Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 65, Issue 1, pp 117–132 | Cite as

Nesting characteristics, floral resources, and foraging activity of Trigona iridipennis Smith in Bankura district of West Bengal, India

Research Article


For successful establishment of meliponiculture with Trigona iridipennis Smith, several attributes such as nesting substrates, orientations, elevation, internal characteristics of nests, floral resources, and foraging activity were studied in Bankura district of West Bengal, India. The most commonly found nesting substrate was tree trunks, especially within the cavities in tree trunks of Butea monosperma. Majority of the wild nests were oriented westward direction with an elevation of > 2–≤ 3 m from the ground level. The mean cavity size was 204.3 ± 92.45 × 159 ± 17.59 × 174.5 ± 26.13 mm3. The diversified local angiosperm flora supports the broad polylectic foraging habit of the bee species. Most of the visited plants were of tree habits and had small-sized flowers with yellow, white, and cream colours. The best represented families were Fabaceae and Asteraceae. The plants intensely utilized by the bee species were Acacia auriculiformis, Borassus flabellifer, Brassica nigra, Eucalyptus globulus, and Lannea coromandelica. In contrast to majority of multifloral honey samples, all the pollen loads were unifloral which reflects the high degree of floral fidelity behaviour of the bee species. The foraging activity of the bee species varied according to time hours, plant species, weather conditions, and seasons. It was confined to daytime from 5.00 to 18.00 h, reaching its zenith during 9.00–11.00 h and 15.00–1600 h. Maximum activity was observed in spring, followed by winter, late autumn, summer, autumn, and monsoon. Mean number of foragers without pollen load and resin load was much higher than pollen foragers and resin foragers.


Butea monosperma Multifloral honey Trigona iridipennis Unifloral pollen load 



We are thankful to authorities of Vidyasagar University for providing necessary laboratory facilities. We are also grateful to Dr. B. Mitra (Scientist C, Zoological Survey of India) for identification of the bee species.

Supplementary material

40_2017_593_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 KB)
40_2017_593_MOESM2_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 18 KB)
40_2017_593_MOESM3_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 17 KB)


  1. Azmi WA, Zulqurnain NS, Ghazi R (2015) Melissopalynology and foraging activity of stingless bees, Lepidotrigona terminata (Hymenoptera: Apidae) from an apiary in Besut, Terengganu. JSSM 10(1):27–35Google Scholar
  2. Basu R (2009) Biodiversity and ethnobotany of sacred groves in Bankura district, West Bengal. Indian For 135(6):765–778Google Scholar
  3. Camargo JMF (1988) Meliponinae (Hymenoptera, Apidae) da coleção do Instituto di entomologia agraria, Portici, Itália. Rev Bras Entomol 32:351–374Google Scholar
  4. Cortopassi-Laurino M (1982) Divisão de recursos tróficos entre abelhas sociais, principalmente em Apis mellifera Linneus e Trigona (Trigona) spinipes Fabricius (Apidae, Hymenoptera). Thesis: Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, p 180Google Scholar
  5. Cortopassi-Laurino M, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Roubik DW, Dollin A, Heard T, Aguilar IB, Venturieri GC, Eardley C, Nogueira-Neto P (2006) Global Meliponiculture: challenges and opportunities. Apidologie 37:1–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalmazzo M, Vossler FG (2015) Pollen host selection by a broadly polylectic halictid bee in relation to resource availability. Arthropod Plant Interact 9(3):253–262. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danaraddi CS, Hakkalappanavar S, Biradar SB, Tattimani M, Vinod SK (2011) Studies on foraging behaviour of stingless bee, Trigona iridipennis Smith at Dharwad, Karnataka. Int J For Crop Improv 2(2):163–169Google Scholar
  8. Danaraddi CS, Viraktamath S, Basavanagoud K, Bhat ARS (2009) Nesting habits and nest structure of stingless bee, Trigona iridipennis Smith at Dharwad, Karnataka. Karnataka J Agric Sci 22(2):310–313Google Scholar
  9. Devanesan S, Nisha MM, Bennet R, Shailaja KK (2002) Foraging behaviour of stingless bees, Trigona iridipennis Smith. Insect Environ 8(3):131–133Google Scholar
  10. Erdtman G (1952) Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy—angiosperms (an introduction to palynology I). Almqvist & Wiksell, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  11. Erdtman G (1960) The acetolysis method. A revised description. Svens Bot Tidskr 54:561–564Google Scholar
  12. Faegri K, Iversen J (1975) Textbook of pollen analysis. Munksgaard, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  13. Forcone A (2008) Pollen analysis of honeys from Chubut (Argentinean Patagonia). Grana 47:147–158. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gajanan S, Mohite S, Kuberappa GC, Kencharaddi RN (2005) The nest architecture of stingless bee Trigona iridipennis. Indian Bee J 67:36–40Google Scholar
  15. Heard TA (1999) The role of stingless bees in crop pollination. Annu Rev Entomol 44:183–206. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hesse M, Halbritter H, Zetter R, Weber M, Buchner R, Frosh-Radivo A, Ulrich S (2009) Pollen terminology—an illustrated handbook. Springer, WienGoogle Scholar
  17. Inoue T, Salmah S, Abbas I, Yusuf E (1985) Foraging behaviour of individual workers and foraging dynamics of colonies of three Sumatran stingless bees. Res Popul Ecol 27:373–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones GD, Bryant VM Jr (2004) The use of ETOH for the dilution of honey. Grana 43:174–182. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kalpana T, Fatima K, Ramanujam C (1990) Pollen analysis of Apis cerana and Apis florea honeys from Adikmet area. Hyderabad Proc Ind Acad Sci 100:183–193Google Scholar
  20. Kumar MS, Singh AJAR, Alagumuthu G (2012) Traditional beekeeping of stingless bee (Trigona sp.) by Kani tribe of Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. Indian J Tradit Knowl 11(2):342–345Google Scholar
  21. Layek U, Karmakar P (2016) Bee plants used as nectar sources by Apis florea Fabricius in Bankura and Paschim Medinipur districts, West Bengal. Geophytology 46(1):1–14Google Scholar
  22. Layek U, Nandi T, Karmakar P (2016) Pollen forage and storage pattern of Apis dorsata Fabricius in Bankura and Paschim Medinipur districts, West Bengal. Int J Pure Appl Biosci 4(5):59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Louveaux J, Maurizio A, Vorwohl G (1978) Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World 59:139–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Michener CD (2000) The bees of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  25. Nagamitsu T, Inoue T (2002) Foraging activity and pollen diets of subterranean stingless bee colonies in response to general flowering in Sarawak. Malays Apidol 33:303–314. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nair P (1970) Pollen morphology of angiosperms a historical and phylogenetic study. Barnes and Noble, Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Nayak PP, Reddy SM, Jayaprakash (2013) Nesting pattern preferences of Stingless Bee, Trigona iridipennis Smith (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Jnanabharathi Campus, Karnataka, India. Int Res J Biol Sci 2(2):44–50Google Scholar
  28. Oliveira PP, Van den Berg C, Santos FAR (2010) Pollen analysis of honeys from Caatinga vegetation of the state of Bahia, Brazil. Grana 49:66–75. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oliveira RC, Menezes C, Soares AEE, Fonseca VLI (2012) Trap-nests for stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Meliponini). Apidologie 44(1):29–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pal PK, Karmakar P (2013) Pollen analysis in understanding the foraging behaviour of Apis mellifera in Gangetic West Bengal. Geophytology 42(2):93–114Google Scholar
  31. Pooley AC, Michener CD (1969) Observations on nests of stingless bees in natal (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J Entomol Soc South Africa 32:423–430Google Scholar
  32. Punt W, Hoen PP, Blackmore S, Nilsson S, Le Thomas A (2007) Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 143:1–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rahaman A, Das PK, Rajkumari P, Saikia J, Sharmah D (2015) Stingless Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini): diversity and distribution in India. IJSR 4(1):77–81Google Scholar
  34. Ramalho M, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Kleinert-Giovannini A, Cortopassi-Laurino M (1985) Exploitation of floral resources by Plebeia remota Holmberg (Apidae, Meliponinae). Apidologie 16:307–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roopa AN, Eswarappa G, Sajjanar SM, Gowda G (2015) Study on nesting characteristics and biology of Stingless Bee (Trigona iridipennis Smith.). IOSR JAVS 8(10):34–36. Google Scholar
  36. Roubik DW (2006) Stingless bee nesting biology. Apidologie 37:124–143. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Santos FAR, Oliveira JM, Oliveira PP, Leite KRB, Carneiro CE (2006) Plantas do semi-árido importantes para as abelhas. In: Santos FAR (ed) Apium Plantae. pp 61–86. IMSEAR, RecifeGoogle Scholar
  38. Vijayakumar K, Muthuraman M, Jayaraj R (2013) Propagating Trigona iridipennis colonies (Apidae: Meliponini) by eduction method. Sch Acad J Biosci 1(1):1–3Google Scholar
  39. Virkar PS, Shrotriya S, Uniyal VP (2014) Building walkways: observation on nest duplication of Stingless Bee Trigona iridipennis Smith (1854). Ambient Sci 1(1):38–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Von der Ohe W, Persano Oddo L, Piana ML, Morlot M, Martin P (2004) Harmonized methods of melissopalynology. Apidologie 35(Suppl 1):S18–S25. Google Scholar
  41. Vossler FG (2012) Flower visits, nesting and nest defence behaviour of stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini): suitability of the bee species for meliponiculture in the Argentinean Chaco region. Apidologie 43:139–161. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. White JW (2005) Honey. In: Graham JM (ed) The hive and the honey bee. 869–927. Dadant & Sons, HamiltonGoogle Scholar
  43. Wille A (1983) Biology of stingless bees. Annu Rev Entomol 28(1):41–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Botany and ForestryVidyasagar UniversityMidnaporeIndia

Personalised recommendations