Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 64, Issue 4, pp 505–514 | Cite as

Ant and termite communities in isolated and continuous forest fragments in Singapore

  • T. Bourguignon
  • C. A. L. Dahlsjö
  • J. Jacquemin
  • L. Gang
  • L. S. Wijedasa
  • T. A. Evans
Research Article
  • 191 Downloads

Abstract

The conservation of tropical rainforest biodiversity is a pressing issue, due to the rapid rate of deforestation. Secondary forests may provide a useful alternative to old growth forests, as they often contain a substantial proportion of the original biodiversity. In this study, we investigate species richness, density and composition of ants and termites in six forest sites in Singapore, each differing in habitat isolation and land-use history. The six sites include an old growth forest, a selectively logged old growth forest, and four secondary forests: either located on abandoned agricultural lands or in abandoned villages, and either isolated or adjacent to old growth forests. We found that the old growth forest had significantly higher species density of ants and termites than any other site. Rarefaction curves showed that ant and termite species richness were highest in the old growth forest followed by the selectively logged forest albeit these results were not significantly different from other sites. Ant species composition changed along a gradient of fragment isolation. Termite community composition in the old growth forest shared a higher proportion of species with the adjacent secondary forest, than with the selectively logged old growth forest, suggesting that the species pool of adjacent habitats is important for species re-colonisation of regenerating habitats. Our results suggest, albeit without replications, that secondary forests differ in conservation value and that disturbed habitats in continuous forest fragments recover more rapidly than isolated ones. Further, we emphasise the importance of old growth forest fragments within man-made ecosystems as sources of original biodiversity.

Keywords

Biodiversity Conservation biology Community ecology Singapore Species richness 

Supplementary material

40_2017_570_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (46 kb)
Table S1. Ant occurrence in the six sampling sites: OGF: old growth forest; SL: selectively logged forest; SAC: secondary forest on abandoned agricultural land in continuous forest patch, SVC: secondary forest on abandoned village land in continuous forest fragment, SVI: secondary forest on abandoned village land in isolated forest fragment, SAI: secondary forest on abandoned agricultural land in isolated forest fragment. 1 (XLSX 46 kb)
40_2017_570_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (46 kb)
Table S2. Termite occurrence in the six sampling sites: OGF: old growth forest; SL: selectively logged forest; SAC: secondary forest on abandoned agricultural land in continuous forest patch, SVC: secondary forest on abandoned village land in continuous forest fragment, SVI: secondary forest on abandoned village land in isolated forest fragment, SAI: secondary forest on abandoned agricultural land in isolated forest fragment. * indicate species for which identification is unsure. Feeding-groups were either: W, wood-feeders; or S, soil-feeders. 2 (XLSX 46 kb)

References

  1. Ackerman IL, Constantino R, Gauch HG, Lehmann JJ, Riha SJ, Fernandes ECM (2009) Termite (Insecta: Isoptera) species composition in a primary rain forest and agroforests in Central Amazonia. Biotropica 41:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandeira AG, Vasconcellos AA (2002) Quantitative survey of termites in a gradient of disturbed highland forest in northeastern Brazil (Isoptera). Sociobiology 39:429–439Google Scholar
  3. Bandeira AG, Vasconcellos A, Silva MP, Constantino R (2003) Effects of habitat disturbance on the termite fauna in a highland humid forest in the Caatinga domain, Brazil. Sociobiology 42:117–127Google Scholar
  4. Bardgett RD, Usher MB, Hopkins DW (2005) Biological diversity and function in soils. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barlow J, Gardner TA, Araujo IS, Ávila-Pires TC, Bonaldo AB, Costa JE, Esposito MC, Ferreira LV, Hawes J, Hernandez MIM, Hoogmoed MS, Leite RN, Lo-Man-Hung NF, Malcolm JR, Martins MB, Mestre LAM, Miranda-Santos R, Nunes-Gutjahr AL, Overal WL, Parry WL, Peters SL, Ribeiro-Junior MA, da Silva MNF, da Silva MC, Peres CA (2007) Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18555–18560CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Basset Y, Cizek L, Cuénoud P, Didham RK, Guilhaumon F, Missa O, Novotny V, Ødegaard F, Roslin T, Schmidl J, Tishechkin AK, Winchester NN, Roubik DW, Aberlenc HP, Bail J, Barrios H, Bridle JR, Castaño-Meneses G, Corbara B, Curletti G, Duarte da Rocha W, De Bakker D, Delabie JHC, Dejean A, Fagan LL, Floren A, Kitching RL, Medianero E, Miller SE, Gama de Oliveira E, Orivel J, Pollet M, Rapp M, Ribeiro SP, Roisin Y, Schmidt JB, Sørensen L, Leponce M (2012) Arthropod diversity in a tropical forest. Science 338:1481–1484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bihn JH, Gebauer G, Brandl R (2010) Loss of functional diversity of ant assemblages in secondary tropical forests. Ecology 91:782–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Blüthgen N, Gebauer G, Fiedler K (2003) Disentangling a rainforest food web using stable isotopes: dietary diversity in a species-rich ant community. Oecologia 137:426–435CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolton B (1994) Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolton B (2003) Synopsis and classification of Formicidae. Mem Am Entomol Inst 71:1–370Google Scholar
  11. Bourguignon T, Šobotník J, Lepoint G, Martin JM, Hardy OJ, Dejean A, Roisin Y (2011) Feeding ecology and phylogenetic structure of a complex neotropical termite assemblage, revealed by nitrogen stable isotope ratios. Ecol Entomol 36:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowen ME, McAlpine CA, House APN, Smith GC (2007) Regrowth forests on abandoned agricultural land: a review of their habitat values for recovering forest fauna. Biol Conserv 140:273–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brühl CA, Eltz T (2010) Fuelling the biodiversity crisis: species loss of ground-dwelling forest ants in oil palm plantations in Sabah, Malaysia (Borneo). Biodivers Conserv 19:519–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carvalho KS, Vasconcelos HL (1999) Forest fragmentation in central Amazonia and its effects on litter-dwelling ants. Biol Conserv 91:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chazdon RL (2008) Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320:1458–1460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chazdon RL, Peres CA, Dent D, Sheil D, Lugo AE, Lamb D, Stork NE, Miller SE (2009) The potential for species conservation in tropical secondary forests. Conserv Biol 23:1406–1417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Colwell RK (2013) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. User’s guide and application. Available from http://purl.oclc.org/estimates. Accessed 5 Feb 2014
  18. Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J (2004) Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85:2717–2727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Corlett RT (1992) The ecological transformation of Singapore 1819–1990. J Biogeogr 19:411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Corlett RT (1997) The vegetation in the nature reserves of Singapore. Gard Bull Singap 49:147–159Google Scholar
  21. Dale OJ (1999) Urban planning in singapore: the transformation of a city. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Davies RG (2002) Feeding group responses of a Neotropical termite assemblage to rain forest fragmentation. Oecologia 133:233–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Davies RG, Eggleton P, Jones DT, Gathorne-Hardy FJ, Hernandez LM (2003) Evolution of termite functional diversity: analysis and synthesis of local ecological and regional influences on local species richness. J Biogeogr 30:847–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Del Toro I, Ribbons RR, Pelini SL (2012) The little things that run the world revisited: a review of ant-mediated ecosystem services and disservices (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 17:133–146Google Scholar
  25. Dent DH, Wright JS (2009) The future of tropical species in secondary forests: a quantitative review. Biol Conserv 142:2833–2843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DeSouza O, Brown VK (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on Amazonian termite communities. J Trop Ecol 10:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Donovan SE, Eggleton P, Bignell DE (2001) Gut content analysis and a new feeding group classification of termites. Ecol Entomol 26:356–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eggleton P, Bignell DE, Sands WA, Mawdsley NA, Lawton JH, Wood TG, Bignell NC (1996) The diversity, abundance and biomass of termites under differing levels of disturbance in the Mbalmayo Forest Reserve, southern Cameroon. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 351:51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eggleton P, Homathevi R, Jones DT, MacDonald JA, Jeeva D, Bignell DE, Davies RG, Maryati M (1999) Termite assemblages, forest disturbance and greenhouse gas fluxes in Sabah, east Malaysia. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354:1791–1802CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Eggleton P, Bignell DE, Hauser S, Dibog L, Norgrove L, Madong B (2002) Termite diversity across an anthropogenic disturbance gradient in the humid forest zone of West Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 90:189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ellwood MDF, Foster WA (2004) Doubling the estimate of invertebrate biomass in a rainforest canopy. Nature 429:549–551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Evans TA, Dawes TZ, Ward PR, Lo N (2011) Ants and termites increase crop yield in a dry climate. Nat Commun 2:262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Fayle TM, Turner EC, Snaddon JL, Chey VK, Chung AYC, Eggleton P, Foster WA (2010) Oil palm expansion into rain forest greatly reduces ant biodiversity in canopy, epiphytes and leaf-litter. Basic Appl Ecol 11:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fittkau EJ, Klinge H (1973) On biomass and trophic structure of the Central Amazonian rain forest ecosystem. Biotropica 5:2–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Floren A, Linsenmair KE (2005) The importance of primary tropical rain forest for species diversity: an investigation using arboreal ants as an example. Ecosystems 8:559–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gibson L, Lee TM, Koh LP, Brook BW, Gardner TA, Barlow J, Peres A, Bradshaw CJA, Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, Sodhi NS (2011) Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478:378–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Giraudoux P, Giraudoux MP (2013) R package “pgirmess”. Available from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pgirmess/index.html. Accessed 3 May 2014
  38. Gove AD, Majer JD, Rico-Gray V (2005) Methods for conservation outside of formal reserve systems: the case of ants in the seasonally dry tropics of Veracruz, Mexico. Biol Conserv 126:328–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gray CL, Lewis OT, Chung AYC, Fayle TM (2015) Riparian reserves within oil palm plantations conserve logged forest leaf litter ant communities and maintain associated scavenging rates. J Appl Ecol 52:31–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gunawardene NR, Majer JD, Edirisinghe JP (2010) Investigating residual effects of selective logging on ant species assemblages in Sinharaja Forest Reserve, Sri Lanka. For Ecol Manag 259:555–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:9Google Scholar
  42. Hansen MC, Stehman SV, Potapov PV, Arunarwati B, Stolle F, Pittman K (2009) Quantifying changes in the rates of forest clearing in Indonesia from 1990 to 2005 using remotely sensed data sets. Environ Res Lett 4:034001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hashimoto Y (2003) Identification guide to the ant genera of Borneo. In: Hashimoto Y, Rahman H (eds) Inventory and collection. Total protocol for understanding of biodiversity. Research and Education Component, BBEC Programme (Universiti Malaysia Sabah), Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, pp 89–162Google Scholar
  44. Heil M, McKey D (2003) Ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:425–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The Ants. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holt JA, Lepage M (2000) Termites and soil properties. In: Abe T, Bignell DE, Higashi M (eds) Termites: evolution, sociality, symbioses, ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 389–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hu J, Zhong JH, Guo MF (2007) Alate dispersal distances of the black-winged subterranean termite Odontotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Termitidae) in southern China. Sociobiology 50:1–8Google Scholar
  48. ITTO (2002) Guidelines for the restoration, management and rehabilitation of degraded and secondary. ITTO Policy development series, 13, pp 1–84Google Scholar
  49. Jones DT, Prasetyo AH (2002) A survey of the termites (Insecta: Isoptera) of Tabalong District, South Kalimantan, Indonesia. Raffles Bull Zool 50:117–128Google Scholar
  50. Jones DT, Susilo FX, Bignell DE, Hardiwinoto S, Gillison AN, Eggleton P (2003) Termite assemblage collapse along a land-use intensification gradient in lowland central Sumatra, Indonesia. J Appl Ecol 40:380–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jones DT, Rahman H, Bignell DE, Prasetyo AH (2010) Forests on ultramafic-derived soils in Borneo have very depauperate termite assemblages. J Trop Ecol 26:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jouquet P, Traore S, Choosai C, Hartman C, Bignell D (2011) Influence of termites on ecosystem functioning. Ecosystem services provided by termites. Eur J Soil Biol 47:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jouquet P, Blanchart E, Capowiez Y (2014) Utilization of earthworms and termites for the restoration of ecosystem functioning. Appl Soil Ecol 73:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jouquet P, Bottinelli N, Shanbhag R, Bourguignon T, Traoré S, Abbasi SA (2016) Termites: the neglected engineers of tropical soils. Soil Sci 181:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Junker R, Chung AYC, Blüthgen N (2007) Interaction between flowers, ants and pollinators: additional evidence for floral repellence against ants. Ecol Res 22:665–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Klimes P, Fibich P, Idigel C, Rimandai M (2015) Disentangling the diversity of arboreal ant communities in tropical forest trees. PLoS One 10:e0117853CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Lamb D, Erskine PD, Parrotta JA (2005) Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310:1628–1632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Lawton JH, Bignell DE, Bolton B, Bloemers GF, Eggleton P, Hammond PM, Hodda M, Holt RD, Larsen TB, Mawdsley NA, Stork NE, Srivastava DS, Watt AD (1998) Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391:72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Leal IR, Filgueiras BKC, Gomes JP, Iannuzzi L, Andersen AN (2012) Effects of habitat fragmentation on ant richness and functional composition in Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biodivers Conserv 21:1687–1701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Luke SH, Fayle TM, Eggleton P, Turner EC, Davies RG (2014) Functional structure of ant and termite assemblages in old growth forest, logged forest and oil palm plantation in Malaysian Borneo. Biodivers Conserv 23:2817–2832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Majer JD, Brennan KEC, Moir ML (2007) Invertebrates and the restoration of a forest ecosystem: 30 years of research following bauxite mining in Western Australia. Restor Ecol 15:104–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Malhi Y, Roberts JT, Betts RA, Killeen TJ, Li W, Nobre CA (2008) Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 319:169–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Markin GP, Dillier JH, Hill SO, Blum MS, Hermann HR (1971) Nuptial flight and flight ranges of the imported fire ant, Solenopsis saevissima richteri (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J GA Entomol Soc 6:145–156Google Scholar
  64. Mayaux P, Pekel JF, Desclée B, Donnay F, Lupi A, Achard F, Clerici M, Bodart C, Brink A, Nasi R, Belward A (2013) State and evolution of the African rainforests between 1990 and 2010. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368:20120300CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Messenger MT, Mullins AJ (2005) New flight distance recorded for Coptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Fla Entomol 88:99–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nature Society of Singapore (2013) Cross Island line—discussion and position paper. Nature Society (Singapore), SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  67. Nutting WL (1969) Flight and colony foundation. In: Krishna K, Weesner FM (eds) Biology of termites. Academic Press, New York, pp 233–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2017) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.4-2Google Scholar
  69. Petersen H, Luxton M (1982) A conparative analysis of soil fauna populations and their role in decomposition processes. Oikos 39:288–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Prugh LR, Hodges KE, Sinclair ARE, Brashares JS (2008) Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:20770–20775CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Putz FE, Zuidema PA, Synnott T, Peña-Claros M, Pinard MA, Sheil D, Vanclay JK, Sist P, Gourlet-Fleury S, Griscom B, Palmer J, Zagt R (2012) Sustaining conservation values in selectively logged tropical forests: the attained and the attainable. Conserv Lett 5:296–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reynolds G, Payne J, Sinun W, Mosigil G, Walsh RPD (2011) Changes in forest land use and management in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo 1990–2010, with a focus on the Danum Valley region. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366:3168–3176CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Roisin Y, Leponce M (2004) Characterizing termite assemblages in fragmented forests: a test case in the Argentinian Chaco. Austral Ecol 29:637–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sanderson MG (1996) Biomass of termites and their emissions of methane and carbon dioxide: a global database. Glob Biogeochem Cycle 10:543–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Silva RR, Feitosa RSM, Eberhardt F (2007) Reduced ant diversity along a habitat regeneration gradient in the southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest. For Ecol Manag 240:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sugimoto A, Bignell DE, Macdonald JA (2000) Global impact of termites on the carbon cycle and atmospheric trace gases. In: Abe T, Bignell DE, Higashi M (eds) Termites: evolution, sociality, symbioses, ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 409–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thapa RS (1982) Termites of Sabah (East Malaysia). Sabah Forest Department, SandakanGoogle Scholar
  78. Tho YP (1992) Termites of Peninsular Malaysia. Mal For Rec 36:1–224Google Scholar
  79. Tschinkel WR (2006) The fire ants. The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  80. Vasconcellos A, Bandeira AG, Moura FMS, Araújo VFP, Gusmão MAB, Constantino R (2010) Termite assemblages in three habitats under different disturbance regimes in the semi-arid Caatinga of NE Brazil. J Arid Environ 74:298–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vasconcelos HL (1999) Effects of forest disturbance on the structure of ground-foraging ant communities in central Amazonia. Biodivers Conserv 8:409–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vasconcelos HL, Bruna EM (2012) Arthropod responses to the experimental isolation of Amazonian forest fragments. Zoologia 29:515–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vasconcelos HL, Vilhena JMS, Caliri GJA (2000) Responses of ants to selective logging of a central Amazonian forest. J Appl Ecol 37:508–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Widodo ES, Naito T, Mohamed M, Hashimoto Y (2004) Effects of selective logging on the arboreal ants of a Bornean rainforest. Entomol Sci 7:341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wood TG, Johnson RA, Bacchus S, Shittu MO, Anderson JM (1982) Abundance and distribution of termites (Isoptera) in a riparian forest in the Southern Guinea Savanna Vegetation zone of Nigeria. Biotropica 14:25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yee ATK, Corlett RT, Liew SC, Tan HTW (2011) The vegetation of Singapore—an updated map. Gard Bull Singapore 63:205–212Google Scholar
  87. Zhang M, Evans TA (2017) Determining urban exploiter status of a termite using genetic analysis. Urban Ecosyst 20:535–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Faculty of Forestry and Wood SciencesCzech University of Life SciencesPragueCzech Republic
  3. 3.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate UniversityOkinawaJapan
  5. 5.Biodiversity Monitoring and AssessmentRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural SciencesBrusselsBelgium
  6. 6.Singapore Botanic Gardens 1SingaporeSingapore
  7. 7.RimbaBandar Baru BangiMalaysia
  8. 8.School of Animal BiologyUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations