Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 64, Issue 4, pp 525–533 | Cite as

White-gutted soldiers: simplification of the digestive tube for a non-particulate diet in higher Old World termites (Isoptera: Termitidae)

  • R. H. Scheffrahn
  • T. Bourguignon
  • C. Bordereau
  • R. A. Hernandez-Aguilar
  • V. M. Oelze
  • P. Dieguez
  • J. Šobotnik
  • A. Pascual-Garrido
Open Access
Research Article
  • 613 Downloads

Abstract

Previous observations have noted that in some species of higher termites the soldier caste lacks pigmented particles in its gut and, instead, is fed worker saliva that imparts a whitish coloration to the abdomen. In order to investigate the occurrence of this trait more thoroughly, we surveyed a broad diversity of termite specimens and taxonomic descriptions from the Old World subfamilies Apicotermitinae, Cubitermitinae, Foraminitermitinae, Macrotermitinae, and Termitinae. We identified 38 genera that have this “white-gutted” soldier (WGS) trait. No termite soldiers from the New World were found to possess a WGS caste. Externally, the WGS is characterized by a uniformly pale abdomen, hyaline gut, and proportionally smaller body-to-head volume ratio compared with their “dark-gutted” soldier (DGS) counterparts found in most termitid genera. The WGS is a fully formed soldier that, unlike soldiers in other higher termite taxa, has a small, narrow, and decompartmentalized digestive tube that lacks particulate food contents. The presumed saliva-nourished WGS have various forms of simplified gut morphologies that have evolved at least six times within the higher termites.

Keywords

Apicotermitinae Cubitermitinae Foraminitermitinae Macrotermitinae Termitinae Enteric valve armature Proctodeum 

Introduction

Trophallaxis is the mouth-to-mouth (stomodeal) or anus-to-mouth (proctodeal) exchange of alimentary contents between members of a social insect colony (Wilson 1971). Termite soldiers lack chewing mandibles and must obtain their food as liquids or pastes offered by nestmate workers (Grassé 1949). In the lower wood-feeding termites (e.g., Kalotermitidae and Rhinotermitidae), soldiers are fed with worker gut contents which consist of mixtures of masticated wood particles and saliva (Grassé 1982; Noirot 1969). The diets of most higher termites (Termitidae) are much more varied (Donovan et al. 2001), and soldiers are nourished by stomodeal trophallaxis with particles of worker-masticated wood, leaf litter, soil, fungus, bacteria, herbaceous plants, lichens, algae, or some derivation of these (e.g., sound vs. severely decayed wood). Workers of soil-feeding termites, which constitute the majority of termitid genera, ingest masticated mixtures of humus, roots, mycelia, lignified tissue, silica grains, etc. (Sleaford et al. 1996; Donovan et al. 2001; Donovan 2002) which are transferred to their soldiers. These particulate suspensions impart a contrastingly darker coloration to the gut tubes of both mature workers and soldiers, which are visible through their opaque or nearly transparent integument.

Grassé (1949) reported that in some higher termites (probably mostly in soil-feeding taxa), the diet of soldiers may consist wholly of the worker’s saliva in its clear or opalescent form. Noirot (1955) observed that soldiers of Procubitermes curvatus Silvestri (Cubitermitinae) have an exclusively liquid diet and their digestive tube, contrary to that of their workers, lacks particulate food content. Noirot (1955) further noted that soldiers of Pericapritermes urgens Silvestri (Termitinae) also have an exclusively liquid diet which imparts a whitish-yellowish color to their abdomens. Noirot and Noirot-Timothée (1969) reported that soldiers of Basidentitermes, Fastigitermes, Orthotermes, Proboscitermes, Procubitermes, and Promirotermes also have a strict liquid (salivary) diet but did not mention their abdominal coloration. Finally, in her key of southern African termitine genera, Uys (2002) used abdominal coloration, an artifact of a salivary diet, in her first couplet (“creamy yellow to creamy white” for the African genera Angulitermes, Basidentitermes, Lepidotermes, Noditermes, Pericapritermes, Promirotermes, Unguitermes, and Unicornitermes; and “greyish-black” for Amitermes, Batillitermes, Crenetermes, Cubitermes, Euchilotermes, Microcerotermes, Okavangotermes, Ovambotermes, and Termes).

