Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 65, Issue 2, pp 305–313 | Cite as

Underground nest building: the effect of CO2 on digging rates, soil transport and choice of a digging site in leaf-cutting ants

Research Article

Abstract

By reacting to local environmental stimuli, ant workers excavate a nest that offers suitable climatic conditions. Workers may face increasing CO2 levels while digging across the soil profile, and it is an open question whether these levels are used as cues during nest excavation. Here, we explored the influence of different underground CO2 concentrations on digging behavior in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lundii. We first quantified digging rates and transport of excavated material as a function of CO2 levels, ranging from atmospheric values to 11% CO2. The mass of both the excavated soil and the pellets transported out of the digging chamber were quantified. CO2 preferences for excavation were investigated in a second experiment, in which workers were presented with a choice of two digging sites that differed in their CO2 levels, ranging from atmospheric to 4% CO2, and the mass of excavated material was quantified. Digging rates were similar for all tested CO2 levels up to 7%, and only significantly lower for 11%. The transport of excavated soil increased with increasing CO2 levels up to 7%, and then decreased at 11%. Workers preferred digging at 1% CO2 and avoided levels of 4%. We suggest that the observed CO2 preferences are likely driven by the requirements of their symbiotic fungus, and could be one of the reasons why colonies of A. lundii excavate superficial nest chambers.

Keywords

Carbon dioxide Nest excavation Cue Self-organization Nest architecture 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank David Urbaniec, Lisa Weidner and Baris Düdükcü for their help during the experiments, and Griselda Roces for the ant drawing. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers, whose comments greatly improved the manuscript. Daniela Römer was supported by a grant from the Postdoc Plus funding program of the Graduate School of Life Sciences (GSLS) of the University of Würzburg, Germany, and a Grant of the Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación (ANII, Grant Number PD_NAC_2015_1_108641), Uruguay. Florian Halboth was supported by a Grant from the German Excellence Initiative to the Graduate School of Life Sciences, University of Würzburg.

