Advertisement

Hybridization in the European carpenter ants Camponotus herculeanus and C. ligniperda (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

  • B. SeifertEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

The first case of hybridization between the large European carpenter ants Camponotus herculeanus (Linnaeus 1758) and C. ligniperda (Latreille 1802) is demonstrated by means of exploratory and hypothesis-driven data analyses of standardized phenotypic characters. The strong signal separating the parental species allows the identification of hybrid workers on the individual level, based on only seven characters. The frequency of hybridization between the two species is estimated for Central Europe as 0.2–1.0%. This low ratio indicates strong reproductive barriers considering syntopic occurrence at about 10% of the observation sites, a nearly complete overlap of swarming times and basically equal meteorological conditions to release swarming. The presented case increases the known ratio of hybridizing species within the 178 ant species of Central Europe to 19.1%. This figure dramatically contrasts the known hybridization ratio of 0.55% within an estimated number of 2000 ant species from the Holarctic outside Central Europe. This 30-fold lower discovery rate of hybrids may be explained by the predominance of idiosyncratic species delimitation methods in morphology-based taxonomy in combination with the psychology of human decision-making. A neotype of Camponotus ligniperda is fixed in a specimen from the terra typica and comments on the Latin naming are given.

Keywords

Sister species Hybridization Allometry Numeric taxonomy Reproductive barrier 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank Jörn Bittcher from Albertslund for providing the first hybrid sample and samples of the parental species from Denmark and Christophe Galkowski/St. Aubin de Medoc for collecting the neotype sample. Many thanks are also given to Roland Schultz/SMN Görlitz for making the z-stack photos.

