Advertisement

Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 65, Issue 3, pp 439–444 | Cite as

Termite diversity and species composition in heath forests, mixed dipterocarp forests, and pristine and selectively logged tropical peat swamp forests in Brunei

  • T. Bourguignon
  • C. A. L. Dahlsjö
  • K. A. Salim
  • T. A. Evans
Research Article
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

Since the 1970s Southeast Asian peat swamp forests have been increasingly threatened by anthropogenic disturbance. Peat swamps act as refuge for many endangered species, and they may turn into a net producer of CO2 and greatly contribute to climate change if cleared and drained. As one of the main invertebrate decomposers in the tropics, termites are likely to play a major role in peat forests. In this paper, we used a grid-based sampling plot protocol to sample termites in Brunei. We sampled termite communities in pristine and selectively logged peat swamp forests, that we compared with termite communities sampled in heath and dipterocarp forests. More precisely, we determined: (i) termite species diversity in peat swamp forests, and (ii) how termites respond to peat swamp logging. We found that species richness was the highest in the mixed dipterocarp forest. Selective logging had limited impact on species richness in peat swamp forest, suggesting that termite communities are resilient to limited amount of perturbations. Further data are needed to better understand the impact peat swamp clearance has on termite populations and their contribution to climate change.

Keywords

Biodiversity Brunei Conservation biology Community ecology Southeast Asia Species richness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Maria L.A. Lan, Amy Chua, Alexander Cobb, Jangarun Eri, and Lee Gang for logistic support and field assistance. This work was supported by the LHK fund of the National University of Singapore; by the Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology; by the OP Research Development and Education (EVA4.0 grant No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000803); and by the Internal Grant Agency of Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague (IGA 13/17). CALD was financially supported by the IGA fund of the Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague (No. B03/15).

Supplementary material

40_2018_630_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (51 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 51 KB)