References

  1. Beckmann HE (1974) The damaging effect of supercooling, narcosis and stress on the memory of the honeybee. J Comp Physiol 94:249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bollazzi M, Forti LC, Roces F (2012) Ventilation of the giant nests of Atta leaf-cutting ants: does underground circulating air enter the fungus chambers? Insectes Soc 59:487–498.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-012-0243-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bollazzi M, Kronenbitter J, Roces F (2008) Soil temperature, digging behaviour, and the adaptive value of nest depth in South American species of Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Oecologia 158:165–175.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1113-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollazzi M, Roces F (2002) Thermal preference for fungus culturing and brood location by workers of the thatching grass-cutting ant Acromyrmex heyeri. Insectes Soc 49:153–157.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-002-8295-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bollazzi M, Roces F (2007) To build or not to build: circulating dry air organizes collective building for climate control in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex ambiguus. Anim Behav 74:1349–1355.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.02.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonabeau E (1998) Fixed response thresholds and the regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Bull Math Biol 60:753–807.  https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1998.0041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coelho Junior A, Geremias LD, Alves GR et al (2017) The biology of Trichogramma pretiosum as atmospheric O2 becomes depleted and CO2 accumulates. Biol Control 105:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coelho Junior A, Parra JRP (2013) Effect of carbon dioxide (CO2) on mortality and reproduction of Anagasta kuehniella (Zeller 1879), in mass rearing, aiming at the production of Trichogramma spp. An Acad Bras Cienc 85:823–831.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652013000200021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Deneubourg JL, Franks NR (1995) Collective control without explicit coding: the case of communal nest excavation. J Insect Behav 8:417–432.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01995316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Falibene A, Roces F, Rössler W, Groh C (2016) Daily thermal fluctuations experienced by pupae via rhythmic nursing behavior increase numbers of mushroom body microglomeruli in the adult ant brain. Front Behav Neurosci 10:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grassé P-P (1959) La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations interindividuelles chez Bellicositermes natalensis et Cubitermes sp. La theorie de la stigmergie. Insectes Soc 6:41–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guerenstein PG, Hildebrand JG (2008) Roles and effects of environmental carbon dioxide in insect life. Annu Rev Entomol 53:161–178.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093402 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Halboth F, Roces F (2017) The construction of ventilation turrets in Atta vollenweideri leaf-cutting ants: carbon dioxide levels in the nest tunnels, but not airflow or air humidity, influence turret structure. PLoS One 12:e0188162.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188162 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamada Y, Tanaka T (2001) Dynamics of carbon dioxide in soil profiles based on long-term field observation. Hydrol Process 15:1829–1845.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hangartner W (1969) Carbon dioxide, a releaser for digging behavior in Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche (Stuttg) 76:58–67.  https://doi.org/10.1155/1969/58428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansell MH (1984) Animal architecture and building behavior. Longman Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Hebling MJA, Penteado CHS, Mendes EG (1992) Respiratory regulation in workers of the leaf cutting ant Atta sexdens rubropilosa Forel, 1908. Comp Biochem Physiol 101:319–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hillel D (1998) Environmental soil physics. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Klaiber J, Najar-Rodriguez A, Dialer E, Dorn S (2013) Elevated carbon dioxide impairs the performance of a specialized parasitoid of an aphid host feeding on Brassica plants. Biol Control 66:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kleineidam C, Roces F (2000) Carbon dioxide concentrations and nest ventilation in nests of the leaf-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri. Insectes Soc 47:241–248.  https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kleineidam C, Romani R, Tautz J, Isidoro N (2000) Ultrastructure and physiology of the CO2 sensitive sensillum ampullaceum in the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens. Arthropod Struct Dev 29:43–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kleineidam C, Tautz J (1996) Perception of carbon dioxide and other “air-condition” parameters in the leaf cutting ant Atta cephalotes. Naturwissenschaften 83:566–568.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01141981 Google Scholar
  23. Moreira AA, Forti LC, Andrade APP et al (2004a) Nest architecture of Atta laevigata (F. Smith 1958) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 39:109–116.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01650520412331333756 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moreira A, Forti L, Boaretto M et al (2004b) External and internal structure of Atta bisphaerica Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) nests. J Appl Entomol 128:204–211.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2004.00839.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moser JC (1963) Contents and structure of Atta texana nest in summer. Ann Entomol Soc Am 56:286–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nicolas G, Sillans D (1989) Immediate and latent effects of carbon dioxide on insects. Annu Rev Entomol 34:97–116.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.000525 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nielsen MG, Christian K, Henriksen PG, Birkmose D (2006) Respiration by mangrove ants Camponotus anderseni during nest submersion associated with tidal inundation in Northern Australia. Physiol Entomol 31:120–126.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.2005.00492.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pielström S, Roces F (2012) Vibrational communication in the spatial organization of collective digging in the leaf-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri. Anim Behav 84:743–752.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pielström S, Roces F (2013) Sequential soil transport and its influence on the spatial organisation of collective digging in leaf-cutting ants. PLoS One 8:e57040.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057040 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Pielström S, Roces F (2014) Soil moisture and excavation behaviour in the chaco leaf-cutting ant (Atta vollenweideri): digging performance and prevention of water inflow into the nest. PLoS One.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095658 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Powell RJ, Stradling DJ (1986) Factors influencing the growth of Attamyces bromatificus, a symbiont of attine ants. Trans Br Mycol Soc 87:205–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(86)80022-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quinlan RJ, Cherrett JM (1978) Aspects of the symbiosis of the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex octospinosus (Reich) and its food fungus. Ecol Entomol 3:221–230.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1977.tb00877.x doiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rasse P, Deneubourg JL (2001) Dynamics of nest excavation and nest size regulation of Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Insect Behav 14:433–449.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011163804217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roces F, Kleineidam C (2000) Humidity preference for fungus culturing by workers of the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens rubropilosa. Insectes Soc 47:348–350.  https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roces F, Núñez J (1989) Brood translocation and circadian variation of temperature preference in the ant Camponotus mus. Oecologia 81:33–37.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Römer D, Bollazzi M, Roces F (2017) Carbon dioxide sensing in an obligate insect fungus symbiosis: CO2 preferences of leaf-cutting ants to rear their mutualistic fungus. PLoS One 12:e0174597.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174597 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Römer D, Roces F (2014) Nest enlargement in leaf-cutting ants: Relocated brood and fungus trigger the excavation of new chambers. PLoS One 9:e97872.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097872 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Römer D, Roces F (2015) Available space, symbiotic fungus and colony brood influence excavation and lead to the adjustment of nest enlargement in leaf-cutting ants. Insectes Soc 62:401–413.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-015-0419-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Röschard J, Roces F (2003) Cutters, carriers and transport chains: Distance-dependent foraging strategies in the grass-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri. Insectes Soc 50:237–244.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-003-0663-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schofield RMS, Emmett KD, Niedbala JC, Nesson MH (2011) Leaf-cutter ants with worn mandibles cut half as fast, spend twice the energy, and tend to carry instead of cut. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:969–982.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1098-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schwartz DM, Bazzaz FA (1973) In situ measurements of carbon dioxide gradients in a soil-plant-atmosphere system. Oecologia 12:161–167.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345515 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E (1999) A brief history of stigmergy. Artif Life 5:97–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E, Deneubourg J-L (1998) The origin of nest complexity in social insects. Complexity 3:15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tschinkel WR (2013) Florida harvester ant nest architecture, nest relocation and soil carbon dioxide gradients. PLoS One 8:e59911.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059911 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Tschinkel WR (2004) The nest architecture of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. J Insect Sci 4:21.  https://doi.org/10.1672/1536-2442(2004)004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Verza SS, Forti LC, Lopes JFS, Hughes WOH (2007) Nest architecture of the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex rugosus rugosus. Insectes Soc 54:303–309.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-007-0943-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zolessi LC, González LA (1978) Observaciones sobre el género Acromyrmex en el Uruguay. IV. A. (Acromyrmex) lundi (Guérin, 1938) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Rev la Fac Humanidades y Ciencias Ser Ciencias Biológicas 1:9–28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral Physiology and Sociobiology, BiocenterUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
  2. 2.Unidad de Entomología, Departamento de Protección Vegetal, Facultad de AgronomíaUniversidad de la RepúblicaMontevideoUruguay

Personalised recommendations