Medicinal Chemistry Research

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 192–199 | Cite as

3D-QSAR studies of 4-quinolone derivatives as high-affinity ligands at the benzodiazepine site of brain GABAA receptors

  • Anand Gaurav
  • Mange R. Yadav
  • Rajani Giridhar
  • Vertika Gautam
  • Ranjit Singh
Original Research

Abstract

Three dimensional quantitative structure activity relationship approach using CoMFA and CoMSIA was applied to a series of 4-quinolone derivatives as high-affinity ligands at the benzodiazepine site of brain GABAA receptors. For the purpose, 27 compounds were used to develop models. 3D-QSAR models with high-squared correlation coefficient of up to 0.979 for CoMFA and 0.931 for CoMSIA were established. The robustness of the model was confirmed with the help of leave one out cross-validation method with r cv 2 values of up to 0.526 and 0.546 for CoMFA and CoMSIA, respectively. Developed models highlighted the importance of shape of the molecules, i.e., steric descriptors for GABAA receptor binding.

Keywords

GABA 3D-QSAR CoMFA CoMSIA Leave one out PLS analysis 

References

  1. Barnard E, Skolnick P, Olsen R., Mohler H, Sieghart W, Biggio G, Braestrup C, Bateson A, Langer S (1998) International Union of Pharmacology. XV. Subtypes of γ-aminobutyric acidA receptors—classification on the basis of subunit structure and receptor function. Pharmacol Rev 50:291–313Google Scholar
  2. Bormann J (2000) The ‘ABC’ of GABA receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 21:16–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowery NG (1993) GABAB receptor pharmacology. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 33:109–147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chebib M, Johnston GAR (2000) GABA-activated ligand gated ion channels: Medicinal chemistry and molecular biology. J Med Chem 43:1427–1447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Christian G, Chris R, Lankau HJ, Thomas A, Norbert H, Rita D, Ute E, Hofmann HJ, Klaus U (2006) Synthesis, pharmacology, and structure-activity relationships of novel imidazolones and pyrrolones as modulators of GABAA receptors. J Med Chem 49:1855–1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Da Settimo A, Primofiore G, Da Settimo F, Marini AM, Novellino E, Greco G, Martini C, Giannaccini G, Lucacchini A (1996) Synthesis, structure-activity relationships, and molecular modeling studies of N-(indol-3-ylglyoxylyl)-benzylamine derivatives acting at the benzodiazepine receptor. J Med Chem 39:5083–5091CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dekermendjian KP, Witt MR, Sterner O, Nielsen M, Liljefors T (1999) Structure-activity relationships and molecular modeling analysis of flavonoids binding to the benzodiazepine site of the rat brain GABAA receptor complex. J Med Chem 42:4343–4350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Doble A, Martin IL (1996) The GABAA/benzodiazepine receptor as target for psychoactive drugs. Springer-Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  9. Erik L, Pierre A, Jakob N, Ingrid P, Elsebet SN, Mogens N, Olov S, Tommy L (2006) 4-quinolone derivatives: high-affinity ligands at the benzodiazepine site of brain GABAA receptors. Synthesis, pharmacology, and pharmacophore modeling. J Med Chem 49:2526–2533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Golbraikh A, Tropsha A (2002) Beware of q2. J Mol Graph Mod 20:269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kahnberg P, Howard M, Liljefors T, Nielsen M, Ostergaard NE, Sterner O, Pettersson I (2004) The use of a pharmacophore model for identification of novel ligands for the benzodiazepine binding site of the GABAA receptor. J Mol Graphics Model 23:253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Litina DH, Garg R, Hansch C (2004) Comparative quantitative structure-activity relationship studies (QSAR) on non-benzodiazepine compounds binding to benzodiazepine receptor (BzR). Chem Rev 104:3751–3794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Manuel UC, Irene LR, Miguel AG (2006) Refinement and use of the approximate similarity in QSAR models for benzodiazepine receptor ligands. J Chem Inf Model 46:2022–2029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McKernan RM, Whiting P (1996) Which GABAA-receptor subtypes really occur in the brain? Trends Neurosci 19:139–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Puntambekar DS, Giridhar R, Yadav MR (2006a) 3D-QSAR CoMFA/CoMSIA studies on 5-aryl-2, 2-dialkyl-4-phenyl-3(2H)-furanone derivatives, as selective COX-2 inhibitors. Acta Pharm 56:157–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Puntambekar DS, Giridhar R, Yadav MR (2006b) Insights into the structural requirements of farnesyltransferase inhibitors as potential anti-tumor agents based on 3D QSAR CoMFA and CoMSIA models. Eur J Med Chem 41:1279–1292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Puntambekar DS, Yadav MR, Giridhar R (2006c) 3D-QSAR studies of farnesyltransferase inhibitors: a comparative molecular field analysis approach. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 16:1821–1827CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rudolph U, Crestani F, Benke D, Brunig I, Benson JA, Fritschy JM, Martin JR, Bluethmann H, Mohler H (1999) Benzodiazepine actions mediated by specific gammaaminobutyric acid(A) receptor subtypes. Nature 401:796–800CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rudolph U, Crestani F, Mohler H (2001) GABAA receptor subtypes: dissecting their pharmacological functions. Trends Pharmacol Sci 22:188–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tropsha A, Gramatica P, Gombar VK (2003) The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb Sci 22:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yadav MR, Puntambekar DS, Sarathy KP, Vengurlekar S, Giridhar R (2005) Quantitative structure activity relationship studies of diarylimidazoles as selective COX-2 inhibitors. Indian J Chem 45B:475–482Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anand Gaurav
    • 1
  • Mange R. Yadav
    • 2
  • Rajani Giridhar
    • 2
  • Vertika Gautam
    • 1
  • Ranjit Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Pharmaceutical SciencesShobhit UniversityMeerutIndia
  2. 2.Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, KalabhavanThe M.S University of BarodaVadodaraIndia

Personalised recommendations