References

  1. Anderson JAR (1961) The ecology and forest types of the peat swamp forests of Sarawak and Brunei in relation to their silviculture. University of Edinburgh, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  2. Bignell DE (2011) Morphology, physiology, biochemistry and functional design of the termite gut: an evolutionary wonderland. In: Bignell DE, Roisin Y, Lo N (eds) Biology of termites: a modern synthesis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 375–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourguignon T, Šobotník J, Lepoint G, Martin JM, Hardy OJ, Dejean A, Roisin Y (2011a) Feeding ecology and phylogenetic structure of a complex neotropical termite assemblage, revealed by nitrogen stable isotope ratios. Ecol Entomol 36:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourguignon T, Leponce M, Roisin Y (2011b) Beta-diversity of termite assemblages among primary French Guiana rain forests. Biotropica 43:473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourguignon T, Dahlsjö CAL, Jacquemin J, Gang L, Wijedasa LS, Evans TA (2017) Ant and termite communities in isolated and continuous forest fragments in Singapore. Insect Soc 64:505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colwell RK (2013) EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. User’s guide and applicationGoogle Scholar
  7. Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J (2004) Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85:2717–2727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Allison SD, Bauhus J, Eggleton P, Preston CM, Scarff F, Weedon JT, Wirth C, Zanne AE (2009) Plant traits and wood fates across the globe: rotted, burned, or consumed? Glob Chang Biol 15:2431–2449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahlsjö CAL, Parr CL, Malhi Y, Meir P, Chevarria OVC, Eggleton P (2014a) Termites promote soil carbon and nitrogen depletion: Results from an in situ macrofauna exclusion experiment, Peru. Soil Biol Biochem 77:109–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahlsjö CAL, Parr CL, Malhi Y, Rahman H, Meir P, Jones D, Eggleton P (2014b) First comparison of quantitative estimates of termite biomass and abundance reveals strong intercontinental differences. J Trop Ecol 30:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies SJ, Becker P (1996) Floristic composition and stand structure of mixed dipterocarp and heath forests in Brunei Darussalam. J Trop For Sci 8:542–569Google Scholar
  12. Davies AB, Levick AR, Asner GP, Robertson MP, van Rensburg BJ, Parr CL (2014) Spatial variability and abiotic determinants of termite mounds throughout a savanna catchment. Ecography 37:852–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donovan SE, Eggleton P, Bignell DE (2001) Gut content analysis and a new feeding group classification of termites. Ecol Entomol 26:356–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eggleton P, Bignell DE, Sands WA, Mawdsley NA, Lawton JH, Wood TG, Bignell NC (1996) The diversity, abundance and biomass of termites under differing levels of disturbance in the Mbalmayo Forest Reserve, southern Cameroon. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 351:51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eggleton P, Homathevi R, Jones DT, MacDonald JA, Jeeva D, Bignell DE, Davies RG, Maryati M (1999) Termite assemblages, forest disturbance and greenhouse gas fluxes in Sabah, East Malaysia. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354:1791–1802CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellwood MDF, Foster WA (2004) Doubling the estimate of invertebrate biomass in a rainforest canopy. Nature 429:549–551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fittkau EJ, Klinge H (1973) On biomass and trophic structure of the Central Amazonian rain forest ecosystem. Biotropica 5:2–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Furukawa Y, Inubushi K, Ali M, Itang AM, Tsuruta H (2005) Effect of changing groundwater levels caused by land-use changes on greenhouse gas fluxes from tropical peat lands. Nut Cyc Agro 71:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gathorne-Hardy FJ, Syaukani, Inward DJG (2006) Recovery of termite (Isoptera) assemblage structure from shifting cultivation in Barito Ulu, Kalimantan, Indonesia. J Trop Ecol 22:605–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:9Google Scholar
  21. Hansen MC, Stehman SV, Potapov PV, Arunarwati B, Stolle F, Pittman K (2009) Quantifying changes in the rates of forest clearing in Indonesia from 1990 to 2005 using remotely sensed data sets. Environ Res Lett 4:034001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirano T, Jauhiainen J, Inoue T, Takahashi H (2009) Controls on the Carbon balance of tropical peatlands. Ecosystems 12:873–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hirano T, Segah H, Harada T, Limin S, June T, Hirata R, Osaki M (2007) Carbon dioxide balance of a tropical peat swamp forest in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Glob Chang Biol 13:412–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirano T, Segah H, Kusin K, Limin S, Takahashi H, Osaki M (2012) Effects of disturbances on the carbon balance of tropical peat swamp forests. Glob Chang Biol 18:3410–3422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Inoue T, Takematsu Y, Yamada A, Hongoh Y, Johjima T, Moriya S, Sornnuwat Y, Vongkaluang C, Ohkuma M, Kudo T (2006) Diversity and abundance of termites along an altitudinal gradient in Khao Kitchagoot National Park, Thailand. J Trop Ecol 22:609–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson CR, Liew KC, Yule CM (2009) Structural and functional changes with depth in microbial communities in a tropical Malaysian peat swamp forest. Microb Ecol 57:402–412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jaenicke J, Rieley JO, Mott C, Kimman P, Siegert F (2008) Determination of the amount of carbon stored in Indonesian peatlands. Geoderma 147:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jauhiainen J, Takahashi H, Heikkinen JEP, Martikainen PJ, Vasander H (2005) Carbon fluxes from a tropical peat swamp forest floor. Glob Chang Biol 11:1788–1797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones DT, Rahman H, Bignell DE, Prasetyo AH (2010) Forests on ultramafic-derived soils in Borneo have very depauperate termite assemblages. J Trop Ecol 26:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kanokratana P, Uengwetwanit T, Rattanachomsri U, Bunterngsook B, Nimchua T, Tangphatsornruang S, Plengvidhya V, Champreda V, Eurwilaichitr L (2011) Insights into the phylogeny and metabolic potential of a primary tropical peat swamp forest microbial community by metagenomic analysis. Microbial Ecol 61:518–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Langner A, Siegert F (2009) Spatiotemporal fire occurrence in Borneo over a period of 10 years. Glob Chang Biol 15:48–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martius C (1994) Diversity and ecology of termites in Amazonian forests. Pedobiologia 38:407–428Google Scholar
  33. Martius C (1997) The termites. In: WJ Junk (Ed) The Central-Amazon floodplain: ecology of a pulsing system. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miettinen J, Shi C, Liew S (2011) Deforestation rates in insular Southeast Asia between 2000 and 2010. Glob Chang Biol 17:2261–2270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miettinen J, Shi C, Liew SC (2012) Two decades of destruction in Southeast Asia’s peat swamp forests. Front Ecol Environ 10:124–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Momose K, Shimamura T (2002) Environments and people of Sumatran peat swamp forests I: Distribution and typology of vegetation. Southeast Asia Stud 40:74–86Google Scholar
  37. Moore PD (1989) The ecology of peat-forming processes: a review. Int J Coal Geol 12:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neoh KB, Bong LJ, Muhammad A, Itoh M, Kozan O, Takematsu Y, Yoshimura T (2016) The Impact of tropical peat fire on termite assemblage in Sumatra, Indonesia: reduced complexity of community structure and survival strategies. Environ Entomol 45:1170–1177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Neoh KB, Bong LJ, Muhammad A, Itoh M, Kozan O, Takematsu Y, Yoshimura T (2017) The effect of remnant forest on insect successional response in tropical fire impacted peatland: A bi-taxa comparison. PLoS One 12:e0174388CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Ohkuma M, Brune A (2011) Diversity, structure, and evolution of the termite gut microbial community. In: Bignell DE, Roisin Y, Lo N (eds) Biology of termites: a modern synthesis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 413–438Google Scholar
  41. Olivier JGJ, Schure KM, Peters JAHW. (2017) Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2017 reportGoogle Scholar
  42. Page SE, Rieley JO, Shotyk W, Weiss D (1999) Interdependence of peat and vegetation in a tropical peat swamp forest. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354:1885–1897CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Page S, Hosciło A, Wösten H, Jauhiainen J, Silvius M, Rieley J, Ritzema H, Tansey K, Graham L, Vasander H, Limin S (2009) Restoration ecology of lowland tropical peatlands in Southeast Asia: current knowledge and future research directions. Ecosystems 12:888–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Page SE, Rieley JO, Banks CJ (2011) Global and regional importance of the tropical peatland carbon pool. Glob Chang Biol 17:798–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Posa MRC, Wijedasa LS, Corlett RT (2011) Biodiversity and conservation of tropical peat swamp forests. Bioscience 61:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thapa RS (1982) Termites of Sabah (East Malaysia). Sabah Forest Department, Sandakan, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  47. Tho YP (1992) Termites of Peninsular Malaysia. Malayan Forest Records 36:1–224Google Scholar
  48. Vaessen T, Verwer C, Demies M, Kaliang H, van der Meer P (2011) Comparison of termite assemblages along a landuse gradient on peat areas in Sarawak, Malaysia. J Trop For Sci 23:196–203Google Scholar
  49. Yule CM (2010) Loss of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in Indo-Malayan peat swamp forests. Biodiv Cons 19:393–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yule CM, Gomez LN (2009) Leaf litter decomposition in a tropical peat swamp forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Wetl Ecol Manag 17:231–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Bourguignon
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • C. A. L. Dahlsjö
    • 2
    • 4
  • K. A. Salim
    • 5
  • T. A. Evans
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Faculty of Forestry and Wood SciencesCzech University of Life SciencesSuchdolCzech Republic
  3. 3.Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate UniversityOnna-sonJapan
  4. 4.Environmental Change InstituteUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  5. 5.Biology Programme, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of Brunei DarussalamBandar Seri BegawanBrunei
  6. 6.School of Animal BiologyUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations