant defense. J Chem Ecol 13:605–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mattson WJ (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:119–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McGraw KJ, Cohen AA, Costantini D, Horak P (2010) The ecological significance of antioxidants and oxidative stress: a marriage between mechanistic and functional perspectives. Funct Ecol 24:947–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Montgomery ME (1990) Variation in the suitability of tree species for gypsy moth. In: Gottschalk KW, Werey MJ, Smith SI (eds) Proceedings, USDA interagency gypsy moth research review 1990. Gen Tech Rept NE-146, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  37. Niemela PJ, Haukioja E (1982) Seasonal patterns in species richness of herbivores: macrolepidopteran larvae on Finnish deciduous trees. Ecol Entomol 7:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ossipova S, Ossipov V, Haukioja E, Loponen J, Pihlaja K (2001) Proanthocyanidins of mountain birch leaves: quantification and properties. Phytochem Anal 12:128–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parry D, Spence JR, Volney WJA (1998) Budbreak phenology and natural enemies mediate survival of first-instar forest tent caterpillar (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Environ Entomol 27:1368–1374Google Scholar
  40. Raupp MJ, Denno RF (1983) Leaf age as a predictor of herbivore distribution and abundance. In: Denno RF, McClure MS (eds) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 91–124Google Scholar
  41. Raupp MJ, Werren JH, Sadof CS (1988) Effects of short-term phenological changes in leaf suitability on the survivorship, growth and development of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) larvae. Environ Entomol 17:316–319Google Scholar
  42. Rossiter M, Schulz JC, Baldwin IT (1988) Relationships among defoliation, red oak phenolics, and gypsy moth growth and reproduction. Ecology 69:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salminen J-P, Ossipov V, Loponen J, Haukioja E, Pihlaja K (1999) Characterization of hydrolyzable tannins from leaves of Betula pubescens by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 564:283–291Google Scholar
  44. Salminen J-P, Ossipov V, Haukioja E, Pihlaja K (2001) Seasonal variation in the content of hydrolyzable tannins in leaves of Betula pubescens. Phytochemistry 57:15–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Salminen J-P, Ossipov V, Pihlaja K (2002) Distribution of hydrolyzable tannins in the foliage of Finnish birch species. Z Naturforsch 57c:248–256Google Scholar
  46. Salminen J-P, Roslin T, Karonen M, Sinkkonen J, Pihlaja K, Pulkkinen P (2004) Seasonal variation in the content of hydrolyzable tannins, flavonoid glycosides, and proanthocyanidins in oak leaves. J Chem Ecol 30:1693–1711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. SAS Institute (2003) The SAS system for Windows, Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmidt D, Reese J (1986) Sources of error in nutritional index studies of insects on artificial diet. J Insect Physiol 32:193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schroeder LA (1986) Changes in tree leaf quality and growth performance of lepidopteran larvae. Ecology 67:1628–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schroeder LA, Malmer M (1980) Dry matter, energy and nitrogen conversion by Lepidoptera and Hymenoptera larvae fed leaves of black cherry. Oecologia 45:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schweitzer DF (1979) Effects of foliage age on body weight and survival in larvae of tribe Lithophanini (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Oikos 32:403–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scriber JM (1977) Limiting effects of low leaf-water content on the nitrogen utilization, energy budget, and larval growth of Hyalophora cecropia (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Oecologia 28:269–287Google Scholar
  53. Scriber JM (1979) Effects of leaf-water supplementation upon post-ingestive nutritional indices of forb-, shrub-, vine-, and tree-feeding Lepidoptera. Entomol Exp Appl 25:240–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scriber JM, Slansky F (1981) The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Ann Rev Entomol 26:183–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Summers CB, Felton GW (1994) Prooxidant effects of phenolic acids on the generalist herbivore Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuiidae): potential mode of action for phenolic compounds in plant anti-herbivore chemistry. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 24:943–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Swain T (1979) Tannins and lignins. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 657–682Google Scholar
  57. Thiboldeaux RL, Lindroth RL, Tracy JW (1998) Effects of juglone (5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone) on midgut morphology and glutathione status in Saturniid moth larvae. Comp Biochem Physiol 120:481–487Google Scholar
  58. Waldbauer GP (1968) The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Adv Insect Physiol 5:229–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams RS, Lincoln DE, Norby RJ (1998) Leaf age effects of elevated CO2-grown white oak leaves on spring-feeding lepidopterans. Global Change Biol 4:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wint GRW (1981) The effect of foliar nutrients upon the growth and feeding of a lepidopteran larva. N as an ecological factor. In: Lee JA, McNeill S, Rorison IH (eds) 22nd Symposium British Ecological Society, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 301–320Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond V. Barbehenn
    • 1
    • 2
  • Julie Niewiadomski
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cristina Pecci
    • 1
    • 2
  • Juha-Pekka Salminen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental BiologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Organic Chemistry and Chemical BiologyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations