Beyond temporal-polyethism: division of labor in the eusocial bee Melipona marginata

  • S. MateusEmail author
  • M. J. Ferreira-Caliman
  • C. Menezes
  • C. Grüter
Research Article


Division of labor plays a fundamental role in colony organization in social insects. In many species, division of labor is based on temporal behavioral castes, whereby workers change tasks as they age. However, division of labor remains relatively poorly understood in the large and diverse group of stingless bees (Meliponini), particularly in the largest and economically important genus Melipona. Recent research suggests that stingless bees can differ considerably from other eusocial bees in their division of labor. Here, we studied the lifetime task performance of individually marked workers of the Brazilian species Melipona marginata. We found that colony organization in M. marginata is characterized by temporal castes and a tendency for elitism, i.e. positive performance correlations across the major tasks. Additionally, we also found that individual workers differ considerably in their work profiles and overall effort. A cluster analysis found evidence for a group of workers that are particularly active in wax manipulation and cell building, two behaviors that are linked to the provisioning and oviposition process (POP). Remarkably, the majority of bees (59%) were never seen foraging and non-foragers were characterized by fewer trophallaxes and less grooming during their lifetime. Bees that did forage often specialized in collecting particular resources, e.g. pollen and mud collectors. In summary, our results suggest that the colony organization in M. marginata is complex and includes temporal castes, elitism across some tasks and specialization in others.


Meliponini Melipona marginata Task-partitioning Division of labor Age polyethism Sub tasks 



We thanks Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto—USP, Departamento de Biologia, Prof. Dr. Ronaldo Zucchi and Ana Carolina Roselino for comments and suggestions on the project. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001 (scholarship to the second author). C.G. was funded by a Science without Borders fellowship from the Brazilian Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—CNPq (Process 400664/2012-7).

Supplementary material

40_2019_691_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 KB)


  1. Ament SA, Corona M, Pollock HS, Robinson GE (2012) Insulin signaling is involved in the regulation of worker division of labor in honey bee colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:4226–4231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bassindale R (1955) The biology of the stingless bee Trigona (Hypotrigona) gribodoi Magretti (Meliponidae). Proc Zool Soc Lond 125:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Shahar Y, Robichon A, Sokolowski MB, Robinson GE (2002) Influence of gene action across different time scales on behavior. Science 296:741–744CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 57:289–300Google Scholar
  5. Beshers SN, Fewell JH (2001) Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:13–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bustamante NCR (2006) Divisão de Trabalho em Três Espécies de Abelhas do Gênero Melipona (Hymenoptera, Apidae) na Amazônia, Brasileira. Universidade Federal do Amazonas, ManausGoogle Scholar
  7. Camargo JMF, Pedro SRM (2013) Meliponini Lepeletier, 1836. In: Moure JS, Urban D, Melo GAR (eds) Catalogue of bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) in the Neotropical Region—online version. Accessed 30 May 2018
  8. Cardoso-Júnior CAM, Silva RP, Borges NA, de Carvalho WJ, Walter SL, Simões ZLP, Bitondi MMG, Vieira CU, Bonetti AM, Hartfelder K (2017) Methyl farnesoate epoxidase (mfe) gene expression and juvenile hormone titers in the life cycle of a highly eusocial stingless bee, Melipona scutellaris. J Insect Physiol 191:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charbonneau D, Dornhaus A (2015) Workers ‘specialized’on inactivity: Behavioral consistency of inactive workers and their role in task allocation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1459–1472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charbonneau D, Sasaki T, Dornhaus A (2017) Who needs ‘lazy’ workers? Inactive workers act as a ‘reserve’ labor force replacing active workers, but inactive workers are not replaced when they are removed. PLoS One 12(9):e0184074CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darchen R (1969) Sur la biologie de Trigona (Apotrigona) nebulata komiensis Cock. I Biol Gabon 5:151–183Google Scholar
  13. Dukas R, Visscher PK (1994) Lifetime learning by foraging honey-bees. Animal Behav 48:1007–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Engels W, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL (1990) Caste development, reproductive strategies, and control of fertility in honey bees and stingless bees. In: Engels W (ed) Social insects. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 167–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farina WM, Grüter C (2009) Trophallaxis—a mechanism of information transfer. In: Jarau S, Hrncir M (eds) Food exploitation by social insects: ecological, behavioral, and theoretical approaches. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 173–187Google Scholar
  16. Giannini KM (1997) Labor division in Melipona compressipes fasciculata Smith (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponinae). An Soc Entomol Bras 26:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goulson D, Peat J, Stout JC, Tucker J, Darvill B, Derwent LC et al (2002) Can alloethism in workers of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, be explained in terms of foraging efficiency? Anim Behav 64:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grosso AF, Bego LR (2002) Labor division, average life span, survival curve, and nest architecture of Tetragonisca angustula angustula (Hymenoptera, Apinae, Meliponini). Sociobiology 40:615–637Google Scholar
  19. Grüter C, Menezes C, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Ratnieks FLW (2012) A morphologically specialized soldier caste improves colony defence in a Neotropical eusocial bee. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:1182–1186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Grüter C, Segers FHID, Menezes C, Vollet-Neto A, Falcon T, von Zuben L, Bitondi MMG, Nascimento FS, Almeida EAB (2017) Repeated evolution of soldier sub-castes suggests parasitism drives social complexity in stingless bees. Nat Commun 8:4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Hammel B, Vollet-Neto A, Menezes C, Nascimento FS, Engels W, Grüter C (2016) Soldiers in a stingless bee: work rate and task repertoire suggest guards are an elite force. Am Nat 187:120–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hart AG, Ratnieks FLW (2002) Task-partitioned nectar transfer in stingless bees: work organisation in a phylogenetic context. Ecol Entomol 27:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heard TA (1999) The role of stingless bees in crop pollination. Annu Rev Entomol 44:183–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hebling NJ, Kerr WE, Kerr F (1964) Divisão de trabalho entre operárias de Trigona (Scaptotrigona) xanthotricha Moure. Pap Avulsos Zool 16:115–127Google Scholar
  25. Herb BR, Wolschin F, Hansen KD, Aryee MJ, Langmead B, Irizarry R, Amdam GV, Feinberg AP (2012) Reversible switching between epigenetic states in honeybee behavioral subcastes. Nat Neurosci 15:1371–1373CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2009) The superorganism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. W. W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Hrncir M, Schmidt VM, Schorkopf DLP, Jarau S, Zucchi R, Barth FG (2006) Vibrating the food receivers: a direct way of signal transmission in stingless bees (Melipona seminigra). J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 192:879–887CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hurd CR, Nordheim EV, Jeanne RL (2003) Elite workers and the colony-level pattern of labor division in the yellow jacket wasp, Vespula germanica. Behaviour 140:827–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Imperatriz-Fonseca V, Zucchi R (1995) Virgin queens in stingless bee (Apidae, Meliponinae) colonies: a review. Apidologie 26:231–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Inoue T, Salmah S, Sakagami SF (1996) Individual variations in worker polyethism of the Sumatran stingless bee, Trigona (Tetragonula) minangkabau (Apidae, Meliponinae). Jpn J Entomol 64:641–668Google Scholar
  31. Jandt JM, Dornhaus A (2009) Spatial organization and division of labour in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens. Anim Behav 77(3):641–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jandt JM, Dornhaus A (2011) Competition and cooperation: bumblebee spatial organization and division of labor may affect worker reproduction late in life. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:2341–2349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson BR, Frost E (2012) Individual-level patterns of division of labor in honeybees highlight flexibility in colony-level development mechanisms. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:923–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Justino CEL, Noll FB, Mateus S, Billen J (2018) Wax gland size according to worker age in Friesella schrottkyi. Apidologie 49:359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kerr WE, Santos Neto dos GR (1956) Contribuição para o conhecimento da bionomia dos Meliponini. 5. Divisão de trabalho entre as operarias de Melipona quadrifasciata quadrifasciata. Insect Soc 3:423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kolmes SA (1986) Have hymenopteran societies evolved to be ergonomically efficient? J N Y Entomol Soc 94:447–457Google Scholar
  37. Leoncini I, Le Conte Y, Costagliola G, Plettner E, Toth AL, Wang M, Huang Z, Bécard JM, Crauser D, Slessor KN, Robinson GE (2004) Regulation of behavioral maturation by a primer pheromone produced by adult worker honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:17559–17564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lindauer M (1952) Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie 34:299–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Manly BF (1994) Multivariate statistical methods. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Mattila HR, Reeve HK, Smith ML (2012) Promiscuous honey bee queens increase colony productivity by suppressing worker selfishness. Curr Biol 22:2027–2031CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Medina LAM, Hart AG, Ratnieks FLW (2014) Waste management in the stingless bee Melipona beecheii Bennett (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sociobiology 61(4):435–440Google Scholar
  42. Menzel R (1990) Learning, memory, and “cognition” in honey bees. In: Kesner R, Olton DS (eds) Neurobiology of comparative cognition. Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp 237–292Google Scholar
  43. Murtagh F, Legendre P (2014) Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: which algorithms implement ward’s criterion? J Classif 31:274–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  45. Pinter-Wollman N, Hubler J, Holley J-A, Franks NR, Dornhaus A (2012) How is activity distributed among and within tasks in Temnothorax ants? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1407–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  47. Rasmussen C, Cameron S (2010) Global stingless bee phylogeny supports ancient divergence, vicariance, and long distance dispersal. Biol J Linn Soc 99:206–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ratnieks FLW, Anderson C (1999) Task partitioning in insect societies. Insect Soc 46:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson GE (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 37:637–665CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Robinson GE (2002) Genomics and integrative analyses of division of labor in the honeybee colonies. Am Nat 160:S160–S172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Robson SK, Traniello JFA (1999) Key individuals and the organisation of labor in ants. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (eds) Information processing in social insects, Springer, Basel, pp 239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roubik DW (2006) Stingless bee nesting biology. Apidologie 37:124–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sakagami SF (1982) Stingless bees. In: Hermann HR (ed) Social insects III. Academic Press, New York, pp 361–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schulz DJ, Sullivan JP, Robinson GE (2002) Juvenile hormone and octopamine in the regulation of division of labor in honey bee colonies. Horm Behav 42:222–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Segers FHID, Menezes C, Vollet-Neto A, Lambert D, Grüter C (2015) Soldier production in a stingless bee depends on rearing location and nurse behaviour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:613–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Segers FHID, Von Zuben LG, Grüter C (2016) Local differences in parasitism and competition shape defensive investment in a polymorphic eusocial bee. Ecology 97:417–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Shorter JR, Tibbetts EA (2009) The effect of juvenile hormone on temporal polyethism in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus. Insect Soc 56:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sommeijer MJ (1984) Distribution of labour among workers of Melipona favosa F.: age-polyethism and worker oviposition. Insect Soc 31:171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sullivan JP, Jassim O, Fahrbach SE, Robinson GE (2000) Juvenile hormone paces behavioral development in the adult worker honey bee. Horm Behav 37:1–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Suzuki R, Shimodaira H (2006) Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 22(12):1540–1542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Tenczar P, Lutz C, Rao VD, Goldenfeld N, Robinson GE (2014) Automated monitoring reveals extreme interindividual variation in plasticity in honeybee foraging activity levels. Animal Behav 95:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tofts C, Franks NR (1992) Doing the right thing: ants, honeybees and naked mole-rats. Trends Ecol Evol 7:346–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. 4th edn, Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Whitfield CW, Ben-Shahar Y, Brillet C, Leoncini I, Crauser D, Le Conte Y, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Robinson GE (2006) Genomic dissection of behavioral maturation in the honey bee. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:16068–16075CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Wille A, Michener C (1973) The nest architecture of stingless bees with special reference to those of Costa. Rica Rev Biol Trop 21:9–278Google Scholar
  67. Yerushalmi S, Bodenhaimer S, Bloch G (2006) Developmentally determined attenuation in circadian rhythms links chronobiology to social organization in bees. J Exp Biol 209:1044–1051CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de FilosofiaCiências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto - USPRibeirão PretoBrazil
  2. 2.Embrapa Meio AmbienteJaguariúnaBrazil
  3. 3.Institute of Organismic and Molecular EvolutionJohannes Gutenberg University MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations