Advertisement

Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 155–162 | Cite as

Establishing an ant-plant mutualism: foundress queen mortality and acquiring the third partner

  • A. Sanchez
Research Article

Abstract

In the Neotropics, colonies of the ant Pseudomyrmex dendroicus are found in the hollow stems of Triplaris americana. The ants are obligate inhabitants of the ant-plant and they nest and reproduce exclusively in this myrmecophyte. However, this mutualistic association often involves a third partner, scale insects (Coccoidea, Hemiptera). Established colonies of this ant are always associated with scale insects and ants appear to be dependent on the honeydew excretions of their trophobionts. Acquisition of scale insects is therefore an important step in the successful establishment of a new colony. Domatia of juvenile host-plants were dissected to determine (1) how colonies are founded, (2) if there was evidence of co-dispersal between trophobionts and foundress queens. Colony foundation is claustral. Founding queens of Pseudomyrmex chew their entrance holes at the prostoma and then close the hole with debris. 104 queens were located with few or no workers. Of the 104 foundresses, 69 were found dead and only 32 had at least a single trophobiont. Although the association with trophobionts may prove vital to the establishment of the colony, these results indicate that scale insects do not seem to co-disperse with the foundress queens.

Keywords

Ant-plant interaction Hemipterans Mutualism Pseudomyrmex Triplaris 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by a grant from the Amazon Conservation Association. I am thankful to all the staff and people at Los Amigos, especially Nigel Pitman. I would also like to thank INRENA-Ministerio de Agricultura in Perú for providing the permits necessary for carrying out the experiments in Madre de Dios. Edwin Bellota provided invaluable assistance in the field.

Supplementary material

40_2015_450_MOESM1_ESM.docx (85 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 85 kb)

References

  1. Agrawal AA (1998) Leaf damage and associated cues induced aggressive ant recruitment in a neotropical ant-plant. Ecology 79:2100–2112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beattie AJ (1985) The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blatrix R, Djiéto-Lordon C, Mondolot L, La Fisca P, Voglmayr H, McKey D (2012) Plant-ants use symbiotic fungi as a food source: new insight into the nutritional ecology of ant-plant interactions. Proc Biol Sci 279:3940–3947PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benson WW (1985) Amazon ant-plants. In: Prance GT, Lovejoy TE (eds) Amazonia. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 239–266Google Scholar
  5. Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandbyge J (1986) A revision of the genus Triplaris (Polygonaceae). Nord J Bot 6:545–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandbyge J (1990) Woody Polygonaceae from Brazil: new species and a new interpretation. Nord J Bot 10:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brouat C, Gielly L, McKey D (2001) Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Leonardoxa (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) inferred from chloroplast trnL Intron and trnL trn-F intergenic spacer sequences. Am J Bot 88:143–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chomicki G, Renner SS (2015) Phylogenetics and molecular clocks reveal the repeated evolution of ant-plants after the late Miocene in Africa and the early Miocene in Australasia and the Neotropics. New Phytol 207:411–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dáttilo WFC, Izzo TJ, Inouye BD, Vasconcelos HL, Bruna EM (2009) Recognition of host plant volatiles by Pheidole minutula Mayr (Myrmecinae), an Amazonian ant-plant specialist. Biotropica 41:642–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson DW, McKey D (1993) The evolutionary ecology of symbiotic ant-plant relationships. J Hymenop Res 2:13–83Google Scholar
  12. Davidson DW, Longino JT, Snelling RR (1988) Pruning of host plant neighbors by ants: an experimental approach. Ecology 69:801–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davidson DW, Cook SC, Snelling RR, Chua TH (2003) Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science 300:969–972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edwards DP, Hassall M, Sutherland WJ, Yu DW (2006) Assembling a mutualism: ant symbionts locate their host plants by detecting volatile chemicals. Insect Soc 53:172–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Federle W, Maschwitz U, Fiala B (1998) The two-partner ant-plant system of Camponotus (Colobopsis) sp. 1 and Macaranga puncticulata (Formicidae: Formicinae; Euphorbiaceae): myrmecophytic traits of the partner ant. Insect Soc 45:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fiala B, Maschwitz U (1990) Studies on the South East Asian ant-plant association Crematogaster borneensis/Macaranga: adaptations of the ant partner. Insect Soc 37:212–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fonseca CR (1999) Amazonian ant-plant interactions and the nesting space limitation hypothesis. J Trop Ecol 15:807–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frederickson ME (2005) Ant species confer different partner benefits on two neotropical myrmecophytes. Oecologia 143:387–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frederickson ME (2006) The reproductive phenology of an Amazonian ant species reflects the seasonal availability of its nest sites. Oecologia 149:418–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaume L, Matile-Ferrero D, McKey D (2000) Colony foundation and acquisition of coccoid trophobionts by Aphomomyrmex afer (Formicinae): co-dispersal of queens and phoretic mealybugs in an ant-plant-homopteran mutualism? Insect Soc 47:84–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grangier J, Dejean A, Malé PJG, Solano PJ, Orivel J (2009) Mechanisms driving the specificity of a myrmecophyte-ant association. Biol J Linn Soc 97:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gullan PJ, Kosztarab M (1997) Adaptations in scale insects. Ann Rev Entomol 42:23–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Handa C, Ueda S, Tanaka H, Itino T, Itioka T (2012) How do scale insects settle into the nests of plant-ants on Macaranga myrmecophytes? Dispersal by wind and selection by plant-ants. Sociobiology 59:435–446Google Scholar
  24. Inui Y, Itioka T, Murase K, Yamaoka R, Itino T (2001) Chemical recognition of partner plant species by foundress ant queens in Macaranga-Crematogaster myrmecophytism. J Chem Ecol 27:2029–2040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Janzen DH (1966) Coevolution of mututalism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution 20:249–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Janzen DH (1972) Protection of Barteria (Passifloraceae) by Pachysma ants (Pseudomyrmecinae) in a Nigerian rain forest. Ecology 53:885–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jürgens A, Feldhaar H, Feldmeyer B, Fiala B (2006) Chemical composition of leaf volatiles in Macaranga species (Euphorbiaceae) and their potential role as olfactory cues in host-localization of foundress queens of specific ant partners. Biochem Syst Ecol 34:97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaspari M, O’Donnell S, Kercher JR (2000) Energy, density, and constraints to species richness: ant assemblages along a productivity gradient. Am Nat 155:280–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keller L, Passera L (1989) Size and fat content of gynes in relation to the mode of colony founding in ants (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Oecologia 80:236–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klein RW, Kovac D, Schellerich A, Maschwitz U (1992) Mealybug-carrying by swarming queens of a Southeast Asian bamboo inhabiting ant. Naturwissenschaften 79:422–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Larrea-Alcázar DM, Simonetti JA (2007) Why are there few seedlings beneath the myrmecophyte Triplaris americana? Acta Oecol 32:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Longino JT (1989) Geographic variation and community structure in an ant-plant mutualism: Azteca and Cecropia in Costa Rica. Biotropica 21:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maschwitz U, Fiala B, Moog J, Shaw LG (1991) Two new myrmecophyte associations from the Malay Peninsula: ants of the genus Cladomyrma (Formicidae, Camponotinae) as partners of Saraca thaipigensis (Caesalpiniaceae) and Crypteronia griffithii (Crypteroniaceae). 1. Colony foundation and acquisition of trophobionts. Insect Soc 38:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Michelangeli FA (2003) Ant protection against herbivory in three species of Tococa (Melastomataceae) occupying different environments. Biotropica 35:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moog J, Saw LG, Hashim R, Maschwitz U (2005) The triple alliance: how a plant-ant, living in an ant-plant, acquires the third partner, a scale insect. Insect Soc 52:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nishi AH, Romero GQ (2008) Colonization pattern of Cecropia by Azteca ants: influence of plant ontogeny, environment and host plant choice by queens. Sociobiology 52:367–376Google Scholar
  37. Oliveira PS, Oliveira Filho AT, Cintra R (1987) Ant foraging on ant-inhabited Triplaris (Polygonaceae) in Western Brazil a field experiment using live termite baits. J Trop Ecol 3:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Philpott SM, Foster PF (2005) Nest-site limitation in coffee agroecosystems: artificial nests maintain diversity of arboreal ants. Ecol Appl 15:1478–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pitman NCA, Terborgh J, Silman MR, Nuñez P (1999) Tree species distribution in an upper Amazonian forest. Ecology 80:2651–2661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rico-Gray V, Oliveira PS (2007) The ecology and evolution of ant-plant interactions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sanchez A (2015) Fidelity and promiscuity in an ant-plant mutualism: a case study of Triplaris and Pseudomyrmex. PLoS One 10:e0143535Google Scholar
  42. Sanchez A, Bellota E (2015) Protection against herbivory in the mutualism between Pseudomyrmex dendroicus (Formicidae) and Triplaris americana (Polygonaceae). J Hymenopt Res 46:71–83Google Scholar
  43. Schremmer F (1984) Untersuchungen und Beobachtungen zur Ökoethologie der Pflanzenameise Pseudomyrmex triplarinus, welche die Ameisenbäume der Gattung Triplaris bewohnt. Zool Jahrb Abt Anat Ontog Tiere 111:385–410Google Scholar
  44. Valverde JP, Hansen P (2011) Parenchyma: a neglected plant tissue in the Cecropia/ant mutualism. Symbiosis 55:47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vasconcelos HL (1991) Mutualism between Maieta guianensis Aubl., a myrmecophytic melastome, and one of its inhabit-ants: ant protection against insect herbivores. Oecologia 87:295–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ward PS (1991) Phylogenetic analysis of Pseudomyrmecine ants associated with domatia-bearing plants. In: Huxley CR, Cutler DF (eds) Ant-plant interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 335–352Google Scholar
  47. Ward PS (1999) Systematics, biogeography and host plant associations of the Pseudomyrmex viduus group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Triplaris- and Tachigali-inhabiting ants. Zool J Linn Soc 126:451–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ward PS, Downie DA (2005) The ant subfamily Pseudomyrmecinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): phylogeny and evolution of big-eyed arboreal ants. Syst Entomol 30:310–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weir TL, Newbold S, Vivanco JM, van Haren M, Fritchman C, Dossey AT, Bartram S, Boland W, Cosio EG, Kofer W (2012) Plant-inhabiting ant utilizes chemical cues for host discrimination. Biotropica 44:246–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wheeler WM (1942) Studies of neotropical ant-plants and their ants. Bull Mus Comp Zool 90:41–65Google Scholar
  51. Williams DJ (1998) Mealybugs of the genera Eumyrmococcus Silvestri and Xenococcus Silvestri associated with the ant genus Acropyga Roger and a review of the subfamily Rhizoecinae (Hemiptera, Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae). Bull Nat Hist Mus London 67:1–64Google Scholar
  52. Yu DW, Davidson DW (1997) Experimental studies of species-specificity in Cecropia-ant relationships. Ecol Monogr 67:273–294Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad del Rosario, Programa de BiologíaBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations