Medicinal Chemistry Research

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 1248–1256 | Cite as

Novel derivatives of 5-amino-1-cyclopropyl-7-[(3R,5S)3,5-dimethylpiperazine-1-yl]-6,8-difluoro-4-oxo-quinoline-3-carboxylic acid: their synthesis, antimicrobial, antifungal, and urease inhibitory studies

  • M. Saeed Arayne
  • Najma Sultana
  • Somia Gul
  • Ajmal Khan
Original Research

Abstract

Sparfloxacin (SPFX) or 5-amino-1-cyclopropyl-7-[(3R,5S)3,5-dimethylpiperazine-1-yl]-6,8-difluoro-4-oxo-quinoline-3-carboxylic acid is an orally active synthetic, broad spectrum third generation quinolone, with excellent activity against Gram-positive bacteria with selectivity against anaerobes and atypical pathogens. Three derivatives of SPFX (2, 3, and 4) were synthesized by reacting different aromatic carboxylic acids with SPFX (1). Chemistry involved the formation of amide between reacting species through nucleophilic substitution reactions. The synthesized derivatives were then structurally characterized by IR, NMR, and mass spectroscopic techniques. The antimicrobial activities of these derivatives were evaluated against four Gram-positive, seven Gram-negative bacteria, and six fungi, using SPFX as a reference. Statistical analysis revealed these derivatives as active antimicrobial agents, and 2 was more potent antimicrobial agents than the parent drug as well other fluoroquinolones. Compounds 3 and 4 showed a significant activity against Fusarium solani. Moreover, these three derivatives were evaluated for inhibitory activities against enzyme urease, carbonic anhydrase II, and α-chymotrypsin. Results showed their selectivity against urease enzyme. Based on their nontoxic behavior, these derivatives may be potential agents for further studies.

Keywords

Sparfloxacin Derivatives Antimicrobial activities Urease Enzyme inhibition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Mrs. Somia Gul acknowledges the financial support of Higher Education Commission Pakistan (Indigenous 5000 Ph.D Fellowship Program) to complete her Ph.D.

References

  1. Amtul Z, Rasheed M, Choudhary MI, Rosanna S, Khan KM, Atta-Ur-Rahman (2004) Kinetics of novel competitive inhibitors of urease enzymes by a focused library of oxadiazoles/thiadiazoles and triazoles. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 319:1053–1063. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X04010125
  2. Anderson VE, Osheroff N (2001) Type II topoisomerases as targets for quinolone antibacterials: turning Dr. Jekyll into Mr. Hyde. Curr Pharm Des 7:337–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson MI, MacGowan AP (2003) Development of the quinolones. J Antimicrob Chemother 51(Suppl S2):1–11. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg212 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arayne MS, Sultana N, Haroon U, Rizvi SBS (2009a) Synthesis, characterization, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities of enoxacin metal complexes. Bioinorg Chem Appl. doi: 10.1155/2009/914105, http://www.hindawi.com/journals/bca/2009/914105/ref/
  5. Arayne MS, Sultana N, Haroon U, Ahmed Mesaik M, Asif M (2009b) Synthesis and biological evaluation of enoxain carboxamide derivatives. Arch Pharm Res 32(7):967–974. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19641876 Google Scholar
  6. Arayne MS, Sultana N, Haroon U, Zuberi MH, Rizvi BS (2010) Synthesis, characterization and biological activity of a series of carboxamide derivatives of ofloxacin. Arch Pharm Res 33(12):1901–1909. doi: 10.1007/s12272-010-1203-4, http://www.springerlink.com/content/711t150286152321/
  7. Arfan M, Ali M, Ahmad H, Anis I, Khan A, Choudhary MI, Shah MR (2010) Urease inhibitors from Hypericum oblongifolium WALL. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 25:296–299. http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/14756360903179385
  8. Boteva AA, Krasnykh OP (2009) The methods of synthesis, modification, and biological activity of 4-quinolones. Chem Heterocycl Compd 45(7):757–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chu DT, Fernandes PB, Claiborne AK, Pihuleac E, Nordeen CW, Maleczka RE Jr, Pernet AG (1985) Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of novel arylfluoroquinolone antibacterial agents. J Med Chem 28(11):1558–1564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. De Sarro A, De Sarro G (2001) Adverse reactions to fluoroquinolones: an overview on mechanistic aspects. Curr Med Chem 8:371–374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Domagala JM, Heifetz CL, Hutt MP, Mich TF, Nichols JB, Solomon M, Worth DF (1988) 1-Substituted 7-[3-[(ethylamino)methyl]-1-pyrrolidinyl]-6,8-difluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acids. New quantitative structure-activity relationships at N1 for the quinolone antibacterials. J Med Chem 31(5):991–1001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dyer JR (1974) Application of absorption spectroscopy of organic compounds. Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, p 35Google Scholar
  13. Foroumadi A, Firoozpour L, Emami S, Mansouri S, Ebrahimabadi AH, Asadipour A, Amini M, Saeid-Adeli N, Shafiee A (2007) Synthesis and antibacterial activity of N-[5-(chlorobenzylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl] piperazinyl quinolone derivatives. Arch Pharm Res 30(2):138–145. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF02977685 Google Scholar
  14. Grady FO, Harold PL, Roger GF, David GW (1997) Antibiotic and chemotherapy anti-infective agent and their use in therapy, 7th edn. Churchill Livingstone Inc., New York, pp 419, 451Google Scholar
  15. Haroon U, Zuberi MH, Arayne MS, Sultana N (2012) New improved quinolone derivatives against infection. In: Bobbarala V (ed) Biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology—“a search for antibacterial agents”, pp 235–248. ISBN 978-953-51-0724-8. doi: 10.5772/46048
  16. Isidro-Llobet A, lvarez MA, Albericio F (2009) Amino acid-protecting groups. Chem Rev 109(6):2455–2504. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/cr800323s Google Scholar
  17. Krajewska B (2002) Ureases: roles, properties and catalysis. Wiad Chem 56:223–253. http://www.chemia.uj.edu.pl/zespol_en.php?id=10112 Google Scholar
  18. Livermore DM, Carter MW, Bagel S, Wiedemann B, Baquero F, Loza E, Endtz HP, van Den Braak N, Fernandes CJ, Fernandes L, Frimodt-Moller N, Rasmussen LS, Giamarellou H, Giamarellos-Bourboulis E, Jarlier V, Nguyen J, Nord CE, Struelens MJ, Nonhoff C, Turnidge J, Bell J, Zbinden R, Pfister S, Mixson L, Shungu DL (2001) In vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against recent clinical bacteria collected in Europe and Australia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45(6):1860–1867. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC90558/ Google Scholar
  19. Mobley HLT, Hausinger RP (1989) Microbial ureases: significance, regulation, and molecular characterization. Microbiol Rev 53:85–108PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mobley HLT, Island MD, Hausinger RP (1995) Molecular biology of microbial ureases. Microbiol Rev 59:451480. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC239369/ Google Scholar
  21. Nakamoto K (2009) Infrared and Raman spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds, applications in coordination, organometallic, and bioinorganic chemistry, 6th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 279–280Google Scholar
  22. Olivera-Severo D, Wassermann GE, Carlini CR (2006) Ureases display biological effects independent of enzymatic activity. Is there a connection to diseases caused by urease-producing bacteria? Braz J Med Biol Res 39:851–861. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0100-879X2006000700002&script=sci_arttext Google Scholar
  23. Polacco JC, Holland MA (1993) Roles of urease in plant cells. In: Jeon KW, Jarvik J (eds) International review of cytology, vol 145. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, pp 65–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Remington (2006) The science and practice of pharmacy, 21th edn, vol 1. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, p 561. ISBN 0-7817-4673-6. http://books.google.com.pk/books?id=NFGSSSbaWjwC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q&f=false
  25. Sarkar A, Roy SR, Parikh N, Chakraborti AK (2011) Nonsolvent application of ionic liquids: organo-catalysis by 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium cation based room-temperature ionic liquids for chemoselective N-tert-butyloxycarbonylation of amines and the influence of the C-2 hydrogen on catalytic efficiency. J Org Chem 76:7132–7140. http://www.organic-chemistry.org/abstracts/lit3/374.shtm Google Scholar
  26. Shen LL, Mitscher LA, Sharma PN, O’Donnell TJ, Chu DW, Cooper CS, Rosen T, Pernet AG (1989) Mechanism of inhibition of DNA gyrase by quinolone antibacterials: a cooperative drug—DNA binding model. Biochemistry 28(9):3886–3894CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Silverstein RM, Bassler GC, Morrill TC (1981) Spectrometric identification of organic compounds, 4th edn. Wiley, New York, QD272.S6 S55Google Scholar
  28. Simor AE, Ferro S, Low DE (1989) Comparative in vitro activities of six new fluoroquinolones and other oral antimicrobial agents against Campylobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 33(1):108–109PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sirko A, Brodzik R (2000) Plant ureases: roles and regulations. Acta Biochim Pol 47(4):1189–1195. http://www.actabp.pl/pdf/4_2000/1189-1195s.pdf Google Scholar
  30. Smoot DT, Mobley HLT, Chippendale GR, Lewison JF, Resau JH (1990) Helicobacter pylori urease activity is toxic to human gastric epithelial cells. Infect Immun 58:1992–1994PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sultana N, Naz A, Khan B, Arayne MS and Mesaik MA (2009a) Synthesis, characterization, antibacterial, antifungal and immunomodulating activities of gatifloxacin derivatives. Med Chem Res 19(9):1210–1221. doi: 10.1007/500044-009-9264-y, http://www.springerlink.com/content/727644w025665076/
  32. Sultana N, Arayne MS, Rizvi B, Mesaik MA (2009b) Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of a series of levofloxacin carboxamide analogues Bull Korean Chem Soc 30(10):2294–2298. http://journal.kcsnet.or.kr/main/j_search/j_abstract_view.htm?code=B091024&qpage=j_search&spage=b_bkcs&dpage=ar
  33. Sultana N, Arayne MS, Gul S, Shamim S (2010) Sparfloxacin–metal complexes as antifungal agents—their synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activities. J Mol Struct 975(1–3):285–291. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022286010003911 Google Scholar
  34. Sultana N, Arayne MS, Rizvi SBS, Haroon U (2011a) Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluations of ciprofloxacin carboxamide analogues. Bull Korean Chem Soc 32(2):483–488. doi: 10.5012/bkcs.2011.32.2.483, http://journal.kcsnet.or.kr/main/j_search/j_abstract_view.htm?code=B110221&qpage=j_search&spage=b_bkcs&dpage=ar
  35. Sultana N, Hamza E, Arayne MS, Haroon U (2011b) Effect of metal ions on the in vitro availability of enoxacin, its in vivo implications, kinetic and antibacterial studies. Quim Nova 34(2):186–189. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0100-40422011000200003&script=sci_abstract Google Scholar
  36. Sultana N, Arayne MS, Rizvi SBS, Haroon U, Mesaik MA (2012) Synthesis, spectroscopic and biological evaluation of some levofloxacin metal complexes. Med Chem Res. doi: 10.1007/s00044-012-0132-9
  37. Weatherburn MW (1967) Urea colorimetric endpoint determination urease—berthelot reaction. Anal Chem 39:971. http://www.multi-quimicos.com/plasmatecpdfs/UREACOL125.pdf Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Saeed Arayne
    • 1
  • Najma Sultana
    • 2
  • Somia Gul
    • 2
  • Ajmal Khan
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of KarachiKarachiPakistan
  2. 2.Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of KarachiKarachiPakistan
  3. 3.H.E.J. Research Institute of Chemistry, International Center for Chemical and Biological SciencesUniversity of KarachiKarachiPakistan

Personalised recommendations