Despite its importance, the morphological and phylogenetic underpinnings of this bipartite soldier condition have received little or no additional attention. This led us to examine soldiers from an extensive collection of termites worldwide and to interpret soldier description literature. We show that Old World termitid soldiers can be sorted into two groups: the “white-gutted” soldier group (WGS) and the more common “dark-gutted” soldier group (DGS). Herein, we identify WGS genera, compare the external and internal morphology of WGS and DGS from selected genera of higher termites, and present information from the literature that we use to reconstruct the ancestral state of soldier gut type from a recently published termite phylogenetic tree.

Materials and methods

Photos of whole or partial termite bodies were taken as multi-layer montages using a Leica M205C stereomicroscope controlled by Leica Application Suite version 3 software. Preserved specimens were taken from 85% ethanol and suspended in a pool of Purell® Hand Sanitizer (70% ethanol) to position the specimens within a clear plastic Petri dish. Enteric valve armature (EVA) images were taken from slide mounts using a Leica CTR 5500 compound microscope with differential interference contrast optics and the same montage software. All photographed specimens and those listed in Table S1 (electronic supplementary material) are housed in the University of Florida Termite Collection in Davie, Florida, which contains 42,595 colony samples of 229 described and new genera. African termite specimens were collected in the field for primate nutrition and/or termite diversity studies between 1989 and 2016. Terminology of the worker gut follows that of Sands (1998) and Noirot (2001).

We used one phylogenetic tree of Termitidae recently published by Bourguignon et al. (2017) to reconstruct the ancestral state of the soldier gut. We pruned the tree so that one representative of each genus for which we know the type of soldier gut remains. The tree was a Bayesian phylogenetic chronogram inferred from full mitochondrial genomes with third codon position excluded. Two states were considered, WGS and DGS. We used the function “ace” of the package phytools (Revell 2012) implemented in R version 3.2.0. The model implemented by ace was a maximum likelihood model with equal rate of transition between states.

Results

Our examination of termite specimens (Table S1), and the descriptive wording of taxa we lacked revealed that at least 38 Old World genera have the WGS morph (Table 1). All are soil/humus feeding species (non-flocculent and silica particles abundant in worker gut) with the exception of the plant-feeding Angulitermes (Debelo and Degaga 2014), Eremotermes (Akhtar and Sarwar 2003), Forficulitermes (Scheffrahn and Křeček 2015), Promirotermes (Davies et al. 2015), Synhamitermes (Shanbhag and Sundararaj 2012), and the fungus feeding Acanthotermes, Pseudacanthotermes, and Synacanthotermes, that have abundant flocculent contents in the worker gut but lack silica particles. These eight genera all lack soldiers with asymmetrical snapping mandibles (Table 1). The WGS morph is recognizable externally by its uniformly pale abdomen and proportionally smaller body-to-head volume ratio (Figs. S1, S2) compared with the darker abdomens and larger body-to-head proportions of the DGS taxa (Fig. S3). Unlike Noirot’s 1969 “white soldier” or the equivalent term “presoldier” (Noirot and Pasteels 1987) which describe the stage before the final soldier molt (Fig. 1b inset), the WGS are fully developed and possess functional mandibles.
Table 1

White-gutted soldier genera including subfamily, regional distribution (total no. species), mandible type, abdomen/body coloration as given in reference

Genus

Subfamily

Regiona, no. species

Mandible

Coloration

References

Acanthotermes

Macrotermitinae

Eth, 1

Piercing, cutting

Whiteb

Current paper

Angulitermes

Termitinae

Eth, Ore, Pale, 29

Symmetrical snap

Creamy white

Uys (2002), Harris (1964)

Basidentitermes

Cubitermitinae

Eth, 8

Piercing, cutting

White

Current paper

Captritermes

Termitinae

Eth, 1

Asymmetrical snap

White

Current paper

Dicuspiditermes

Termitinae

Ore, 20

Asymmetrical snap

Yellowish white

Akhtar (1975)

Eremotermes

Termitinae

Eth, Ore, Pale, 10

Piercing, cutting

Whitish

Chhotani (1997)

Eburnitermes

Apicotermitinae

Eth, 1

Piercing, cutting

Yellowish white

Noirot (1966)

Euhamitermes

Apicotermitinae

Ore, 24

Crushing

Body lighter than head

Chhotani (1975)

Eurytermes

Apicotermitinae

Ore, 6

Crushing

Whitish

Chhotani (1997)

Fastigitermes

Cubitermitinae

Eth, 1

Piercing, cutting

White

Current paper

Forficulitermes

Termitinae

Eth, 1

Piercing, cutting

Abdomen paler than head

Emerson (1960), Scheffrahn and Křeček (2015)

Homallotermes

Termitinae

Ore 4

Asymmetrical snap

Whitish

Chhotani (1997)

Indocapritermes

Termitinae

Ore, 1

Asymmetrical snap

Whitish

Chhotani (1997)

Indotermes

Apicotermitinae

Ore, 10

Piercing, cutting

White

Current paper

Krishnacapritermes

Termitinae

Ore, 2

Asymmetrical snap

Whitish

Chhotani (1997)

Labiocapritermes

Termitinae

Ore, 1

Asymmetrical snap

Whitish

Chhotani (1997)

Labritermes

Foraminitermitinae

Ore, 3

Piercing, cutting

Yellowish white

Anonymousc

Lepidotermes

Cubitermitinae

Eth, 9

Piercing, cutting

White

Uys (2002)

Mirocapritermes

Termitinae

Ore, 8

Asymmetrical snap

Yellowish white

Chhotani (1997)

Mucrotermes

Cubitermitinae

Eth, 2

Piercing, cutting

Abdomen paler than pronotum

Emerson (1960)

Noditermes

Cubitermitinae

Eth, 7

Piercing, cutting

White

Current paper

Orthotermes

Cubitermitinae

Eth, 2

Piercing, cutting

White

Current paper

Pericapritermes

Termitinae

Eth, Ore, Pale, Pap, 40

Asymmetrical snap

White

Current paper

Pilotermes

Cubitermitinae

Eth, 1

Piercing, cutting

Abdomen whitish

Emerson (1960)

Proboscitermes

Cubitermitinae

Eth, 2

Piercing, cutting

Hyaline

Scheffrahn and O’Malley (2010)

Procapritermes

Termitinae

Ore, 13

Asymmetrical snap

Pale yellow

Thapa (1982)

Procubitermes

Cubitermitinae

Eth, 9

Piercing, cutting

White

Current paper

Profastigitermes

Cubitermitinae

Eth, 1

Piercing, cutting

Abdomen paler than pronotum

Emerson (1960)

Promirotermes

Termitinae

Eth, 10

Symmetrical snap

White

Current paper

Pseudacanthotermes

Macrotermitinae

Eth, 6

Piercing, cutting

Whiteb

Current paper

Pseudocapritermes

Termitinae

Ore, 2

Asymmetrical snap

Creamy white

Chhotani (1997)

Quasitermes

Termitinae

Eth, 1

Asymmetrical snap

Pale

Katie Cribbs

Sinocapritermes

Termitinae

Ore, 16

Asymmetrical snap

Abdomen without soil content

Chiu et al. (2015)

Speculitermes

Apicotermitinae

Ore, 12

Crushing

White

Chhotani (1997)

Synacanthotermes

Macrotermitinae

Eth, 3

Piercing, cutting

White

Current paper

Synhamitermes

Termitinae

Ore, 4

Piercing, cutting

Yellow white

Chhotani (1997)

Unguitermes

Cubitermitinae

Eth, 7

Piercing, cutting

Creamy white

Uys (2002)

Unicornitermes

Cubitermitinae

Eth, 1

Piercing, cutting

Creamy white

Uys (2002)

aEth Ethiopian, Ore oriental, Pale palarctic, Pap papuan

b Underlying dark cuticle

chttp://termitesandants.blogspot.com/2012/05/labritermes.html

Fig. 1

a White-gutted soldier (WGS) of Basidentitermes n. sp.; bB. malelaensis Emerson live habitus of soldiers, workers, and queen (inset presoldier (PS) and nestmates of B. n. sp.; c uncoiled gut of B. n. sp. WGS; d enteric valve armature (EVA) of B. n. sp. worker; e EVA of B. malelaensis worker; and f lateral view of B. malelaensis worker with abdominal integument removed (triangle marks location of EVA). C crop (includes gizzard), M mesenteron, MS mixed segment, P1–P5 first through fifth proctodeal segments

Internally, the digestive tubes of WGS are variously simplified, shortened, narrowed, and/or decompartmentalized, and lack particulate food contents (Figs. 1, 2, S4) present in the workers of their species (Figs. 1b, f, 2c) or in soldiers and workers of DGS species (Figs. 3, S3). Several gut morphologies are represented in the WGS group. In Basidentitermes, the WGS gut segments form a very long tube with an enlarged crop (C) and rectum (P5) at either end (Fig. 1c). The midgut (mesenteron, M, and mixed segment, MS), can barely be differentiated because they differ from each other only slightly in shape and diameter. The proctodeal segments P1–P4 of the Basidentitermes WGS show no discernable junctures and the EVA is absent. In the Promirotermes WGS (Fig. S4a), the crop, mesenteron, mixed segment, and rectum are all well developed but the proctodeal segments P1–P4 form a long and serpentine tube without clear sectional delineations. The EVA is absent in the Promirotermes soldier. The Pericapritermes WGS (Fig. S4b) has a rather short gut tube and all segments are recognizable but it too lacks the EVA. Unlike the previous genera, the gut segments of the Procubitermes WGS are all recognizable and it has remnants of the enteric valve armature (Fig. 2a), albeit less developed than that of the LIL (Fig. 2b) or that of the fully sclerotized EVA of the fully formed worker (Fig. 2c). In comparison, the DGS taxa have more robust hindgut morphologies similar to their workers, and, akin to workers, the entire DGS alimentary tract contains grainy particulate matter (e.g., Cubitermes schereri Rosen, Fig. 3a, b). Additionally, the DGS soldier has a fully developed EVA similar to that of its worker and LIL (Fig. 3c–e).
Fig. 2

Procubitermes sp. a White-gutted soldier (WGS) whole gut (insets upper left is half of soldier enteric valve armature (EVA), lower left is WGS with abdominal integument removed, and right inset is the contents of the WGS crop); b unwound gut of last instar larva (LIL) (top inset whole LIL); c worker with gut unwound (top inset whole worker; bottom inset worker EVA). D diverticulum. See Fig. 1 for abbreviation definitions

Fig. 3

Cubitermes schereri (Rosen) a Dark-gutted soldier (DGS); B worker of with abdominal integument removed. Enteric valve armature of c DGS, d worker, and e last instar larva. See Fig. 1 for abbreviation definitions

Our phylogenetic tree includes 83 taxa belonging to 82 genera (Fig. 4). The ancestral state reconstruction shows, with strong support, that WGS evolved at least once in Cubitermitinae, twice in Termitinae, and once in Apicotermitinae. We also included some members of the basal Termitidae subfamilies, i.e., Foraminitermitinae, Macrotermitinae, and Sphaerotermitinae and found that WGS also evolved in these subfamilies: once in the soil-feeding Labritermes (Foraminitermitinae), and at least twice in Macrotermitinae.
Fig. 4

Phylogenetic tree of Termitidae reproduced from Bourguignon et al. (in press). Node pie charts show the probabilities for ancestral states to be white-gutted and dark-gutted soldiers. The ancestral states were reconstructed using a Likelihood model with equal rate of transition between states

Discussion

13 WGS genera of Apicotermitinae, Cubitermitinae, Macrotermitinae, and Termitinae are included in both Table 1 and the phylogenetic tree we used to reconstruct the ancestral state of soldier gut. Our tree shows that WGS evolved from DGS at least four times in these lineages. Because our tree did not include all the species recorded with WGS, there is a possibility that WGS evolved independently in more lineages. One of them is Forficulitermes, a genus recently transferred from Cubitermitinae to Termitinae (Scheffrahn and Křeček 2015). The absence of WGS taxa in the New World is enigmatic given the common ancestry of both New and Old World Apicotermitinae and Termitinae (Bourguignon et al. 2017).

In Noirot’s 1966 description of Eburnitermes grassei (Apicotermitidae), he reports that soldiers of this species possess a “yellowish-white abdomen due to the fact that the digestive tract does not contain solid food”. Due to lack of material, we did not examine the gut contents of the E. grassei soldier; however, other apicotermitine genera with soldiers examined including Allognathotermes sp., Coxotermes boukokoensis Grassé and Noirot, Duplidentitermes sp., Heimitermes sp., Jugositermes tuberculatus Emerson, Phoxotermes cerberus Collins, and Rostrotermes cornutus Grassé all possess the DGS form and contain solid dark particulates in their guts.

For the Termitidae, salivary secretions from workers are the sole or primary nutrients for all immature stages (Grassé 1982; Noirot 1969). The immature stages, white in color, are generally found near reproductive centers of the nest for all termite feeding groups, including soil-feeders (Fig. S5a–d) and wood-feeders (Fig. S5e, f). Casual observations of the guts of the last instar larvae (LIL, usually the second instar, Noirot 1969) and presoldier stages sampled from about 120 termitid genera, both Old and New World, show no traces of particulate content (Scheffrahn, pers. obs.).

Although trophallaxis and salivary secretions in the WGS have not been studied, some inference from the DGS group may be useful in understanding the diet common to all dependent castes in the Termitidae. For example, using radionuclide tracing, Alibert (1963) confirmed that larvae and presoldiers of C. fungifaber Sjöstedt received salivary secretions from workers, while mature soldiers and workers received regurgitated foregut contents. Studies of New World Termitidae show that worker salivary (labial) gland secretions contain complex aqueous admixtures of proteins and other non-volatile compounds (Sillam-Dussès et al. 2012) which nourish dependent castes. Billen et al. (1989) found that the worker salivary glands of Macrotermes bellicosus (Smeathman) are substantial and consist of three secretory cell types, while the soldier gland has only a single type that secretes a defense fluid (Prestwich 1979). However, upon reaching maturity, the DGS guts are filled with dark particulate matter from stomodeal trophallaxis (e.g., Figure 3a). Therefore, the worker-to-larval + presoldier trophallaxis in DGS and the worker-to-larval + presoldier + soldier trophallaxis in the WGS is a special form of nutrient sharing with food originating from the salivary gland (buccal trophallaxis?) and not from the foregut (stomodeal trophallaxis).

For the first time, this study introduces the external and internal morphology of the WGS underlying the observations of Noirot (1955, 1966), Noirot and Noirot-Timothée (1969), and Grassé (1949, 1982). Although we did not analyze the WGS worker saliva or guts, the matter found in WGS soldier crops (Fig. 2a inset) has the appearance of a secretory substance. Although obvious in both live and preserved material, the coloration of the WGS is omitted in taxonomic descriptions by some renowned taxonomists such as Emerson AE, Krishna K, and Sands WA. We suspect that their focus was on the complex external morphology of the soldier head capsule, and that the internal anatomy of soldiers had been supplanted by the greater interest in worker internal anatomy.

Compared with other insects, the digestive tube of higher termite workers is morphologically complex (Noirot 2001) and provides for multifaceted nutrient metabolism (Bignell 2010). Although the soldier gut in all taxa is largely overlooked, the similarity of the DGS to its workers (e.g., Fig.  3c, d) suggests similar structure and function. The relatively well-developed midgut (M + MS) in WGS (Figs. 1c, 2a, and S4) is similar to DGS and suggests that its proteolytic function (Ji and Brune 2005) is retained as might be expected from a salivary diet. The termitid worker gut has evolved to optimize microbial symbiosis (Brune 2013). In soil-feeding termites, the gut digests particulates which are comparably nutrient poor and recalcitrant. To accomplish this, soil-feeding termites have compartmentalized physiochemical gut environments to nurture their prokaryotic symbionts (Brune 2013), no doubt at some energy cost. One advantage of the WGS/LIL nutritional scheme over that of the particulate feeders might be to redirect the energy demands lost to soil digestion toward defensive function (WGS) and growth (LIL). For this, the mature workers must carry a greater metabolic burden to feed high-energy secretions to their white-gutted nestmates.

The EVA is well developed in soil-feeding termites. Donovan (2002) and Bignell (2010) suggest that the EVA spines and combs fractionate gut contents by size to expose more digestible organic particles to microbial fermentation. Alternately, Scheffrahn (2013) argues that these structures enhance microbial inoculation of ingested material before entry into the P3. In either case, the EVA probably enhances fermentation of the gut contents before entering the P3 for microbial digestion. As would be expected from a liquid diet, the WGS generally lack an EVA and their P3 is relatively small. Remnants of the EVA and enlargement of the hindgut segments in both the WGS and the LIL of Procubitermes (Fig. 2a) suggest that the conversion to a salivary diet is more recent in this genus. We hope that this paper will stimulate studies on the composition of food and dynamics of trophallaxis in all termites.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We dedicate this paper in honor of the late Dr. Charles Noirot, a leading pioneer of modern termitology. Collection of termites from Issa, Ugalla (Tanzania) was funded by the European Research Council (Grant No. #283959). We thank the following institutions, projects and people for sample collection in the field: PAN AFRICAN PROGRAMME, Tai Chimpanzee Project, Max Planck Society, Juan Lapuente, Amelia Meier and Jessica Junker.

Supplementary material

40_2017_572_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (2.3 mb)
Fig. S1 Soldiers of selected cubitermitine genera that exemplify the WGS: ABasidentitermes malelaensis Emerson, BOrthotermes depressifrons Silvestri, CProboscitermes tubuliferus (Sjöstedt), DFastigitermes jucundus (Sjöstedt), EProcubitermes sp., and FNoditermes wasambaricus Williams (JPEG 2352 kb)
40_2017_572_MOESM2_ESM.jpg (1.4 mb)
Fig. S2 Soldiers of selected non-cubitermitine genera that exemplify the WGS: APromirotermes pygmaeus Harris, BPericapritermes sp. 1, CPericapritermes urgens Silvestri, and DSynacanthotermes heterodon Sjöstedt (JPEG 1439 kb)
40_2017_572_MOESM3_ESM.jpg (2.5 mb)
Fig. S3 Soldiers of selected cubitermitine genera that exemplify the DGS: AOphiotermes ugandensis Fuller (abdominal integument removed in bottom frame), BApilitermes longiceps (Sjöstedt), CCubitermes schereri (Rosen), DThoracotermes macrothorax (Sjöstedt), and EFurculitermes winifredae Emerson (JPEG 2530 kb)
40_2017_572_MOESM4_ESM.jpg (838 kb)
Fig. S4 White-gutted soldiers with all abdominal tissues remove except the gut: APromirotermes pygmeus (inset: detail of gut architecture) and BPericapritermes sp. 2. See Fig. 1 for abbreviation definitions (JPEG 838 kb)
40_2017_572_MOESM5_ESM.jpg (4.5 mb)
Fig. S5 Examples of white brood in the Termitidae (all neotropical): ARuptitermes sp., BSilvestritermes sp., CLabiotermes labralis (Holmgren), DAnoplotermes banksi Emerson, EParvitermes brooksi (Snyder), and FMicrocerotermes arboreus Emerson (JPEG 4566 kb)
40_2017_572_MOESM6_ESM.docx (27 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (DOCX 27 kb)

References

  1. Akhtar MS (1975) Taxonomy and zoogeography of the termites (Isoptera) of Bangladesh. Bulletin of the Department of Zoology, University of the Panjab 7:1–199Google Scholar
  2. Akhtar MS, Sarwar G (2003) Termite population, diversity and damage in cotton fields of Bahawalpur division. Pak J Zool 35:9–13Google Scholar
  3. Alibert J (1963) Échanges trophallactiques chez un termite superieur. Contamination par le phosphore radio-actif de la population d’un nid de Cubitermes fungifaber. Insectes Soc 10:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bignell DE (2010) Morphology, physiology, biochemistry and functional design of the termite gut: an evolutionary wonderland. In: Bignell DE, Roisin Y, Lo N (eds) Biology of termites: a modern synthesis. Springer, Netherlands, pp 375–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billen J, Joye L, Leuthold RH (1989) Fine structure of the labial gland in Macrotermes bellicosus (Isoptera, Termitidae). Acta Zool 70:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourguignon T, Lo N, Šobotník J, Ho SYW, Iqbal N, Coissac E, Lee M, Jendryka M, Sillam-Dussès D, Křížková B, Roisin Y, Evans TA (2017) Mitochondrial phylogenomics resolves the global spread of higher termites, ecosystem engineers of the tropics. Mol Biol Evol 34:589–597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brune A (2013) Symbiotic associations between termites and prokaryotes. In: Rosenberg E (ed) The prokaryotes. Springer, Berlin, pp 545–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chhotani OB (1975) A new species of Euhamitermes and the imago of Nasutitermes garoensis from Arunachal Pradesh (Isoptera: Termtidae). Orient Insects 9:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chhotani OB (1997) The fauna of India and the adjacent countries. Isoptera (Termites): (family Termitidae), vol 2 Calcutta: Zoological Survey of India, pp xx + 800Google Scholar
  10. Chiu CI, Yang MM, Li HF (2015) Redescription of the soil-feeding termite Sinocapritermes mushae (Isoptera: Termitidae: Termitinae): the first step of genus revision. Ann Entomol Soc Am. doi:10.1093/aesa/sav106 Google Scholar
  11. Davies AB, Eggleton P, Van Rensburg BJ, Parr CL (2015) Seasonal activity patterns of African savanna termites vary across a rainfall gradient. Insectes Soc 62:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Debelo DG, Degaga EG (2014) Termite species composition in the central rift valley of Ethiopia. Agric Biol J N Am 5:123–134Google Scholar
  13. Donovan SE (2002) A morphological study of the enteric valves of the Afrotropical Apicotermitinae (Isoptera: Termitidae). J Nat Hist 36:1823–1840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donovan SE, Eggleton P, Bignell DE (2001) Gut content analysis and a new feeding group classification of termites. Ecol Entomol 26:356–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Emerson AE (1960) Six new genera of Termitinae from the Belgian Congo (Isoptera Termitidae). American Museum Novitates no. 1988Google Scholar
  16. Grassé PP (1949) Ordre des isoptères ou termites In P-P Grassé Traité de zoologie vol 9: 408–544 Paris: Masson et Cie, pp 1117Google Scholar
  17. Grassé PP (1982) Termitologia Tome I Masson Paris, pp 676 Food for dependent castesGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris WV (1964) A new species of Angulitermes from Israel (Isoptera, Termitidae). Ann Mag Nat Hist 13(7):171–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ji R, Brune A (2005) Digestion of peptidic residues in humic substances by an alkali-stable and humic-acid-tolerant proteolytic activity in the gut of soil-feeding termites. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1648–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Noirot C (1955) Recherches sur le polymorphisme des termites supérieurs (Termitidae). Ann des Sci Nat Zool 17:399–595 (+4 pls) Google Scholar
  21. Noirot C (1966) Description et affinités de deux nouveaux genres d’Amitermitinae (Isoptera Termitidae). Insectes Soc 13:329–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Noirot C (1969) Formation of castes in the higher termites. In: Krishna K, Weesner FM (eds) Biology of termites, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 311–350 (xiii + 598 pp ) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Noirot C (2001) The gut of termites (Isoptera) comparative anatomy systematics phylogeny II Higher termites (Termitidae). Ann Soc Entomol France 37:431–471Google Scholar
  24. Noirot C, Noirot-Timothée C (1969) The digestive system. In: Krishna K, Weesner FM (eds) Biology of termites, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 49–88 (xiii + 598 pp ) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Noirot CH, Pasteels JM (1987) Ontogenetic development and evolution of the worker caste in termites. Experientia 43:851–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prestwich GD (1979) Chemical defense by termite soldiers. J Chem Ecol 5:459–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Revell LJ (2012) Phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol Evol 3:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sands WA (1998) The identification of worker castes of termite genera from soils of Africa and the Middle East. CAB International, Wallingford, p vii + 500Google Scholar
  29. Scheffrahn RH (2013) Compositermes vindai (Isoptera: Termitidae: Apicotermitinae) a new genus and species of soldierless termite from the Neotropics. Zootaxa 3652:381–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Scheffrahn RH, Křeček J (2015) Redescription and reclassification of the African termite Forficulitermes planifrons (Isoptera, Termitidae, Termitinae). Zootaxa 3946:591–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Scheffrahn RH, O’Malley RC (2010) A new termite (Isoptera: Termitidae: Termitinae: Proboscitermes) from Tanzania. Zootaxa 2670:52–58Google Scholar
  32. Shanbhag RR, Sundararaj R (2012) Host range pest status and distribution of wood destroying termites of India. J Trop Asian Entomol 2:12–27Google Scholar
  33. Sillam-Dussès D, Krasulová J, Vrkoslav V, Pytelková J, Cvačka J, Kutalová K, Bourguignon T, Miura T, Šobotník J (2012) Comparative study of the labial gland secretion in termites (Isoptera). PLoS One 7:e46431CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Sleaford F, Bignell DE, Eggleton P (1996) A pilot analysis of gut contents in termites from the Mbalmayo Forest Reserve Cameroon. Ecol Entomol 21:279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thapa RS (1982) Termites of Sabah. Sabah For Rec 12:iv + 1–374Google Scholar
  36. Uys VM (2002) A guide to the termite genera of southern Africa. Pretoria ARC-Plant Prot Res Inst Handb 1:116Google Scholar
  37. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p 548Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. H. Scheffrahn
    • 1
  • T. Bourguignon
    • 2
  • C. Bordereau
    • 3
  • R. A. Hernandez-Aguilar
    • 4
  • V. M. Oelze
    • 5
  • P. Dieguez
    • 5
  • J. Šobotnik
    • 6
  • A. Pascual-Garrido
    • 7
  1. 1.Fort Lauderdale Research and Education CenterUniversity of FloridaDavieUSA
  2. 2.Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate UniversityOkinawaJapan
  3. 3.UMR CNRS 5548, Communication ChimiqueUniversité de Bourgogne DéveloppementDijonFrance
  4. 4.Department of Biosciences, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES)University of OsloOsloNorway
  5. 5.Department of PrimatologyMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyLeipzigGermany
  6. 6.Faculty of Forestry and Wood SciencesCzech University of Life SciencesPragueCzech Republic
  7. 7.Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellow, School of ArchaeologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations