Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 64, Issue 4, pp 557–566 | Cite as

Collective decision making in the red dwarf honeybee Apis florea: do the bees simply follow the flowers?

  • J. C. Makinson
  • T. M. Schaerf
  • N. Wagner
  • B. P. Oldroyd
  • M. Beekman
Research Article

Abstract

Most studies on collective decision making in honeybees have been performed on the cavity-nesting Western honeybee, Apis mellifera. In more recent years, the open-nesting red dwarf honeybee Apis florea has been developed as a model organism of collective decision making in the context of nest-site selection. These studies have shown that the specifics of the species’ nest-site requirements affect collective decision making. In particular, when potential nesting sites are abundant, as is the case in A. florea, the process of collective decision making can be simplified. Here, we ask if A. florea simply follows the availability of floral resources in their environment when deciding on an area to move into. We determined the locations danced for by three colonies the day before, of and after reproductive swarming. Our results suggest that colonies of A. florea indeed track the availability of forage in their environment and that swarms move in the general direction of forage rather than towards a specific nest site.

Keywords

Apis Collective decision making Honeybees Nest-site selection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Australian-Asia Endeavour award (to JCM) and the Australian Research Council (MB) for funding. We further thank Prof. Siriwat Wongsiri and Dr. Ratna Thapa for providing office space at Mae Fah Luang University, and Mr. Lumphoon Supanyo for his assistance in locating Apis florea colonies. Data have been uploaded onto Dryad: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3j2n8.

Supplementary material

40_2017_577_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3642 kb)