References

  1. Abbott R, Albach D, Ansell S, Arntzen JW, Baird SJE, Bierne N, Boughman J, Brelsford A, Buerkle CA, Buggs R, Butlin RK, Dieckmann U, Eroukhmanoff F, Grill A, Cahan SH, Hermansen JS, Hewitt G, Hudson AG, Jiggins C, Jones J, Keller B, Maczewski T, Mallet J, Martinez-Rodriguez P, Möst M, Mullen S, Nichols R, Nolte AW, Parisod C, Pfennig K, Rice AM, Ritchie MG, Seifert B, Smadja CM, Stelkens R, Szymura JM, Väinölä R, Wolf JBW, Zinner D (2013) Hybridization and speciation. J Evol Biol 26:229–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson E, Stebbins GL (1954) Hybridization as an evolutionary stimulus. Evolution 8:378–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagherian A, Münch W, Seifert B (2012) A first demonstration of interspecific hybridization in Myrmica ants by geometric morphometrics (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 17:121–131Google Scholar
  4. Barton NH (2001) The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol Ecol 10:551–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernard F (1968) Les fourmis d’Europe occidentale et septentrionale. Faune de l’ Europe et du Bassin Méditerranéen Eur. et Bas. Med. 3. Masson éditeurs, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernasconi C, Cherix D, Seifert B, Pamilo P (2010) Molecular taxonomy of the Formica rufa group (red wood ants) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a new cryptic species in the Swiss. Alps? Myrmecol News 14:37–47Google Scholar
  7. Bullini L (1994) Origin and evolution of animal hybrid species. Trends Ecol Evol 9:422–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Csösz S, Fisher B (2015) Diagnostic survey of Malagasy Nesomyrmex species-groups and revision of hafahafa group species via morphology based cluster delimitation protocol. ZooKeys 526:19–59.  https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.526.6037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Douwes P, Stille B (1991) Hybridization and variation in the Leptothorax tuberum group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Z Zool Syst Evol 29:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischer K (1987) Karyotypuntersuchungen an selbständigen und sozialparasitischen Arten der Tribus Leptothoracini (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) im Hinblick auf ihre Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen. PhD thesis, Technische Hochschule DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  11. Grant PJ, Mullarney K, Svensson L, Zetterström D (2000) Vögel Europas, Nordafrikas und Vorderasiens. Franck-Kosmos Verlags-GmbH, Stuttgart, 400 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Helms Cahan S, Parker JD, Rissing SW, Johnson RA, Polony TS, Weiser MD, Smith DR (2002) Extreme genetic differences between queens and workers in hybridizing Pogonomyrmex harvester ants. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1871–1877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kulmuni J, Seifert B, Pamilo P (2010) Segregation distortion causes large-scale differences between male and female genomes in hybrid ants. PNAS 107(16):7371–7376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kutter H (1977) Hymenoptera - Formicidae. Fauna Insecta Helvetica, vol 6, Zurich, pp 298Google Scholar
  15. Pearson B (1983) Hybridisation between Lasius niger and Lasius alienus. Insectes Soc 30:402–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pisarski B (1961) Studien über die polnischen Arten der Gattung Camponotus Mayr (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Ann Zool (Warszawa) 19:147–207Google Scholar
  17. Purcell J, Zahnd S, Athanasiades A, Türler R, Chapuisat M, Brelsford A (2016) Ants exhibit asymmetric hybridization in a mosaic hybrid zone. Mol Ecol 25:4866–4874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pusch K, Heinze J, Foitzik S (2006) The influence of hybridization on the colony structure in the ant species Temnothorax nylanderi and T. crassispinus. Insectes Soc 53:439–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ross KG, Meer RKV, Fletcher DJC, Vargo EL (1987) Biochemical phenotypic and genetic studies of two introduced fire ants and their hybrid (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Evolution 41(2):280–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Seifert B (1984) Nachweis einer im Freiland aufgetretenen Bastardierung von Leptothorax nigriceps Mayr und Leptothorax unifasciatus (Latr.) mittels einer multiplen Diskriminanzanalyse. Abh Ber Naturkundemus Görlitz 58/7:1–8Google Scholar
  21. Seifert B (1989) Camponotus herculeanus (Linné, 1758) und Camponotus ligniperda (Latr., 1802)—determination der weiblichen Kasten, Verbreitung und Habitatwahl in Mitteleuropa. Entomol Nachrichten Berichte 33:127–133Google Scholar
  22. Seifert B (1991) The phenotypes of the Formica rufa complex in East Germany. Abh Ber Naturkundemus Görlitz 65/1:1–27Google Scholar
  23. Seifert B (1999) Interspecific hybridisations in natural populations of ants by example of a regional fauna (Hymenoptera:Formicidae). Insectes Soc 46:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seifert B (2006) Social cleptogamy in the ant subgenus Chthonolasius—survival as a minority. Abh Ber Naturkundemus Görlitz 77:251–276Google Scholar
  25. Seifert B (2013) Keynote—frequency and evolutionary significance of hybridization in ants. In: Schlick-Steiner BC, Arthofer W, Steiner FM (eds): Abstract book of the 5th Central European workshop of myrmecology, p. 41 (published by CEWM 2013 organising committee, Innsbruck, Austria)Google Scholar
  26. Seifert B (2017) The ecology of Central European non-arboreal ants—37 years of a broad-spectrum analysis under permanent taxonomic control. Soil Org 89(1):1–67Google Scholar
  27. Seifert B (2018) The ants of Central and North Europe. Lutra Verlags- und Vertriebsgesellschaft, TauerGoogle Scholar
  28. Seifert B, Goropashnaya A (2004) Ideal phenotypes and mismatching haplotypes—errors of mtDNA treeing in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) detected by standardized morphometry. Org Divers Evol 4/4:295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Seifert B, Kulmuni J, Pamilo P (2010) Independent hybrid populations of Formica polyctena × rufa wood ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) abound under conditions of forest fragmentation. Evol Ecol 24/5:1219–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Steiner FM, Seifert B, Grasso DA, Le Moli F, Arthofer W, Stauffer C, Crozier RH, Schlick-Steiner BC (2011) Mixed colonies and hybridisation of Messor harvester ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Org Divers Evol 11:107–134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-011-0045-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steiner FM, Seifert B, Moder K, Schlick-Steiner BC (2010) A multisource solution for a complex problem in biodiversity research: description of the cryptic ant species Tetramorium alpestre sp. n. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zool Anz 24/9:223–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Umphrey GJ, Danzmann RG (1998) Electrophoretic evidence for hybridization in the ant genus Acanthomyops (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Biochem Syst Ecol 26: 431–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van der Have TM, Pedersen JS, Boomsma JJ (2011) Mating, hybridisation and introgression in Lasius ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 15:109–115Google Scholar
  34. Vander Meer RK, Lofgren CS (1989) Biochemical and behavioral evidence for hybridization between fire ants, Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Chem Ecol 15:1757–1765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wing MW (1968) Taxonomic revision of the nearctic genus Acanthomyops (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Cornell Univ Agric Exp Stn Mem 405:1–173Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Senckenberg Museum of Natural History GörlitzGörlitzGermany

Personalised recommendations