References

  1. Beekman M, Fathke RL, Seeley TD (2006) How does an informed minority of scouts guide a honey bee swarm as it flies to its new home? Anim Behav 71:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg J-L, Aron S, Camazine S (1997) Self-organization in social insects. Trends Ecol Evol 12:188–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg JL, Franks NR, Rafelsberger O, Joly JL, Blanco S (1998) A model for the emergence of pillars, walls and royal chambers in termite nests. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 353:1561–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brito RM, Schaerf TM, Myerscough MR, Heard TA, Oldroyd BP (2012) Brood comb construction by the stingless bees Tetragonula hockingsi and Tetragonula carbonaria. Swarm Intell. doi:10.1007/s11721-012-0068-1 Google Scholar
  5. Cabanes G, van Wilgenburg E, Beekman M, Latty T (2015) Ants build transportation networks that optimise cost and efficiency at the expense of robustness. Behav Ecol 26:223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Camazine S, Visscher PK, Finley J, Vetter RS (1999) House-hunting by honey bee swarms: collective decisions and individual behaviors. Insectes Soc 46:348–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camazine S, Deneubourg JL, Franks NR, Sneyd J, Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E (2001) Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton University, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Couzin ID, Krause J, Franks NR, Levin SA (2005) Effective leadership and decision making in animal groups on the move. Nature 433:513–516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Deneubourg J-L, Franks NR (1995) Collective control without explicit coding: the case of communal nest excavation. J Insect Behav 8(4):417–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diwold K, Schaerf TM, Myerscough MR, Middendorf M, Beekman M (2011) Deciding on the wing: in-flight decision making and search space sampling in the red dwarf honeybee Apis florea. Swarm Intell 5:121–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dyer FC, Seeley TD (1991) Dance dialects and foraging range in three Asian honey bee species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dyer FC, Seeley TD (1994) Colony migration in the tropical honey bee Apis dorsata F. Insectes Soc 41:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher NI (1993) Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge University, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franks NR, Deneubourg J-L (1997) Self-organizing nest construction in ants: individual worker behaviour and the nest’s dynamics. Anim Behav 54:779–796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gordon DM (2014) The ecology of collective behavior. PLoS Biol 12:e1001805CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Karsai I, Penzes Z (1993) Comb building in social wasps: self-organization and stigmergic script. J Theor Biol 161:505–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klein BA, Klein A, Wray MK, Mueller U, Seeley TD (2010) Sleep deprivation impairs precision of waggle dance signaling in honey bees. Proc Nat Acad Sci 107:22705–22709CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Koeniger N, Koeniger G (1980) Observations and experiments on migration and dance communication of Apis dorsata in Sri Lanka. J Api Res 19:21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koeniger N, Koeniger G, Punchihewa RWK, Fabritius M, Fabritius M (1982) Observations and experiments on the dance communication in Apis florea in Sri Lanka. J Api Res 21:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Latty TM, Beekman M (2013) Keeping track of changes—the performance of ant colonies in dynamic environments. Anim Behav 85:637–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Latty T, Duncan M, Beekman M (2009) High bee traffic disrupts transfer of directional information in flying honey bee swarms. Anim Behav 78:117–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Latty T, Holmes MJ, Makinson JC, Beekman M (2017) Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) use adaptable transportation networks to track changes in resource quality. J Exp Biol 220:686–694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lindauer M (1955) Schwarmbienen auf Wohnungssuche. Z vergl Physiol 37:263–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindauer M (1956) Über die verständigung bei Indischen Bienen. Z vergl Physiol 38:521–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lo N, Gloag RS, Anderson DL, Oldroyd BP (2010) A molecular phylogeny of the genus Apis suggests that the Giant honey bee of the Philippines, A. breviligula Maa, and the Plains honey bee of southern India, A. indica Fabricius, are valid species. Syst Ent 35:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Makinson JC, Oldroyd BP, Schaerf TM, Wattanachaiyingchareon W, Beekman M (2011) Moving home: nest site selection in the Red Dwarf honeybee (Apis florea). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:945–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Makinson JC, Schaerf TM, Rattanawannee A, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M (2014) Consensus building in giant Asian honeybee, Apis dorsata, swarms on the move. Anim Behav 93:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Makinson JC, Schaerf TM, Rattanawannee A, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M (2016) How does a swarm of the giant Asian honeybee Apis dorsata reach consensus? A study of the individual behaviour of scout bees. Insectes Soc 63:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nazzi F (2016) The hexagonal shape of the honeycomb cells depends on the construction behavior of bees. Sci Rep 6:28341CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Neumann P, Koeniger N, Koeniger G, Tingek S, Kryger P, Moritz RFA (2000) Home-site fidelity in migratory honeybees. Nature 406:474–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Oldroyd BP, Wongsiri S (2006) Asian honey bees. Biology, conservation and human interactions. Harvard University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Oldroyd BP, Gloag RS, Even N, Wattanachaiyingcharoen W, Beekman M (2008) Nest-site selection in the open-nesting honey bee Apis florea. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1643–1653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paar J, Oldroyd BP, Kastberger G (2000) Giant honeybees return to their nest sites. Nature 406:475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pratt SC (2005) Behavioral mechanisms of collective nest-site choice by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus. Insectes Soc 52:383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ruttner F (1988) Biogeography and taxonomy of honey bees. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schaerf TM, Makinson JC, Myerscough MR, Beekman M (2011) Inaccurate and unverified information in decision making: a model for the nest site selection process of Apis florea. Anim Behav 82:995–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schaerf TM, Makinson JC, Myerscough MR, Beekman M (2013) Do small swarms have an advantage when house hunting? The effect of swarm size on nest-site selection by Apis mellifera. J R Soc Interface 10:20130533CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Schneider SS, McNally LC (1994) Waggle dance behavior associated with seasonal absconding in colonies of the African honey bee Apis mellifera scutellata. Insectes Soc 41:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schultz KM, Passino KM, Seeley TD (2008) The mechanism of flight guidance in honeybee swarms: subtle guides or streaker bees? J Exp Biol 211:3287–3295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive. Harvard University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Seeley TD (2003) Consensus building during nest-site selection in honey bee swarms: the expiration of dissent. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:417–424Google Scholar
  42. Seeley TD (2010) Honeybee democracy. Princeton University, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  43. Seeley TD, Buhrman SC (1999) Group decision making in swarms of honeybees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seeley TD, Buhrman SC (2001) Nest-site selection in honey bees: how well do swarms implement the “best-of-N” decision rule? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:416–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seeley TD, Visscher PK (2003) Choosing a home: how the scouts in a honey bee swarm perceive the completion of their group decision making. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seeley TD, Visscher PK (2004a) Group decision making in nest-site selection by honey bees. Apidologie 35:101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seeley TD, Visscher PK (2004b) Quorum sensing during nest-site selection by honeybee swarms. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:594–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seeley TD, Morse RA, Visscher PK (1979) The natural history of the flight of honey bee swarms. Psyche 86:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seeley TD, Camazine S, Sneyd J (1991) Collective decision-making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sources. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:277–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Seeley TD, Kleinhenz M, Bujok B, Tautz J (2003) Thorough warm-up before take-off in honey bee swarms. Naturwissensch 90:256–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Seeley TD, Visscher PK, Schlegel T, Hogan PM, Franks NR, Marshall JAR (2012) Stop signals provide cross inhibition in collective decision making by honeybee swarms. Science 335:108–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Villa JD (2004) Swarming behavior of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southeastern Louisiana. Ann Entom Soc Am 97:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Visscher PK (2007) Group decision making in nest-site selection among social insects. Ann Rev Entomol 52:255–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Behaviour and Genetics of Social Insects Lab, School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical SciencesQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.School of Science and TechnologyUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations